Senior Exit Plans Survey State Summary Report

Similar documents
Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

46 Children s Defense Fund

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3. Civil Defense

Housekeeping. Questions

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

OIA Paddling Season

CLE/MCLE Information by State

NASWA SURVEY ON PELL GRANTS AND APPROVED TRAINING FOR UI SUMMARY AND STATE-BY-STATE RESULTS

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

The following tables contain data that are derived mainly

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

Proficiency Illusion

Set t i n g Sa i l on a N e w Cou rse

Fisk University FACT BOOK. Office of Institutional Assessment and Research

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

top of report Note: Survey result percentages are always out of the total number of people who participated in the survey.

Albert (Yan) Wang. Flow-induced Trading Pressure and Corporate Investment (with Xiaoxia Lou), Forthcoming at

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

VOLCANO HAZARDS PROGRAM

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Understanding University Funding

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Quantitative Study with Prospective Students: Final Report. for. Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

ObamaCare Expansion Enrollment is Shattering Projections

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

Emergency Safety Interventions Kansas Regulations and Comparisons to Other States. April 16, 2013

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

CC Baccalaureate. Kevin Ballinger Dean Consumer & Health Sciences. Joe Poshek Dean Visual & Performing Arts/Library

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

Susanna M Donaldson Curriculum Vitae

Imagine this: Sylvia and Steve are seventh-graders

NBCC NEWSNOTES. Guidelines for the New. World of WebCounseling. Been There, Done That: Multicultural Training Can. Always be productively revisted

Dinesh K. Sharma, Ph.D. Department of Management School of Business and Economics Fayetteville State University

The Honorable John D. Tinder, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7 th Circuit (retired) Clerk

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Institutional Report. Spring 2014 CLA+ Results. Barton College. cla+

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Restorative Measures In Schools Survey, 2011

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Rosalind S. Chou Georgia State University Department of Sociology

CATALOGUE OF THE TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, AND STUDENTS, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA; AND OF THE GRAMMAR AND CHARITY SCHOOLS, ATTACHED TO THE SAME.

Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

All Hands on Deck! Engaging Faculty Voices to Rise Above the Storm!

2014 Journalism Graduate Skills for the Professional Workplace: Expectations from Journalism Professionals and Educators

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

Wyoming Psychological Association 2017 Fall Conference Continuing Education for Mental Health Professionals

Ken Cyree, Ph.D. Dean of the Business School Frank R. Day/Mississippi Bankers Association Chair Professor of Finance

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

2017 Police Field Guide

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

Beyond Educational Tourism: Lessons Learned While Student Teaching Abroad

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

LEWIS M. SIMES AS TEACHER Bertel M. Sparks*

EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES A peer-reviewed scholarly journal

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Rosalind S. Chou Georgia State University Department of Sociology

Institutional Report. Fall 2013 CLA+ Cross-Sectional Results. Barton College. cla+

Richard C. Schubert Curriculum Vitae

The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology Nicholas C. Kawa (co-authors: Chris McCarty, José A. Clavijo Michelangeli, and Jessica Clark)

Teaching Colorado s Heritage with Digital Sources Case Overview

Carol A. Sommer. Western Kentucky University 24 post-graduate credit hours in counseling

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

PBL, Projects, and Activities downloaded from NextLesson are provided on an online platform.

Intellectual Property and Online Courses: Policies at Major Research Universities. Jeffrey Kromrey

PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID GUIDELINES FOR THE EDWARD T. CONROY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

Transcription:

Senior Exit Plans Survey State Summary Report 2008 Hawaii Department of Education Systems Accountability Office (SAO) System Evaluation and Reporting Section (SERS) Publication Date: December 2008

