DIBELS Next Benchmark Goals & Composite Scores

Similar documents
DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

Aimsweb Fluency Norms Chart

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Technical Report #1. Summary of Decision Rules for Intensive, Strategic, and Benchmark Instructional

Review of Student Assessment Data

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills TM

Dibels Next Benchmarks Kindergarten 2013

ACIP. Matthews Elementary School

The New York City Department of Education. Grade 5 Mathematics Benchmark Assessment. Teacher Guide Spring 2013

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Dibels Math Early Release 2nd Grade Benchmarks

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

Using CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading. Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

Grade Five Chapter 6 Add and Subtract Fractions with Unlike Denominators Overview & Support Standards:

This scope and sequence assumes 160 days for instruction, divided among 15 units.

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics. Standards Unpacking Documents Grade 5

On-the-Fly Customization of Automated Essay Scoring

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Strategic Improvement Plan

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

ACTL5103 Stochastic Modelling For Actuaries. Course Outline Semester 2, 2014

Chapter 4 - Fractions

African American Male Achievement Update

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Bellehaven Elementary

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Data-Based Decision Making: Academic and Behavioral Applications

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Math 098 Intermediate Algebra Spring 2018

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Individual Differences & Item Effects: How to test them, & how to test them well

prehending general textbooks, but are unable to compensate these problems on the micro level in comprehending mathematical texts.

Characteristics of the Text Genre Realistic fi ction Text Structure

Literacy Across Disciplines: An Investigation of Text Used in Content-Specific Classrooms

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

The Effects of Super Speed 100 on Reading Fluency. Jennifer Thorne. University of New England

INTERNAL MEDICINE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (IM-ITE SM )

Unit 13 Assessment in Language Teaching. Welcome

THE EFFECT OF WRITTEN WORD WORK USING WORD BOXES ON THE DECODING FLUENCY OF YOUNG AT-RISK READERS

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Unit 3: Lesson 1 Decimals as Equal Divisions

First Grade Standards

Big Ideas Math Grade 6 Answer Key

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA PRODUCT GUIDE

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Shelters Elementary School

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

Generic Project Rubrics 4th Grade

IMPROVED MANUFACTURING PROGRAM ALIGNMENT W/ PBOS

Me on the Map. Standards: Objectives: Learning Activities:

NEALE ANALYSIS OF READING ABILITY FOR READERS WITH LOW VISION

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

TIMSS ADVANCED 2015 USER GUIDE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL DATABASE. Pierre Foy

Georgia Department of Education

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Building Vocabulary Knowledge by Teaching Paraphrasing with the Use of Synonyms Improves Comprehension for Year Six ESL Students

Page 1 of 11. Curriculum Map: Grade 4 Math Course: Math 4 Sub-topic: General. Grade(s): None specified

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

NCAA Division I Committee on Academic Performance Academic Performance Program Access to Postseason and Penalty Waiver Directive

Sight Word Assessment

MGT 136 Advanced Accounting

Guide to the Uniform mark scale (UMS) Uniform marks in A-level and GCSE exams

WELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS!

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

3rd Grade Ngsss Standards Checklist

Course Name: Elementary Calculus Course Number: Math 2103 Semester: Fall Phone:

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

College Action Project Worksheet for CAP Projects March 18, 2016 Update

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Proficiency Illusion

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Mathematics Education

A Critique of Running Records

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

Cooper Upper Elementary School

learning collegiate assessment]

CHAPTER 5: COMPARABILITY OF WRITTEN QUESTIONNAIRE DATA AND INTERVIEW DATA

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Transcription:

