NIRF Analysis. Dr. N.Jayasankaran Former Vice-Chancellor and Director General BIM.

Similar documents
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli: Performa for CV of Faculty/ Staff Members

NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM CUM WORKSHOP ON "RECENT TRENDS IN STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTER AIDED DRUG DESIGN" (SBCADD-2014) PARTICIPANT LIST

AC : ENGINEERING EDUCATION EXCELLENCE: START-UP TO NUMBER ONE

The Gandhigram Rural Institute Deemed University Gandhigram

11.EDUCATION 11.1 STUDENTS ABSTRACT FOR THE YEAR

Thiagarajar College (Autonomous), Madurai 9 (Re-Accredited with A Grade by NAAC)

11.EDUCATION 11.1 UNIVERSITIES, STUDENTS AND TEACHERS AND COURSES OFFERED

AC : ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND RECOGNITION

11.EDUCATION 11.1 UNIVERSITIES, STUDENTS AND TEACHERS AND COURSES OFFERED

K.L.N. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, POTTAPALAYAM. Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Academic Year:

Information Communication Technology (ICT) Infrastructure Facilities in Self-Financing Engineering College Libraries in Tamil Nadu

Bharathiar University: Coimbatore 46

An Evaluation of E-Resources in Academic Libraries in Tamil Nadu

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY SUG FACULTY SALARY DATA BY COLLEGE BY DISCIPLINE

GRG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES NEWS AND EVENTS FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2016

CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR

A STUDY ON INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOUR OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ENGINEERING COLLEGES IN VELLORE DISTRICT G. SARALA

The DTED. Curriculum / Syllabus of the State Tamilnadu In Inidia And Performance of Student Teachers

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 11 : 3 March 2011 ISSN

Aug day 31 Vermicomposting day 50 Workshop on Low Cost Nutritious Food day 45

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

PG DEGREE/ DIPLOMA COURSES SESSION LIST OF CANDIDATES ALLOTTED IN DEEMED UNIVERSITIES ON

Government of Tamil Nadu TEACHERS RECRUITMENT BOARD 4 th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai

A STUDY ON AWARENESS ABOUT BUSINESS SCHOOLS AMONG RURAL GRADUATE STUDENTS WITH REFERENCE TO COIMBATORE REGION

CHAPTER 5: COMPARABILITY OF WRITTEN QUESTIONNAIRE DATA AND INTERVIEW DATA

STATUS OF OPAC AND WEB OPAC IN LAW UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES IN SOUTH INDIA

STUDENT SATISFACTION IN PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN GWALIOR

The specific objectives of Career Guidance and Placement Cell of SIGC Create awareness among students regarding available career options and help

What, Why and How? Past, Present and Future! Gudrun Wicander

2. Contact Information : 19, Samarth colony, M. J. College Road, Jalgaon-01 Tel. No ; Mobil :

CURRICULUM VITAE. To develop expertise in Graph Theory and expand my knowledge by doing Research in the same.

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

MCA DEPARTMENT. Department of Computer Applications. July May 2016 ISSUE III VOLUME 4

BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY UNDER UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY INTERACTION PROGRAMMES

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU DIPLOMA IN PHARMACY SESSION

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY SUG FACULTY SALARY DATA BY COLLEGE BY DISCIPLINE 12 month salaries converted to 9 month

Advertisement No. 2/2013

Making welding simulators effective

Michigan State University

C.ABDUL HAKEEM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (ISO 9001 : 2008 & NBA

Academic Partnerships with Asian Universities Paul Wheeler Utah State University, USA

Systematic Assessment and Monitoring leading to Improving Quality of Education

The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of English Article Usage in L2 Writing

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU. ADMISSION TO B. PHARM (Lateral Entry)

SRI RAMACHANDRA UNIVERSITY (Declared under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956)

Monitoring Metacognitive abilities in children: A comparison of children between the ages of 5 to 7 years and 8 to 11 years

1. M. Sc. Program objectives

CHENNAI MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE

Ministry of Education Singapore

BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY

SALIS Newsletter Vol.10. No

The Implementation of Interactive Multimedia Learning Materials in Teaching Listening Skills

Leprosy case detection using schoolchildren

ACCREDITATION MANUAL FOR UG ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES (TIER-II)

Information Needs and Use Pattern of District Court Lawyers of Salem and Erode in Tamilnadu

Mexico (CONAFE) Dialogue and Discover Model, from the Community Courses Program

Management and monitoring of SSHE in Tamil Nadu, India P. Amudha, UNICEF-India

Teachers development in educational systems

What is Effect of k-12 in the Electrical Engineering Practice?

