Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 2 Project/MOU Criterion MOU Type Deliverabl Act Deliverable/Activity Status e CONTACT Number Number 2 Gayle Nobles deliverable 1 Submission of a 4-year LEA timeline and implementation plan based on the analysis of employer needs in the community to initiate one of the RTTT-approved career and technical programs. 2 Gayle Nobles deliverable 2 Evidence of funding allocated to provide for the costs associated with student candidates industry certification exams. 2 Gayle Nobles deliverable 3 Documentation of implementation of a complete program that results in industry certification. We began the BioMedical program at CRHS with the first class for freshmen. Funding was available for industry certifications exams. Students have yet to complete the program therefore no exams were given.
Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 3 Project/MOU Criterion MOU Type Deliverable Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTACT Number Number 3 Gayle Nobles 3 Gayle Nobles deliverable 1 Submission of a district timeline and implementation plan to increase the number of STEM accelerated courses. deliverable 2 Documentation of increased STEM accelerated course offerings, including a comparison of baseline data to end-of-grant period data. Previously submitted. All schools are now implementing AVID. Number of accelerated courses rising. Awaiting Total of students who Industry Certifications taken during the year. Enrollments reported each January
Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 4 MOU Type Deliverable Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTACT Number Number Dr. Mike Geddes Dr. Mike Geddes Dr. Mike Geddes Dr. Mike Geddes deliverable 1 Readiness for computer-based testing (FCAT 2.0, End-of-Course Exams, Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading) as certified through completion and submission of Florida's online certification tool. activity 1 d Implement one-to-one computer initiative pilot for 300 students (netbook or ipad @ $500 each = $150,000) activity 1 e Implement wall-to-wall wireless access at our four middle schools $135,000; (see supporting narrative for rationale) activity 1 f Provide professional development for teachers in the areas of: classroom management of student-use technology; management of computer-based assessment; technology curriculum integration; and, utilization of existing classroom technology. Completed 4/10/2012 using the Florida DOE Computer- Based Assessments Certification Tool. Devices were ordered and delivered and will be distributed to students August 2012. Wall to wall wireless at our middle schools has been completed as of 6/28/2012. Professional Development for teachers in these areas has been provided one on one and in small groups and it will continue into next quarter.
Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 5 Type Deliverable Act Deliverable/Activity Status Number Number deliverable A-1 Detailed timeline and implementation plan that addresses the tasks, timing, and resources required to provide single signon access to state resources. activity A-1 a Develop a plan to implement single sign-on access to state resources by school and district staff deliverable A-2 For state-level data downloads, provide a report of the following: a. Name of the download b. Date of the most recent download activity A-2 a Hire.5 Programmer/Analyst, as soon as RttT funds are available to support state data access and utilization Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State. Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State. Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State. activity A-2 b Obtain state-level data when available Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State. activity A-2 c Incorporate downloaded data into local instructional improvement system Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State.
activity A-2 d Provide a report of state-level data downloads incorporated into local instructional improvement systems Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State. deliverable 2 Single Sign-on Integration Readiness Certification activity 2 a Prepare technical environment and expand internet access capability through adequate bandwidth using RttT funding Internet access has been upgraded from 50-100 MB deliverable 4 For state-level data downloads, provide a report of the following: Name of the download; Date of most recent download activity 4 a Provide feedback to the Department regarding single sign-on implementation Waiting for direction on the single sign-on from the State.
Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 6 Project/MOU Criterion MOU Type Deliverable Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTACT Number Number 6 Patrick 6 Patrick 6 Patrick activity 1 d Provide training for staff on use of student response systems activity 1 e Through the use of RttT funds, publish/ print benchmark assessments currently used in our local instructional improvement system, as well as those developed in the future, to support the use of data to inform instruction, including purchase of test bank items, as needed activity 1 f Continue to support the use of data to inform instruction by developing/purchasing (with RttT funding), new No formal staff training was provided during this quarter due to FCAT Reading, Math, Science, Retakes, and EOC testing at the schools. Some help sessions were available at the schools when needed. Reading Passages for the benchmark assessment tests were printed during this quarter. The new test bank was purchased in a previous quarter and is currently being used to create new benchmark tests or update existing tests.
