AP English Language and Composition Exam

Similar documents
English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not a text, cite appropriate resource(s)) MINNESOTA ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR LANGUAGE ARTS GRADES 9 12

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

Florida Reading for College Success

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

EQuIP Review Feedback

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

correlated to the Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards Grades 9-12

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

New York State P-12 Common Core Learning Standards For English Language Arts & Literacy

AP English Language and Composition Instructor: Jason Flanagan Room 210, A Office: 210, 3B

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Mercer County Schools

Office: Colson 228 Office Hours: By appointment

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING: ENG 200H-D01 - Spring 2017 TR 10:45-12:15 p.m., HH 205

FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVILLE COLLEGE CREDIT COURSE OUTLINE

5th Grade English Language Arts Learning Goals for the 2nd 9 weeks

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Rottenberg, Annette. Elements of Argument: A Text and Reader, 7 th edition Boston: Bedford/St. Martin s, pages.

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Summarizing A Nonfiction

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

2015 correlated to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Toolkit (IMET): Grade 6

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

myperspectives 2017 Click Path to Success myperspectives 2017 Virtual Activation Click Path

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

- COURSE DESCRIPTIONS - (*From Online Graduate Catalog )

Textbook: American Literature Vol. 1 William E. Cain /Pearson Ed. Inc. 2004

Tap vs. Bottled Water

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

KENTUCKY COGNIT IVE LIT ERACY MODEL UNIT PLANNING TEMPLATE

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

Honors 7 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum

Greeley/Evans School District 6

Timeline. Recommendations

Night by Elie Wiesel. Standards Link:

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

LEAD 612 Advanced Qualitative Research Fall 2015 Dr. Lea Hubbard Camino Hall 101A

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

4 th Grade Reading Language Arts Pacing Guide

CDE: 1st Grade Reading, Writing, and Communicating Page 2 of 27

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Language Arts Methods

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Fears and Phobias Unit Plan

Reflective Peer Review: A Metacognitive Approach

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Adolescence and Young Adulthood / English Language Arts. Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS

Common Core Curriculum- Draft

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

LIS 681 Books and Media for Children Spring 2009

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

TASK 1: PLANNING FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

English 2, Grade 10 Regular, Honors Curriculum Map

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

EXTENDING TRANSFER IN COMPOSITION: EXPLORING A MODEL FOR CONCEPTUALIZING RHETORICAL PROBLEMS. Janet Roser. A thesis. submitted in partial fulfillment

VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS, MFA

Oakland Schools Response to Critics of the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy Are These High Quality Standards?

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

Transcription:

A Correlation of, 2017 To the and Composition Exam AP is a trademark registered and/or owned by the College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this product.

Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives English Language Arts meets the objectives of the. Correlation page references are to the Student Edition and Teacher s Edition and are cited by selection or feature title. myperspectives English Language Arts is a learning environment that focuses on a connected approach to student learning. Students read texts and engage in activities that inspire thoughtful conversation, discussion, and debate. Students will encounter authors perspectives as they read literature from across time periods and cultures. Students will listen to the perspectives of their peers through conversations and collaborative activities. And, as students read the literature and engage in activities in myperspectives, they will formulate and defend their opinions as they develop their own perspectives. In each unit of study, students will read classic and contemporary fiction and nonfiction texts, and view/listen to media selections, all related to an Essential Question. Students will use technology to interact with texts and activities, and they can write directly in their Student Edition to make interaction with texts more meaningful. 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved 2

Upon completing the AP English Language and Composition course, students should be able to: Analyze and interpret samples of purposeful writing, identifying and explaining an author s use of rhetorical strategies. This process includes students understanding of what an author is saying, how an author is saying it, and why an author is saying it. Additionally, this process looks at how an author s rhetorical choices develop meaning or achieve a particular purpose or effect with a given audience. myperspectives promotes student-centered learning through a unit organization that provide activities focus on making meaning. Students develop and share their perspectives on the unit topic through writing in a targeted mode. Students are provided with frequent opportunities to practice writing within the unit s focus mode. Throughout the unit, students participate in speaking and listening, writing, and research activities that enable them to share learning. Performance Task: Writing Focus: Write an Explanatory Text, 58 63; Write an Argument, 190 195; Write an Informative Essay, 298 303; Write an Informative Text, 408 413; Write an Argument, 614 619; Write a Nonfiction Narrative, 728 733 Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus: Deliver an Explanatory Presentation, 114 115; Deliver a Multimedia Presentation, 246 247; Deliver a Multimedia Presentation, 350 351; Present an Informative Essay, 480 481; Present an Argument, 644 645; Present an Oral Retelling, 802 803 Quick Write, 9, 119, 133, 251, 265, 355, 369, 485, 499, 649, 663, 807 Writing to Compare, 48 49, 292 293, 322 323, 468 469, 612 613 Writing to Sources, 81, 122, 184, 189, 211, 254, 297, 335, 358, 386, 400, 441, 488, 533, 602, 633, 652, 726, 785, 810 3 Handbook: Writing Handbook, R6 R23; Research, R24 R33