PROMOTING QUALITY AND EQUITY IN EDUCATION: THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE (H SCI)

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE (AGLS)

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Math 4 Units Algebra I, Applied Algebra I or Algebra I Pt 1 and Algebra I Pt 2

Indian Institute of Ayurvedic Pharmaceutical Sciences [ISO (9001:2008) Certified College]

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

PSIWORLD Keywords: self-directed learning; personality traits; academic achievement; learning strategies; learning activties.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 237 ( 2017 )

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

On the Design of Group Decision Processes for Electronic Meeting Rooms

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Catalog Submitted November 12, 2012 to FSCC

NCSA Director Presentation Committee on Research and Education at NCSA

KUMAUN UNIVERSITY, NAINITAL

Undergraduate Program Guide. Bachelor of Science. Computer Science DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE and ENGINEERING

USING DRAMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING CLASSROOMS TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF LEARNERS

VOL. 3, NO. 5, May 2012 ISSN Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences CIS Journal. All rights reserved.

EDPS 859: Statistical Methods A Peer Review of Teaching Project Benchmark Portfolio

UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR NAAC Accredited Grade A University Campus, Hazratbal, Srinagar (J&K)

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (WOMEN)

ScienceDirect. Noorminshah A Iahad a *, Marva Mirabolghasemi a, Noorfa Haszlinna Mustaffa a, Muhammad Shafie Abd. Latif a, Yahya Buntat b

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

ADMISSION TO M. Sc., (Nursing ) COURSE

CURRICULAR VITAE : Dr.R.S.S.Nehru Aspect & Details Dr. RAVIPALLI SRI SANTHI NEHRU

Quantitative analysis with statistics (and ponies) (Some slides, pony-based examples from Blase Ur)

TEACHERS RECRUITMENT BOARD 4 th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

Sl. No. Name of the Post Pay Band & Grade Pay No. of Post(s) Category

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

STAT 220 Midterm Exam, Friday, Feb. 24

MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN STATISTICS

June 15, 1962 in Shillong, Meghalaya, India. Address: Civil Dept, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati

JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES ISSN: X Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), ; 2017

===COURSE j =1 1 I I 1=

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

$33 7,704 DONORS GAVE BETWEEN $1.00 AND $5 MILLION CHAIRS SUPPORTED

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

INFORMATION OF THE SCHOOL REQUIRED TO BE UPLOADED ON WEBSITE

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM INFORMATION FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Transcription:

NIRF Analysis Dr. N.Jayasankaran Former Vice-Chancellor and Director General BIM Email: profdrjay@gmail.com

S.NO STATE UNIVERSITIES TAMIL NADU 1 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 2 ANNA UNIVERSITY 3 ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY 4 BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY 5 BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY 6 MADURAI KAMRAJ UNIVERSITY 7 MANONMANIAM SUNDARNAR UNIVERSITY 8 MOTHER TERESA WOMEN S UNIVERSITY 9 PERIYAR UNIVERSITY 10 TAMIL UNIVERSITY 11 TAMILNADU AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY 12 TAMILNADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY 13 TAMILNADU DR. M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 14 TAMILNADU FISHERIES UNIVERSITY 15 TAMILNADU MUSIC AND FINE ARTS UNIVERSITY 16 TAMILNADU NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL 17 TAMILNADU OPEN UNIVERSITY 18 TAMILNADU PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS UNIVERSITY 19 TAMILNADU TEACHER EDUCATION UNIVERSITY 20 TAMILNADU VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY 21 THIRUVALLUVAR UNIVERSITY 22 UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS

S.NO DEEMED UNIVERSITIES TAMIL NADU 1 ACADEMY OF MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2 AMRITA VISHWA VIDYAPEETHAM 3 AVINASHILINGAM INSTITUTE FOR HOME SCIENCE & HIGHER EDUCATION FOR WOMEN 4 B.S. ABDUR RAHMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 5 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION & RESEARCH 6 CHENNAI MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE 7 CHETTINAD ACADEMY OF RESEARCH AND EDUCATION (CARE) 8 GANDHIGRAM RURAL INSTITUTE 9 HINDUSTAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE (HITS) 10 KALASALINGAM ACADEMY OF RESEARCH AND HIGHER EDUCATION 11 KARPAGAM ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 12 KARUNYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCES 13 M.G.R. EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE 14 MEENAKSHI ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 15 NOORUL ISLAM CENTRE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, KUMARACOIL 16 PERIYAR MANIAMMAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (PMIST) 17 PONNAIYAH RAMAJAYAM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (PRIST) 18 S.R.M. INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY 19 SATHYABAMA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 20 SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES 21 SHANMUGHA ARTS, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH & ACADEMY (SASTRA) 22 SRI CHANDRASEKHARANDRA SARASWATI VISHWA MAHAVIDYALAYA 23 SRI RAMACHANDRA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE 24 ST. PETER S INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 25 VEL TECH RANGARAJAN DR. SAGUNTHALA R & D INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 26 VEL S INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS) 27 VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 28 VINAYAKA MISSION S RESEARCH FOUNDATION

