Strategic Plan January 2014 December 2018 REVISED: 9/23/14

Similar documents
DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Texas Woman s University Libraries

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Michigan State University

University of Toronto

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Communication Disorders Program. Strategic Plan January 2012 December 2016

University Senate CHARGE

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Geography MASTER OF SCIENCE MASTER OF APPLIED GEOGRAPHY. gradcollege.txstate.edu

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

DVANCING BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING ADVANCING BIOMEDICAL Lead RESEARCH TRAINING

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

School Leadership Rubrics

SECTION 1: SOLES General Information FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Engagement of Teaching Intensive Faculty. What does Engagement mean?

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Upward Bound Program

lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Report survey post-doctoral researchers at NTNU

Mission Statement To achieve excellence in our Pharm.D. and graduate programs through innovative education and leading edge research.

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

PLAN 2020: Gateway to the Future. Enter Engage Excel

School of Basic Biomedical Sciences College of Medicine. M.D./Ph.D PROGRAM ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Student Experience Strategy

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

Programme Specification

Access Center Assessment Report

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

State Parental Involvement Plan

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Monitoring & Evaluation Tools for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Standard IV: Students

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

MSc Education and Training for Development

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

Utica College Web Policies and Guidelines

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Examples of Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

SOCI 625D1/D2: Professional Development Seminar in Sociology Fall 2016 and Winter 2017

WHY GO TO GRADUATE SCHOOL?

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

February 1, Dear Members of the Brown Community,

Meek School of Journalism and New Media Will Norton, Jr., Professor and Dean Mission. Core Values

Transcription:

Strategic Plan January 2014 December 2018 REVISED: 9/23/14

Table of Contents Introduction... 5 Goal 1: To advance excellence in graduate education & postdoctoral training... 5 Strategy A: Support the recruitment and admission of highly qualified students by improving quality and efficiencies in graduate admissions... 5 Tactic A1: Provide excellent direct service... 5 Tactic A2: Enhance use of admissions technology... 5 Tactic A3: Engage in outreach activities... 5 Tactic A4: Provide quality assurance... 6 Tactic A5: Communicate effectively... 6 Tactic A6: Facilitate administration of recruitment fellowships and funding packages for incoming students... 6 Strategy B: Improve the graduate student experience from start to finish... 6 Tactic B1: Obtain funding support and funding packages... 6 Tactic B2: Sponsor academic and professional development of graduate students... 6 Tactic B3: Sponsor advising and mentoring of graduate students... 6 Tactic B4: Regularly assess student perceptions of their educational experience... 7 Tactic B5: Provide an annual Graduate School Orientation... 7 Tactic B6: Administer graduate student fellowships... 7 Tactic B7: Support national fellowship competitions... 7 Tactic B8: Support timely degree completion... 7 Tactic B9: Increase timely completion of degrees by students from underrepresented backgrounds... 7 Tactic B10: Support placement of graduates from underrepresented backgrounds... 7 Tactic B11: Bring timely issues in graduate & professional education before the University s graduate education community... 8 Strategy C: Track placement... 8 Tactic C1: Improve information on placement of graduate alumni... 8 Strategy D: Support Directors of Graduate Studies... 8 Tactic D1: Offer orientation for Directors of Graduate Studies... 8 Tactic D2: Update handbook for Directors of Graduate Studies... 8 Strategy E: Provide leadership for new models of program assessment... 9 REVISED: 9/23/14 2

Tactic E1: Establish models, metrics, standards and approaches for measuring program quality... 9 Tactic E2: Maintain and analyze data responsive to program needs... 9 Tactic E3: Support articulation of graduate student program goals and graduate student outcomes... 9 Strategy F: Support post-docs... 9 Tactic F1: Support postdoctoral fellows and associates... 9 Strategy G: Recruit high-quality and high potential students from diverse backgrounds... 10 Tactic G1: Develop a pool of academically strong candidates from diverse backgrounds... 10 Tactic G2: Support the recruitment of an internationally diverse student body... 10 Goal 2: To advance intellectual communication and scholarship across disciplines... 10 Strategy H: Facilitate collaboration and communication across disciplines... 10 Tactic H1: Increase graduate student and faculty engagement in interdisciplinary research, scholarship and creative activity... 10 Tactic H2: Foster innovation in interdisciplinary graduate education... 10 Tactic H3: Increase funding opportunities for interdisciplinary inquiry by graduate students... 11 Tactic H4: Expand visibility of interdisciplinary initiatives... 11 Goal 3: To promote global and international initiatives and opportunities... 11 Strategy I: Work collaboratively with other University offices to support and promote international aspects of graduate education... 11 Tactic I1: Promote international experiences for graduate students... 11 Tactic I2: Improve graduate experiences of international students... 11 Tactic I3: Promote intercultural activities and discussions... 11 Strategy J: Promote international graduate study opportunities to students... 12 Tactic J1: Provide research travel grants... 12 Goal 4: To promote scholarly integrity and responsibility... 12 Strategy K: Work collaboratively with other University offices and faculty to promote responsible research and scholarship... 12 Tactic K1: Increase awareness among faculty and students about their roles in promoting responsible research and scholarship... 12 Tactic K2: Provide and highlight resources available on campus for training in responsible research and scholarship... 12 Goal 5: To position graduate education more centrally and visibly within the University... 12 REVISED: 9/23/14 3

