SECTION 400: PERSONNEL

Similar documents
Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

School Leadership Rubrics

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

What does Quality Look Like?

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Teachers Guide Chair Study

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

Digital Media Literacy

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

MATH 205: Mathematics for K 8 Teachers: Number and Operations Western Kentucky University Spring 2017

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Secondary English-Language Arts

LANGUAGES SPEAK UP! F 12 STRATEGY FOR VICTORIAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Promoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children. Facilitator s Guide. Administration for Children & Families

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text


Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

A Strategic Plan for the Law Library. Washington and Lee University School of Law Introduction

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Florida s Common Language of Instruction

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Transcription:

PROCEDURE TITLE: Certificated Employee Evaluation Form 1 Formal Summative Evaluation POLICY NO: 443F1 PAGE 1 of 7 FORMAL SUMMATIVE EVALUATION FORM 1 NAME: DATE: Observation Dates (List): Key: U = Unsatisfactory B = Basic P = Proficient D = Distinguished Domain 1: Planning and Preparation U B P D 1a Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b Knowledge of Students 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d Knowledge of Resources 1e Designing Coherent Instruction 1f Designing Student Assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment 2a Creating an Environment of Respect & Rapport 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c Managing Classroom Procedures 2d Managing Student Behavior 2e Organizing Physical Space Domain 3: Instruction 3a Communicating with Students 3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c Engaging Students in Learning 3d Using Assessment in Instruction 3e Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 4a Reflecting on Teaching 4b Maintaining Accurate Records 4c Communicating with Families 4d Participating in a Professional Community 4e Growing and Developing Professionally 4f Showing Professionalism Domain 1: Domain 2: Domain 3: Domain 4: (Use page 3 for additional information or comments.)

continued Page 2 of 7 ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS (unsatisfactory rating must include written documentation): PARENTAL INPUT USED: Yes No STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Provide a description of measurable student achievement data used (25% of the evaluation): Proficient Unsatisfactory Overall Educator Rating: Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished (Combines Measurable Student Achievement and Danielson Components) Professional Learning Plan (must be attached): Yes No Evaluator s Recommendation: Continued Employment Placed on Improvement Plan Recommendation of Probation Recommendation for Non-renewal/Non employment Administrator s Signature Employee s Signature Date Date

continued Page 3 of 7 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

continued Page 4 of 7 Formal Evaluation Rubric Domain 1 1a Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Teacher displays little or no understanding of knowledge and content pedagogy. Teacher displays no understanding of how to correct content errors made by themselves and students. Teacher s content and pedagogical knowledge represents basic understanding, but does not extend to connections with other disciplines or to possible student misconceptions. Teacher s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional goals at least nominally, with clear assessment criteria and standards that have been communicated to students. Teacher uses the assessment to plan for groups of students or individuals. Teacher s knowledge of the content and pedagogy is extensive, showing evidence of a continuing search for improved practice. Teacher actively builds on knowledge of misconceptions when describing instruction or seeking causes for student misunderstanding. 1b Knowledge of Students no knowledge of the developmental characteristics of the age group. partial knowledge of the developmental characteristics of the age group. thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skill, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for groups of students. thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skills, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for individual student learning 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes Teacher s goals are of no value or suitability for the students in the class, consisting of a combination of goals and activities, none of which permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher s goals are of moderate value or suitability for students in the class, consisting of a combination of goals and activities, some of which permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher s goals represent valuable learning and are suitable for most students in the class; they reflect opportunities for integration and permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher s goals reflect highlevel learning relating to curriculum frameworks and standards; they are adapted, where necessary, to the needs of individual students, and permit viable methods of assessment. 1d Knowledge of Resources Teacher displays little to no knowledge of school or district resources available either for teaching or for students who need them. Teacher displays limited knowledge of school or district resources available either for teaching or for students who need them. thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skill, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for groups of students. Teacher seeks out resources for teaching in professional organizations and in the community, and is aware of resources available for students who need them, in the school, the district, and the larger community. 1e Designing Coherent Instruction None or very little of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning. Teacher s lesson or unit has no recognizable structure. Some of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning, while others do not. Teacher s lesson or unit has a recognizable structure. Most of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning and the lesson or unit has a clearly defined structure. All of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals, engage students in meaningful learning, and show evidence of student input. Teacher s lesson or unit is highly coherent and has a clear structure