Analyze images and other multimodal texts for rhetorical features. This goal acknowledges the multiple modes of learning that help students acquire literacy, with attention to the power of visual literacy in understanding an author s purpose. Use effective rhetorical strategies and techniques when composing. Students apply their analytical skills to their own writing so that they are reading like writers and writing like readers. SE/TE: First Review Media: Art and Photography, 50 57, 82 89, 402 407; Infographic, 344; Video, 186 189, 294 297, 318 321; Compare Texts to Media, 318; Magazine Article, 471; Research: Digital Presentation, 99, 245; Presentation, 349; Multimedia Presentation, 643; Performance Task: Deliver a Multimedia Presentation, 246 247, 350 351 TE only: Planning, 50A 50B, 82A 82B, 186A 186B, 294A 294B, 318A 318B, 402A 402B SE/TE: Performance Task: Write an Explanatory Text, 58 63; Write an Argument, 190 195; Write an Informative Essay, 298 303; Write an Informative Text, 408 413; Write an Argument, 614 619; Write a Nonfiction Narrative, 728 733; Quick Write, 9, 119, 133, 251, 265, 355, 369, 485, 499, 649, 663, 807; Writing to Compare, 48 49, 292 293, 322 323, 468 469, 612 613; Writing to Sources, 81, 122, 184, 189, 211, 254, 297, 335, 358, 386, 400, 441, 488, 533, 602, 633, 652, 726, 785, 810 Peer Reviewing: 63, 195, 303, 413, 619, 733 4

Write for a variety of purposes. Students writing experiences in the course must exceed the timed writings that are assessed on the AP English Language. For instance, students might undertake a lengthy and intensive inquiry into a problem or controversy, consulting and evaluating arguments and viewpoints presented in a variety of sources, and using those sources to provoke, complicate, and/or support their own responses to the problem or controversy. Students writing in the course should also go through a process that includes feedback from other readers, revision, and proofreading. Finally, forms other than the essays featured in the exam have a place in the course, such as personal narrative, letters, advertisements, reviews, etc. Respond to different writing tasks according to their unique rhetorical and composition demands, and translate that rhetorical assessment into a plan for writing. Different contexts require different choices in creating and delivering texts. This goal addresses the importance of prewriting and planning in the writing process. SE/TE: Argumentative Writing: Performance Task: Write an Argument, 190 195; Write an Argument, 614 619; Writing to Sources: Argument, 184; Visual Analysis, 189; Response to Literature, 211 Informative/ Explanatory Writing: Performance Task: Write an Explanatory Essay, 58 63; Write an Informative Essay, 298 303; Write an Informative Essay, 408 413; Writing to Compare: Explanatory Essay, 49; Comparison and Contrast Essay, 12 613; Writing to Sources: Character Analysis, 400; Paraphrase, 533 Narrative Writing: Performance Task: Write a Nonfiction Narrative, 728 733; Writing to Sources: Narrative, 81; Poem, 335; Short Story, 441; Dialogue, 726; Performance-Based Assessment: Nonfiction Narrative, 810 SE/TE: Performance Task: Write an Explanatory Text, 58 63; Write an Argument, 190 195; Write an Informative Essay, 298 303; Write an Informative Text, 408 413; Write an Argument, 614 619; Write a Nonfiction Narrative, 728 733; Quick Write, 9, 119, 133, 251, 265, 355, 369, 485, 499, 649, 663, 807; Writing to Compare, 48 49, 292 293, 322 323, 468 469, 612 613; Writing to Sources, 81, 122, 184, 189, 211, 254, 297, 335, 358, 386, 400, 441, 488, 533, 602, 633, 652, 726, 785, 810 5

