Strategic Framework Performance Metrics Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

Similar documents
Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

State Budget Update February 2016

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Financing Education In Minnesota

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

NC Community College System: Overview

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

River Parishes Community College

A Comparison of State of Florida Charter Technical Career Centers to District Non-Charter Career Centers,

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Partnerships and sponsorships: beverage pouring rights, on-campus ATMs and banking center, athletics sponsorships.

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Access Center Assessment Report

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Adult Education and Literacy Letter Index AEL Letters 2016 AEL Letters 2015 AEL Letters 2014 AEL Letters 2013 AEL Letters 10/11/17

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

For Your Future. For Our Future. ULS Strategic Framework

Dr. Brent Benda and Ms. Nell Smith

Trends in College Pricing

Ministry Audit Form 2016

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

Purdue Data Summit Communication of Big Data Analytics. New SAT Predictive Validity Case Study

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Assurance Argument. September 25-26, 2017

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

Tale of Two Tollands

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

JICA s Operation in Education Sector. - Present and Future -

WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

2016 Annual Report to the School Community

21 st Century Apprenticeship Models

The University of Wisconsin Library System

Optimal Enrollment Targets for the University of Minnesota, Morris

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

ANNUAL SCHOOL REPORT SEDA COLLEGE SUITE 1, REDFERN ST., REDFERN, NSW 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

MINNESOTA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Northern Kentucky University Department of Accounting, Finance and Business Law Financial Statement Analysis ACC 308

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent


Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

How Living Costs Undermine Net Price As An Affordability Metric

UIC HEALTH SCIENCE COLLEGES

Transcription:

Strategic Framework Performance Metrics Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Anoka-Ramsey Community College Anoka Technical College Summary of Measures and Goals April 27, 2015 ARCC/ATC Office of Institutional Research

MnSCU Strategic Framework Metrics Overview The MnSCU Strategic Framework Metrics include measures to be addressed by each college or university (institution-level) or the MnSCU system as a whole (system-level). Colleges and universities are responsible for addressing 21 institution-level metrics. The measures are based on prior performance of the institution and not how the college or university compares to other institutions. This document includes a visual summary of the 21 metrics and the intended goals to be met over a 5-year period for ARCC and ATC. (Note: The timelines for assessing the baseline often vary by metric as does the final assessment of progress. For further details on how each metric is measured, please contact the Office of Institutional Research (research@anokaramsey.edu). How this Document is Organized List of Metrics Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for All Minnesotans Area: Quality of Graduates Area: Student Success Area: Affordability Area: Diversity Goal 2: Be the Partner of Choice to Meet Community and Workforce Needs Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Efficient Use of Resources Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources Area: Develop New Resources Goal 4: Collective Success of the MnSCU System in Serving the State and Regions