GOVT. UNIVERSITIES S.No UNIVERSITY NIRF SCORE NIRF RANK NAAC CGPA NAAC GRADE 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 56.5 6 3.46 A 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 48.84 17 3 BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY 44.29 28 3.11 A 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 42.48 38 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 41.85 41 3.32 A 6 ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY 38.59 56 3.09 A 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 36.04 77 3.08 A 8 PERIYAR UNIVERSITY 35.44 85 3.15 A 9 BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY 35.14 88 A 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 33.66 97 3.64 A+

PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME NIRF NIRF NAAC NAAC SCORE RANK CGPA GRADE 1 AMRITHA UNIVERSITY 54.7 9 3.4 A 2 VIT UNIVERSITY 51.36 14 3.42 A 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 46.45 21 3.2 A 4 SASTRA UNIVERSITY 43.5 32 A 5 SRM UNIVERSITY 43.07 34 A 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA UNIVERSITY 42.46 39 3.62 A 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 41.3 44 2.5 B 8 SAVEETHA UNIVERSITY 38.68 55 3.02 A 9 VEL TECH UNIVERSITY 37.13 65 3.17 A 10 MEENAKSHI UNIVERSITY 36.47 70 2.41 B 11 KARUNYA UNIVERSITY 36.44 71 2.7 B 12 KARPAGAM UNIVERSITY 34.86 90 2.1 B 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN UNIVERSITY 32.99 100 3.08 A 14 GANDHIGRAM RURAL INSTITUTE 34.56 91 3.2 A

AVERAGE OF PARAMETERS ETWEEN PVT & GOVT.UNIVERSITIES UNI TLR RPC GO OI PR FULL SCORE PRIVATE 49.84 20.2 60.04 73.74 10.97 41.49 GOVT 47.88 24.53 61.06 58.24 9.09 40.67

AVERAGE OF PARAMETERS BETWEEN PVT & GOVT.UNIVERSITIES

COMPARISON BETWEEN TLR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME TLR TLRR FULL SCORE FSR 1 AMRITHA 62.9 16 54.7 9 2 VIT 41.65 90 51.36 14 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 59.33 22 46.45 21 4 SASTRA 43.1 80 43.5 32 5 SRM 45.8 60 43.07 34 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 68.16 11 42.46 39 7 SATYA BAMA 42.32 82 41.3 44 8 SAVEETHA 21.11 44 38.68 55 9 VEL TECH 45.32 63 37.13 65 10 MEENAKSHI 56.87 30 36.47 70 11 KARUNYA 38.08 114 36.44 71 12 KARPAGAM 50.69 46 34.86 90 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 42.56 81 32.99 100 AVERAGE 47.53 41.49308

COMPARISON BETWEEN TLR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME TLR FULL SCORE 1 AMRITHA 62.9 54.7 2 VIT 41.65 51.36 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 59.33 46.45 4 SASTRA 43.1 43.5 5 SRM 45.8 43.07 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 68.16 42.46 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 42.32 41.3 8 SAVEETHA 21.11 38.68 9 VEL TECH 45.32 37.13 10 MEENAKSHI 56.87 36.47 11 KARUNYA 38.08 36.44 12 KARPAGAM 50.69 34.86 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 42.56 32.99

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT TLR FS TLR 1 FS 0.336917 1

COMPARISON BETWEEN RPC AND FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME RPC RPCR FULL SCORE 1 AMRITHA 39.49 11 54.7 9 2 VIT 42.87 8 51.36 14 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION FSR 23.12 35 46.45 21 4 SASTRA 31.09 19 43.5 32 5 SRM 25.07 32 43.07 34 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 14.1 58 42.46 39 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 22.17 36 41.3 44 8 SAVEETHA 11.81 75 38.68 55 9 VEL TECH 20.13 39 37.13 65 10 MEENAKSHI 2.75 155 36.47 70 11 KARUNYA 14.77 54 36.44 71 12 KARPAGAM 8.94 91 34.86 90 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 6.33 111 32.99 100