Strategy M: Strengthen partnerships and collaborations... 12 Tactic M1: Coordinate with other university units to meet graduate students' needs and enhance opportunities available to them... 12 Strategy N: Enhance strategic communications... 13 Tactic N1: Increase visibility and improve understanding of the Grad School's roles and work... 13 Tactic N2: Advocate for and recognize the work of students at the post-baccalaureate level... 13 Tactic N3: Enhance the Graduate School's status as a source of data and information on graduate education... 13 Tactic N4: Demonstrate intellectual leadership in all aspects of graduate education... 13 Strategy O: Support advisory and governance relationships... 13 Tactic O1: Enhance consultation to ensure strong relationships with faculty... 13 Tactic O2: Enhance relationships with COGS/CIGS/GAPSA/PDA... 14 Tactic O3: Strengthen the Graduate School's connections with the University governance system... 14 Strategy P: Maintain the Graduate School's role in policy development... 14 Tactic P1: Promote excellence in oversight, compliance, and standards through graduate education policy... 14 REVISED: 9/23/14 4

Introduction The Graduate School at the University of Minnesota has a proud history and current role in fostering and supporting advanced study at the University of Minnesota. Its strategic directions are guided by its Mission Statement: "The mission of the Graduate School at the University of Minnesota is to ensure quality in graduate education, advocate for the academic and professional development of graduate students, advance intellectual communication and scholarship across disciplines, and promote cultural diversity, scholarly integrity, and inclusivity." This Strategic Plan is organized around five goals, each associated with specific strategies, tactics, actions and targeted outcomes. It is intended to provide focus and direction for the Graduate School's work through the five-year period, January 2014 December 2018. Goal 1: To advance excellence in graduate education and postdoctoral training Strategy A: Support the recruitment and admission of highly qualified students by improving quality and efficiencies in graduate admissions Tactic A1: Provide excellent direct service Action: Be proactive and highly responsive to constituents (prospective students, applicants, staff, faculty, others) Outcome: Constituent satisfaction with direct service Tactic A2: Enhance use of admissions technology Action: Offer leading-edge admissions technology to all constituents Outcome: Visible role for the Graduate School as a leader among peer institutions in use of admissions technology Tactic A3: Engage in outreach activities Action: Engage stakeholders and audiences on graduate admissions topics Outcome: High-quality programming and high-profile participation in outreach activities REVISED: 9/23/14 5

Tactic A4: Provide quality assurance Action: Ensure excellence and security in all areas of graduate admissions processing Outcome: Mistake-free and policy-compliant admissions processing Tactic A5: Communicate effectively Action: Provide relevant and timely communication to all constituents Outcome: Good fit for prospective students through clear information online and in communication campaigns Tactic A6: Facilitate administration of recruitment fellowships and funding packages for incoming students Action: Advocate for strategic investment in attracting top-quality students Outcome: Matriculation of top-ranked students Strategy B: Improve the graduate student experience from start to finish Tactic B1: Obtain funding support and funding packages Action: Advocate for and actively pursue enhanced funding for graduate students in preparation for capital campaign Outcome: Higher levels of support for individual students and higher overall funding levels for fellowships and assistantships, competitive with those of our peer group Tactic B2: Sponsor academic and professional development of graduate students Action: Improve existing initiatives and develop new initiatives, in collaboration with other University offices, to foster graduate students' academic and professional development Outcome: Extensive student engagement with resources for academic and professional development Tactic B3: Sponsor advising and mentoring of graduate students Action: Provide programming and tools to foster and recognize outstanding graduate advising Outcome: Events and online resources that meet needs of students and faculty in the area of advising and mentoring REVISED: 9/23/14 6