Metric MnSCU Strategic Framework Metrics Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for All Minnesotans Reporting Level ARCC Current ARCC Goal* ATC Current ATC Goal* Area: Quality of Graduates 1.1 Program Learning Outcomes (in development) Institution NA NA NA NA 1.2 Licensure Exams Pass Rate Institution 83.7% 90.9% 94.8% 95.0% Area: Student Success 1.3 Student Persistence and Completion Institution 68.5% 71.4% 61.6% 73.1% 1.4 Completion Rate Institution 43.8% 54.0% 46.8% 55.4% Area: Affordability 1.5A Net Tuition and Fees System NA NA NA NA 1.5B Trajectory of Tuition and Fees Institution $0 $155 $0 $155 Area: Diversity 1.6 Employee Diversity - Employees of Color Institution 9.0% 11.5% 4.0% 8.2% 1.7 Student Diversity - Students of Color Institution 19.9% 19.3% 19.4% 20.0% 1.8 Student Persistence & Completion - Diverse Populations Institution 0.97 0.96 0.77 0.96 1.9 Completion Rate - Diverse Populations Institution 0.84 0.97 0.75 0.97 1.10 Campus Diversity Climate Institution 13.4 13.7 12.5 13.4 Goal 2: Be the Partner of Choice to Meet Community and Workforce Needs 2.1 Certificates and Degrees Awarded Institution 1,235 1,192 619 558 2.2 Related Employment of Graduates Institution 73.1% 76.2% 90.5% 93.7% 2.3 Align Academic Programs with Workforce Needs State NA NA NA NA 2.4 Customized Training/Cont. Ed. Enrollment Institution 1,231 595 1,732 1,633 Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Efficient Use of Resources 3.1 Institutional Support Expenses Institution 12.6 10.0-11.5 14.8 10.0-11.5 Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources 3.2 Space Utilization Institution 59.4% 68.3% 38.2% 47.1% 3.3 Instructional Cost Per FYE Institution 0.86 0.92 1.02 1.00 3.4 Composite Financial Index (CFI) Institution 3.75 3.00 2.67 3.00 3.5 Facilities Condition Index (FCI) Institution 0.1 0.07-0.13 0.13 0.07-0.13 Area: Develop New Resources 3.6 Private Giving (in millions) Institution $1.23 $1.91 $2.28 $2.47 3.7 Grants (in millions) Institution $2.70 $2.30 $0.00 $0.20 3.8 Customized Training & Cont. Ed. Revenue (in millions) Institution $0.94 $1.25 $1.02 $1.51 Goal 4: Collective Success of the MnSCU System in Serving the State and Regions 4.1 Successful Transfer Institution 82.3% 88.6% 60.9% 62.3% 4.2 System Market Share of Awards Conferred System NA NA NA NA 4.3 System Share of Higher Education Enrollment System NA NA NA NA Note: * 5-year goals with most of the final measures occuring in FY 2017.