COMPARISON BETWEEN RPC & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME RPC RPCR FULL SCORE FSR 1 AMRITHA 39.49 11 54.7 9 2 VIT 42.87 8 51.36 14 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 23.12 35 46.45 21 4 SASTRA 31.09 19 43.5 32 5 SRM 25.07 32 43.07 34 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 14.1 58 42.46 39 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 22.17 36 41.3 44 8 SAVEETHA 11.81 75 38.68 55 9 VEL TECH 20.13 39 37.13 65 10 MEENAKSHI 2.75 155 36.47 70 11 KARUNYA 14.77 54 36.44 71 12 KARPAGAM 8.94 91 34.86 90 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 6.33 111 32.99 100 AVERAGE 20.20308 41.49308

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT RPC FS RPC 1 FS 0.89521 1

COMPARISON BETWEEN GO & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME GO GOR FULL SCORE 1 AMRITHA 65.77 67 54.7 9 2 VIT 75.57 29 51.36 14 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 63.42 76 46.45 21 4 SASTRA 68.04 60 43.5 32 5 SRM 64.33 72 43.07 34 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 47.94 142 42.46 39 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 65.64 68 41.3 44 8 SAVEETHA 57.85 114 38.68 55 9 VEL TECH 43.86 162 37.13 65 10 MEENAKSHI 59.66 105 36.47 70 11 KARUNYA 60.31 96 36.44 71 12 KARPAGAM 51.21 136 34.86 90 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 56.98 118 32.99 100 AVERAGE 60.04462 41.49308 FSR

COMPARISON BETWEEN GO & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME GO FULL SCORE 1 AMRITHA 65.77 54.7 2 VIT 75.57 51.36 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 63.42 46.45 4 SASTRA 68.04 43.5 5 SRM 64.33 43.07 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 47.94 42.46 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 65.64 41.3 8 SAVEETHA 57.85 38.68 9 VEL TECH 43.86 37.13 10 MEENAKSHI 59.66 36.47 11 KARUNYA 60.31 36.44 12 KARPAGAM 51.21 34.86 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 56.98 32.99

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT GO FS GO 1 FS 0.623938 1

COMPARISON BETWEEN OI & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME OI OIR FULL SCORE FSR 1 AMRITHA 82.17 7 54.7 9 2 VIT 75.99 20 51.36 14 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 86.49 1 46.45 21 4 SASTRA 65.18 51 43.5 32 5 SRM 78.65 10 43.07 34 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 73.02 28 42.46 39 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 77.13 15 41.3 44 8 SAVEETHA 76.63 19 38.68 55 9 VEL TECH 72.48 29 37.13 65 10 MEENAKSHI 66.49 43 36.47 70 11 KARUNYA 77.36 14 36.44 71 12 KARPAGAM 63.92 57 34.86 90 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 63.08 62 32.99 100 AVERAGE 73.73769 41.49308

COMPARISON BETWEEN OI & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME OI FULL SCORE 1 AMRITHA 82.17 54.7 2 VIT 75.99 51.36 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 86.49 46.45 4 SASTRA 65.18 43.5 5 SRM 78.65 43.07 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 73.02 42.46 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 77.13 41.3 8 SAVEETHA 76.63 38.68 9 VEL TECH 72.48 37.13 10 MEENAKSHI 66.49 36.47 11 KARUNYA 77.36 36.44 12 KARPAGAM 63.92 34.86 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 63.08 32.99

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT OI FS OI 1 FS 0.635954 1

COMPARISON BETWEEN PR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME PR PRR FULL SCORE FSR 1 AMRITHA 26.12 12 54.7 9 2 VIT 32.95 69 51.36 14 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 3.79 84 46.45 21 4 SASTRA 11.1 37 43.5 32 5 SRM 10.8 41 43.07 34 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 8.86 46 42.46 39 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 11.08 38 41.3 44 8 SAVEETHA 5.81 62 38.68 55 9 VEL TECH 14.69 26 37.13 65 10 MEENAKSHI 0.09 185 36.47 70 11 KARUNYA 7.82 50 36.44 71 12 KARPAGAM 3.39 89 34.86 90 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 6.07 60 32.99 100 AVERAGE 10.96692 41.49308