6 Patrick 6 Patrick 6 Patrick 6 Patrick benchmark tests for use with our local instructional improvement system (see narrative) activity 1 g Implement a process (data warehouse tool) for linking student data with teacher appraisal and training. deliverable 2 The LEA will provide timely, accurate, and complete information in Department sponsored technology assessments and surveys to verify the Lea s local instructional improvement system meets the minimum standards. activity 2 a All technology assessments/surveys will be completed annually (contact name listed in narrative) deliverable 3 The LEA will provide data from local instructional improvement and longitudinal data systems to the During this quarter, notepad devices for administrators were purchased (with other funding) to use with this data warehouse tool, FASTe. These devices will assist administrators in accessing the web tool, inputting and analyzing data. All required reports have been submitted on time. Peter Weiss and Bob Brust s contact information has been provided in previous deliverable reporting. All data requested will be provided. Peter Weiss and Bob Brust s contact information has been provided in previous deliverable reporting.
6 Patrick 6 Patrick Department, as requested. LEAs will provide the name, title, phone number, and e- mail address of a staff member responsible for receiving such requests from the Department. activity 3 a.5 Programmer/Analyst (RttT funded) will support schools and district in developing reports to assist in the analysis of data from our instructional improvement data system as well as information from state reports and other district systems activity 3 b Data, as requested, will be provided from our data systems annually (contact name listed in narrative) The Program Analyst: *Assisted with data from FCAT Reading, Math, Science, Retakes and EOCs *Continues to complete DOE surveys throughout the year. *Works with our district testing coordinator creating Pre-ID Files that are submitted to allow the creation of student testing materials. *Ensures that the test results are accurately uploaded into our database. *Loads ACT & SAT scores into our system, which is a continuing process through the year. *Works with our district Supervisor of Achievement Data Technology to ensure that the daily data extracts for input into the Performance Matters and FASTe systems are timely and accurate. Peter Weiss and Bob Brust s contact information has been provided in previous deliverable reporting and narrative.
Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 7 Project/MOU Criterion MOU Type Deliv Act Deliverable/Activity Y2Q4 Status CONTACT Number Number 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler deliverable 1 Plan for collaboration with institutions or other program providers (include list) to assign supervising teachers. activity 1 a Maintain and expand Educational Training Consortium (ETC) College of Central Florida University Partnership (quarterly meetings establish goals and priority activities) activity 1 b Attend yearly meeting with university representatives regarding internship placement process. (Protocol, timeline, requirements for both candidates and supervising teachers) activity 1 c Increase and expand communication systems with university partners and other regional institutions and districts to increase the number of secondary interns in the district. (STEM Recruitment) deliverable 3 Description of qualifications to supervise program interns or serve as a peer mentor. X X X X X District representative Mike Ballard attended the May 15, 2012 ETC meeting. Notes are in MOU 7 folder. Woythaler met with UCF advisor 5/22/12 to plan graduate course Clinical Ed/Mentoring course being taught for Citrus county teachers. Met with university supervisors (St. Leo, UCF, UWF, USF to discuss internship timeline for Fall 2012 placement. Contacted schools to begin placement process. During collaboration meetings with university partners, we continue to express interest in hosting secondary interns. We have had an increase in secondary interns from St. Leo.
7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler 7 Lindy Woythaler activity 3 a Review data from annual DOE report to analyze mentor and supervisor effectiveness and make adjustments to current intern and mentor placement practices. activity 3 c Identify targets/expectations for effectiveness of selected supervisors and mentors and set schedule for yearly review to make adjustments to targets/expectations for effectiveness levels for newly assigned/hired supervisors and mentors (committee meetings required substitutes needed out of RttT funding) deliverable 4 Reporting teachers and principals who are selected for these positions (the staff database will be updated with a data element for this purpose). deliverable 5 Annual APEP reports for district alternative certification programs and annual reports for School Leadership programs reflect requirements met for Continued Approval Standard Three (regarding use of data for continuous program improvement and the assignment and training of peer mentors). activity 5 a Create survey for district based alternative certification participants to include the effectiveness of assigned mentors. Implement, review and revise program. Reassign peer mentors to participants as needed based on performance reviews. (committee X X X X Interns and supervising teachers completed surveys regarding placement. The results indicate that most we satisfied with the experience. Survey results will be shared with university partners and administrators in the fall. See email from DOE - Sancho - in MOU 7 folder. This will be a reporting element for 2012-2013. Survey sent to ACP participants 5/22/12. Results will be reviewed with ACP mentors in the fall and adjustments made to the program if necessary.
