Ohio Nonprofit Employment

Similar documents
Price Sensitivity Analysis

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

Miami Valley Tech Prep

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

San Francisco County Weekly Wages

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

JD Concentrations CONCENTRATIONS. J.D. students at NUSL have the option of concentrating in one or more of the following eight areas:

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students


Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Trends in College Pricing

DEPARTMENT OF ART. Graduate Associate and Graduate Fellows Handbook

Scholarship Reporting

Financing Education In Minnesota

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

Northwest Region Touchpoint

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Jon N. Kerr, PhD, CPA August 2017

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

Educational Attainment

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

TABLE OF CONTENTS CSWE INITIAL ACCREDITATION SELF STUDY GREATER MIAMI VALLEY JOINT MASW: MIAMI UNIVERSITY OF OHIO AND WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY

Northwestern Local School District Preparing Our Students Today for Tomorrow s Opportunities. Creating a STEM Project-Based Learning Culture:

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

International Literacy Day and National Adult Education and Family Literacy Week TOOLKIT 2015

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

Organization Profile

Vast Inequality in Wealth Means Poor School Districts Are Less Able to Rely on Local Property Taxes

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

MARYLAND BLACK BUSINESS SUMMIT & EXPO March 24-27, 2011 presented by AATC * Black Dollar Exchange * BBH Tours

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

FTE General Instructions

The Louis Stokes Scholar Internship A Paid Summer Legal Experience

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Updated: December Educational Attainment

IN-STATE TUITION PETITION INSTRUCTIONS AND DEADLINES Western State Colorado University

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Nevada Last Updated: October 2011

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

How Business-Friendly Are Tennessee s Cities?

University of California, Irvine - Division of Continuing Education

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Indiana Last Updated: October 2011

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Give a little time... make a big difference

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

THE BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ONE BROOKDALE PLAZA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11212

FIELD PLACEMENT PROGRAM: COURSE HANDBOOK

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

ARTS ADMINISTRATION CAREER GUIDE. Fine Arts Career UTexas.edu/finearts/careers

Executive Summary. Curry High School

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Global Television Manufacturing Industry : Trend, Profit, and Forecast Analysis Published September 2012

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Executive Summary. Lava Heights Academy. Ms. Joette Hayden, Principal 730 Spring Dr. Toquerville, UT 84774

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Resume. Christine Ann Loucks Telephone: (208) (work)

Internship Program. Employer and Student Handbook

ANALYSIS: LABOUR MARKET SUCCESS OF VOCATIONAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

Giving in the Netherlands 2015

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Minnesota Student Association 1/21/11. Fees Request for Academic Year. 235 Coffman Union, 300 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455_

Republican and Democratic Nominations are to be made for the following Federal, State, County and Municipal Offices:

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

GENERAL BUSINESS CONSENT AGENDA FOR INSTRUCTION & PROGRAM, OPERATIONS, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE May 17, 2017

Communities in Schools of Virginia

David Erwin Ritter Associate Professor of Accounting MBA Coordinator Texas A&M University Central Texas

Daniel B. Boatright. Focus Areas. Overview

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

COMMUNITY VITALITY DIRECTOR

Chapter Six The Non-Monetary Benefits of Higher Education

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Participatory Research and Tools

BOOM FOR WHOM? How the resurgence of the Bronx is leaving residents behind JULY 2008

Carolyn L. Dessin CURRICULUM VITAE

Intellectual Property

Western Australia s General Practice Workforce Analysis Update

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Transcription:

Ohio Nonprofit Employment Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project Nonprofit Employment Bulletin Number 15 Lester M. Salamon Stephanie Lessans Geller with the technical assistance of S. Wojciech Sokolowski A Joint Product of the Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies and the Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations

This report was prepared for the Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations by Lester M. Salamon and Stephanie Lessans Geller at the Center for Civil Society Studies, Institute for Policy Studies, Johns Hopkins University. Copyright 2004, Lester M. Salamon All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Acknowledgments We are grateful to Jennifer Campbell and her staff at the Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations; Amy Knapp at the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; and Wojciech Sokolowski, Senior Research Coordinator; Mimi Bilzor, Communications Associate; and Claudine Holaska, Project Assistant, at The Johns Hopkins University. Suggested Citation Ohio Nonprofit Employment, by Lester M. Salamon and Stephanie Lessans Geller (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, February 2004).