COMPARISON BETWEEN PR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME PR FULL SCORE 1 AMRITHA 26.12 54.7 2 VIT 32.95 51.36 3 BHARATH INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION 3.79 46.45 4 SASTRA 11.1 43.5 5 SRM 10.8 43.07 6 SRI RAMACHANDRA 8.86 42.46 7 SATYA BAMA UNIVERSITY 11.08 41.3 8 SAVEETHA 5.81 38.68 9 VEL TECH 14.69 37.13 10 MEENAKSHI 0.09 36.47 11 KARUNYA 7.82 36.44 12 KARPAGAM 3.39 34.86 13 B.S.ABDUR RAHMAN 6.07 32.99

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT PR FS PR 1 FS 0.758315 1

COMPARISON ANALYSIS TLR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME TLR TLRR FULL SCORE FSR 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 46.25 58 56.5 6 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 77.67 5 48.84 17 3 BHARATHIAR 45.67 62 44.29 28 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 75.08 6 42.48 38 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 44.22 69 41.85 41 6 ANNAMALAI 39.03 108 38.59 56 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 43.14 79 36.04 77 8 PERIYAR 38.13 113 35.44 85 9 BHARATHIDASAN 39.08 107 35.14 88 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 38.56 113 33.66 97 AVERAGE 47.88273 40.67182

COMPARISON BETWEEN TLR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME TLR FULL SCORE 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 46.25 56.5 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 77.67 48.84 3 BHARATHIAR 45.67 44.29 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 75.08 42.48 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 44.22 41.85 6 ANNAMALAI 39.03 38.59 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 43.14 36.04 8 PERIYAR 38.13 35.44 9 BHARATHIDASAN 39.08 35.14 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 38.56 33.66

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT TLR FS TLR 1 FS 0.497138 1

COMPARISON BETWEEN RPC & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME RPC RPCR FS FSR 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 54.58 3 56.5 6 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 12.56 70 48.84 17 3 BHARATHIAR 35.58 14 44.29 28 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 6.36 110 42.48 38 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 29.26 21 41.85 41 6 ANNAMALAI 26.87 29 38.59 56 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 25.87 29 36.04 77 8 PERIYAR 17.6 44 35.44 85 9 BHARATHIDASAN 27.22 26 35.14 88 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 18.92 41 33.66 97 AVERAGE 24.53455 40.67182

COMPARISON BETWEEN RPC & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME RPC FS 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 54.58 56.5 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 12.56 48.84 3 BHARATHIAR 35.58 44.29 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 6.36 42.48 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 29.26 41.85 6 ANNAMALAI 26.87 38.59 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 25.87 36.04 8 PERIYAR 17.6 35.44 9 BHARATHIDASAN 27.22 35.14 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 18.92 33.66

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT RPC FS RPC 1 FS 0.536685 1

COMPARISON BETWEEN GO & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME GO GOR FS FSR 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 79.31 22 56.5 6 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 75.33 31 48.84 17 3 BHARATHIAR 63.73 74 44.29 28 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 61.11 87 42.48 38 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 62.26 81 41.85 41 6 ANNAMALAI 68.64 56 38.59 56 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 47.93 143 36.04 77 8 PERIYAR 59.46 107 35.44 85 9 BHARATHIDASAN 46.39 154 35.14 88 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 49.32 140 33.66 97 AVERAGE 61.05636 40.67182

COMPARISON BETWEEN GO & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME GO FS 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 79.31 56.5 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 75.33 48.84 3 BHARATHIAR 63.73 44.29 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 61.11 42.48 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 62.26 41.85 6 ANNAMALAI 68.64 38.59 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 47.93 36.04 8 PERIYAR 59.46 35.44 9 BHARATHIDASAN 46.39 35.14 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 49.32 33.66

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT GO FS GO 1 FS 0.858451 1

COMPARISON OI & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME OI OIR FS FSR 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 60.01 89 56.5 6 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 63.48 60 48.84 17 3 BHARATHIAR 62.6 68 44.29 28 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 57.5 106 42.48 38 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 62.75 67 41.85 41 6 ANNAMALAI 47.19 171 38.59 56 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 54.17 127 36.04 77 8 PERIYAR 62.4 70 35.44 85 9 BHARATHIDASAN 51.66 141 35.14 88 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 61.29 80 33.66 97 AVERAGE 58.24273 40.67182