DIBELS Next Benchmark Goals & Composite Scores The following tables present DIBELS Next benchmark and strategic level goals (cut points) across Fall, Winter and Spring assessment periods accompanied by the rate of improvement (ROI) necessary for a student to achieve the next benchmark or strategic goal. Composite scores and ROIs, presented on page two, represent a combination of DIBELS measures within each grade to provide an overall estimate of a student s reading proficiency. Grades K through 2 nd Composite scores include different measures depending on assessment period, and consequently ROI is not provided as its meaning is obscured by the omission and addition of early literacy measures within Composite scores. Page two provides a breakdown of which measures are used in calculating Composite scores by grade and assessment period. Benchmark and strategic level goals and ROIs for key DIBELS measures are provided on page three by grade and assessment period. Measures include early literacy measures and DORF. Following, on page four, are the benchmark and strategic level goals and ROIs for additional measures and indicators considered in the calculation of Composite scores. These DIBELS measures and indicators include the Daze, DORF Retell, and DORF accuracy. ROIs are not provided for DORF accuracy given the low variability in goals between assessment periods. Finally, it is important to note that whereas DIBELS goals are presented as raw scores for the majority of measures, Daze adjusted scores are not raw scores. Daze Adjusted scores represent an equation taking into consideration both correct and incorrect student responses on the Daze measure, with a minimum of 0. The following equation can be used to calculate a student s Daze adjusted score: # correct (# incorrect / 2 ). 1

DIBELS established (benchmark) and emerging (strategic) Composites Measure Fall Winter Spring Benchmark Strategic Benchmark Strategic Benchmark Strategic K 26 13 122 85 119 89 1 113 97 130 100 155 111 2 141 109 190 145 238 180 3 220 180 285 235 330 280 4 290 245 330 290 391 330 5 357 258 372 310 415 340 6 344 280 358 285 380 324 DIBELS established (benchmark) and emerging (strategic) Composite ROI s Measure Fall- Winter Winter Spring Full Year Benchmark Strategic Benchmark Strategic Benchmark Strategic 3 3.61 3.06 2.50 2.50 3.06 2.78 4 2.22 2.50 3.39 2.22 2.81 2.36 5 0.83 2.89 2.39 1.67 1.61 2.28 6 0.78 0.28 1.22 2.17 1.00 1.22 DIBELS COMPOSITE Score Components GRADE Benchmark COMPOSITE includes: K Fall FSF; LNF Winter FSF; LNF; PSF; NWF (cls) Spring LNF; PSF; NWF (cls) 1 st Fall LNF; PSF; NWF (cls) Winter NWF (cls); NWF (wwr); DORF; DORF Accuracy value Spring NWF (wwr); DORF; DORF Accuracy value 2 nd Fall NWF (wwr); DORF; DORF Accuracy value Win & Spring DORF; Retell; DORF Accuracy value 3 rd All DORF; Retell; Daze adjusted score; DORF Accuracy value 4 th All DORF; Retell; Daze adjusted score; DORF Accuracy value 5 th All DORF; Retell; Daze adjusted score; DORF Accuracy value 6 th All DORF; Retell; Daze adjusted score; DORF Accuracy value *DORF Accuracy is converted to an accuracy value based on DIBELS Next table. All component scores are summed to provide a Composite score. 2

DIBELS benchmarks & ROI (ROI based on 18 weeks between benchmarks, 36 total weeks): Measure Fall Winter (Fall-Win ROI) Spring (Win-Spr ROI) Total Year ROI K-FSF 10 30 (1.1) N/A N/A K-PSF 0 20 (1.1) 40 (1.1) 1.11 K-NWF 0 17 (.9) 28 (.6) 0.78 1 NWF (CLS) 27 43 (.9) 58 (.8) 0.86 1 - ORF 0 23 (1.3) 47 (1.3) 1.31 2 - ORF 52 72 (1.1) 87 (.8) 0.97 3 ORF 70 86 (.9) 100 (.8) 0.83 4 - ORF 90 103 (.7) 115 (.7) 0.69 5 ORF 111 120 (.5) 130 (.6) 0.53 6 ORF 107 109 (.1) 120 (.6) 0.36 DIBELS established (benchmark) and emerging (strategic) targets: Early literacy measures; DORF Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring K-FSF 10 30 N/A 5 20 N/A K-PSF N/A 20 40 N/A 10 25 K-NWF N/A 17 28 N/A 8 15 1 PSF 40 N/A N/A 25 N/A N/A 1 NWF (CLS) 27 43 58 18 33 47 1-NWF(WWR) 1 8 13 0 3 6 1 - ORF N/A 23 47 N/A 16 32 2 NWF (CLS) 54 N/A N/A 35 N/A N/A 2-NWF (WWR) 13 N/A N/A 6 N/A N/A 2 ORF 52 72 87 37 55 65 3 - ORF 70 86 100 55 68 80 4 - ORF 90 103 115 70 79 95 5 - ORF 111 120 130 96 101 105 6- ORF 107 109 120 90 92 95 ROI for benchmark and strategic levels (based on 18 weeks between benchmarks, 36 total weeks): Early literacy measures; DORF Fall- Win ROI Win- Spr ROI Year ROI Fall- Win ROI Win- Spr ROI Year ROI K-FSF 1.11 N/A N/A 0.83 N/A N/A K-PSF 1.11 1.11 1.11 0.56 0.83 0.69 K-NWF 0.94 0.61 0.78 0.44 0.39 0.42 1-NWF(CLS) 0.89 0.83 0.86 0.83 0.78 0.81 1 - ORF 1.28 1.33 1.31 0.89 0.89 0.89 2 ORF 1.11 0.83 0.97 1.0 0.56 0.78 3 ORF 0.89 0.78 0.83 0.72 0.67 0.69 4 ORF 0.72 0.67 0.69 0.50 0.89 0.69 5 ORF 0.50 0.56 0.53 0.28 0.22 0.25 6 ORF 0.11 0.61 0.36 0.11 0.17 0.14 3

