Bloom & Beyond. Susanne C. Ashby, PhD Assessment Coordinator Pulaski Technical College

Similar documents
Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Promoting Active Learning in University Classes

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

Language Acquisition Chart

USING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Lecturing Module

Teachers Guide Chair Study

EQuIP Review Feedback

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Secondary English-Language Arts

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Florida Reading for College Success

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Copyright Corwin 2015

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry


English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Outcome Based Education 15/01/2012

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Biome I Can Statements

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

Course Syllabus Art History I ARTS 1303

ADDIE MODEL THROUGH THE TASK LEARNING APPROACH IN TEXTILE KNOWLEDGE COURSE IN DRESS-MAKING EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

Syllabus Education Department Lincoln University EDU 311 Social Studies Methods

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Technical Manual Supplement

Developing True/False Test Sheet Generating System with Diagnosing Basic Cognitive Ability

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

Objectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

SPATIAL SENSE : TRANSLATING CURRICULUM INNOVATION INTO CLASSROOM PRACTICE

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Statewide Framework Document for:

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Relating Math to the Real World: A Study of Platonic Solids and Tessellations

Last Editorial Change:

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

MBA 510: Critical Thinking for Managers

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

UC San Diego - WASC Exhibit 7.1 Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators

Enduring Understandings: Students will understand that

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

WHI Voorhees SOL Unit WHI.3 Date

Guest Editorial Motivating Growth of Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching: A Case for Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Rigor is NOT a Four-Letter Word By Barbara R. Blackburn (Eye On Education, Inc., 2008)

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

PHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Sample Performance Assessment

Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies Master of Professional Studies in Human Resources Management Course Syllabus Summer 2014

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Multiple Intelligences 1

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Transcription:

Bloom & Beyond Susanne C. Ashby, PhD Assessment Coordinator Pulaski Technical College

Presentation Goals List the 3 domains of Bloom s Taxonomy List and define the 6 levels of Cognition according to Bloom Make comparisons among Bloom s Original taxonomy, Bloom s Revised Taxonomy & Webb s Depths of Knowledge Identify key words and question stems used at each level of Cognition Apply Bloom s Taxonomy to craft SLOs and assessments

Bloom Benjamin S. Bloom [1913 1999] American Educational Psychologist Chicago University Influenced by Ralph W. Tyler What Bloom had to offer his students was a model of an inquiring scholar, someone who embraced the idea that education as a process was an effort to realize human potential, indeed, even more, it was an effort designed to make potential possible. [E. W. Eisner, 2000] Development of specifications through which educational objectives could be organized according to their cognitive complexity.

Bloom s Taxonomy Affective Domain Includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally Such as feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes

Bloom s Taxonomy Psychomotor Domain Includes physical movement, coordination, and use of the motorskill areas. Development of these skills requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or techniques in execution.

Bloom s Taxonomy Cognitive Domain Involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills This includes the recall or recognition of specific facts, procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and skills. There are 6 major categories starting from the simplest behavior to the most complex. Hierarchy of objectives according to cognitive complexity Higher-level objectives include, and are dependent on lower level cognitive skills

Bloom s Taxonomy: Cognitive Domain Adapted from Bloom, 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I, cognitive domain. NY & Toronto: Longmans, Green.

Bloom s Lower Levels Knowledge Recalling previously learned information such as facts, terminology, rules, etc. Answers may be memorized or closely paraphrased from assigned material. Define, list, name, recall

Bloom s Lower Levels Comprehension Ability to comprehend the meaning of material. Answers must be in the student s own words while still using terminology appropriate to the course material. Explain, summarize, distinguish between, restate

Bloom s Lower Levels Demonstrate rote or surface learning Declarative or Procedural Knowledge Answers found in the assigned materials 80% of HS teachers test at these lower levels

Bloom s Higher Levels Application Requires recognizing, identifying, or applying a concept or principle in a new situation or solving a new problem. May require identifying or generating examples not found in assigned materials. Demonstrate, arrange, relate, adapt

Bloom s Higher Levels Analysis Ability to break material down into its component parts and to understand its underlying structure May require students to compare and contrast or explain how an example illustrates a given concept or principle Require students to identify logical errors or to differentiate among facts, opinions, assumptions, hypotheses and conclusions Expected to draw relationships between ideas Differentiate, estimate, infer, diagram

Bloom s Higher Levels Synthesis Opposite of Analysis Ability to combine parts to form a new whole; to synthesize a variety of elements into an original and significant whole. Produce something unique or original Solve some unfamiliar problem in a unique way Combine, create, formulate, construct

Bloom s Higher Levels Evaluation Ability to evaluate a total situation, to judge the value of material for a certain purpose, combining elements of all the other categories and also value judgments based on defined, fixed criteria. The most important part of the answer is the justification and rationale for the conclusion Judge, critique, justify, discriminate

Bloom s Higher Levels Meaningful or deep learning Go beyond textual material in that they must be inferred or extrapolated from the material in the assigned material. Students creativity, originality and critical thinking is required at higher levels More authentic than lower levels Thinking at this level is more likely to represent types of performances required in the real world

Bloom s Taxonomy Revised Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering Bloom s Taxonomy, 1956 Bloom s Revised Taxonomy, 2001

Bloom s Comparison Bloom s Original Knowledge Recall appropriate information Comprehension Application Grasp the meaning of the material Use new material in new and concrete situations Bloom s Revised Remembering Recall appropriate information Understanding Applying Grasp the meaning of the material Use new material in new and concrete situations

Bloom s Comparison Bloom s Original Analysis Break down material into component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood Synthesis Put parts together to form a new whole Evaluation Judge the value of material for a given purpose Bloom s Revised Analyzing Break down material into component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood Evaluating Creating Make judgments based on criteria and standards Put elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning, or producing.