Tactic B4: Regularly assess student perceptions of their educational experience Action: Actively participate in the development of a survey of current graduate and professional students and utilize results to improve the graduate student experience Action: Conduct doctoral exit survey graduate and professional students and utilize results to improve the graduate student experience Outcome: Improved and comparative data on graduate students' experiences Tactic B5: Provide an annual Graduate School Orientation Action: Plan and execute annual Graduate School Orientation Outcome: Effective transition into graduate school for students and expanded awareness of Graduate School's role Tactic B6: Administer graduate student fellowships Action: Support University-wide fellowship competitions Outcome: Efficient processes and broad visibility for University-wide fellowship competitions Tactic B7: Support national fellowship competitions Action: Efficient processes and broad visibility for national fellowship competitions Outcome: Greater engagement and success in national fellowship competitions Tactic B8: Support timely degree completion Action: Work with programs to ensure attention to degree completion timelines Outcome: Improved time-to-degree Tactic B9: Increase timely completion of degrees by students from underrepresented backgrounds Action: Develop and support programs that help students complete their degrees Outcome: Completion rates of graduates from underrepresented backgrounds comparable to those of the overall graduate population Tactic B10: Support placement of graduates from underrepresented backgrounds Action: Collaborate with other University offices to increase students' exposure to postgraduation opportunities REVISED: 9/23/14 7

Outcome: Evidence of placement of graduates from underrepresented backgrounds comparable to that of the overall graduate population Tactic B11: Bring timely issues in graduate & professional education before the University s graduate education community Action: Offer an annual graduate and professional education assembly for members of the U s graduate education community Outcome: U graduate education community will be informed of relevant and timely issues in graduate education Strategy C: Track placement Tactic C1: Improve information on placement of graduate alumni Action: Collaborate with appropriate University partners to develop a central tracking system for graduate alumni placement Outcome: Improved knowledge of placement of graduate alumni and their use of their earned degrees Strategy D: Support Directors of Graduate Studies Tactic D1: Offer orientation for Directors of Graduate Studies Action: Develop new orientation program for Directors of Graduate Studies and updates on Graduate School initiatives Outcome: Comprehensive knowledge and engagement among Directors of Graduate Studies that enable DGSs to be evermore effective Tactic D2: Update handbook for Directors of Graduate Studies Action: Produce online handbook for Directors of Graduate Studies Outcome: Comprehensive online access to resources and information for Directors of Graduate Studies that enables DGSs to be evermore effective REVISED: 9/23/14 8

Strategy E: Provide leadership for new models of program assessment Tactic E1: Establish models, metrics, standards and approaches for measuring program quality Action: Collect and distribute data, including comparative data, on the characteristics and quality of graduate programs and work collaboratively with colleges and departments toward program improvement Outcome: Strong lines of communication with graduate programs to strengthen and improve their self-study processes and planning Tactic E2: Maintain and analyze data responsive to program needs Action: In collaboration with OIR, facilitate access and interpretation of data Outcome: Programs are able to make comparisons using well-informed data Tactic E3: Support articulation of graduate student program goals and graduate student outcomes Action: Provide templates and materials to enhance the efforts of all graduate programs in the development of statements of their intended learning outcomes for graduate students Outcome: Effective communication of graduate programs' goals for their graduate students Strategy F: Support post-docs Tactic F1: Support postdoctoral fellows and associates Action: Work collaboratively with other University offices and the Postdoctoral Association to advance the professional training and improve the experiences of postdoctoral fellows and associates Outcome: Advancements in the professional preparation of postdoctorates and in the experiences of postdoctorates REVISED: 9/23/14 9

Strategy G: Recruit high-quality and high potential students from diverse backgrounds Tactic G1: Develop a pool of academically strong candidates from diverse backgrounds Action: Provide resources to graduate programs to facilitate and support recruitment and enrollment of students from underrepresented backgrounds Outcome: Consistent improvements in the proportions and numbers of graduate students from underrepresented backgrounds Tactic G2: Support the recruitment of an internationally diverse student body Action: Collaborate with GPS Alliance, Office of Student Affairs and other University offices towards a more cohesive plan for international graduate student recruitment Outcome: An international student recruitment plan Goal 2: To advance intellectual communication and scholarship across disciplines Strategy H: Facilitate collaboration and communication across disciplines Tactic H1: Increase graduate student and faculty engagement in interdisciplinary research, scholarship and creative activity Action: Develop and promote interdisciplinary opportunities for graduate students and faculty Outcome: Participation by graduate students and faculty in expanded and enhanced interdisciplinary experiences Tactic H2: Foster innovation in interdisciplinary graduate education Action: Sponsorship of ongoing and innovative interdisciplinary work of graduate students and faculty Outcome: Increased activity reflecting ongoing and innovative interdisciplinary work of graduate students and faculty REVISED: 9/23/14 10