meetings required substitutes needed out of RttT funding) 7 Lindy Woythaler activity 5 c Implement and maintain a systematic approach to identifying teachers who need district ACP by tracking Temporary Certificate teachers and providing information to school administrators. X We will continue to monitor temporary certificate teachers and make recommendations for coursework options.
Project/MOU Criterion Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 8 MOU Type z Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTACT Number Number 8 Jeff Davis deliverable 1 A completed teacher appraisal system that reflects the inclusion of and implementation process for each of the content and design requirements listed in s. 1012.34, F.S., and in the MOU in (D)(2)(i)--(iii). 8 Jeff Davis activity 1 d Create/refine an appraisal system which includes the seven (7) components of the MOU and Florida Statute 1012.34 to ensure a fair and equitable process. (committee meetings required; substitutes needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis activity 1 e Revise our appraisal system, as needed, based on feedback Committee meeting was held May 4, 2012. Agenda items included deliberate practice as an option for the additional metric requirement; highly effective vs effective ratings; the possibility of a revision to the plan to include teacher absences for more than half the year to be based on district portion of the evaluation Agreed upon items for revision will be submitted in the Fall. 8 Jeff Davis deliverable 2 A timetable for implementing the teacher evaluation system (this may be adjusted annually).
8 Jeff Davis activity 2 b Upon receipt of the growth model for FCAT subjects from DOE, work with DOE contacts and stakeholders to develop a teacher evaluation system that matches the MOU requirement. School years 2011-12 and 2012-13 with be utilized as phase-in years with full implementation in 2013-14. (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis activity 2 c Based upon DOE guidance and resources, develop a value added growth model for non-fcat core subjects during the 2011-12 school year. School year 2012-13 will be utilized as a phase-in year with full implementation in 2013-14. (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis activity 2 d Based upon DOE guidance and resources, develop a value added growth model for non-fcat elective subjects. Phase in will begin in school year 2012-13 with full implementation in 2013-14. (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis activity 2 e Evaluate, and revise (as needed) the timetable for the teacher evaluation system (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding). State statute superseded phase in option. Full implementation began 2011-2012, State statute superseded phase in option. Full implementation began 2011-2012. District and school based administrators identified appropriate data sources for all content areas to determine growth measures or learning targets. State statute superseded phase in option. Full implementation began 2011-2012. District and school based administrators identified appropriate data sources for all content areas to determine growth measures or learning targets. Timeline for submitting teacher evaluation information has been and will be adjusted in response to the arrival of value added data from the state
8 Jeff Davis deliverable 3 A completed principal appraisal system that reflects the inclusion of and implementation process for each of the content and design requirements listed in s.1012.34, F.S., and in the MOU in (D)(2)(i)-(iii). 8 Jeff Davis activity 3 a Evaluate the current appraisal instrument using the criteria of the Florida MOU (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis activity 3 b Review and assess appraisal systems being used in other Districts 8 Jeff Davis activity 3 d Create an appraisal system which includes the provisions of Florida Statute 1012.34 and the MOU requirements to ensure a fair and equitable process (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis deliverable 4 A timetable for implementing the principal evaluation system (this may be adjusted annually). 8 Jeff Davis activity 4 b Develop a principal evaluation system. (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) 8 Jeff Davis activity 4 d With June 1st documentation, the district will provide detailed information regarding the criteria, review process and personnel participating in evaluating the effectiveness of the appraisal system Components of the existing principal appraisal system are imbedded in the revised/new system that was submitted to the state May 1, 2012 Submitted to the state May 1, 2012. Currently waiting approval. Submitted to the state May 1, 2012. Currently waiting approval. Submitted to the state May 1, 2012. Currently waiting approval.