Webb s Depth of Knowledge [2002] Extended Thinking Strategic Thinking Skills & Concepts Recall & Reproduction Bloom s Taxonomy, 1956 Webb s Depth of Knowledge, 2002

Webb s Depth of Knowledge [2002] Webb s DoK Level Recall & Reproduction Skill & Concepts Described Recall a fact, information, or procedure Engages in mental process beyond habitual response using information or conceptual knowledge. Requires two or more steps.

Webb s Depth of Knowledge [2002] Webb s DoK Level Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking Described Requires reasoning, developing a plan or a sequence of steps, some complexity, more than one possible answer, higher level of thinking than the previous 2 levels. Requires investigation, complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking most likely over an extended period of time. Note: longer time period is not an applicable factor if work is simply repetitive and/or does not require higher order thinking skills

Knowledge: Key Words Arrange Define Describe Duplicate Identify Label List Match Order Outline Recognize Relate Recall Repeat Reproduce Select State Who, what, when, & where

Knowledge: Questions What happened after...? How many...? Who was it that...? Can you name the...? Describe what happened at...? Who spoke to...? Can you tell why...? Find the meaning of...? What is...? Which is true or false...?

Comprehension: Key Words Classify Convert Defend Describe Discuss Distinguish Estimate Explain Express Extend Generalized Give example(s) Identify Indicate Infer Locate Paraphrase Predict Recognize Rewrite Review Select Summarize Translate

Comprehension: Questions Can you write in your own words...? Can you write a brief outline...? What do you think could of happened next...? Who do you think...? What was the main idea...? Who was the key character...? Can you distinguish between...? What differences exist between...? Can you provide an example of what you mean...? Can you provide a definition for...? How would you classify the type of...?

Application: Key Words Apply Change Choose Compute Demonstrate Discover Dramatize Employ Illustrate Interpret Manipulate Modify Operate Practice Predict Prepare Produce Relate Schedule Show Sketch Solve Use Write

Application: Questions Do you know another instance where...? Could this have happened in...? Can you group by characteristics such as...? What factors would you change if...? Can you apply the method used to some experience of your own...? What questions would you ask of...? From the information given, can you develop a set of instructions about...? Would this information be useful if you had a...?

Analysis: Key Words Analyze Appraise Breakdown Calculate Categorize Compare Contrast Criticize Diagram Differentiate Discriminate Distinguish Examine Experiment Identify Illustrate Infer Model Outline Point out Question Relate Select Separate Subdivide Test

Analysis: Questions Which events could have happened...? If... happened, what might the ending have been? How was this similar to...? What was the underlying theme of...? What do you see as other possible outcomes? Why did... changes occur? Can you compare your... with that presented in...? Can you explain what must have happened when...? How is... similar to...? What are some of the problems of...? Can you distinguish between...? What were some of the motives behind...?

Synthesis: Key Words Arrange Assemble Categorize Collect Combine Comply Compose Construct Create Design Develop Devise Explain Formulate Generate Plan Prepare Rearrange Reconstruct Relate Reorganize Revise Rewrite Set up Summarize Synthesize Tell Write

Synthesis: Questions Can you design a... to...? Why not compose a song about...? Can you see a possible solution to...? If you had access to all resources how would you deal with...? Why don't you devise your own way to deal with...? What would happen if...? How many ways can you...? Can you create new and unusual uses for...? Can you write a new recipe for a tasty dish? Can you develop a proposal which would...?

Evaluation: Key Words Appraise Argue Assess Attach Choose Compare Conclude Contrast Debate Defend Describe Discriminate Estimate Evaluate Explain Judge Justify Interpret Relate Predict Rate Select Summarize Support Value

Evaluation: Questions Is there a better solution to.... Judge the value of.... Can you defend your position about...? Do you think... is a good or a bad thing? How would you have handled...? What changes to... would you recommend? Do you believe...? Are you a... person? How would you feel if...? How effective are...? What do you think about...?

Bloom & Grow Bloom s Taxonomy is a useful tool in crafting Student Learning Outcomes [SLO] Bloom s Taxonomy is a useful tool in drafting questions at various levels of cognition [that could be used on tests and quizzes and during class discussions] Bloom s Taxonomy is a useful tool in designing appropriate assessments that relate to SLO

Bloom & Beyond Thank you for your time and attention Susanne C. Ashby, PhD Assessment Coordinator Pulaski Technical College