Examiners Report. Summer Pearson Edexcel GCE in Core Mathematics C3R (6665/01R)

Similar documents
Examiners Report January GCSE Citizenship 5CS01 01

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

Math 098 Intermediate Algebra Spring 2018

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

Mathematics process categories

Julia Smith. Effective Classroom Approaches to.

Statewide Framework Document for:

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

AP Calculus AB. Nevada Academic Standards that are assessable at the local level only.

TabletClass Math Geometry Course Guidebook

Mathematics subject curriculum

This scope and sequence assumes 160 days for instruction, divided among 15 units.

HOLMER GREEN SENIOR SCHOOL CURRICULUM INFORMATION


Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

Functional Skills Mathematics Level 2 assessment

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Mathematics. Mathematics

Characteristics of Functions

Edexcel GCSE. Statistics 1389 Paper 1H. June Mark Scheme. Statistics Edexcel GCSE

Are You Ready? Simplify Fractions

SOUTHERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE South Portland, Maine 04106

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer International GCSE Bengali (4BE0/01)

Syllabus ENGR 190 Introductory Calculus (QR)

Foothill College Summer 2016

Algebra 1 Summer Packet

Fairfield Methodist School (Secondary) Topics for End of Year Examination Term

Mathematics Assessment Plan

GUIDE TO THE CUNY ASSESSMENT TESTS

Pearson Baccalaureate Higher Level Mathematics Worked Solutions

EDEXCEL FUNCTIONAL SKILLS PILOT TEACHER S NOTES. Maths Level 2. Chapter 4. Working with measures

The New York City Department of Education. Grade 5 Mathematics Benchmark Assessment. Teacher Guide Spring 2013

GCSE. Mathematics A. Mark Scheme for January General Certificate of Secondary Education Unit A503/01: Mathematics C (Foundation Tier)

Numeracy Medium term plan: Summer Term Level 2C/2B Year 2 Level 2A/3C

Dublin City Schools Mathematics Graded Course of Study GRADE 4

Instructor: Matthew Wickes Kilgore Office: ES 310

Math 96: Intermediate Algebra in Context

Let s think about how to multiply and divide fractions by fractions!

Diagnostic Test. Middle School Mathematics

EDEXCEL FUNCTIONAL SKILLS PILOT. Maths Level 2. Chapter 7. Working with probability

GCE. Mathematics (MEI) Mark Scheme for June Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit 4766: Statistics 1. Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

Paper 2. Mathematics test. Calculator allowed. First name. Last name. School KEY STAGE TIER

Activity 2 Multiplying Fractions Math 33. Is it important to have common denominators when we multiply fraction? Why or why not?

Paper Reference. Edexcel GCSE Mathematics (Linear) 1380 Paper 1 (Non-Calculator) Foundation Tier. Monday 6 June 2011 Afternoon Time: 1 hour 30 minutes

Page 1 of 11. Curriculum Map: Grade 4 Math Course: Math 4 Sub-topic: General. Grade(s): None specified

Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems

Technical Manual Supplement

Algebra 2- Semester 2 Review

LLD MATH. Student Eligibility: Grades 6-8. Credit Value: Date Approved: 8/24/15

Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade

The Algebra in the Arithmetic Finding analogous tasks and structures in arithmetic that can be used throughout algebra

Answers To Hawkes Learning Systems Intermediate Algebra

Math Grade 3 Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content

Alignment of Australian Curriculum Year Levels to the Scope and Sequence of Math-U-See Program

Grade 6: Correlated to AGS Basic Math Skills

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Students Understanding of Graphical Vector Addition in One and Two Dimensions

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA PRODUCT GUIDE

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

The Indices Investigations Teacher s Notes

Ghanaian Senior High School Students Error in Learning of Trigonometry

May To print or download your own copies of this document visit Name Date Eurovision Numeracy Assignment

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Unit 3: Lesson 1 Decimals as Equal Divisions

THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY Semester 2, Information Sheet for MATH2068/2988 Number Theory and Cryptography

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics. Standards Unpacking Documents Grade 5

Talk About It. More Ideas. Formative Assessment. Have students try the following problem.

Changing User Attitudes to Reduce Spreadsheet Risk

Focus of the Unit: Much of this unit focuses on extending previous skills of multiplication and division to multi-digit whole numbers.

International Advanced level examinations

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Measurement. When Smaller Is Better. Activity:

Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Primary Mathematics: A Case Study of Two Teachers

Afm Math Review Download or Read Online ebook afm math review in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

MTH 141 Calculus 1 Syllabus Spring 2017

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

Visit us at:

Films for ESOL training. Section 2 - Language Experience

TOPICS LEARNING OUTCOMES ACTIVITES ASSESSMENT Numbers and the number system

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Geo Risk Scan Getting grips on geotechnical risks

Introduction and Motivation

Case study Norway case 1

Digital Fabrication and Aunt Sarah: Enabling Quadratic Explorations via Technology. Michael L. Connell University of Houston - Downtown

Edexcel Gcse Maths 2013 Nov Resit

Students concept images of inverse functions

SAT MATH PREP:

What Do Croatian Pre-Service Teachers Remember from Their Calculus Course?

Course Syllabus for Math

Using Calculators for Students in Grades 9-12: Geometry. Re-published with permission from American Institutes for Research

Transcription:

Examiners Report Summer 014 Pearson Edexcel GCE in Core Mathematics C3R (6665/01R)

Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK s largest awarding body. We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus. Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere Pearson aspires to be the world s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they are in the world. We ve been involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk Summer 014 Publications Code UA03846 All the material in this publication is copyright Pearson Education Ltd 014

Mathematics Unit Core Mathematics 3 Specification 6665/01R General Introduction This paper was found to be accessible by most students. It contained a mixture of straightforward questions that tested the student s ability to perform routine tasks, as well as some more challenging and unstructured questions that tested the most able students. Overall the level of algebra was pleasing, although there are many examples of students not using brackets correctly. When an answer is given it is important to show all stages of the calculation. It is also useful to quote a formula before using it. Examples of this are when using the product and quotient rule (Qu 4) and using trigonometrical identities (Qu4(i) and Qu3).