8 Jeff Davis deliverable 5 Annually report evaluation results for teachers and principals through the regular student and staff survey. 8 Jeff Davis activity 5 a Meet with Information Services Department to refine the internal process to review and report accurate data of teacher and principal evaluations 8 Jeff Davis activity 5 b Complete the annual reporting requirement of the instructional and principal evaluations 8 Jeff Davis deliverable 6 Submit revisions to the teacher and principal evaluation systems annually, if revisions are made. 8 Jeff Davis activity 6 a Review the validity, reliability, fidelity, and effectiveness of the instructional and principal evaluation systems through annual progress monitoring systems 8 Jeff Davis activity 6 b Submit instructional and principal evaluation revisions annually to the Florida Department of Education On going communication is taking place with Information Services for accurate reporting Mid year evaluation ratings for teachers hired after July 1, 2012 were submitted to the state via Survey 3. End of year ratings will be reported to the state when the information is available (Survey 5) Teacher evaluation system ratings will be reviewed upon completion of the 2011-2012 evaluation cycle. Appropriate data sources will be assigned/revised for the 2012-2013 school year based on validity and reliability of the scores. Revisions to the instructional and school based administrator systems will be submitted to the DOE according to revision timelines.
Project/MOU Criterion Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 9 MOU Type Deliv Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTACT Number Number deliverable 1 Annually submit the teacher and principal salary schedules that reflect the basis of determining the pay scale and supplements. The salary schedule will reflect the use of evaluation data and the requirements of the MOU based on the district determined implementation timeline. activity 1 a Our teacher and principal salary schedules will be submitted annually. activity 1 b District Staff and CCEA representatives will negotiate a salary schedule that reflects the use of evaluation data per MOU requirements. deliverable 2 Submit a revised teacher and principal evaluation system that reflects the process for using evaluation data to make each of the human capital decisions listed in the MOU (date submitted will be based on the district determined implementation timeline.) activity 2 a District Staff and CCEA representatives will negotiate language that reflects the process of using data to make personnel decisions (committee meetings required; substitute costs needed out of RttT funding) deliverable 3 Submit a staffing plan that reflects the assignment of effective and highly effective teachers and principals as defined in the grant notice to the district`s schools that have the highest percentages of low income students and minority students. Revisions to the plan, if made, should be submitted annually. That is done by the IT department every year Union negotiations will continue when the teachers return in September The union has not agreed with new teacher evaluation system and we can't move forward until we reach consensus on that issue. Union negotiations will continue when the teachers return in September
activity 3 a The staffing of each school will be reviewed annually to determine if inconsistencies exist between schools. activity 3 b Staffing plans and demographic data will be submitted to show consistency between schools. If inconsistencies exist (including lower student performance in relation to other schools within the same grouping/ level), the staffing plan will be adjusted to reflect the required deliverables in the MOU. deliverable 4 Annually submit the district`s collective bargaining agreement. The agreement that shows the use of teacher evaluation data to inform human capital decisions listed in the MOU will be submitted based on the district determined implementation timeline. activity 4 a District and Union representatives will meet throughout the initiative years (through our interest based bargaining process) to refine our contract to meet the requirements of using teacher evaluation data to make informed human capital decisions. activity 4 b District personnel will submit the collective bargaining agreement each year that meets the appropriate MOU and District timelines with annual revisions. deliverable 5 Submit documentation of the accountability process for administrators to utilize evaluation results for teachers and principals in human capital decisions (list the documentation and the timeline for submission in Related Activities). activity 5 a District personnel will develop an accountability process for administrators to utilize the evaluation results of teacher and principals to make personnel decisions. activity 5 b Feedback from administrators will be obtained for revisions to the process, if needed. The review will be made when all the data is in from the state. activity 5 c Training will be provided for principals and supervisors.