OHIO NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT A JOINT PRODUCT OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR CIVIL SOCIETY STUDIES AND THE OHIO ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS LESTER M. SALAMON AND STEPHANIE LESSANS GELLER WITH THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OF S. WOJCIECH SOKOLOWSKI FEBRUARY 2004 KEY FINDINGS 1. The nonprofit sector is a major economic force in Ohio, accounting for 1 out of every 12 paid workers more than three times as many people as are employed by state government and more people than are employed in many major industries in the state (see page 3). 2. The 372,114 nonprofit employees in Ohio earned close to $11 billion in wages in 2002, or 7.2 percent of the state s total (see page 4). 3. In the heavily urban Northern and Southwest regions of Ohio, as well as in the Southwest Central region, nonprofit organizations account for over 11 percent of private employment. But nonprofit employment exceeds 10 percent of total private employment in several other regions as well, including the Northwest, the Northeast, and the East Central regions (see page 5). 4. The bulk of nonprofit employment in the state (61 percent) is in the health services field, and another 17 percent is in social services (see page 6). 5. On average, overall weekly wages of nonprofit employees are lower than those of for-profit and government workers. But, in industries in which nonprofits and for-profits are both significantly involved, nonprofit average weekly wages generally outpace for-profit wages (see page 7).

INTRODUCTION Nonprofit organizations contribute to the quality of life for all Ohio citizens through the health care, education, job training, youth development, nursing home care, arts, culture, and other services they provide, and through the opportunities they offer for democratic participation in the life of Ohio communities. What is not widely appreciated, however, is that nonprofit organizations are also a major force in the state s economy, and in the economies of all the state s regions. This report presents new information on the size, composition, and distribution of paid employment in the private nonprofit sector in Ohio as of the second quarter of 2002. The report draws on data generated by the Ohio Department of Labor through the quarterly surveys of Ohio workplaces it carries out under the national ES-202 labor market information program administered by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics as part of the unemployment insurance program. These data are compiled from quarterly reports submitted by employers in compliance with U.S. and Ohio law. By law, all nonprofit places of employment with at least four employees are required to complete these quarterly surveys and either be covered by the federal unemployment insurance system or make other arrangements to provide unemployment coverage to laid-off workers. The one major exclusion is religious congregations, which are not required to take part in the unemployment insurance system, although the significance of this exclusion is unknown as some religious organizations nevertheless elect to be covered by unemployment insurance. For the purpose of this report, we have chosen to focus on the charitable portion of the nonprofit sector. This includes organizations registered with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which embraces private, not-for-profit hospitals, clinics, colleges, universities, elementary schools, social service agencies, day care centers, orchestras, museums, theaters, environmental organizations, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, and many more. For further information on the ES-202 data source, the definition of the nonprofit sector, and the method used here to extract data on nonprofit organizations from the Ohio ES- 202 records, see Appendix A.

