LRN Entry Level Certificate in ESOL Skills for Life (Speaking and Listening) (Entry 1) MARK SHEET FOR ENTRY 1 SAMPLE PAPER (Dec0111)

Similar documents
Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

One Stop Shop For Educators

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Language Acquisition Chart

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Lower and Upper Secondary

English for Life. B e g i n n e r. Lessons 1 4 Checklist Getting Started. Student s Book 3 Date. Workbook. MultiROM. Test 1 4

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Handbook for Teachers

Writing a composition

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Applying Speaking Criteria. For use from November 2010 GERMAN BREAKTHROUGH PAGRB01

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Beginners French FREN 101 University Studies Program. Course Outline

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Author: Fatima Lemtouni, Wayzata High School, Wayzata, MN

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Linguistic Variation across Sports Category of Press Reportage from British Newspapers: a Diachronic Multidimensional Analysis

Example answers and examiner commentaries: Paper 2

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

ELD CELDT 5 EDGE Level C Curriculum Guide LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT VOCABULARY COMMON WRITING PROJECT. ToolKit

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

Advanced Grammar in Use

UKLO Round Advanced solutions and marking schemes. 6 The long and short of English verbs [15 marks]

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Participate in expanded conversations and respond appropriately to a variety of conversational prompts

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Tracy Dudek & Jenifer Russell Trinity Services, Inc. *Copyright 2008, Mark L. Sundberg

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Emmaus Lutheran School English Language Arts Curriculum

LEXICAL COHESION ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE WHAT IS A GOOD RESEARCH PROJECT? BY BRIAN PALTRIDGE A JOURNAL ARTICLE

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

This publication is also available for download at

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Geographical Location School, Schedules, Classmates, Activities,

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Preschool - Pre-Kindergarten (Page 1 of 1)

Lesson objective: Year: 5/6 Resources: 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, Examples of newspaper orientations.

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

Developing Grammar in Context

Today we examine the distribution of infinitival clauses, which can be

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Teacher: Mlle PERCHE Maeva High School: Lycée Charles Poncet, Cluses (74) Level: Seconde i.e year old students

Intensive English Program Southwest College

Conversation Task: The Environment Concerns Us All

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

South Carolina English Language Arts

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

L1 and L2 acquisition. Holger Diessel

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

November 2012 MUET (800)

Mercer County Schools

Course Outline for Honors Spanish II Mrs. Sharon Koller

I. INTRODUCTION. for conducting the research, the problems in teaching vocabulary, and the suitable

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Creating Travel Advice

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

Nancy Hennessy M.Ed. 1

Arabic. Victorian Certificate of Education Study Design. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2004

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Transcription:

LRN Entry Level Certificate in ESOL Skills for Life (Speaking and Listening) (Entry 1) MARK SHEET FOR ENTRY 1 SAMPLE PAPER (Dec0111) 1

Curriculum links and notes to examiner Part 1 Part 2a Part 2b Part 3 The purpose of this section is to assess candidates ability to listen and respond (Lr/E1.4b ) to requests for personal information and to articulate the sounds of English to be comprehensible to a sympathetic native speaker. Candidates are expected to be able to recognise and discriminate between Wh- (E.g. When/What?) and Yes and No questions. Candidates are expected to be able to answer either type of question with minimal response, short form of the verb or fuller answers. To assess candidates ability to listen and respond (Lr/E1.4b ) to requests for personal information, to articulate the sounds of English to be comprehensible to a sympathetic native speaker. Candidates are expected to be able to recognise and discriminate between Wh- (E.g. When/What?) and Yes and No questions, express likes and dislikes and to to articulate the sounds of English to be comprehensible to a sympathetic native ear To assess candidates ability to articulate the sounds of English to be comprehensible to a sympathetic native speaker, give instructions To assess candidates ability to articulate the sounds of English to be comprehensible to a sympathetic native speaker, take part in social interaction 2

Rationale Grading - Speaking tasks assess candidate performance on the scales of 1 = inadequate, 2 = adequate, 3 = more than adequate Pronunciation, grammatical accuracy, use of vocabulary, discourse management, overall achievement 1 fail 2 adequate pass 3 pass with merit Listening comprehension 1 fail 2 adequate pass 3 pass with merit Assessment ESOL CC ref Criteria Language features 1. Pronunciation Sc/E1.1a, b Candidate can make him/herself understood through articulating the sounds of English and uses the correct stress & intonation to make speech comprehensible to a sympathetic native speaker. Performance pertaining to pass with merit can contain minor inaccuracies with some hesitancy that do not impede communication expected at Entry 1. Adequate performance can contain inaccuracies with some hesitancy that can occasionally impede communication and require a sympathetic Inadequate performance contains inaccuracies with large gaps in flow and a large degree of hesitancy (below the level of Entry 1) that is impeding and requires significant effort from the listener to understand 2. Grammatical accuracy 3. Use of vocabulary Sd/E1.1a,b,c Sd/E1.1a,b,c Candidate can be understood in simple exchanges and everyday contexts, when making requests, asking questions to obtain information, expressing likes and dislikes through making statements of fact, using the correct sentence structure in relation to subject-verb agreement, interrogatives, negatives and short forms, word order, correct tense appropriate to the time reference used, question forms using modals etc pertaining to Entry 1 (see breakdown of Language competency in ESOL Entry 1 CC pages 60 61 for a more comprehensive overview of language features expected for grammatical accuracy). Candidates who achieve pass with merit (more than adequate performance) show confidence at their level with minimal hesitancy expected at E1 level, a wider range of structures that stretch beyond E1 language features and ambition to produce more complex structures, beyond E1 level. The candidate may make mistakes when attempting this but will not be penalised as it lies beyond E1 structure. Adequate performance can contain inaccuracies with some hesitancy that can occasionally impede communication and require a sympathetic Inadequate performance contains inaccuracies with large gaps in speech and sentence flow and inaccuracies impede communication and require significant effort from the listener to understand Candidate demonstrates an appropriate range of general and topic based vocabulary. Candidate uses common adjectives followed by the verb to be, adverbs and prepositional phrases, simple adverbs of place, manner and time, intensifiers appropriate to the required level etc 3