deliverable 6 Report all bonuses and salary augmentations by teacher through the regularly scheduled student and staff survey. activity 6 a District personnel will report all bonuses and salary augmentations by teacher through the regularly scheduled survey That is done by the IT department every year deliverable 7 Annually report terminations through the regularly scheduled student and staff survey. activity 7 a District personnel will annually report terminations through the regularly scheduled student and staff survey deliverable 8 Report and update as necessary during the school year the assignment of teachers and principals through the regularlyscheduled student and staff surveys. activity 8 a District personnel will report and update as necessary during the school year the assignment of teachers and principals through the regularly scheduled student and staff surveys That is done by the IT department every year That is done by the IT department every year
Project/MOU Criterion Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 10 MOU Type Deliv Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTACT Number Number deliverable 1 A revised district professional Completed development system that meets the requirements of Florida`s Protocol Standards for Professional Development and reflects the inclusion of each of the content and design requirements in the MOU sections listed above. See combined checklist attached, to be submitted with this Table. activity 1 aa Determine district-wide fidelity of current teacher Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) process activity 1 g Provide training on accommodations and assistive technology to schools on an as requested, as needed basis activity 1 h Develop a process to introduce Common Core State Standards (CCSS) to teachers activity 1 i Deliver CCSS training (using RttT funds to pay for substitutes for math, reading/writing, science and social studies teachers from each school) to teachers (See timetable deliverable for details) Quarterly meetings have taken place with administrators to implement this process. We have engaged in professional development on accommodations and assistive technology to schools as requested during the past quarter. Attendance at the Summer Common Core Institute has generated individual school plans to be reviewed and submitted to the state. Plans will used to generate the common core timeline; we are in the process of completing this.
activity 1 l Align leadership training program to include administrators role in supporting and using common planning time, lesson study and coaching for improvement activity 1 m On a yearly basis, collect leadership program completer, satisfaction, student achievement, promotion, and administrator satisfaction data activity 1 mm Implement 2nd year services for new teachers activity 1 n Use data relating to the leadership program to drive program updates and revisions activity 1 nn Determine district-wide fidelity of current principal Individual Leadership Development Plan (ILDP) process activity 1 o Based on evaluation data and available research, continuously improve our stateadopted leadership training program activity 1 q Train facilitators (using RttT funds to pay for substitutes for a facilitator from each school) to use Mathematics K-3 Formative Lesson Study Toolkit activity 1 y Provide training to teachers and administrators when updates occur in Performance Matters and when changes occur in state curriculum (use RttT funds to pay for release time for teachers to attend half-day school-based training, i.e., Data Days, in updates and changes) Lead and Learn has provided two professional development workshops with all our administrators. We will provide training on the Lesson Study to expand to elementary and high schools next year. This was conducted at the conclusion of the 2011-2012 school year. Meeting took place with program completers. The Teacher Induction Program now operates for two years for new to teaching teachers. This is currently being reviewed for changes. This is being developed now that our principals have been trained on the new principal evaluation system. Ongoing process. K-1 has been trained and will complete 2-3 this fall. This has been done through our data day process.
deliverable 2 A timetable for implementing the new elements into the professional development system for teachers and principals in the district. Completed activity 2 b Complete revisions to MIP Completed activity 2 c Present updated MIP to School Board for approval Completed activity 2 d Submit updated MIP to DOE Completed activity 2 i Provide assistive tech/accommodation training on as needed basis activity 2 k Deliver train-the-trainer lesson study/formative assessment training Summer workshops have taken place to deliver this training. This has been completed at the middle school level. deliverable 3 A revised teacher and principal evaluation system that reflects the use of evaluation results to plan and provide professional development. activity 3 a Review data from Annual Student and Staff survey that is sent to DOE to identify areas needing professional development deliverable 4 A component of the district`s professional development system reflecting a revised process for evaluating the district`s professional development in accordance with Protocol Standards, the requirements of the MOU, and as described in the grant. Completed This data has been reviewed and areas identified. This is currently in place.
activity 4 b Work with DOE consultant, if available, to implement new evaluation system. deliverable 5 A timetable for implementing the evaluation of professional development in the district. Kathy Lasiter has completed two training days this summer. This currently in place. activity 5 b Complete the design of evaluation system Completed deliverable 7 Submit revisions to the professional development system annually, based on the district-determined timetable for implementation. Ongoing process.