Tactic H3: Increase funding opportunities for interdisciplinary inquiry by graduate students Action: Collaborate to enlarge the funding pool for Interdisciplinary Graduate Groups, the Interdisciplinary Doctoral Fellowship, and similar initiatives Outcome: Flexible and engaged networks with effective and innovative ideas for funding interdisciplinary inquiry; increased funding opportunities for graduate students Tactic H4: Expand visibility of interdisciplinary initiatives Action: Communicate the rewards and complexities of interdisciplinary work with specific examples Outcome: Readiness of graduate students to engage in interdisciplinary research and scholarship Goal 3: To promote global and international initiatives and opportunities Strategy I: Work collaboratively with other University offices to support and promote international aspects of graduate education Tactic I1: Promote international experiences for graduate students Action: Improve communication about international connections and opportunities Outcome: High levels and appropriate forms of student involvement in international research and service opportunities Tactic I2: Improve graduate experiences of international students Action: Work with international graduate students and Directors of Graduate Studies to address experiences of international graduate students Outcome: High achievement and satisfaction among international students Tactic I3: Promote intercultural activities and discussions Action: Partner with other University units to advance initiatives Outcome: Intercultural competency and awareness of intercultural issues REVISED: 9/23/14 11

Strategy J: Promote international graduate study opportunities to students Tactic J1: Provide research travel grants Action: Administer research travel grant program Outcome: Increased opportunities for international graduate research and scholarship Goal 4: To promote scholarly integrity and responsibility Strategy K: Work collaboratively with other University offices and faculty to promote responsible research and scholarship Tactic K1: Increase awareness among faculty and students about their roles in promoting responsible research and scholarship Action: Expand workshops and online resources that support responsible research and scholarship and the rights and responsibilities of academic freedom Outcome: Engaged and articulate graduate students who understand and enact their responsibilities in research and scholarship Tactic K2: Provide and highlight resources available on campus for training in responsible research and scholarship Action: Provide options for satisfying requirements in the responsible conduct of research Outcome: Clear lines of information and responsibility to foster responsible conduct of research Goal 5: To position graduate education more centrally and visibly within the University Strategy M: Strengthen partnerships and collaborations Tactic M1: Coordinate with other university units to meet graduate students' needs and enhance opportunities available to them Action: Increase scope and density of collaborative efforts REVISED: 9/23/14 12

Outcome: Visible, collaborative partnerships and renewed intentionality about coordination of Graduate School activities Strategy N: Enhance strategic communications Tactic N1: Increase visibility and improve understanding of the Grad School's roles and work Action: Keep faculty, staff and students informed of Graduate School events and activities. Outcome: Widespread awareness of the role and work of the Graduate School Tactic N2: Advocate for and recognize the work of students at the postbaccalaureate level Action: Disseminate information about student accomplishments regularly and through several media Outcome: High visibility and recognition of students' work and accomplishments Tactic N3: Enhance the Graduate School's status as a source of data and information on graduate education Action: Keep faculty, staff and students informed of critical information related to graduate education Outcome: Ready access to critical information related to graduate education Tactic N4: Demonstrate intellectual leadership in all aspects of graduate education Action: Regional and national engagement with leaders in graduate education Outcome: Recognized status of the Graduate School as an intellectual leader in graduate education within the University and among its peers Strategy O: Support advisory and governance relationships Tactic O1: Enhance consultation to ensure strong relationships with faculty Action: Utilize the Graduate Education Council in planning and implementation of programs Outcome: Good working relationships with representatives of the faculty and, through them, engagement with the broader faculty REVISED: 9/23/14 13

Tactic O2: Enhance relationships with COGS/CIGS/GAPSA/PDA Action: Collaboration with student governance groups Outcome: Good working relationships with representatives from student governance groups Tactic O3: Strengthen the Graduate School's connections with the University governance system Action: Maintain involvement in Senate committees Outcome: Active and consultative role for the Graduate School in governance and decisionmaking at the University level Strategy P: Maintain the Graduate School's role in policy development Tactic P1: Promote excellence in oversight, compliance, and standards through graduate education policy Action: Review graduate education policies and maintain involvement in University-level policy development and oversight in conjunction with governance committees and administration Outcome: High standards for excellence in graduate education university-wide REVISED: 9/23/14 14