DETAILED FINDINGS I. A MAJOR ECONOMIC FORCE The private nonprofit sector in Ohio, including private hospitals, clinics, colleges, universities, schools, day care centers, social service providers, museums, theaters, soup kitchens, and many more, is a major economic force in the state. Employment: Ohio s private, nonprofit organizations employed 372,114 paid workers as of the second quarter of 2002. This represents 8.2 percent of the Ohio workforce, or 1 out of every 12 workers, and puts Ohio above the U.S. average in terms of the nonprofit share of total employment (8.2 percent vs. 7.2 percent) (see Figure 1). As shown in Figure 2, the Ohio nonprofit sector employed: Figure 1: Nonprofit share of total employment, Ohio vs. the national average Percent of total employment 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 8.2% Ohio 7.2% United States Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data, and Census of Service Industries (1997). Figure 2: Employment in Ohio nonprofit sector in comparison to selected Ohio industries, 2002 400 372.1 Number of employees (in thousands) 350 300 250 200 150 100 113.9 177.2 Nonprofit Industries Government 203.7 238.7 243.7 50 0 501 (c) (3) Organizations State Government Transportation and Communications Construction Wholesale Trade Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data. 3

More than three times as many people as the Ohio state government; About twice as many workers as the state s construction industry and its transportation and communications industry; Roughly 50 percent more workers than the state s wholesale trade industry and its entire finance, insurance and real estate industry. Payroll: The 372,114 nonprofit employees in Ohio earned close to $11 billion in wages in 2002. 1 Nonprofit organizations thus accounted for 7.2 percent of the state s total payroll. Nonprofit payrolls equaled or exceeded those for: State government ($4.9 billion). Transportation and communications ($6.9 billion). Construction ($7.5 billion). Wholesale trade ($10.3 billion). Finance, insurance, and real estate ($10.5 billion). II. STATEWIDE PRESENCE Nonprofit employment is not restricted to any one region in Ohio. Rather, it is found in every region in the state. 2 Similar to Ohio s population, most of the state s nonprofit employment is located in the regions containing the state s largest cities (see Figure 3). Twenty-two percent of the state s private nonprofit employment is located in Northern Ohio, the region that includes the city of Cleveland. Nearly eighteen percent of the state s private nonprofit employment is in Southwest Ohio, the region that includes Cincinnati. Twelve percent of the state s private nonprofit employment is located in Central Ohio, the region encompassing the capital city of Columbus. Other regions with a significant portion of the state s nonprofit employment include Southwest Central Ohio (with 11 percent of the total), Northeast Central Ohio (10 percent), and Northwest Ohio (9 percent). Figure 3: Ohio nonprofit employment, by region, 2002 Northern 22.0% West Central 2.4% Central 12.2% North Central 3.4% Northeast Central 9.8% 1 All payroll data are annual estimates computed by multiplying second quarter data by 4. Actual annual payrolls may differ slightly due to seasonal variations. 2 In this report, regions refer to the Ohio Department of Development s twelve Economic Development Regions. See http://www.odod.state.oh.us/regionals.htm for information about their boundaries, major industries, and other key characteristics. Southwest 17.6% Southwest Central 11.5% Northwest 9.1% Southern 2.0% Southeast 1.2% East Central 4.3% Northeast 4.5% Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data. 4

However, in all the regions in the state, nonprofit employment accounts for a significant share of total private employment (see Figure 4). The regions with the highest shares of total nonprofit employment are Northern, Southwest, and Southwest Central Ohio, where nonprofit employment accounts for over 11 percent of total private employment, or more than 1 out of every 9 private sector workers. Other regions where nonprofit organizations account for considerable shares of total private employment include Southeast Ohio, where nonprofit employment represents close to 10 percent of total private employment, and Southern and Northeast Central Ohio, where nonprofit employment represents nearly 9 percent. For a county-by-county breakdown of nonprofit employment, see Appendix B. The Northwest, Northeast, and East Central regions of Ohio are not far behind, however, with the nonprofit workforce accounting for over 10 percent of private employment in each of these areas. Figure 4: Nonprofit employment as a percent of total private employment, by region, 2002 Northwest 10.27% North Central 8.43% Northern 11.38% West Central 7.26% Northeast 10.16% Southwest Central 11.08% Northeast Central 8.56% Southwest 11.29% East Central 10.04% Southeast 9.77% Central 7.49% Southern 8.99% Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data. 5