Senior Exit Plans Survey State Summary Report Class of 2008 Introduction Since 1992, the Hawaii Department of Education has collected data annually from high schools regarding the education and employment plans of our students completing high school. The Senior Exit Plans Survey (SEPS) provides school and department officials with information for school improvement planning, school accountability, and for supporting student guidance and counseling needs. The SEPS also provides information to institutions of higher learning, state and federal government agencies, legislators, the business community, and to the general public. This report presents statewide, complex area, and individual school summaries of students post-secondary plans for the year following their completion of high school. It is important to note that students may not respond to each item. Thus, the denominators used to calculate the percentages reported in this document may differ across and within sections. For example, the denominator used to calculate percentages regarding the educational plans of students in the Educational Plans of School-bound Students section is based on students who responded to items on school type, status, and location. In this same section, the denominator used to calculate the percentages regarding acceptance status is based on students who responded to items on school type and acceptance status. Method and Procedures The SEPS Coordinator at each school, usually a school counselor, was responsible for distributing, collecting, checking, and returning the completed surveys to the System Evaluation and Reporting Section (SERS) for scanning and tabulation. The SEPS Coordinator was also responsible for reporting the number of seniors and graduating juniors enrolled at the time the survey was administered. School personnel, primarily teachers and counselors, administered the survey to all seniors and graduating juniors between April and June 2008. The SEPS was distributed to regular public high schools and to charter schools that expressed an interest in participating. The survey instrument is included in Appendix A.

Response Rate At regular public schools, SEPS coordinators were asked to complete a Senior Exit Plan Survey response form that indicated the number of seniors enrolled. Graduating juniors were included in the senior enrollment total. A reported 11,754 seniors (and graduating juniors) were enrolled at the time of the survey. Of these students, 85% (n = 9,969) returned the survey form. At public charter schools, the director was most often the person who completed the Senior Exit Plan Survey form. The participating public charter schools reported 68 seniors enrolled at the time of the survey. Sixty-seven students returned the survey form for a return rate of 99%. Table 1.1 summarizes the response rates for the state, complex areas and individual schools. The table also provides the response rates by regular public and public charter schools. Summary of Findings Post-secondary plans Regular public schools. To find out about their post-secondary school plans, high school completers were asked what will they most likely be doing in the first year after high school: do they plan to go to school, work, or join the military, or do they have multiple plans, for example, attend school and join the military. As shown in Table 1.2a, the majority of students (68%) indicated they planned to attend school and work. However, a closer look at students responding yes to any of the post-secondary school options reveals that 8,874 (89%) students planned to attend school either as the only option or in combination with other post-secondary options. Less than ten percent of students indicated they had multiple plans that would include school, work, and the military. In 2004, the military status item was revised to include whether students who intended to join the military intended to be active (full time) or participate in the reserves (National Guard or other). It was noted by some coordinators that the response categories were not clear to students. Based upon this feedback, the responses were further refined to more accurately reflect the various options available. Thus, there were four response categories: (1) active duty (full-time), (2) reserves (part-time, non-specific locale, all branches), (3) Hawaii Army National Guard (part-time, specific to Hawaii), and (4) Hawaii Air National Guard (part-time, specific to Hawaii). This year, of the 789 students who included the military in their post-secondary plans, 727 (92%) responded to the military status item. Of these, 46% indicated active status, 25% indicated reserves, 18% indicated Hawaii Army National Guard, and 11% indicated Hawaii Air National Guard. Public charter schools. Table 1.2b summarizes charter school students post-secondary plans. Of the 67 students who completed the SEPS, 46 (69%) indicated they planned to attend school and work. Eighty-seven percent of the students included school in their post-secondary plans.

Educational Plans of School-Bound Students Regular public schools. More than four-fifths (89%) of those students completing the SEPS indicated plans to obtain post-secondary education. Table 1.3a summarizes the educational plans of school bound students. Of the 8,874 students who indicated some type of post-secondary education, 8,586 responded to items requesting the type of school (4-year, 2-year, business), status (full or part time), and location (Hawaii, not in Hawaii). Of these school bound students, 90% planned to attend a 4-year or 2-year college or university. Those attending a 4- year institution (n=3,685) were much more apt to indicate full-time status (88%) than part-time status (12%). Those attending a 2-year institution (n=4,023) were more likely to indicate fulltime status (64%) than part-time status (36%). Of the school bound students planning to attend 4-year or 2-year institutions, 75% planned to do so in Hawaii. Approximately 10% of school bound students indicated they planned to attend a business or trade school. Table 1.4a summarizes the acceptance status reported by students. Of those students who responded to a survey item regarding school acceptance (n= 8,423), 64% reported they had been accepted to the institution of their choice, 6% reported they had not yet been accepted, and 30% had not yet applied. Table 1.5a summarizes the financial status of school bound students. Of the 8,306 school bound students who responded to the financial status item, 53% had applied for financial aid. Public Charter Schools. Of the charter school students who completed the SEPS item on plans (n=67), 58 included school in their post-secondary plans. Of these students, 57 responded to items requesting information on type of school (4-year, 2-year, business), status (full or part time), and location (Hawaii, not in Hawaii). Table 1.3b summarizes the educational plans reported by these 57 school bound students. Most (82%) of these school bound students planned to attend a 4-year or 2-year college or university. Sixty-one percent of these school bound students indicated they planned to attend a 4-year or 2-year college or university full-time. Forty-one (72%) planned to attend a 4-year or 2-year institution in Hawaii. Eighteen percent (n=10) indicated plans to attend a business or trade school in Hawaii. Table 1.4b summarizes school acceptance status reported by charter school students. Sixty percent (n=35) of students reported they had been accepted to the institution of their choice. Thirty-six percent (n=21) of students reported they had not yet applied. Table 1.5b summarizes the financial status of school bound students. Of the 56 school bound students who responded to the financial status item, 24 (43%) had applied for financial aid.