Metric Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for All Minnesotans Reporting Level Shared Current Shared Goal* Area: Quality of Graduates 1.1 Program Learning Outcomes (in development) Institution NA NA 1.2 Licensure Exams Pass Rate Institution 86.9% 91.9% Area: Student Success 1.3 Student Persistence and Completion Institution 66.7% 71.7% 1.4 Completion Rate Institution 44.5% 54.3% Area: Affordability 1.5A Net Tuition and Fees System NA NA 1.5B Trajectory of Tuition and Fees Institution $0 $155 Area: Diversity 1.6 Employee Diversity - Employees of Color Institution 7.7% 10.6% 1.7 Student Diversity - Students of Color Institution 19.8% 19.4% 1.8 Student Persistence & Completion - Diverse Populations Institution 0.93 0.96 1.9 Completion Rate - Diverse Populations Institution 0.82 0.97 1.10 Campus Diversity Climate Institution 13.0 13.7 Goal 2: Be the Partner of Choice to Meet Community and Workforce Needs 2.1 Certificates and Degrees Awarded Institution 1,854 1,750 2.2 Related Employment of Graduates Institution 82.1% 84.7% 2.3 Align Academic Programs with Workforce Needs State NA NA 2.4 Customized Training/Cont. Ed. Enrollment Institution 2,963 2,228 Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Efficient Use of Resources 3.1 Institutional Support Expenses Institution 13.2 10.0-11.5 Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources 3.2 Space Utilization Institution 51.0% 60.0% 3.3 Instructional Cost Per FYE Institution 0.90 0.95 3.4 Composite Financial Index (CFI) Institution 3.39 3.00 3.5 Facilities Condition Index (FCI) Institution 0.11 0.07-0.13 Area: Develop New Resources MnSCU Strategic Framework Metrics (Combined) 3.6 Private Giving (in millions) Institution $1.45 $2.13 3.7 Grants (in millions) Institution $2.70 $2.50 3.8 Customized Training & Cont. Ed. Revenue (in millions) Institution $1.96 $2.76 Goal 4: Collective Success of the MnSCU System in Serving the State and Regions 4.1 Successful Transfer Institution 74.7% 79.5% 4.2 System Market Share of Awards Conferred System NA NA 4.3 System Share of Higher Education Enrollment System NA NA Note: * 5-year goals with most of the final measures occuring in FY 2017.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Quality of Graduates 1.2 Licensure Exam Pass Rate 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 94.8% 83.7% 95.0% 90.9% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 1.2 Description: Percent of a cohort of students or graduates that passed a state or national licensure examination. This measure is a weighted average pass rate and currently includes four licensing exams: nursing, teaching, peace officer, and radiography. Data Source: State or national licensing boards Licensure Exam Pass Rate: ARCC CY2006 CY2007 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 Actual 85.7% 81.1% 83.9% 91.6% 96.2% 90.9% 92.9% 83.7% Goal 90.9% 90.9% 90.9% 90.9% Change from CY2006 to CY2013 = -2. The rate is not reported if the number of candidates taking exams is less than 20. Licensure Exam Pass Rate: ATC CY2006 CY2007 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 Actual 89.5% 91.6% 89.8% 93.1% 95.1% 98.3% 96.9% 94.8% Goal 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% Change from CY2006 to CY2013 = 5.3. The rate is not reported if the number of candidates taking exams is less than 20.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Student Success 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 1.3 Student Persistence and Completion 68.5% 61.6% Goals 73.1% 71.4% 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Measure 1.3 Description: Percent of a fall entering cohort of full time regular and transfer students who have been retained, graduated, or transferred by the second fall term following original fall enrollment. Student Persistence and Completion - ARCC 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Actual 72.6% 71.7% 71.6% 72.5% 67.3% 65.0% 69.1% 67.0% 68.5% Goal 67.9% 69.5% 71.4% Change from 2005 to 2013 = -4.3. Student Persistence and Completion - ATC 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Actual 69.2% 67.5% 70.4% 66.9% 65.4% 64.6% 61.4% 66.1% 61.6% Goal 68.4% 70.6% 73.1% Change from 2005 to 2013 = -7.6.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Student Success 100% 1.4 Completion Rate 80% 60% 40% 20% 46.8% 43.8% 55.4% 54.0% 0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Measure 1.4 Description: Percent of an entering cohort of full time undergraduate regular and transfer students that has completed. Completion is measured as graduation by the end of the sixth spring after entry at the universities and as graduation or transfer by the end of the third spring after entry at the colleges. Completion Rate - ARCC 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Actual 52.7% 50.9% 54.5% 51.8% 50.4% 47.5% 45.6% 43.8% Goal 49.5% 50.7% 52.2% 54.0% Change from 2004 to 2011 = -8.9. Completion Rate - ATC 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Actual 54.0% 56.5% 55.2% 56.1% 52.0% 50.3% 48.6% 46.8% Goal 50.9% 52.1% 53.6% 55.4% Change from 2004 to 2011 = -7.2.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Affordability $600 $500 $400 $300 1.5B Trajectory of Tuition and Fees $200 $100 $0 -$100 $155 $0 $0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Measure 1.5B Description: Annual dollar change from the previous fiscal year in Board of Trustees approved tuition and required fees for full time undergraduate students. Trajectory of Tuition and Fees - ARCC FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Actual $ 211 $ 85 $ 108 $ 279 $ 252 $ 167 $ 22 $0 Goal $ 155 $ 155 $ 155 $ 155 Change from FY2008 to FY2015 = -211. Trajectory of Tuition and Fees - ATC FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Actual $122 $84 $62 $215 $560 $83 ($22) $0 Goal $155 $155 $155 $155 Change from FY2008 to FY2015 = -122.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Diversity 1.6 Employee Diversity - Employees of Color 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 11.5% 9.0% 8.2% 4.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 1.6 Description: Employees of color as a percent of total employees. Employee Diversity - Employees of Color - ARCC Actual 7.4% 6.1% 7.3% 8.8% 8.6% 8.7% 8.8% 9.0% Goal 9.4% 10.0% 10.7% 11.5% Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 1.6%. Employee Diversity - Employees of Color - ATC Actual 5.7% 5.3% 5.6% 4.9% 4.5% 5.4% 3.7% 4.0% Goal 6.1% 6.7% 7.3% 8.2% Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = -1.6%.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Diversity 1.7 Student Diversity - Students of Color 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 19.4% 19.9% 20.0% 19.3% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 1.7 Description: Student of color credit students as a percent of total credit headcount. Student Diversity - Students of Color - ARCC Actual 13.5% 13.8% 15.1% 16.0% 17.1% 18.1% 19.0% 19.9% Goal 18.5% 18.7% 19.0% 19.3% Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 6.4. Student Diversity - Students of Color - ATC Actual 18.1% 19.4% 19.0% 19.2% 19.1% 18.8% 18.5% 19.4% Goal 19.1% 19.3% 19.6% 20.0% Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 1.3.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Diversity 1.50 1.00 0.50 1.8 Student Success (Persistence and Completion) Ratio Students of Color to White Students 0.97 0.77 0.96 0.96 0.00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Measure 1.8 Description: The ratio of the student persistence and completion rate for students of color to white students. Student Success - Ratio Students of Color to White Students - ARCC 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Actual 0.95 0.94 0.97 0.96 0.86 0.86 0.91 1.00 0.97 Goal 0.90 0.93 0.96 Change from 2005 to 2013 = 0.01. Student Success - Ratio Students of Color to White Students - ATC 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Actual 0.98 1.11 1.03 0.70 0.91 0.79 0.96 0.79 0.77 Goal 0.86 0.91 0.96 Change from 2005 to 2013 = -0.21.

Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Diversity 1.50 1.00 0.50 1.9 Completion Rate Ratio Students of Color to White Students 0.84 0.75 0.97 0.97 0.00 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Measure 1.9 Description: The ratio of the student completion rate for students of color to white students. Completion Rate - Ratio Students of Color to White Students - ARCC 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Actual 0.92 1.03 0.91 0.99 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.84 Goal 0.86 0.89 0.93 0.97 Change from 2004 to 2011 = -0.08. Completion Rate - Ratio Students of Color to White Students - ATC 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Actual 0.69 1.11 1.08 1.07 0.80 0.79 0.81 0.75 Goal 0.85 0.88 0.92 0.97 Change from 2004 to 2011 = 0.07.

Composite Score Goal 1: Provide Access to Extraordinary Education for all Minnesotans Area: Diversity 1.10 Campus Diversity Climate 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.5 13.4 12.5 13.7 13.4 11.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Measure 1.10 Description: The extent to which the college or university promotes contact with and understanding of diverse populations, as measured by student opinion. Data Source: Composite scores of five items from Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and MnSCU Consortium items Campus Diversity Climate - ARCC FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Actual NA 12.9 NA 13.0 NA 13.4 Goal 13.2 13.3 13.5 13.7 Change from FY 2009 to FY 2013 = 0.5. Campus Diversity Climate - ATC FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Actual 12.5 12.4 NA 12.2 NA 12.5 Goal 12.5 12.8 13.0 13.4 Change from FY 2009 to FY 2013 = 0.

Goal 2: Be Partner of Choice to Meet Community and Workforce Needs 2.1 Certificates and Degrees Awarded 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 1,235 619 1,192 558 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 2.1 Description: The number of certificates, diplomas and degrees awarded each fiscal year. Certificates and Degrees Awarded - ARCC FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014* FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Actual 821 865 822 841 1,054 1,133 1,086 1,235 Goal 1,148 1,159 1,174 1,192 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 414. * Preliminary data. Certificates and Degrees Awarded - ATC FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014* FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Actual 464 387 402 401 492 502 551 619 Goal 508 516 527 541 558 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 155. * Preliminary data.