III. HEALTH DOMINANCE Health organizations account for the vast majority of Ohio s nonprofit jobs, but social service and education organizations also account for significant shares (see Figure 5). Sixty-one percent of all nonprofit employment in Ohio is in the health services field (over 225,200 jobs). These jobs include work in hospitals, nursing and personal care facilities, and clinics. Seventeen percent of all nonprofit jobs in Ohio are in social services (close to 63,500 jobs). This includes employment in individual and family services, job training and related services, child day care services, and residential care. Twelve percent of all nonprofit employment in Ohio is in educational services (nearly 44,200 jobs), including elementary and secondary schools, colleges, and universities. Five percent of all nonprofit employment is in membership organizations (about 17,900 jobs) (see Appendix C). As shown in Figure 6, the distribution of nonprofit employment in Ohio is similar to the national average, although Ohio has a larger share of nonprofit employment in health and a slightly smaller share in social services and education. Figure 5: Distribution of Ohio nonprofit employment, by field, 2002 Membership Organizations 4.8% Social 17.1% Educational 11.9% Other 5.8% Health 60.5% Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data. Figure 6: Distribution of nonprofit employment, Ohio vs. the nation 70% Percent of total nonprofit employment 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 61% 55% Health 12% 15% Educational 17% 18% Social Ohio United States 3% 4% Culture and Recreation 5% 6% Membership Organizations 3% 2% Other Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data. 6

IV. NONPROFIT WAGE RATES Overall average weekly wages of nonprofit employees are lower than those of for-profit or government workers. However, in industries in which nonprofits and for-profits are significantly involved, average weekly wages for nonprofit employees often exceed those of for-profit workers (see Figure 7). At $567, the nonprofit average weekly wage is 12 percent lower than that of for-profit workers, and 11 and 32 percent lower than those of local and state government employees, respectively. Figure 7: Nonprofit, for-profit, and government average weekly wages in Ohio, 2002 These averages obscure some significant variations in the average wages of nonprofit workers in different fields, however. Thus, as shown in Figure 8, average nonprofit weekly wages range from a low of $352 in the field of day care to a high of $662 in the field of healthcare. As Figure 8 also shows, moreover, in the fields where both nonprofits and for-profits are significantly involved, the average weekly wage of the nonprofit workers is actually often higher than that of the forprofit workers. This suggests that the lower overall average wage of nonprofit employees is more a function of the industry mix of nonprofit employment than it is of the wage levels of nonprofit organizations. In fact, the nonprofit jobs in these industries tend to be better paying. For example: Average weekly wage $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $567 $645 $635 $829 Nonprofit home health care workers earn 50 percent more on average than their for-profit counterparts; In social services, nonprofit child day care workers earn 40 percent more on average than their forprofit counterparts, and nonprofit residential care workers earn 10 percent more; Similarly, in the educational services field, nonprofit salaries average 25 percent more than forprofit ones. $0 Nonprofit For-profit Local Government State Government Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data. This nonprofit wage advantage may be a result of a heavier use of part-time workers on the part of forprofit employers, which would pull down the for-profit average, but it is not possible to determine this from the available data. 3 3 The average weekly wage reported in the ES-202 survey data makes no adjustment for full-time or part-time work. Industries with a greater number of part-time workers could appear to have lower average weekly wages than those with fewer part-time workers even if the actual pay rates are equal. 7