School Bound Students and Gender Regular public schools. As shown in Table 1.6a, a somewhat higher percentage of females (53%) planned to pursue a post-secondary education. Although females were more likely than males to have plans to pursue post-secondary education at a 4-year institution, there was an similar distribution of males and females that planned to attend 2-year institutions and business schools. Public Charter Schools. As shown in Table 1.6b, of the 57 students who responded, males (n=13) were somewhat more likely to indicate plans to attend a 4 year college than females (n=9; however, females (n=16) were somewhat more likely to indicate plans to attend a 2 year college. School Choice Regular Public Schools. Table 1.7a summarizes students school choice. Of those students who indicated their school of choice (n = 8,328), 74% listed Hawaii based colleges, universities, and business schools. Leeward Community College (n=1,195) and the University of Hawaii at Manoa (n=937) were the most frequently listed Hawaii based schools. The majority of students listing Hawaii based schools listed a school associated with the UH system. Table 1.8a indicates that students planning to attend out of state schools, tended to choose schools located in the Western states with California based schools (n=284) most frequently listed and followed by Oregon (n=218), and Arizona (n=119). Public Charter Schools. Table 1.7b summarizes students school choice. Of those students who indicated their school of choice, the majority (n=46) listed Hawaii based colleges and universities. Windward Community College was the most frequently listed Hawaii based school. Anticipated Field of Study Regular Public Schools. Students completing the SEPS were asked to indicate their most likely field of study. The top three anticipated fields of study were nursing and dental hygiene, business administration, and engineering. As shown in Table 1.9a, Other was the most frequently listed response. Responses to the other field of study option included automotive industry (e.g., mechanic, body and repair, technology), cosmetology, communications (e.g., broadcasting, journalism, radio), criminal justice administration, electrician, fire sciences, forensic science, hospitality, law enforcement, medical technicians (e.g., emergency medical technician, radiology technician, etc.), and a variety of other fields.

Charter Public Schools. Students completing the SEPS were asked to indicate their most likely field of study. As shown in Table 1.9b, business administration and medical sciences were the top two fields of study. The most frequently cited option was the Other category. Responses to the other field of study option included automotive industry, cosmetology, fire sciences, forensic science, hospitality, law enforcement, medical assistant.

Table 1.1 Enrollment and Completion Rate for State, Complex Area, and School State, Complex Area, and School Total # of Seniors and Graduating Juniors Enrolled* Number Completing Survey Percent Return State - All Regular Public Schools Farrington-Kaiser 691 622 90% Wallace Rider Farrington High 461 398 86% Henry J. Kaiser High 230 224 97% Kaimuki-Kalani 499 466 93% Kaimuki High 241 217 90% Kalani High 250 241 96% Hawaii Center for the Deaf and Blind (HCDB) 8 8 100% McKinley-Roosevelt 794 701 88% Kula Kaiapuni o Anuenue 32 26 81% William McKinley High 382 320 84% Theodore Roosevelt High 380 355 93% Aiea-Moanalua-Radford 968 916 95% Aiea High 248 216 87% Moanalua High 435 426 98% Admiral Arthur W. Radford High 285 274 96% Leilehua-Mililani-Waialua 1098 1069 97% Leilehua High 425 398 94% Mililani High 566 566 100% Waialua High 107 105 98% Campbell-Kapolei-Waianae 1583 1206 76% James Campbell High 640 397 62% Kapolei High 493 418 85% Waianae High 450 391 87% Nanakuli-Pearl City-Waipahu 1138 971 85% Nanakuli High 141 133 94% Pearl City High 471 392 83% Waipahu High 526 446 85% Castle-Kahuku 606 465 77% James B. Castle High 348 244 70% Kahuku High 258 221 86% Kailua-Kalaheo 454 444 98% Kailua High 214 206 96% Kalaheo High 227 227 100% Olomana 13 11 85%