Create and sustain original arguments based on information synthesized from readings, research, and/or personal observation and experience. Students learn to see argument as addressing a wide range of purposes in a variety of formats. They should be able to recognize general features of arguments, such as claims, evidence, qualifiers, warrants, and conclusions. Students ability to create informed arguments depends largely upon their reading of primary and secondary sources. The more that students discern argument as entering into a conversation with others, the more credible and cogent their own arguments become. Evaluate and incorporate sources into researched arguments. When entering into a conversation with others, students must comprehend and evaluate (not just summarize or quote) others positions. Such a process involves purposeful reading, a wide range of reading, and the ability to credibly support an evaluation of a writer s position. SE/TE: Analyze Craft and Structure: Author s Claims, 97; Reasoning and Evidence, 229; Literary Nonfiction, 243; Seminal Documents, 279; Author s Purpose, 316; Analyzing the Text, 242 Argumentative Writing: Performance Task: Write an Argument, 190 195; Write an Argument, 614 619; Writing to Sources: Response to Literature, 211; Argument, 184, 254 255, 652 653; Literary Criticism, 602; Visual Analysis, 189 Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus: Present an Argument, 644 645 Performance Based Assessment Prep: Review Evidence for an Argument, 253, 651 SE/TE: Research to Clarify & Research to Explore, 31, 43, 55, 77, 95, 109, 179, 188, 207, 219, 227, 241, 277, 287, 296, 314, 320, 331, 339, 347, 381, 395, 425, 437, 456, 464, 475, 530, 550, 568, 582, 597, 610, 629, 639, 698, 721, 741, 753, 781, 797; Performance Task: Write an Informative Essay, 298 300; Research: Digital Presentation, 99, 245; Presentation, 349; Multimedia Presentation, 643; Group Presentation, 745; Conducting Research, R24 R33 TE only: Cross-Curricular Perspectives, 6, 131, 169, 230, 263, 660 6

Demonstrate understanding of the conventions of citing primary and secondary sources. Students must learn to use the conventions recommended by professional organizations such as the Modern Language Association (MLA), the University of Chicago Press (The Chicago Manual of Style), or the American Psychological Association (APA). Students need to understand that for academic writing, the selection of documentation style depends upon the discipline the writing is intended for; students therefore need to learn how to find and follow style guides in various disciplines. Gain control over various reading and writing processes, with careful attention to inquiry (research), rhetorical analysis and synthesis of sources, drafting, revising/rereading, editing, and review. This goal emphasizes the importance of the entire process of writing, including teacher intervention in providing useful feedback, along with peer review and publication. SE/TE: Toll Kit: Research: Formats for Citing Sources, R32; MLA Style for Listing Sources, R33 Research: Group Presentation, 99, 245; Multimedia Presentation, 429; Whole Class Performance Task: Gather Evidence, 299 SE/TE: The Writing Process Workshops provide detailed instruction on writing to sources and include models and step-by-step revision instructions. Performance Task: Prewriting/ Planning, 59, 191, 293, 299, 322, 409, 468, 612, 615, 729; Drafting, 60, 192, 293, 300, 410, 469, 613, 616, 730; Revising, 62, 194, 302, 412, 618, 732; Editing/ Proofreading, 63, 195, 303, 413, 619, 733; Publishing and Presenting, 63, 195, 303, 413, 619, 733 7

Converse and write reflectively about personal processes of composition. Metacognition, or reflection, is a key component of this course; the practice of describing their own processes helps students internalize standards articulated by local, state, or national rubrics of effective composition. SE/TE: Performance Task: Write an Explanatory Essay, 58 63; Write an Argument, 190 195; Write an Informative Essay, 298 303; Write an Informative Essay, 408 413; Write an Argument, 614 619; Write a Nonfiction Narrative, 728 733 Performance Task: Speaking and Listening Focus: Deliver an Explanatory Presentation, 144 115; Deliver a Multimedia Presentation, 246 247, 350 351; Present an Informative Essay, 480 481; Present an Argument, 644 645; Present an Oral Retelling, 802 803; Performance Based Assessment Prep: Review Evidence for an Explanatory Essay, 121; Review Evidence for an Argument, 253, 651; Review Evidence for an Informative Essay, 357, 487; Review Notes for a Nonfiction Narrative, 809 Writing to Compare: Explanatory Essay, 49; Character Profile, 613; Writing to Sources: Explanatory Text, 122 123; Argument, 254 255, 652 653; Informative Essay, 358 359; Create Cohesion: Quotations and Paraphrases, 617 Peer Reviewing: 63, 195, 303, 413, 619, 733 8

Demonstrate understanding and control of Standard Written English as well as stylistic maturity in their own writing. This process clearly relates to the goals of reading rhetorically the better that students understand how other writers create a particular effect or produce meaning, the more fully their own prose accomplishes such goals. Revise a work to make it suitable for a different audience. In addition to revision, this goal acknowledges the importance of recognizing a variety of audiences for a piece of writing. SE/TE: myperspectives offers instruction and practice in grammar and conventions throughout the program. Performance Task: Editing/ Proofreading, 57, 173, 303, 499, 645, 743; Conventions, 35, 47, 183, 244, 281, 317, 385, 459, 642, 744, 800; Vocabulary and Conventions Connection, 49, 184, 386, 602, 613, 726; Language Development: Conventions, 411, 731; Writing to Sources, 533; Handbook R57 R66 SE/TE: Revising, 56, 172, 293, 302, 498, 644, 742 9