Figure 8: Comparative nonprofit and for-profit average weekly wages in selected industries in Ohio, 2002 $700 $662 $600 $574 $617 $545 Nonprofit For-profit Average weekly wage $500 $400 $300 $200 $459 $415 $331 $363 $418 $417 $352 $252 $409 $372 $420 $388 $100 $0 Educational Social Hospitals Home Health Care Nursing and Child Day Personal Care Care Residential Care Individual and Family Social Source: Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project based on Ohio ES-202 data, and Census of Service Industries (1997). CONCLUSION Throughout the state of Ohio, nonprofit organizations serve citizens and communities, addressing issues of concern and improving the quality of life. Ohio s nonprofits range from hospitals to boys and girls clubs, from universities to environmental groups, and from museums and theaters to organizations working with the elderly, veterans, and the disabled. But nonprofit organizations are not only vital to Ohio communities; they are also a major force in the state s economy and in the economies of the state s regions. Regrettably, however, the economic significance of the nonprofit sector as a source of jobs and wages is not well understood. As a result, this sector is often overlooked in economic development as well as in education and training efforts that could prove extremely beneficial to the sector in the longterm. The data presented in this report are intended to correct this situation, promote greater understanding of the economic contributions and impact of the nonprofit sector, and demonstrate the immense stake that Ohio citizens consequently have in this sector s continued health. 8

APPENDIX A: THE ES-202 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LABOR MARKET INFORMATION PROGRAM SOURCE OF DATA The major source of employment and wage data for this report is the Covered Employment and Wages Program, commonly referred to as the ES-202 program, a cooperative initiative involving state employment security agencies and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The ES-202 program produces a comprehensive tabulation of employment and wage information for workers covered by state unemployment insurance laws and federal workers covered by the Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees Program. Data contained in this report represent all employees covered by the Unemployment Insurance Law of Ohio as well as federal workers covered by the Unemployment Compensation of Federal Employees Program. The data on state-insured workers are compiled from quarterly contribution reports submitted by employers subject to Ohio law. Employment data pertaining to the federal government are obtained from similarly required reports submitted by the various government installations in Ohio. SCOPE OF COVERAGE The ES-202 program accounts for approximately 98 percent of all wage and salary civilian employment nationally (the program does not cover self-employed and family workers). The principal exclusions from the ES-202 data set are employees of religious organizations, railroad workers, small-scale agriculture workers, domestic service workers, crew members on small vessels, state and local government elected officials, and insurance and real estate agents who receive payment solely by commission. In terms of nonprofit employment, the exclusion of religious organizations is the most significant; however, religious organizations may elect to be covered by the unemployment insurance program and those that do are covered in the data. At this time the level of noncoverage is unknown. The number of employees is measured by the number of filled jobs for the pay period that includes the 12th day of each month as reported by the employer. Both part-time and full-time employees are included in the data set. If a person holds two jobs, that person would be counted twice in the data set. Wages include bonuses, stock options, the cash value of meals and lodging, and tips and other gratuities. The employment data for nonprofit organizations were identified by matching the Federal Employer Identification Numbers (FEINs) of firms in the Ohio ES-202 system with the FEINs of firms that have registered with the IRS for tax-exempt status. Ohio tax-exempt firms were identified using the Exempt Organization Master File (EOMF), which is a listing of all organizations exempt from taxation under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. The file is cumulative; information on new organizations is added to the file on an ongoing basis and an effort is made to delete defunct organizations. The file includes the name, address, and zip code of the organization, the Federal Employer Identification Number, and the exact Internal Revenue Code subsection under which the organization has claimed tax exemption. By matching the FEINs in the EOMF with those on the ES-202 data set, it is possible to identify all nonprofit entities in the state registered with the IRS, including not only the 501(c)(3)s, the so-called charitable portion of the tax-exempt universe, but other types of tax-exempt organizations as well, such as social clubs, trade associations, and civic organizations. For the purpose of this report, we have chosen to focus on the charitable portion of the nonprofit sector. This includes organizations registered with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which embraces private, not-for-profit hospitals, clinics, colleges, universities, elementary schools, social service agencies, day care centers, orchestras, museums, theaters, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, and many more. In addition to Section 501(c)(3), the Internal Revenue Code contains 25 other subsections under which organizations can claim exemption from federal income taxation as nonprofit organizations. Section 501(c)(3) is by far the most important of these, the one that covers the bulk of nonprofit organizations, and the one with the organizations most commonly associated with the nonprofit sector. 9