Table 1.1 Enrollment and Completion Rate for State, Complex Area, and School Complex Area and School con't. Total # of Seniors and Graduating Juniors Enrolled Number Completing Survey Percent Return Hilo-Laupahoehoe-Waiakea 651 592 91% Hilo High 346 340 98% Laupahoehoe High 12 12 100% Waiakea High 293 240 82% Kau-Keaau-Pahoa 369 310 84% Keaau High 192 146 76% Kau High 67 64 96% Pahoa High 110 100 91% Honokaa-Kealakehe-Kohala-Konawaena 771 442 57% Honokaa High 175 112 64% Kohala High 70 69 99% Konawaena High 136 101 74% Ke Kula o Ehunuikaimalino 1 1 100% Kealakehe High 389 159 41% Baldwin-Kekaulike-Maui 1066 841 79% Henry Perrine Baldwin High 350 350 100% Maui High 418 293 70% King Kekaulike High 298 198 66% Hana-Lahainaluna-Lanai-Molokai 368 274 74% Hana High 21 18 86% Lahainaluna High 194 112 58% Lanai High 50 47 94% Molokai High 103 97 94% Kapaa-Kauai-Waimea 698 650 93% Kapaa High 249 235 94% Kauai High 265 261 98% Waimea High 184 154 84% Regular Public Schools Total 11754 9969 85% Participating Charter Schools Hakipu'u Learning Center 9 9 100% Halau Lokahi 5 5 100% Kua o ka La 5 5 100% Ke Kula Niihau o Kekaha Learning Center 1 1 100% Myron B. Thompson Academy 48 47 98% Participating Charter Schools Total 68 67 99% *Note: These enrollment figures were submitted by SEPS coordinators on their SEPS Response Form. These figures were requested in March, thus they may be a more accurate reflection of the senior and graduating junior enrollment than the official enrollment figures which are released in September/October. If an enrollment figure was not submitted, then the DOE official enrollment count was used as the denominator.

State Summary of Return Rate Regular Public Schools Total number of seniors enrolled 11757 Number of surveys 9969 returned Response Rate 85% Note. The total number of students enrolled is based upon the SEPS Response Form completed by the school's SEPS coordinator. The total number includes graduating juniors. Summary of Respondents Gender Female 4949 Male 4855 Note. These figures represent only those who responded to the item. Table 1.2a. Student Plans Number Percent School Work Military School and Work School and Military Work and Military School, Work, and Military Other Undecided Total 1610 16% 655 7% 161 2% 6736 68% 118 1% 100 1% 410 4% 55 1% 103 1% 9948 The "Student Plans" table presents the distribution of all students who responded to the post secondary options on the Senior Exit Plans Survey (SEPS). For example, the number of students who plan only to attend school (e.g., they do not plan to work or join the military and do not have other plans) is given as "School." Those who intend to attend school and work are counted as "School and Work." No response 21 0% Note. 1) "No response" indicates students who did not respond to any of the post high school plan choices. The number of surveys returned is the denominator used to calculate the "No reponse" percent. 2) The percents in this table are based upon the the number of surveys returned minus the "No response" figure. 3) Percents may add to more than 100 due to rounding. Table 1.3a. School-bound Students by Type of School, Full/Part Time Status, and Location Type of school In Hawaii Not in Hawaii Number Percent Number Percent 4-year college or university Full-time Part-time 2-year college or university Full-time Part-time Business or trade school Full-time Part-time 1959 23% 332 4% 2146 25% 1313 15% 278 3% 256 3% 1286 15% 108 1% 412 5% 152 2% 225 3% 119 1% Note. The percents in this table are based upon the total number of school bound students who responded to items requesting information on the type, status, and location of the school they had plans to attend (n = 8586 ).