COMPARISON BETWEEN OI & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME OI FS 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 60.01 56.5 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 63.48 48.84 3 BHARATHIAR 62.6 44.29 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 57.5 42.48 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 62.75 41.85 6 ANNAMALAI 47.19 38.59 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 54.17 36.04 8 PERIYAR 62.4 35.44 9 BHARATHIDASAN 51.66 35.14 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 61.29 33.66

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT OI PR OI 1 PR 0.344531 1 Project Management

COMPARISON BETWEEN PR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME PR PRR FS FSR 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 43.94 5 56.5 6 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 3.53 86 48.84 17 3 BHARATHIAR 9.11 45 44.29 28 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 0.67 144 42.48 38 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 10.82 40 41.85 41 6 ANNAMALAI 3.67 85 38.59 56 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 3.33 92 36.04 77 8 PERIYAR 5.85 61 35.44 85 9 BHARATHIDASAN 8.03 48 35.14 88 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 4.17 77 33.66 97 AVERAGE 9.093636 40.67182

COMPARISON BETWEEN PR & FS S.NO UNIVERSITY NAME PR FS 1 ANNA UNIVERSITY 43.94 56.5 2 TN AGRI UNIVERSITY 3.53 48.84 3 BHARATHIAR 9.11 44.29 4 TN VETERINTY & ANIMAL SCIENCES 0.67 42.48 5 MADRAS UNIVERSITY 10.82 41.85 6 ANNAMALAI 3.67 38.59 7 MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY 3.33 36.04 8 PERIYAR 5.85 35.44 9 BHARATHIDASAN 8.03 35.14 10 ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY 4.17 33.66

CORRELATION ANALYSIS COEFFT PR FS PR 1 FS 0.70971 1

RANK CORRELATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS & FS TLR 0.55 RPC 0.43 GO 0.77 OI 0.37 PR 0.26

RANK CORRELATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS & FS 0.26 0.55 0.37 0.43 TLR RPC GO OI PR 0.77

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF TLR BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 49.83769 47.88273 Variance 87.09204 207.2376 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 141.7036 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat 0.400877 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.346189 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.692378 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF RPC BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 20.20308 24.53455 Variance 150.1257 170.4593 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 159.3682 Hypothesized Mean Difference df 22 t Stat -0.83752 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.205653 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.411305 t Critical two-tail 2.073873 0

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF GO BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 60.04462 61.05636 Variance 74.97919 113.9243 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 92.68151 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat -0.25653 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.399963 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.799925 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF GO BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 73.73769 58.24273 Variance 52.81305 27.9444 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 41.50912 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat 5.870583 P(T<=t) one-tail 3.3E-06 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 6.6E-06 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF OI BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 73.73769 58.24273 Variance 52.81305 27.9444 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 41.50912 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat 5.870583 P(T<=t) one-tail 3.3E-06 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 6.6E-06 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

EST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF OI BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 10.96692 9.093636 Variance 84.91104 142.246 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 110.9724 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat 0.434069 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.334233 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.668465 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF PR BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 10.96692 9.093636 Variance 84.91104 142.246 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 110.9724 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat 0.434069 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.334233 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.668465 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MEANS OF FS BETWEEN PVT. & GOVT. SIG PVT GOVT Mean 41.49308 40.67182 Variance 41.48762 50.528 Observations 13 11 Pooled Variance 45.59688 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 22 t Stat 0.296876 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.384673 t Critical one-tail 1.717144 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.769346 t Critical two-tail 2.073873

LIST OF UNIVERSITIES IN THE BAND 101-150 & 151-200 BAND 101-150 1.AVINASILINGAM 2. CHETTINAD 3. SCSVMV KANCHI 4. VINAYAGA MISSION 5. KALASALINGAM BAND 151-200 1.CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF TN 2.HINDUSTAN

BASIC FEATURES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY IN UNIVERSITIES 1. High quality faculty 2. Excellence in research 3. Top notch teaching 4. High levels of Govt & non Govt funding 5. Highly talented national / international students 6. Academic freedom 7. Well defined autonomous governance structures. 8. Well equipped facilities for teaching, research, administration and student life 9. International reputation of University 10. University contribution to the Society.

All these features can be grouped into three complimentary sets of factors to be a top class university A) A high concentration of Talent (Faculty, Students, Staff) B) Abundant resources to offer a rich learning environment and to conduct advanced research. C) Favourable governance features that encourage strategic vision, innovation, flexibility, decision making and to manage resources. D)Universities must constantly encourage the colleges affiliated to it to improve their quality of teaching and do rigorous research and go for NAAC, NBA accreditation.

Thank You! All the Very Best!