APPENDIX B: NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT IN OHIO, BY REGION AND COUNTY, IN COMPARISON TO TOTAL PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT, 2002 Region County Nonprofit employment 501 (c)(3) Total private employment Nonprofit employment as a percent of total private employment Region 1 - Central Delaware 1,987 23,040 8.63% Union [D] 20,279 [D] Fayette 187 7,524 2.48% Franklin 36,280 457,011 7.94% Fairfield 910 22,306 4.08% Licking 3,187 37,200 8.57% Logan 1,450 16,483 8.80% Madison 652 7,980 8.17% Pickaway 354 9,346 3.78% Central 45,007 601,170 7.49%* Region 2 - Northwest Defiance 828 13,785 6.00% Erie 2,688 29,269 9.18% Fulton 1,250 16,137 7.74% Henry 774 7,354 10.53% Lucas 24,013 174,401 13.77% Ottawa 842 10,909 7.72% Sandusky 1,641 20,946 7.83% Williams 175 14,067 1.25% Wood 1,473 41,031 3.59% Northwest 33,684 327,899 10.27% Region 3 - West Central Allen 3,767 40,520 9.30% Auglaize 283 13,741 2.06% Hancock 2,673 32,080 8.33% Hardin 1,009 5,564 18.14% Mercer 350 10,711 3.26% Paulding [D] 3,475 [D] Putnam [D] 7,659 [D] Van Wert 807 8,600 9.38% West Central 8,888 122,350 7.26%* Region 4 - Southwest Clark 5,576 40,220 13.86% Central Clinton 583 12,773 4.56% Darke 1,236 14,924 8.28% Champaign 809 7,971 10.15% Greene 3,638 33,627 10.82% Miami 848 32,040 2.65% Montgomery 28,330 213,284 13.28% Preble 175 8,122 2.15% Shelby 1,323 20,833 6.35% Southwest Central 42,517 383,794 11.08% Region 5 - Southwest Butler 7,245 88,131 8.22% Clermont 1,949 35,202 5.54% Hamilton 52,841 410,564 12.87% Warren 3,083 43,089 7.16% Southwest 65,117 576,985 11.29% Region 6 - North Central Ashland 1,993 14,578 13.67% Crawford 998 11,851 8.42% Huron 1,158 20,624 5.61% Knox 2,128 12,835 16.58% Marion 831 18,776 4.42% Morrow [D] 3,728 [D] Richland 3,721 44,521 8.36% Seneca 1,868 16,058 11.64% 10

Region County Nonprofit employment 501 (c)(3) Total private employment Nonprofit employment as a percent of total private employment Wyandot [D] 7,675 [D] North Central 12,697 150,646 8.43%* Region 7 - Southern Adams [D] 3,564 [D] Brown 300 3,866 7.75% Lawrence 357 6,667 5.36% Highland 188 7,892 2.38% Jackson 460 8,499 5.42% Gallia 1,431 9,075 15.77% Vinton [D] 1,210 [D] Ross 964 16,836 5.73% Pike 414 5,931 6.98% Scioto 3,158 17,368 18.18% Southern 7,272 80,907 8.99%* Region 8 - Northern Cuyahoga 67,590 548,952 12.31% Lake 5,484 72,327 7.58% Lorain 7,295 72,349 10.08% Geauga 1,101 22,346 4.93% Northern 81,470 715,974 11.38% Region 9 - Northeast Medina 1,978 38,702 5.11% Central Portage 1,638 32,876 4.98% Wayne 2,324 36,368 6.39% Stark 11,596 124,932 9.28% Summit 18,822 191,872 9.81% Northeast Central 36,358 424,749 8.56% Region 10 - East Central Guernsey 1,055 10,684 9.88% Harrison [D] 2,543 [D] Holmes [D] 12,638 [D] Jefferson 2,752 18,358 14.99% Muskingum 4,256 30,299 14.05% Tuscarawas 2,023 26,785 7.55% Belmont 1,925 17,462 11.02% Carroll 283 4,819 5.87% Columbiana 2,406 24,285 9.91% Coshocton 1,131 9,829 11.51% East Central 15,831 157,701 10.04%* Region 11 - Southeast Athens 1,410 9,331 15.11% Washington 2,485 19,783 12.56% Hocking 227 4,428 5.13% Meigs 182 2,948 6.18% Monroe [D] 2,903 [D] Morgan [D] 2,014 [D] Noble [D] 1,844 [D] Perry 313 4,013 7.80% Southeast 4,618 47,264 9.77%* Region 12 - Northeast Trumbull 5,426 62,848 8.63% Mahoning 8,776 76,887 11.41% Ashtabula 2,407 23,785 10.12% Northeast 16,610 163,520 10.16% * These figures may be slightly lower than the actual shares because they do not include data on nonprofit employment for counties for which such data are unavailable due to federal disclosure restrictions. [D] Data suppressed because of federal restrictions on disclosure of data that can identify individual establishments. 11

