Institutional Characteristics of NCAA Member Schools

Similar documents
Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey


Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Trends in College Pricing

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Kenya: Age distribution and school attendance of girls aged 9-13 years. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 20 December 2012

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Evaluation of Teach For America:

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

National Survey of Student Engagement

Educational Attainment

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

Rural Education in Oregon

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

CLASSROOM USE AND UTILIZATION by Ira Fink, Ph.D., FAIA

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

learning collegiate assessment]

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

Principal vacancies and appointments

Committee to explore issues related to accreditation of professional doctorates in social work

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Western Australia s General Practice Workforce Analysis Update

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

ABILITY SORTING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLEGE QUALITY TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGES

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Best Colleges Main Survey

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Use of Out-of-District Programs by Massachusetts Students with Disabilities

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Undergraduate Cost Calculator Licensed Data Set 2017 Data Dictionary

College Pricing. Ben Johnson. April 30, Abstract. Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

6 Financial Aid Information

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

LIM College New York, NY

Guinea. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 46% Number Out of School 842,000

Report on Academic Recruitment, Hiring, and Attrition

James H. Williams, Ed.D. CICE, Hiroshima University George Washington University August 2, 2012

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) Degree Program Curriculum for the 60 Hour DrPH Behavioral Science and Health Education

Healthcare Leadership Outliers : An Analysis of Senior Administrators from the Top U.S. Hospitals

NCEO Technical Report 27

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the Illinois Certification Testing System Examinations

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Best Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Software Maintenance

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

The Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

A Program Evaluation of Connecticut Project Learning Tree Educator Workshops

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

NCAA DIVISION I: (2-4 TRANSFER STUDENTS)

The Evaluation of Students Perceptions of Distance Education

New Jersey s Segregated Schools Trends and Paths Forward

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Why Graduate School? Deborah M. Figart, Ph.D., Dean, School of Graduate and Continuing Studies. The Degree You Need to Achieve TM

Updated: December Educational Attainment

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

How Living Costs Undermine Net Price As An Affordability Metric

Transcription:

Institutional Characteristics of NCAA Member Schools Institutional Characteristics Study Findings The NCAA research staff has compiled the most recent data on the non-athletics characteristics of NCAA member schools. The first iteration of this study was compiled in 2015. This study updates those findings and offers a few new categories as well, including a breakdown of institutions by cost of attendance, and a more detailed look into various demographic distinctions. The Institutional Characteristics Study is another important resource the NCAA offers to prospective student-athletes and their families to further define the menu of educational opportunities at NCAA institutions and the demographics they serve. These data not only indicate substantial variation in some characteristics within division but also reveal how institutions differ across Divisions I, II and III. Statistical analyses in the new study revealed the following five characteristics as demonstrating the strongest relationships with school divisional status: Enrollment size Carnegie Basic Classification Cost of attendance Whether the institution is a Historically Black College or University (HBCU) School location The following report offers a summary of those five characteristics, as well as an examination of additional findings. How the data were compiled Data for this analysis are based on the 2015-16 Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of the Department of Education. The IPEDS is a system of interrelated surveys conducted annually by the NCES and collects institutional information from all postsecondary education institutions that participate in the federal student aid program. The information collected in IPEDS includes basic institutional characteristics (such as school affiliation, type of calendar system, etc.), enrollments, financial status, program completion, graduation rates and other variables. To determine the institutional factors that most distinguish NCAA divisions, NCAA researchers employed what is called a multinomial logistic regression, which is a classification method that predicts the probabilities of possible outcomes among categories that can t otherwise be ordered in a meaningful way. In this case, the regression modeled a school s division status (a categorical variable) as a function of the non-sport institutional characteristics. The regression analyses examined the independent relationship between a specific institutional characteristic and a school s division status once other institutional variables were controlled for. In other words, if an institutional characteristic significantly correlates with the division variable in the multinomial model, there is evidence that the difference in this institutional variable is significant across divisions.