DIBELS established (benchmark) and emerging (strategic) targets: DORF Accuracy; Retell; Daze Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 1 ORF (ACC) N/A 78 90 N/A 68 82 1- Retell N/A N/A 15 N/A N/A 0 2- ORF (ACC) 90 96 97 81 91 93 2 - Retell 16 21 27 8 13 18 3 ORF (ACC) 95 96 97 89 92 94 3 Retell 20 26 30 10 18 20 3 - Daze 8 11 19 5 7 14 4-ORF (ACC) 96 97 98 93 94 95 4 Retell 27 30 33 14 20 24 4 Daze 15 17 24 10 12 20 5- ORF (ACC) 98 98 99 95 96 97 5- Retell 33 36 36 22 25 25 5 Daze 18 20 24 12 13 18 6 ORF (ACC) 97 97 98 94 94 96 6 Retell 27 29 32 16 18 24 6 - Daze 18 19 21 14 14 15 ROI for benchmark and strategic levels (based on 18 weeks between benchmarks, 36 total weeks): Retell; Daze Fall- Win ROI Win- Spr ROI Year ROI Fall- Win ROI Win- Spr ROI Year ROI 2 Retell 0.28.33.31 0.28 0.28 0.28 3 Retell.33.22.28.44.11.28 3 Daze.17.44.31.11.39.25 4 Retell.17.17.17.33.22.28 4- Daze.11.39.25.11.44.28 5 Retell.17 0.08.17 0.08 5 - Daze.11.22.17.06.28.17 6 Retell.11.17.14.11.33.22 6 Daze.06.11.08 0.06.03 4

ROI for benchmark and strategic levels Composite Score (based on 18 weeks between benchmarks, 36 total weeks) ROI ONLY CALCULATED WHEN MEASURES FROM ONE ASSESSMENT PERIOD TO THE NEXT ARE THE SAME. Benchmark Benchmark ROI Grade Fall Winter Spring Grade F- W ROI W- S ROI F- S ROI K 26 122 119 K ** ** ** 1 113 130 155 1 ** ** ** 2 141 190 238 2 ** ** ** 3 220 285 330 3 3.61 2.50 3.06 4 290 330 391 4 2.22 3.39 2.81 5 357 372 415 5 0.83 2.39 1.61 6 344 358 380 6 0.78 1.22 1.00 Strategic Strategic ROI Grade Fall Winter Spring Grade F- W ROI W- S ROI F- S ROI K 13 85 89 K ** ** ** 1 97 100 111 1 ** ** ** 2 109 145 180 2 ** 1.94 ** 3 180 235 280 3 3.06 2.50 2.78 4 245 290 330 4 2.50 2.22 2.36 5 258 310 340 5 2.89 1.67 2.28 6 280 285 324 6 0.28 2.17 1.22 ** Note- because the measures making up the composite score change from fall to winter to spring, calculation of ROI for the composite score is not meaningful. 5