Goal 2: Be Partner of Choice to Meet Community and Workforce Needs 2.2 Related Employment of Graduates 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 90.5% 73.1% 93.7% 76.2% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Measure 2.2 Description: The percent of institution graduates in a fiscal year that reported they were employed during the year after graduation in a job that was related to their program or major. Data Source: System Office Research, Planning and Effectiveness, Graduate Follow Up data Related Employment of Graduates - ARCC FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Actual 88.6% 94.4% 73.9% 63.6% 66.9% 62.5% 69.6% 73.1% Goal 66.0% 68.7% 72.1% 76.2% Change from FY 2006 to FY 2013 = -15.5. The rate is not reported if number of graduates is less than 20. Related Employment of Graduates - ATC FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Actual 92.5% 79.7% 85.3% 65.3% 71.4% 86.1% 87.1% 90.5% Goal 88.0% 89.5% 91.4% 93.7% Change from FY 2006 to FY 2013 = -2. The rate is not reported if number of graduates is less than 20.

Goal 2: Be Partner of Choice to Meet Community and Workforce Needs 2.4 Customized Training / CE Enrollment 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 1,732 1,231 1,633 500 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 595 Measure 2.4 Description: Unduplicated number of students enrolled in credit or non credit contract customized training courses or non credit occupational/professional instructional courses. Customized Training/Continuing Education Enrollment - ARCC FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Actual 1,596 1,168 567 953 1,231 Goal 574 580 587 595 Change from FY 2010 to FY 2014 = -365. Customized Training/Continuing Education Enrollment - ATC FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Actual 2,313 1,472 1,555 2,029 1,732 Goal 1,574 1,590 1,609 1,633 Change from FY 2010 to FY 2014 = -581.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Efficient Use of Resources 24% 3.1 Institutional Support Expenses 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 14.8% 12.6% 11.5% 10.0% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: Where two goal lines are displayed, the goal is the range between the two lines. Measure 3.1 Description: Institutional support expenses as a percent of total expenses. Institutional Support Expenses - ARCC Actual 11.4% 12.4% 12.0% 12.2% 13.9% 11.0% 12.4% 12.6% Goal 10.6-12.1 10.4-11.9 10.2-11.7 10.0-11.5 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 1.2. Institutional Support Expenses - ATC Actual 13.2% 13.8% 13.8% 13.5% 15.4% 20.7% 16.1% 14.8% Goal 10.6-12.1 10.4-11.9 10.2-11.7 10.0-11.5 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 1.6.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources 100% 3.2 Space Utilization 80% 60% 40% 20% 59.4% 38.2% 68.3% 47.1% 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Measure 3.2 Description: Percent of available academic room time that is utilized for credit courses. Space Utilization - ARCC FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Actual 59.4% Goal 63.0% 64.7% 68.3% Space Utilization - ATC FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Actual 38.2% Goal 41.8% 43.6% 47.1%