continued Page 5 of 7 1f Designing Student Assessments Teacher s approach to assessing student learning contains no clear criteria or standards, and lacks congruence with the instructional goals. Teacher has no plans to use assessment results in designing future instruction Teacher s approach to assessing student learning contains minimal clear criteria or standards, and lacks congruence with the instructional goals. Teacher has few plans to use assessment results in designing future instruction. Teacher s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional goals at least nominally, with clear assessment criteria and standards that have been communicated to students. Teacher uses the assessment to plan for groups of students or individuals. Teacher s plan for student assessment is fully aligned with the instructional goals, containing clear assessment criteria and standards that are not only understood by students but also show evidence of student participation in their development. Teacher s students monitor their own progress in achieving the goals. Domain 2 2a Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Classroom interactions are often inappropriate. Classroom interactions are generally appropriate and free from conflict but may be characterized by occasional displays of insensitivity. Classroom interactions reflect general warmth and caring, and are respectful of the cultural and developmental differences among groups of students. Classroom interactions are highly respectful, reflecting genuine warmth and caring toward individuals. Students themselves ensure maintenance of high level of civility among member of the class. 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning The classroom environment does not reflect a culture for leaning, with none or inconsistent expectations for student achievement, no teacher commitment to the subject, and no student pride in work. Both teacher and students are performing at the below minimal level. The classroom environment reflects only a minimal culture for leaning, with only modest or inconsistent expectations for student achievement, little teacher commitment to the subject, and little student pride in work. Both teacher and students are performing at the minimal level to get by. The classroom environment represents a genuine culture for learning, with a commitment to the subject on the part of teacher and students, high expectations for student achievement, and student pride in work. Students assume much of the responsibility for establishing a culture for learning in the classroom by taking pride in their work, initiating improvements to their products, and holding the work to the highest standard. Teacher demonstrates a passionate commitment to the subject. 2c Managing Classroom Procedures No classroom procedures have been established. Classroom routines and procedures have been established but function unevenly or inconsistently, with some loss of instruction time. Classroom routines and procedures have been established and function smoothly for the most part and with little loss of instruction time. Classroom routines and procedures are seamless in their operation, and students assume considerable responsibility for their smooth functioning. 2d Managing Student Behavior Teacher makes little or no effort to establish standards of conduct for students, monitor student behavior, and respond to student misbehavior. Teacher makes an effort to establish standards of conduct for students, monitor student behavior, and respond to student misbehavior, but these efforts are not always successful Teacher is aware of student behavior, has established clear standards of conduct, and responds to student misbehavior in ways that are appropriate and respectful of the students. Student behavior is entirely appropriate, with evidence of student participation in setting expectations and monitoring behavior. Teacher s monitoring of student behavior is subtle and preventive, and teacher s response to student misbehavior is sensitive to individual student needs.