Project/M OU Criterion 13 Patrick 13 Patrick Citrus County Schools Year 2 Quarter 4 Deliverables MOU Number 13 MOU Type Deliverable Act Deliverable/Activity Status CONTA Number Numb CT er delivera ble 1 The LEA will provide documentation of its efforts to engage and include charter schools in discussions of its RTTT efforts. The documentation must include dates, times, and attendees of any and all RTTT meetings with charter schools. activity 1 a The district will maintain a packet of contact documentation to include: dates, times, agendas, and attendance of efforts to include the school in discussions of RttT efforts. (A chart containing this information will be provided to the DOE All documentation and meeting agendas are documented on the charter school website and continually updated: http://academyofenvironmentalsciencerttt.wi kispaces.com/ A hard copy of the portfolio was started in October 2010 and is updated each quarter. A website is set up for an electronic portfolio of documentation of deliverables 1-7. http://academyofenvironmentalsciencerttt.wi kispaces.com/
as evidence.) 13 Patrick 13 Patrick delivera ble 2 The LEA will provide signed statements from each charter school that they have been fully informed of their opportunity to participate in the RTTT grant, and their decision to participate or optout. activity 2 c If/when another charter school opens in Citrus County, the district will provide a signed statement from the charter stating they have been informed of their opportunity to participate in the RttT initiative. The charter school provided the district with a signed statement in a previous quarter, October 13, 2010. At this time there is no other charter school in Citrus County. If another one does open here, information and documentation will be provided
13 Patrick 13 Patrick 13 Patrick 13 Patrick delivera ble 3 The LEA will submit documentation that participating charter schools have been invited to participate in RTTT-funded activities. activity 3 b If/when another charter school opens in Citrus County, the district will submit appropriate documentation to DOE as to the Charter School's participation in the RttT initiative. delivera ble 4 The LEA will submit a budget that provides commensurate share of grant funds to participating charter schools. activity 4 a The budget for the charter school for RttT activities will be integrated into the district budget. The district has one charter school that is a public charter school that was initiated by the district. The charter school is The one existing charter school provided the district with a signed statement that they were invited to participate in October 2010. Any new charter schools will be provided with the same information. At this time there is no other charter school in Citrus County. If one does open here, information and documentation will be provided. There is no separate budget for the charter school. The district RTTT budget includes the charter school in the RTTT initiatives along with the other district school sites During Y2Q4, the charter school was provided by the district: * Assistance with assessment administration *Technology assistance for required testing *Training of staff for assessments *The opportunity to attend any RTTT related staff development *Assistance with staff observations and evaluations
13 Patrick aligned and included in district staff development, curriculum, teacher evaluations, teacher salary scale, data systems, teacher preparation programs and other areas. Records will be kept to show commensurate funds/activities are provided. activity 4 b The planned RttT initiatives do not provide allocations to be distributed to school accounts. The schools (including the charter school) will be receiving services from RttT funding or purchases will be made to by the district for all sites. If there is a distribution of RttT funds to the sites, our charter school will receive their share according to their student enrollment/fte. There is no separate budget for the charter school. The district RTTT budget includes the charter school in the RTTT initiatives along with the other district school sites
13 Patrick 13 Patrick 13 Patrick 13 Patrick delivera ble 5 The LEA will submit expenditure reports that demonstrate that participating charter schools have received their commensurate share of funds or services. activity 5 a Submission of required district budget RttT reports will include the charter school s commensurate share of funds and services. delivera ble 6 The LEA will provide a signed agreement from each participating charter school that states that the charter school will provide all necessary data and reports. activity 6 b If/when another charter school opens in Citrus County, we will provide a list showing all the data and reports that need to be submitted with signed acknowledgement by the Charter school. There is no separate budget for the charter school. The district RTTT budget includes the charter school in the RTTT initiatives along with the other district school sites The district RTTT budget includes the charter school in the RTTT initiatives along with the other district school sites. There is no separate budget for the charter school. This signed agreement was provided by the one charter school in the district in October 2010. As of now, no new charter schools have opened in Citrus County. If one does, the information will be provided.
13 Patrick 13 Patrick delivera ble 7 The LEA will provide documentation that FDOE was notified if any charter school fails to provide the necessary data and reports. (Quarterly as appropriate) activity 7 a If the charter school fails to provide the necessary data or reports for their share of the RttT funds or activities, documentation notifying FDOE will be provided. N/A-The charter school has not failed to provide the necessary data and reports. N/A-The charter school has not failed to provide the necessary data and reports.