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources 3.3 Instructional Cost Per FYE 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 1.02 1.00 0.92 0.86 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 3.3 Description: The ratio of the Actual to Expected Value of the Fully allocated instructional expenditures per fullyear equivalent enrollment (FYE). Instructional Cost Per FYE - ARCC Actual 0.88 0.91 0.99 0.93 0.89 0.92 0.87 0.86 Goal 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = -0.01. Instructional Cost Per FYE - ARCC Actual 0.98 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.08 1.06 1.02 Goal 1.06 1.05 1.02 1.00 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 0.03.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources 5.00 3.4 Composite Financial Index (CFI) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.75 2.67 3.00 0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 3.4 Description: Weighted composition of four financial measures: Primary Reserve Ratio, Viability Ratio, Return on Net Assets, and Operating Margin. Data Source: System Office Finance Division Composite Financial Index (CFI) - ARCC Actual 3.71 0.86 1.58 3.29 2.45 4.36 3.86 3.75 Goal 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 0.04. Composite Financial Index (CFI) - ATC Actual 2.96 2.24 3.36 4.01 1.53 3.18 3.95 2.67 Goal 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = -0.29.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Steward Financial and Physical Resources 3.5 Facilities Condition Index (FCI) 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.07 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: Where two goal lines are displayed, the goal is the range between the two lines. Measure 3.5 Description: The dollar value of deferred maintenance as a proportion of facility replacement value at each college and university. Data Source: System Office Finance Division Facilities Condition Index (FCI) - ARCC Actual 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.10 Goal 0.07-0.13 0.07-0.13 0.07-0.13 0.07-0.13 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 =-0.02. Facilities Condition Index (FCI) - ATC Actual 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.06 0.13 0.13 Goal 0.07-0.13 0.07-0.13 0.07-0.13 0.07-0.13 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 =0.05.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Develop New Resources 3.6 Private Giving $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $- $2.47 $2.28 $1.91 1.23 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 3.6 Description: Ratio of funds raised by the Foundation to the net funds provided by the institution to the Foundation. Data Source: System Office Advancement Division, Annual Return on Investment Reports from college and university foundations Private Giving - ARCC FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Actual $1.94 $1.47 $1.76 $1.23 Goal $1.58 $1.67 $1.78 $1.91 Change from FY 2011 to FY 2014 = $ -0.701. Private Giving - ATC FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Actual $2.95 $1.90 $1.86 $2.28 Goal $2.04 $2.16 $2.30 $2.47 Change from FY 2011 to FY 2013 = $ -0-664.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Develop New Resources $ Millions $5.00 $4.00 3.7 Grant Revenue $4.04 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 $2.70 $0.20 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 3.7 Description: Grant revenues received by the institution in the fiscal year. Data Source: System Office Finance Division, Financial Reporting Unit. All grant data reported in audited financial statements Grants - ARCC Actual $1.611 $1.978 $2.154 $1.895 $2.230 $1.997 $2.652 $2.699 Goal $2.072 $2.132 $2.207 $2.297 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = $ 1.087. Grants - ATC Actual $0.653 $0.530 $0.448 $0.316 $0.340 $0.177 $0.063 $0.003 Goal $0.183 $0.189 $0.195 $0.203 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = $ -0.651.

Goal 3: Provide Highest Value/Most Cost-Effective Higher Education Option Area: Develop New Resources 3.8 Customized Training and Continuing Education Revenues $ Millions $1.51 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.02 $1.25 $1.00 $0.80 $0.94 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 3.8 Description: Total customized training revenue received in a fiscal year net of state appropriations. Customized Training and Continuing Education Revenues - ARCC Actual $0.606 $0.659 $0.652 $1.062 $1.130 $1.040 $1.030 $0.937 Goal $1.092 $1.134 $1.186 $1.248 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = $ 0.331. Customized Training and Continuing Education Revenues - ATC Actual $1.074 $1.130 $1.113 $1.147 $0.855 $1.260 $1.500 $1.020 Goal $1.323 $1.373 $1.436 $1.512 Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = $ -0.053.

Goal 4: Collective Success of MnSCU System in Serving State and Regions 4.1 Successful Transfer 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 82.3% 60.9% 88.6% 62.3% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Measure 4.1 Description: Percent of credits accepted in transfer for undergraduate students at receiving institutions. Successful Transfer - ARCC Actual 75.7% 75.6% 75.7% 75.5% 77.0% 80.1% 82.3% 82.3% Goal 82.2% 83.9% 86.0% 88.6% Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 6.6. Successful Transfer - ATC Actual 28.1% 31.1% 33.0% 31.5% 37.2% 53.8% 58.2% 60.9% Goal 55.9% 57.6% 59.8% 62.3% Change from FY 2007 to FY 2014 = 32.8.