State Summary of School Bound Students, con't. Regular Public Schools Table 1.4a. School-bound Students by Type of School and Acceptance Status Type of school Accepted Not Yet Accepted Number Percent Number Percent Have Not Applied Number Percent 4-year college or university 2-year college or university Business or trade school 2908 35% 159 2% 579 7% 2113 25% 277 3% 1567 19% 359 4% 79 1% 382 5% Note. The percents in this table are based upon number of students who responded to both the type of school and acceptance status items (n = 8423 ). Table 1.5a. School-bound Students by Type of School and Financial Aid Application Status Type of school Have Applied Have Not Applied Number Percent Number Percent 4-year college or university 2563 31% 1041 13% 2-year college or university Business or trade school 1520 18% 2371 29% 289 3% 522 6% Note. The percents in this table are based upon number of students who responded to both the type of school and financial aid items (n = 8306 ). Table Note. The 1.6a. percentages School-bound in this table Students are based upon by Type number of of School students who and responded Genderto the financial aid item. Type of school Male Female Number Percent Number Percent 4-year college or university 1524 18% 2189 25% 2-year college or university 2050 24% 2033 23% Business or trade school 495 6% 380 4% Note. The percents in this table are based upon number of students who responded to both the type of school and gender items (n = 8671 ). SEPS 2008 School Summary

Table 1.7a. Schools, Colleges, and Universities Regular Public Schools Students completing the Senior Exit Plans Survey were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. The following list gives the names of the schools, listed by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai`i listed first). Students were also asked to bubble in the college or university College Board code of the school they planned to attend; codes for over 100 schools were provided on the back of the survey form. If a student's intended school was not among the those listed on the back of the survey form, students were instructed to write in the name of the school in the space provided. Schools for which there were 10 or more students planning to attend are reported in this table; however, the percents reported below are based upon the total number of school bound students responding to this item (n = 8,328). A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Hawaii Brigham Young University: Hawaii 72 1% Chaminade University of Honolulu 92 1% Education America Honolulu 48 1% Hawaii Community College 670 9% Hawaii Pacific University 242 3% Heald Business College 82 1% Honolulu Community College 617 8% Kapiolani Community College 892 12% Kauai Community College 241 3% Leeward Community College 1195 16% Maui Community College 458 6% Remington College 48 1% University of Hawaii at Hilo 324 4% University of Hawaii at Manoa 937 13% University of Hawaii West Oahu 80 1% Windward Community College 202 3% Arizona Arizona State University Tempe 13 0% Arizona Western College 10 0% Eastern Arizona College 27 0%

Table 1.7a. Schools, Colleges, and Universities Regular Public Schools Students completing the Senior Exit Plans Survey were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. The following list gives the names of the schools, listed by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai`i listed first). Students were also asked to bubble in the college or university College Board code of the school they planned to attend; codes for over 100 schools were provided on the back of the survey form. If a student's intended school was not among the those listed on the back of the survey form, students were instructed to write in the name of the school in the space provided. Schools for which there were 10 or more students planning to attend are reported in this table; however, the percents reported below are based upon the total number of school bound students responding to this item (n = 8,328). A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Northern Arizona University 27 0% Universal Technical Institute 42 1% California Art Institute of California: San Francisco 17 0% California College of the Arts 10 0% Chapman University 13 0% City College of San Francisco 11 0% El Camino College 10 0% Fashion Institute Of Design 18 0% Grossmont Community College 13 0% Loyola Marymount University 10 0% Menlo College 12 0% Mount San Antonio College 10 0% Orange Coast College 14 0% Remington College 10 0% San Diego State University 20 0% San Jose City College 11 0% Santa Barbara City College 11 0% Santa Monica College 36 0% University of Pacific 14 0% University of San Francisco 24 0% University of Southern California 18 0%

Table 1.7a. Schools, Colleges, and Universities Regular Public Schools Students completing the Senior Exit Plans Survey were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. The following list gives the names of the schools, listed by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai`i listed first). Students were also asked to bubble in the college or university College Board code of the school they planned to attend; codes for over 100 schools were provided on the back of the survey form. If a student's intended school was not among the those listed on the back of the survey form, students were instructed to write in the name of the school in the space provided. Schools for which there were 10 or more students planning to attend are reported in this table; however, the percents reported below are based upon the total number of school bound students responding to this item (n = 8,328). A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Colorado Colorado State University 28 0% Mesa State College 16 0% University of Northern Colorado 21 0% Montana University of Montana: Western 18 0% Nebraska Creighton University 20 0% Nevada Community College of Southern Nevada 10 0% University of Nevada Las Vegas 76 1% University of Nevada: Reno 12 0% Oregon Linfield College 11 0% Oregon State University 51 1% Pacific University 39 1% Portland State University 18 0% Southern Oregon University 19 0% University of Oregon 37 1% University of Portland 21 0% Western Oregon University 22 0% Texas University of Texas at Austin 10 0%

