Performance standards for STAAR to be phased in

Similar documents
Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Evaluation of Teach For America:

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL. 9 th Grade Registration Information

Holt Mcdougal Pre Algebra Teachers Edition

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

PreAP Geometry. Ms. Patricia Winkler

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Fifth Grade Science Inquiry Questions

Math 4 Units Algebra I, Applied Algebra I or Algebra I Pt 1 and Algebra I Pt 2

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Dibels Next Benchmarks Kindergarten 2013

Keystone Algebra 1 Open Ended Practice

COURSE SELECTION WORKSHEETS

COURSE CATALOG & EDUCATIONAL PLANNING GUIDE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

English English 1,2,3,4 Textbooks used as a resource Using new curriculum - building novel library editions. rbooks - consumables

Data Diskette & CD ROM

World s Best Workforce Plan

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

General Admission Requirements for Ontario Secondary School Applicants presenting the Ontario High School Curriculum

Praxis Study Guide For 5086

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

Harmony School of Advancement Harmony Public Schools Course Selection Guide

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

ADVANCED AND HONORS DIPLOMAS (BEGINNING WITH THE GRADUATING CLASS OF 2013)

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

Campaign Platform For Middle School Student Council

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Tablet PCs, Interactive Teaching, and Integrative Advising Promote STEM Success

Miami Central Senior High School Academy of Finance

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Dublin City Schools Career and College Ready Academies FAQ. General

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Pearson Mymathlab Answer Key Math 110 Amu

Bayless High School Career & Educational Planning Guide

Executive Summary. Marian High School (NTI Career Institute, Inc.) Mr. Larry Ivory, Principal 9896 Bissonnet, Suite 230 Houston, TX 77036

A Math Adventure Game Pi and the The Lost Function Episode 1 - Pre-Algebra/Algebra

MAIS ACCREDITATION MANUAL AND MAIS REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES MAIS TEACHER CERTIFICATION MANUAL MAIS ETHICS POLICY

Program Elements Definitions and Structure

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

International Advanced level examinations

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Executive Summary. Osan High School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Texas Bioscience Institute Educating Scientists For The Future. Nelda Howton

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Philosophy of Literacy. on a daily basis. My students will be motivated, fluent, and flexible because I will make my reading

STUDENT GRADES POLICY

Prentice Hall Outline Map 1914 With Answers

Fashion Design Program Articulation

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Wsu Study Guide Download or Read Online ebook wsu study guide in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

have professional experience before graduating... The University of Texas at Austin Budget difficulties

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

Dear Internship Supervisor:

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Yabisi Santillana Social Studies 5

Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education

Today s Presentation

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

GIS 5049: GIS for Non Majors Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Geography University of South Florida St. Petersburg Spring 2011

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Algebra 2 Saxon Download or Read Online ebook algebra 2 saxon in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17. Syllabus

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

Bayless High School Career & Educational Planning Guide

Transcription:

TEA News Releases Online Performance standards for STAAR to be phased in April 24, 2012 AUSTIN The commissioner of education today unveiled the performance standards students must achieve to pass or excel on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR ) end-of-course tests. These standards will be challenging for our students and will push academic performance to a new level in Texas. Students who pass the STAAR end-of-course assessments will be better prepared for success in the next course or in postsecondary pursuits, said Commissioner of Education Robert Scott. Three performance categories have been set for STAAR EOCs. The definitions for the categories are: I: Advanced Academic Performance* Performance in this category indicates that students are well prepared for the next grade or course. They demonstrate the ability to think critically and apply the assessed knowledge and skills in varied contexts, both familiar and unfamiliar. Students in this category have a high likelihood of success in the next grade or course with little or no academic intervention. * For Algebra II and English III, this level of performance also indicates students are well prepared for postsecondary success. : Satisfactory Academic Performance** Performance in this category indicates that students are sufficiently prepared for the next grade or course. They generally demonstrate the ability to think critically and apply the assessed knowledge and skills in familiar contexts. Students in this category have a reasonable likelihood of success in the next grade or course but may need short-term, targeted academic intervention. ** For Algebra II and English III, this level of performance also indicates students are sufficiently prepared for postsecondary success. Level I: Unsatisfactory Academic Performance Performance in this category indicates that students are inadequately prepared for the next grade or course. They do not demonstrate a sufficient understanding of the assessed knowledge and skills. Students in this category are unlikely to succeed in the next grade or course without significant, ongoing academic intervention.