Enrollment size Examination of enrollment size is relatively intuitive. Historically (and perhaps even stereotypically), the labeling of NCAA divisions as I, II and III suggests an enrollment-size hierarchy, and our analysis supports that assumption. When it comes to median undergraduate enrollment, Division I schools have about 9,000 undergraduates, whereas the medians for Divisions II and III schools are about 2,500 and 1,800, respectively. While about 44 percent of Division I schools enroll more than 10,000 undergraduate students, only about 7 percent of Division II schools and 2 percent of Division III schools are that large. School Size (based on full-time undergraduate enrollment) Small (2,999 or fewer) 10% 59% 77% Medium (3,000-9,999) 46% 34% 21% Large (10,000 or more) 44% 7% 2% Mean total undergraduate enrollment Median total undergraduate enrollment 11,798 3,798 2,602 8,959 2,455 1,784 Carnegie Basic Classification Another basic distinction among the three divisions is how schools classify their educational programs. For example, when people talk about Division I, they often refer to the division as being composed primarily of research universities. Our study supports that claim. The term research university is among labels used in the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, Carnegie Basic Classification which is the gold standard for classification purposes in education. It is defined as institutions that awarded at least Research universities 63% 11% 8% 20 research doctoral degrees during a (at least 20 doctoral degrees) given year. Master s colleges and universities (at least 50 master s and fewer than 20 doctoral) 32% 65% 40% The other categories in the Carnegie classification system are: Baccalaureate colleges Associate s Colleges Institutions (at least 10% of all degrees baccalaureate; 6% 24% 51% at which all degrees are at the associate s level, or at which bachelor s fewer than 50 master s and 20 doctoral) degrees account for fewer than 10 percent of all undergraduate degrees. Master s Colleges and Universities Institutions that awarded at least 50 master s degrees and fewer than 20 doctoral degrees during a given year. Baccalaureate Colleges Institutions at which baccalaureate degrees represent at least 10 percent of all undergraduate degrees and at which fewer than 50 master s degrees or 20 doctoral degrees were awarded during a given year. Almost 63 percent of Division I schools in the updated study qualified as research universities, compared to just 11 and 8 percent, respectively, for Divisions II and III. That is up from 58 percent in the 2015 study. A majority of Division II schools about 65 percent are master s colleges and universities, while the lion s share of Division III schools about 51 percent are baccalaureate colleges. No NCAA members are in the associate s colleges category.

Cost of attendance Cost of Attendance (using out-of-state tuition) A new category in the 2017 Institutional Characteristics Study is the cost of attending a Division I, II or III institution. These data are from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) for the 2015-16 school year. Cost of attendance includes published tuition and fees, books Median Minimum Maximum DI $40,427 $0 $69,912 DII $34,981 $5,898 $64,804 DIII $46,054 $2,393 $70,100 and supplies, room and board, transportation, and personal expenses. The NCAA study applied out-of-state tuition for public institutions in order to obtain figures that are relatively comparable to those at private schools. The median cost of attendance is lower for Division II institutions (about $35,000) than for their Division I and III counterparts ($40,000 and $46,000, respectively). HBCUs Another distinction in the study that demonstrates HBCU a strong relationship with school divi- sional status is whether a school is classified as a Historically Black College or University (HBCU). HBCUs are defined in the Higher Yes DI 7% DII 9% DIII 0% Education Act of 1965 as schools that were established before 1964 principally to serve the black community. Division II has the greatest proportion of HBCUs, with a little more than 9 percent of its membership fitting the HBCU distinction. About 7 percent of Division I schools are HBCUs, while there currently are none in Division III. School location NCAA schools are naturally defined by their locale as well. Based on a school s physical address, the locale variable identifies the geographic status of a school on an urban continuum ranging from large city to rural-remote. The study combines the IPEDS school locale code into four large urban continuum categories: (1) city (territory inside an urbanized area and inside a principal city); (2) suburb (territory outside a principal city and inside an urbanized area); (3) town (territory inside an urban cluster); and (4) rural (census-defined rural territory). Almost 67 percent of Division I schools are located in an urbanized area, significantly higher than the other two divisions (about 40 percent in Division II and 38 percent in Division III). The enrollment sizes in Division I almost by nature mean they need to be located in more urbanized areas. Divisions II and III schools are relatively balanced among urban, suburban and town locales. Location City (territory inside an urbanized area and inside a principal city) Suburb (territory outside principal city/inside urbanized area) 66% 40% 38% 19% 25% 32% Town (territory inside an urban cluster) 13% 30% 24% Rural (census-defined rural territory) 2% 5% 6%