continued Page 6 of 7 2e Organizing Physical Space Teacher s classroom is unsafe and cluttered. Teacher s classroom is safe, and essential learning is accessible to all students, but the furniture arrangement only partially supports the learning activities. Teacher s classroom is safe, and learning is accessible to all students; teacher uses physical resources well and ensures that the arrangement of furniture supports the learning activities. Teacher s classroom is safe, and students contribute to ensuring that the physical environment supports the learning of all students. Domain 3 3a Communicating with Students Teacher communication often contains errors and is often inappropriate. Teacher s oral and written communication contains no errors, but may not be completely appropriate or may require further explanations to avoid confusion. Teacher communicates clearly and accurately to students, both orally and in writing. Teacher s oral and written communication is clear and expressive, anticipating possible student misconceptions. 3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Teacher uses little to no questioning and discussion techniques. Teacher s use of questioning and discussion techniques is uneven, with some high-level questions, attempts at true discussion, and moderate student participation. Teacher seeks ways to ensure successful learning for all students, making adjustments as needed to instruction plans and responding to student interests and questions. Students formulate many of the high-level questions and assume responsibility for the participation of all students in the discussion. 3c Engaging Students in Learning Students are not engaged, resulting from activities or material of inadequate quality, inadequate representations of content, or no structure or pacing. Students are intellectually engaged only partially, resulting from activities or material of uneven quality, inconsistent representations of content, or uneven structure or pacing. Students are highly engaged throughout the lesson and make material contributions to the representation of content, the activities, and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure. Students are highly engaged throughout the lesson and make material contributions to the representation of content, the activities, and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure. 3d Using Assessment in Instruction Little to no teacher feedback to students is evident. Teacher s feedback to students is uneven, and its timeliness is inconsistent. Teacher s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality. Teacher s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality, and students make use of the feedback in their learning. 3e Flexibility and Responsiveness minimal flexibility and responsiveness to students needs during a lesson. moderate flexibility and responsiveness to students needs and interests during a lesson, and seeks to ensure the success of all students. Teacher s use of questioning and discussion techniques reflects high-level questions, true discussion, and full participation by all students. Teacher is highly responsive to students interests and questions, making major lesson adjustments if necessary, and persists in ensuring the success of all students.

continued Page 7 of 7 Domain 4 4a Reflecting on Teaching Little to no evidence of teacher reflection is evident. Teacher s reflection on the lesson is generally accurate, and teacher makes global suggestions as to how it might be improved. Teacher reflects accurately on the lesson, citing general characteristics and makes some specific suggestions about how it might be improved. Teacher s reflection on the lesson is highly accurate and perceptive, citing specific examples. Teacher draws on an extensive repertoire to suggest alternative strategies. 4b Maintaining Accurate Records maintaining accurate record is ineffective. maintaining accurate records is rudimentary and only partially effective. maintaining accurate records is efficient and effective. maintaining accurate records is efficient and effective, and students contribute to its maintenance. 4c Communicating with Families Teacher fails to consistently communicate with families and does not make an effort to engage families in the instructional program. Teacher complies with school procedure for communicating with families and makes an effort to engage families in the instructional program. Teacher communicates frequently with families and successfully engages them in the instruction programs. Teacher communicates frequently and sensitively with families and successfully engages them in the instructional program; students participate in communicating with families. 4d Participating in a Professional Community Teacher is not contributing to the school and district when specifically requested. Teacher s relationships with colleagues are strained, and teacher does not participate in school and district events and projects when specifically requested. Teacher s relationships with colleagues are cordial, and teacher participates in school and district events and projects when specifically requested. Teacher participates actively in school and district projects, and maintains positive relationships with colleagues. Teacher makes a substantial contribution to school and district events and projects, assuming leadership with colleagues. 4e Growing and Developing Professionally Teacher does not participate in professional development. Teacher s participation in professional development activities is limited to those that are convenient. Teacher participates actively in professional development activities and contributes to the profession. Teacher makes a substantial contribution to the profession through such activities as action research and mentoring new teachers, and actively pursues professional development. 4f Showing Professionalism Teacher makes little to no attempt to ensure that students are well served by the school. Teacher s attempts to serve students based on the best information are genuine but inconsistent. Teacher makes genuine and successful efforts to ensure that all students are well served by the school. Teacher assumes a leadership position in ensuring that school practices and procedure ensure that all students, particularly those traditionally underserved, are honored in the school. ADOPTED: April 20, 2010 Reviewed: September 20, 2011 Revised: August 20, 2012 Revised: October 6, 2014 Revised: January 23, 2017 Revised: December 8, 2017 Reviewed: May 15, 2018