Table 1.7a. Schools, Colleges, and Universities Regular Public Schools Students completing the Senior Exit Plans Survey were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. The following list gives the names of the schools, listed by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai`i listed first). Students were also asked to bubble in the college or university College Board code of the school they planned to attend; codes for over 100 schools were provided on the back of the survey form. If a student's intended school was not among the those listed on the back of the survey form, students were instructed to write in the name of the school in the space provided. Schools for which there were 10 or more students planning to attend are reported in this table; however, the percents reported below are based upon the total number of school bound students responding to this item (n = 8,328). A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Utah Number Percent Brigham Young University: Utah 18 0% Snow College 11 0% University of Utah 14 0% Utah Valley State College 10 0% Washington Seattle University 22 0% Shoreline Community College 14 0% University of Puget Sound 11 0% University of Washington 19 0% Washington State University 36 0% Wyoming WYOTech: Laramie 11 0% Technical, Trade, or Institute Technical, Trade, or Institute 116 2%

Table 1.8a. School-bound Students by State, Territory, or Country Regular Public Schools Students completing the SEPS were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. This table provides the total number of students who responded to this item, inclusive of schools for which there were less than 10 students planning to attend, by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai'i listed first). Also included are those students who responded planning to attend schools outside of the continental United States. This listing does not include the Technical, Trade, or Institute responses. In most cases these schools did not have a college code that could be used to attribute them to a specific state or the institution listed had multiple locations and the student did not indicate the location they planned to attend. Although these schools could not be attributed to a specific state, territory, or country in the list below, they were reported by students in response to this item and therefore are included in the denominator (n=8,329) used to calculate the percents in this table. A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Hawaii 6207 76% Alabama 5 0% Alaska 8 0% Arizona 164 2% Arkansas 3 0% California 640 8% Colorado 103 1% Connecticut 4 0% District of Columbia 4 0% Florida 23 0% Georgia 18 0% Idaho 23 0% Illinois 36 0% Indiana 17 0% Iowa 8 0% Kansas 1 0% Kentucky 4 0%

Table 1.8a. School-bound Students by State, Territory, or Country Regular Public Schools Students completing the SEPS were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. This table provides the total number of students who responded to this item, inclusive of schools for which there were less than 10 students planning to attend, by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai'i listed first). Also included are those students who responded planning to attend schools outside of the continental United States. This listing does not include the Technical, Trade, or Institute responses. In most cases these schools did not have a college code that could be used to attribute them to a specific state or the institution listed had multiple locations and the student did not indicate the location they planned to attend. Although these schools could not be attributed to a specific state, territory, or country in the list below, they were reported by students in response to this item and therefore are included in the denominator (n=8,329) used to calculate the percents in this table. A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Louisiana 4 0% Maine 3 0% Maryland 6 0% Massachusetts 14 0% Michigan 9 0% Minnesota 4 0% Mississippi 4 0% Missouri 4 0% Montana 22 0% Nebraska 25 0% Nevada 100 1% New Hampshire 2 0% New Jersey 2 0% New Mexico 14 0% New York 35 0% North Carolina 6 0% North Dakota 5 0% Ohio 2 0%

Table 1.8a. School-bound Students by State, Territory, or Country Regular Public Schools Students completing the SEPS were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. This table provides the total number of students who responded to this item, inclusive of schools for which there were less than 10 students planning to attend, by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai'i listed first). Also included are those students who responded planning to attend schools outside of the continental United States. This listing does not include the Technical, Trade, or Institute responses. In most cases these schools did not have a college code that could be used to attribute them to a specific state or the institution listed had multiple locations and the student did not indicate the location they planned to attend. Although these schools could not be attributed to a specific state, territory, or country in the list below, they were reported by students in response to this item and therefore are included in the denominator (n=8,329) used to calculate the percents in this table. A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Oklahoma 4 0% Oregon 250 3% Pennsylvania 20 0% Rhode Island 4 0% South Carolina 5 0% South Dakota 2 0% Tennessee 4 0% Texas 45 1% Utah 73 1% Virginia 15 0% Washington 180 2% Wisconsin 2 0% Wyoming 12 0% American Samoa 2 0% Puerto Rico 0 0% Canada 1 0% Germany 1 0% Mexico 0 0%