Comments on Individual Questions: Question 1 The vast majority could obtain the fully simplified answer accurately and efficiently. However there were a few students who failed to factorise the 4 x 9term, so could not complete their solution, and some who used more terms in the denominator than necessary, resulting in quadratic or cubic numerators. Some of these did proceed to a complete solution, but most made errors in the process. A frequent transcription error was instead of 3 in the numerator of the first term. Only occasionally did students use partial fractions on the final term. Question Q0(a) was generally well done, with accurate differentiation and manipulation of the given expression. Some students failed to recognise that, as a proof, there was an expectation to set dy dx = 0 3 In Q0(b) the graph of y x was often correct, although some students drew a straight line, and others showed a cubic with two turning points. The exponential graph was less successful, with some students showing a reflection of the correct graph. Some accurate sketches were seen, but a correct asymptote was rare often given as x instead of y =- Those students who had graphs with one point of intersection generally answered Q0(c) correctly, although there were also references to graphs crossing axes, and to one-to-one mappings. Q0(d) was nearly always successful and mostly given to the accuracy asked for by the question. In Q0(e) most students obtained the x coordinate, although many did a lot of extra work, either by continuing the iteration or by looking for a change of sign of the function. However many either forgot to find a y coordinate, or substituted into an incorrect function finding an incorrect y value. Question 3 Q03(i)(a) was a question that was generally done well, with most students knowing the trigonometrical identities for for tan x,cot xand cosec x. A frequent error in Q03(a) was the omission of cosec x from the original equation, but those who started with the correct form could usually follow an appropriate process, with some making minor arithmetical/algebraic errors. In Q03(i)(b) nearly all could solve their quadratic, and most gave two values for x. There were very few answers given in degrees. Q03(ii) was usually successfully attempted, although some students who worked from both sides of the required identity did not give an adequate conclusion to complete their work. One of the most 1 common errors was to obtain, as they had difficulty with the 1 in the denominator.

Question 4 In Q04(i) many students wrote down dy dx correctly. Some did it implicitly, and a few used 1 cos y dy dy and quotient rule. The most common errors seen were sec ytanyand 4secytany dx dx Most then went on to find dy dx of x. by inverting their result, often not until after expressing dy dx in terms A number used a triangle with ratios as expressions of x to reach their final expression. Some manipulated the given answer, but there were many completely correct solutions. It was important that students used the identity 1+ tan y= sec y and not 1+ tan x = sec x in proving their result. Q04(ii) was well completed. Students know the product rule really well but all should be advised to 1 write it down first before using it. The derivative of lnx was also often correct, although was x e frequently seen. The substitution of was often correct, but a number of students made algebraic errors in manipulating the resulting expression.. In Q04(iii) most students differentiated correctly, but could not simplify the numerator to gain the final mark. Most used the quotient rule although those who used the product rule found the expression easier to simplify. There were a lot of basic algebraic errors shown in the attempt to reach an expression of the right form. Again it must be stressed that writing down the quotient rule formula would have resulted in more marks for students making errors in applying the method. Question 5 Nearly all students drew a V shaped graph in Q05(a), and most were in the right position with coordinates correctly labelled. Generally marks were lost for not labelling one of the intersections. In Q05(b) and Q05(c) most students retained inequalities throughout their working, frequently having problems when the x term was negative. Many only used one inequality and hence only achieved half of the required region. Those who had sketched a graph were most likely to pick the correct regions in Q05(b) and some clearly changed a correct inequality because they did not understand which region was required. Those who found the critical values by squaring often failed to consider whether they had introduced extra solutions. In part Q05(c) it was noticeable that many students reversed the sign of the wrong expression, so 3 obtained an incorrect inequality. Many students did not realise that x 4 And 3 x meant that 3 4 4 was excluded from the solution set.

Question 6 Most students could find the inverse function correctly, although a few differentiated. However a 1 f x, and often an incorrect domain for f. lot of students gave an incorrect range for Many students misunderstood Q06(c) and used ln 4x. They usually proceeded with correct log and exponential work, but obtained an incorrect answer. Very few students who started this part correctly could simplify 6 8 to obtain. Q06(d) and Q06(e) were moderately successful, although many students failed to square both the and the x when simplifying the expression. Many then lost marks in Q06(e) because of incorrect lnx solutions to Q06(d). A few managed to restart from e k and solve correctly. Question 7 The majority of students could complete Q07(a), with only a few giving answers in degrees. A very common error in Q07(b) was to forget the intersection of the graph with the y axis; many found at least one correct intersection with the x axis. Q07(c) was probably the least successful part of the question. Although a good number of students could write down the maximum and minimum easily, some of those who had a correct value for the maximum then gave either 18.5 or 1 as the minimum. Some students found this part challenging, often using values of H when t 0 and t 5. Q07(d) many students successfully reached one or more correct values for t but then made 5 calculator errors in reaching their value for t. Many students showed very little working at this stage, so it was sometimes unclear how much of the work was accurate. There were still a number of students who did not realise that Q07(a) should be used in solving Q07(c) and Q07(d).

Grade Boundaries Grade boundaries for this, and all other papers, can be found on the website on this link: http://www.edexcel.com/iwantto/pages/grade-boundaries.aspx

Pearson Education Limited. Registered company number 8788 with its registered office at Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM0 JE