APPENDIX C: DISTRIBUTION OF NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT IN OHIO, BY INDUSTRY, 2002 SIC codes 4 Industry Type of organizations Number of nonprofit employees Percent of total nonprofit employment 80 Health Hospitals, nursing and personal care facilities, home health care organizations 225,209 60.5% 81 Legal Legal aid clinics, conflict resolution programs 585 0.2% 82 Educational Private colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools 44,173 11.9% 83 Social Child day care services, residential care, job training and related services, individual and family services 63,453 17.1% 79, 84 Culture and Recreation Museums, theaters, art galleries, orchestras, membership sport and recreation clubs, amateur sports clubs, day camps 9,919 2.7% 86 Membership Organizations Business associations, professional associations, neighborhood associations, social clubs, hiking clubs, environmental organizations 17,855 4.8% All other Other Research, development, and testing firms; printing and publishing firms; religious, educational, and charitable trusts, and others 10,920 2.9% Total 372,114 100.0% 4 SIC codes are based on the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1987). 12

The Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Employment Data Project The Nonprofit Employment Data (NED) Project is utilizing a previously untapped source of up-to-date data to shed new light on nonprofit employment and wages in the U.S. and to chart the relationship among nonprofit, forprofit, and government employment both nationally and locally. To do so, the project is drawing on data compiled as part of the U.S. Unemployment Insurance program. A collaboration between the Center for Civil Society Studies and state employment security agencies, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and state nonprofit associations, the NED Project is yielding a vital new resource for understanding the nonprofit sector. The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies seeks to improve understanding and the effective functioning of not-for-profit, philanthropic, or civil society organizations in the United States and throughout the world in order to enhance the contribution these organizations can make to democracy and the quality of human life. The Center is part of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies and carries out its work through a combination of research, training, and information-sharing both domestically and internationally. The Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations The Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations (OANO) is a statewide membership association of nearly 650 nonprofit organizations representing the breadth and diversity of Ohio s charitable nonprofit sector. OANO s mission is to provide leadership, education, and advocacy to enhance the ability of Ohio s nonprofit organizations to serve their communities. For more information about the Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations, visit www.ohiononprofits.org. Center for Civil Society Studies Institute for Policy Studies The Johns Hopkins University 3400 N. Charles St. Wyman Park Bldg., 5th Floor Baltimore, MD 21218-2688, USA Phone: 410-516-4327 Fax: 410-516-7818 E-mail: sgeller@jhu.edu Web site: www.jhu.edu/ccss Ohio Association of Nonprofit Organizations 42 E. Gay Street Suite 1010 Columbus, OH 43215-3119 Phone: 614-280-0233 Fax: 614-280-0657 Email: Info@OANO.org Web site: www.ohiononprofits.org