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Several other institutional characteristics were found to be related to divisional membership: Undergraduate instruction classification. Based on the proportion of bachelor s degree majors in the arts and sciences and in professional fields, NCAA schools are classified into three groups: 1. Those whose programs are concentrated in the arts and sciences; 2. Those that balance art and science with professions; and Undergraduate Instruction Classification Majority art and science (more than 60% of majors in art and science) Balanced art and science and professions (41-59% majors in either art and science or professional field) Majority professions (more than 60% of majors in professional field) 3. Those that focus primarily on professions. The arts and sciences category is not the same as liberal arts. The majors in arts and sciences include the basic fields of science and scholarship, such as chemistry, economics, history, literature, math, philosophy and political science. By contrast, programs in professional fields are designed to educate students for jobs in a particular field in business, education, engineering, nursing and public administration, among others. Division II has the highest percentage of schools (about 52 percent) at which more than 60 percent of bachelor s degrees are in professional fields, while Division III has the highest percentage of schools (about 37 percent) focusing on art and science majors. Division I has the highest percentage of schools (about 49 percent) offering a balance between the arts/sciences and professions. Undergraduate campus residential status. Schools are classified into three categories based on the proportion of undergraduate students residing on campus. Schools in Divisions I and II are similar in this charac- Undergraduate Residential Status 17% 10% 37% 49% 38% 29% 35% 52% 34% Less than 25% of undergraduates live on campus Between 25% and 49% of undergraduates live on campus 50% or more of undergraduates live on campus 27% 24% 9% 43% 46% 25% 30% 30% 67% Full-time Enrollment Status At least 80% of undergraduates are full-time students 84% 74% 87% Total Enrollment Classification: Carnegie Classification 2015 Fewer than 10% graduate enrollment 23% 50% 63% 10-24% graduate enrollment 55% 35% 22% 25-49% graduate enrollment 21% 13% 12% Over 50% graduate enrollment 3% 2% 3%

teristic, while Division III schools tend to have more students living on campus. Undergraduate and graduate enrollment. An overwhelming majority of students in all divisions are enrolled full time (though the percentage in Division II is lower than in Divisions I and III), and there tends to be a higher graduate population in Division I. NCAA divisions also differ in their proportion of public and private schools. A majority of Division I schools (about 67 percent) are public institutions, while most Division III schools (about 80 percent) are private. Division II is about 48 percent public and 52 percent private. The overwhelming private majority in Division III is a factor in policy decisions, especially when it comes to resource expectations (such as athletics facilities, for example, since private schools are funded differently than public institutions). In addition to the HBCU distinction, the 2017 study also includes whether a member institution is a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). As was the case in the HBCU category, these are more prevalent in Division II, as about 13 percent of Division II schools identify as an HSI, while the percentages in Divisions I and III are 8 and 5, respectively. Another demographic is the percentage of the white student population at Divisions I, II and III institutions. The undergraduate enrollment at the majority of schools in all three divisions is more than 50 percent white, though that percentage is lower in Division II (about 66 percent) than in Division I (71 percent) and Division III (84 percent). The study also examined other characteristics: School history (age). Division II schools tend to be younger than schools in Divisions I and III, as the median age of Division II schools is Public/Private Admission 117 years old, versus 131 in Division I and 136 in Division III. HSI (whether a member institution is a Hispanic Serving Institution) Open-admission schools 2% 7% 1% Rate of admission^ 67% 72% 68% Student-athletes who are first generation college students* Yes 8% 13% 5% Primarily White Institution (whether a member institution s undergraduate enrollment consists of 50% or more white population) 50% or fewer white undergraduate 29% 35% 16% 50%+ white undergraduate population Public 67% 48% 20% Private 33% 52% 80% 71% 65% 84% Average % white enrollment 57% 55% 65% Median 64% 62% 64% School Age (years since established, as of 2017) 49 or fewer 2% 4% 2% 50-99 23% 29% 20% 100-199 69% 67% 74% 200 or more 7% 0.3% 5% Median institution age 131 117 136 14% 20% 15% ^ Rate of admission is defined as the number of students accepted by the school divided by the number of applicants. *From the NCAA s GOALS-2016 study. Admission rate. On average, Division II schools have the highest median admission rate (72 percent, versus 67 and 68 percent in Divisions I and III, respectively).