Table 1.8a. School-bound Students by State, Territory, or Country Regular Public Schools Students completing the SEPS were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. This table provides the total number of students who responded to this item, inclusive of schools for which there were less than 10 students planning to attend, by state including District of Columbia (with Hawai'i listed first). Also included are those students who responded planning to attend schools outside of the continental United States. This listing does not include the Technical, Trade, or Institute responses. In most cases these schools did not have a college code that could be used to attribute them to a specific state or the institution listed had multiple locations and the student did not indicate the location they planned to attend. Although these schools could not be attributed to a specific state, territory, or country in the list below, they were reported by students in response to this item and therefore are included in the denominator (n=8,329) used to calculate the percents in this table. A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent New Zealand 1 0% Philippines 3 0%

State Summary of Anticipated Major Regular Public Schools Table 1.9a. Anticipated Major Students completing the SEPS were asked to select their intended major from a list of twenty possible majors. If a student did not see their intended major listed, then they were instructed to bubble in the "Other" category and write in the name of their major. If a student was undecided, they were asked to bubble in the "Undecided" category. Number Percent Airline/Travel Industry Trade 134 2% Architecture 128 1% Arts & Humanities 379 4% Business Administration 726 8% Computer Technology 360 4% Construction/Trades 294 3% Education/Teaching 472 5% Engineering 521 6% Food Service 276 3% Hawaiian/Asian Pacific Studies 58 1% Medical Sciences 582 7% Natural Sciences 105 1% Nursing and Dental Hygiene 1001 12% Ocean, Earth Science & Technology 72 1% Public Health 82 1% Secretarial/Clerical 1 0% Social Sciences 123 1% Social Work 149 2% Travel Industry Management 79 1% Tropical Agriculture 31 0% Other 1819 21% Undecided 1217 14% Note. The percents in this table are based upon the number of school bound students for Regular Public Schools (n= 8609 ) responding to this item. School bound students are all students who responded to any of the school options in the "Student Plans" section of the survey. The percents are rounded to the nearest whole percent using standard rounding rules.

State Summary of Return Rate Participating Charter Schools Total number of students enrolled 68 Number of surveys 67 returned Response Rate 99% Note. The total number of students enrolled is based upon the SEPS Response Form completed by the school's SEPS coordinator. Summary of Respondents Gender Female 35 Male 31 Note. These figures represent only those who responded to the item. Table 1.2b. Student Plans Number Percent School Work Military School and Work School and Military Work and Military School, Work, and Military Other Undecided Total 9 13% 7 10% 0 0% 46 69% 0 0% 1 1% 3 4% 0 0% 1 1% 67 The "Student Plans" table presents the distribution of all students who responded to the post secondary options on the Senior Exit Plans Survey (SEPS). For example, the number of students who plan only to attend school (e.g., they do not plan to work or join the military and do not have other plans) is given as "School." Those who intend to attend school and work are counted as "School and Work." No response 1 1% Note. 1) "No response" indicates students who did not respond to any of the post high school plan choices. The number of surveys returned is the denominator used to calculate the "No reponse" percent. 2) The percents in this table are based upon the the number of surveys returned minus the "No response" figure. Table 1.3b. School-bound Students by Type of School, Full/Part Time Status, and Location Type of school In Hawai'i Not in Hawai'i Number Percent Number Percent 4-year college or university Full-time Part-time 2-year college or university Full-time Part-time Business or trade school Full-time Part-time 14 25% 3 5% 15 26% 9 16% 1 2% 5 9% 5 9% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 3 5% 1 2% Note. The percents in this table are based upon the total number of school bound students who responded to items requesting information on the type, status, and location of the school they had plans to attend (n = 57 ).