As the state has done for at least the past two testing programs the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) and the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) the passing standards will be phased in. The passing standards will be a four-year, two-step process. A two-year phase-in will be used for I performance on English III reading and writing and Algebra II only. The phase-in approach was adopted because of the significant increase in the rigor of the STAAR program and because the distance between the initial and final passing standards for are generally larger than the distance between the initial and final passing standards for TAKS. The phase-in will provide districts with time to adjust instruction, provide additional staff training, and close knowledge gaps. We have found that a gradual increase in standards sets realistic but challenging expectations for our students and results in improved academic performance, Scott said. The performance standards each student must achieve will be based on the year a student takes his first end-of-course assessment. If students take their first STAAR EOC assessment in 2012 or 2013, they will be held to the first set of phase-in performance standards for every assessment in that content area. Students who take their first STAAR EOC assessment in 2014 or 2015 will be held to the second set of phase-in performance standards. The final performance standards will be in place for any students who take their first STAAR EOC assessment in 2016 or later. The final I performance standards will be in place for any students who take their first STAAR English III writing and reading and Algebra II EOC tests in 2014 or later. standards The scores needed to reach the various performance levels are expressed as scale scores. Once fully phased in, the score needed to achieve performance will be a scale score of 4000 for each of the following assessments: Algebra I, Algebra II, geometry, biology, chemistry, physics, world geography, world history, and United States history. The initial phase-in standard for these tests will be 3500. The scale score needed to achieve a performance on each of the English I, II, and III reading and writing assessments is 2000. The initial phase-in score is 1875. I standards The I standards will not be phased in for English I and II reading and writing, Algebra I, geometry, biology, chemistry, physics, world geography, world history and U.S. history. The final performance standards on these tests for I will range from 4333 to 4634, depending on the assessment. An initial phase-in score of 4080 will be required to earn a I performance for the Algebra II assessment with the final I score set at 4411. The English III reading assessment will require an initial phase-in score of 2135, while the English III writing assessment will require an initial score of 2155. The fully-implemented standards will require a score of 2356 on the English III reading test and a score of 2300 on the English III writing test.

State law now requires students graduating in 2015 or later to earn a I rating on Algebra II and English III to qualify for the state s Distinguished Achievement Program high school diploma. The attached table lists the scale scores needed on all the STAAR EOC assessments. The category called minimum refers to a score that is below but is high enough to be included in the cumulative score students must achieve on the three assessments in each core content area. Texas classroom teachers and administrators, higher education faculty, education policy experts, staff from the Texas Education Agency and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and psychometricians who are experts in the development of educational tests, worked together for four years to prepare passing standard recommendations. Additionally, TEA and Coordinating Board staff conducted research studies over a three-year period to link performance on a STAAR assessment and performance on other assessments in the same content area. TEA expects to release the first round of STAAR results in June. Additional information about the STAAR EOC standards can be found at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/.

Assessment Phase-in and Final Recommended and I Standards and Scores Phase-in 1 Phase-in 1 2014 & 2015 Phase-in 2 2014 & 2015 Phase-in 2 2016 Final Recommended 2016 Final Recommended *Phase-in I 2014 Final Recommended I English I Reading 1813 1875 1887 1950 1936 2000 N/A 2304 English II Reading 1806 1875 1880 1950 1929 2000 N/A 2328 *English III Reading 1808 1875 1882 1950 1932 2000 2135 2356 English I Writing 1798 1875 1872 1950 1921 2000 N/A 2476 English II Writing 1807 1875 1880 1950 1928 2000 N/A 2408 *English III Writing 1808 1875 1881 1950 1929 2000 2155 2300 Algebra I 3371 3500 3626 3750 3872 4000 N/A 4333 *Algebra II 3350 3500 3604 3750 3852 4000 4080 4411 Geometry 3362 3500 3619 3750 3868 4000 N/A 4397 Biology 3367 3500 3621 3750 3868 4000 N/A 4576 Chemistry 3348 3500 3600 3750 3846 4000 N/A 4607 Physics 3346 3500 3600 3750 3848 4000 N/A 4499 World Geography 3383 3500 3632 3750 3874 4000 N/A 4404 World History 3326 3500 3576 3750 3822 4000 N/A 4634 U.S. History 3372 3500 3624 3750 3869 4000 N/A 4440

STAAR Standard-Setting Process Nine steps for setting STAAR performance standards: 1. Conduct validity and linking studies 2. Develop performance labels and policy definitions 3. Develop grade/course specific performance level descriptors 4. Policy committee 5. Standard-setting committee 6. Reasonableness review 7. Approval of performance standards 8. Implementation of performance standards 9. Review of performance standards 5