4. Discourse management 5. Listening comprehension Lr/E1.1a,b,c Lr/E1.3a,b; Lr/E1.4a,b; Lr/E1.5a,b,c,d Gist (see breakdown of Language competency in ESOL Entry 1 CC pages 60 61 for a more comprehensive overview of language features expected for grammatical accuracy for a more comprehensive overview of language features expected for grammatical accuracy) Candidates who achieve pass with merit (more than adequate performance) show confidence to communicate more freely with minimum hesitancy at the required level, a wider range of structures that stretch beyond E1 language features and ambition to produce more complex structures, beyond E1 level. The candidate may make mistakes when attempting this but will not be penalised as it lies beyond E1 structure. Adequate performance can contain some hesitancy and inaccuracies that can occasionally impede communication and require a sympathetic Inadequate performance contains inaccuracies with large gaps in speech and sentence flow and inaccuracies impede communication and require significant effort from the listener to understand, below the level of Entry 1 The candidate uses cohesive devices that stretch language at the required level this includes using simple sentences with related vocabulary and noun phrases and sentence connectives such as then, next, and, but Candidates who achieve pass with merit (more than adequate performance) show confidence to communicate more freely with minimum hesitancy at the required level and ambition to produce a wider range of structures, vocabulary and connectives that stretch beyond E1 language features. The candidate may make mistakes when attempting this but will not be penalised as it lies beyond E1 structure. Candidates performing within adequate performance bracket may use simple structures with related vocabulary, use connectives but not all of the time and with some hesitancy. Sentences can also contain inaccuracies that can occasionally impede communication and require a sympathetic Candidates performing within Inadequate performance bracket do not construct sentences but rather nouns and verbs that do not connect to make a sentence, large gaps in speech are also present. Speech patterns contain structural and vocabulary related inaccuracies that are impeding and require significant effort from the listener to understand that would be expected below the level of Entry 1. Candidate can recognise the context & predict general meaning, listen for gist in short explanations, narratives, conversations and respond in face to face situations. Candidate can follow single step instructions, follow directions, listen and respond to requests for personal information, recognise a speaker s feeling and attitude, take part in social conversation, take part in more formal exchanges, follow a simple discussion on a familiar topic Candidates who fall into the above adequate performance bracket may need occasional paraphrasing and repetition in order to understand. Responses are appropriate in most exchanges. Adequate performance at this level equates to the candidate needing the examiner / pairing candidate to paraphrase and root for clarification in order to understand, although responses are appropriate in most exchanges at the required level. 4

Candidates performing within inadequate performance bracket equates to the candidate not responding appropriately in most exchanges expected at Entry 1, despite frequent paraphrasing, repetition and clarification from examiner. Lr/E1.2a,b,c,d,e Lr/E1.3a,b; Lr/E1.4a,b; Lr/E1.5a,b,c,d Detail Candidate can listen for detail in short narratives & explanations; listen for detail and respond in face to face situations and extract key information, listen to phonological detail. Candidate can follow single step instructions, follow directions, listen and respond to requests for personal information, recognise a speaker s feeling and attitude, take part in social conversation, take part in more formal exchanges, follow a simple discussion on a familiar topic 6. Overall achievement Sc/E1.1a, b Sd/E1.1a,b,c Lr/E1.1a,b,c Lr/E1.2a,b,c,d,e Lr/E1.3a,b; Lr/E1.4a,b; Lr/E1.5a,b,c,d Candidates who fall into the above adequate performance bracket may need occasional paraphrasing and repetition in order to understand. Responses are appropriate in most exchanges. Adequate performance at this level equates to the candidate needing the examiner / pairing candidate to paraphrase and root for clarification in order to understand, although responses are appropriate in most exchanges at the required level. Candidates performing within inadequate performance bracket equates to the candidate not responding appropriately in most exchanges expected at Entry 1, despite frequent paraphrasing, repetition and clarification from examiner. This feature relates to the candidates overall effectiveness in meeting all aspects of the performance criteria as one feature. Candidates who demonstrate more than adequate performance show confidence at their level with minimum hesitancy, a wider range of structures that stretch beyond E1 language features and ambition to produce more complex structures, beyond E1 level. The candidate may make mistakes when attempting this but will not be penalised as it lies beyond E1 structure. Adequate performance can contain inaccuracies that can occasionally impede communication with some hesitancy and require a sympathetic Inadequate performance contains inaccuracies that are impeding and require significant effort from the listener to understand. There are also large gaps in flow of speech. 0 11 = fail 12-17 = pass 18-21 = merit 5

Candidate name: Examiner name: Candidate number: Examiner number: Date of test: Monitored by SE: Yes / No Notes for examiner use (to inform centre feedback process) - consider pronunciation, grammatical accuracy, use of vocabulary discourse management, listening comprehension, overall achievement. Candidate confidence levels, dynamics between candidates, rapport. Also see rationale below Section 1 Notes on performance How did the candidate perform? To assist examiner judgement (and clarification in borderline cases). For eg: able to understand / not able to understand Wh- questions, responds to 1 / 2 questions relating to personal information Section 2a Section 2b Section 3 6