State Summary of School Bound Students, con't. Participating Charter Schools Table 1.4b. School-bound Students by Type of School and Acceptance Status Type of school Accepted Not Yet Accepted Number Percent Number Percent Have Not Applied Number Percent 4-year college or university 2-year college or university Business or trade school 19 33% 0 0% 3 5% 12 21% 1 2% 13 22% 4 7% 1 2% 5 9% Note. The percents in this table are based upon number of students who responded to both the type of school and acceptance status items (n = 58 ). Table 1.5b. School-bound Students by Type of School and Financial Aid Application Status Type of school Have Applied Have Not Applied Number Percent Number Percent 4-year college or university 11 20% 11 20% 2-year college or university Business or trade school 10 18% 14 25% 3 5% 7 13% Note. The percents in this table are based upon number of students who responded to both the type of school and gender items (n = 56 ). Table Note. The 1.6b. percentages School-bound in this table Students are based upon by Type number of School students who and responded Genderto the financial aid item. Type of school Male Female Number Percent Number Percent 4-year college or university 13 23% 9 16% 2-year college or university 9 16% 16 28% Business or trade school 2 4% 8 14% Note. The percents in this table are based upon number of students who responded to both the type of school and financial aid items (n = 57 ). SEPS 2008 School Summary

Table 1.7b. Schools, Colleges, and Universities Participating Charter Schools Students completing the Senior Exit Plans Survey were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. The following list gives the names of the schools, listed by state (with Hawai`i listed first) and in descending order based on the number of students planning to attend each school. Students were also asked to bubble in the college or university College Board code of the school they planned to attend; codes for over 100 schools were provided on the back of the survey form. If a student's intended school was not among those listed on the back of the survey form, students were instructed to write in the name of the school in the space provided. Percents reported below are based upon the number of school bound students responding to this item (n= 58). A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Hawaii Brigham Young University: Hawaii 2 3% Chaminade University of Honolulu 1 2% Hawaii Community College 3 5% Honolulu Community College 7 12% Kapiolani Community College 5 9% Kauai Community College 1 2% Leeward Community College 6 10% Maui Community College 1 2% University of Hawaii at Hilo 1 2% University of Hawaii at Manoa 6 10% Windward Community College 13 22% California California Polytechnical State University, Pomo 1 2% Florida Illinois Utah University of Central Florida 1 2% Malcom X College - City College 1 2% Brigham Young University: Utah 1 2% Dixie College 1 2% Utah Valley State College 1 2% Virginia Northern Virginia Community College 2 3%

Table 1.7b. Schools, Colleges, and Universities Participating Charter Schools Students completing the Senior Exit Plans Survey were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. The following list gives the names of the schools, listed by state (with Hawai`i listed first) and in descending order based on the number of students planning to attend each school. Students were also asked to bubble in the college or university College Board code of the school they planned to attend; codes for over 100 schools were provided on the back of the survey form. If a student's intended school was not among those listed on the back of the survey form, students were instructed to write in the name of the school in the space provided. Percents reported below are based upon the number of school bound students responding to this item (n= 58). A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Technical, Trade, or Institute Technical, Trade, or Institute 3 5% Croatia University of Zagreb Medical School 1 2%

Table 1.8b. School-bound Students by State Participating Charter Schools Students completing the SEPS were asked to write the name of the school they planned to attend during the year following their graduation from high school. This listing does not include the Technical, Trade, or Institute responses. In most cases these schools did not have a college code that could be used to attribute them to a specific state or the institution listed had multiple locations and the student did not indicate the location they planned to attend. Although these schools could not be attributed to a specific state, territory, or country in the list below, they were reported by students in response to this item and therefore are included in the denominator (n=58) used to calculate the percents in this table. A zero percent means the number of students planning to attend that college represent less than 1% of the total. Number Percent Hawaii 46 84% California 1 2% Florida 1 2% Illinois 1 2% Utah 3 5% Virginia 2 4% Croatia 1 2%

State Summary of Anticipated Major Participating Charter Schools Table 1.9b. Anticipated Major Students completing the SEPS were asked to select their intended major from a list of twenty possible majors. If a student did not see their intended major listed, then they were instructed to bubble in the "Other" category and write in the name of their major. If a student was undecided, they were asked to bubble in the "Undecided" category. Number Percent Airline/Travel Industry Trade 2 4% Architecture 1 2% Arts & Humanities 2 4% Business Administration 5 9% Computer Technology 1 2% Engineering 1 2% Food Service 2 4% Hawaiian/Asian Pacific Studies 2 4% Medical Sciences 4 7% Nursing and Dental Hygiene 3 6% Ocean, Earth Science & Technology 2 4% Social Work 1 2% Other 22 41% Undecided 10 19% Note. The percents in this table are based upon the number of school bound students for Charter Schools (n = 58 ) who responded to this item. School bound students are all students who responded to any of the school options in the "Student Plans" section of the survey. Percents are rounded to the nearest whole percent using standard rounding rules.