Philanthropy Panel Study The Philanthropy Module in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics

Similar documents
Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

46 Children s Defense Fund

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

Housekeeping. Questions

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

CLE/MCLE Information by State

NASWA SURVEY ON PELL GRANTS AND APPROVED TRAINING FOR UI SUMMARY AND STATE-BY-STATE RESULTS

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

The following tables contain data that are derived mainly

Fisk University FACT BOOK. Office of Institutional Assessment and Research

Proficiency Illusion

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

Set t i n g Sa i l on a N e w Cou rse

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

Understanding University Funding

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

ObamaCare Expansion Enrollment is Shattering Projections

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Giving in the Netherlands 2015

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES A peer-reviewed scholarly journal

top of report Note: Survey result percentages are always out of the total number of people who participated in the survey.

NBCC NEWSNOTES. Guidelines for the New. World of WebCounseling. Been There, Done That: Multicultural Training Can. Always be productively revisted

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Imagine this: Sylvia and Steve are seventh-graders

Educational Attainment

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

LEWIS M. SIMES AS TEACHER Bertel M. Sparks*

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Emergency Safety Interventions Kansas Regulations and Comparisons to Other States. April 16, 2013

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Kenya: Age distribution and school attendance of girls aged 9-13 years. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 20 December 2012

January 2014 March 2015 Virginia LGBT TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report August 10, 2015

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Updated: December Educational Attainment

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Produced by the Feminist Majority Foundation s Campus Leadership Program East Coast: 1600 Wilson Blvd Suite 801, Arlington, VA

Innovation Village: Building Tradition

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

CC Baccalaureate. Kevin Ballinger Dean Consumer & Health Sciences. Joe Poshek Dean Visual & Performing Arts/Library

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Albert (Yan) Wang. Flow-induced Trading Pressure and Corporate Investment (with Xiaoxia Lou), Forthcoming at

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Evaluation of Grassroots Volunteer Leadership Development Training Conducted by Points of Light Foundation

Mathematics Session 1

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

CLASS EXODUS. The alumni giving rate has dropped 50 percent over the last 20 years. How can you rethink your value to graduates?

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

The Implementation of a Consecutive Giving Recognition Program at the University of Florida

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Ken Cyree, Ph.D. Dean of the Business School Frank R. Day/Mississippi Bankers Association Chair Professor of Finance

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

Draft Preliminary Master Plan April 18, 2012

2014 Journalism Graduate Skills for the Professional Workplace: Expectations from Journalism Professionals and Educators

NCEO Technical Report 27

Transcription:

Philanthropy Panel Study The Philanthropy Module in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics The Philanthropy Panel Study (PPS) is a module of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), which reaches more than 9,000 households every two years. The PSID is fielded by the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. Questions were asked in 2015 about charitable giving in 2014. To learn more, visit https://philanthropy.iupui.edu/research/current-research/philanthropy-panelstudy.html. The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy thanks Atlantic Philanthropies for the initial funding to launch PPS in 2001 and the donors whose recent contributions make continued waves of PPS possible. Recent institutional donors include: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Charles Stewart Mott Foundation John Templeton Foundation To contribute, please contact Andrew Keeler (ackeeler@iupui.edu) or give online at www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/give-now and select School of Philanthropy Fund. 2

Acknowledgments Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy is dedicated to improving philanthropy to improve the world by training and empowering students and professionals to be innovators and leaders who create positive and lasting change. The School offers a comprehensive approach to philanthropy through its academic, research and international programs, and through The Fund Raising School, Lake Institute on Faith & Giving, and the Women s Philanthropy Institute. Learn more at philanthropy.iupui.edu. The analyses presented here are made possible by the work of many people, including the following at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy: Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm, Founding Director of the Philanthropy Panel Study Amir Pasic, Eugene R. Tempel Dean Patrick M. Rooney, Executive Associate Dean for Academic Programs Una O. Osili, Associate Dean for Research and International Programs Jon Bergdoll, Applied Statistician Xiao Han, Research Associate Timothy Gondola, Research Assistant Permission is granted to use, circulate, and cite figures in this pamphlet with attribution to the Philanthropy Panel Study. 2017 The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. All rights reserved. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy University Hall 301 University Blvd., Suite 3000 Indianapolis, IN 46202 3

Overview of Overall Giving A number of demographic factors play a role in how much households and individuals give to charity. The graphs in this overview provide comparisons of giving to charity by: Age (<=40, 41 64, and 65+) Income (<=$50,000, $50,001 $99,999, and $100,000+) Wealth, excluding the equity in a home (<=$50,000, $50,001 $199,999, and $200,000+) Education level of the head of household (high school or less, some college, bachelor s degree, and graduate school) Geographical location, using regions of the United States defined by the U.S. Census Bureau Marital status of the head of household (married, never married, widowed, separated, and divorced) This overview uses the 2015 wave of the Panel Philanthropy Study (PPS) data, a module of the Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID), to make inferences about household charitable giving in the United States. The PPS is the nation s first and largest ongoing study examining the charitable giving of American households over time. This overview uses the nationally representative data from PPS to present some key facts about charitable giving based on responses provided by households in 2014, drawing on demographic characteristics of U.S. donor households. This report presents the giving rate (the percentage of U.S. households that gave) and the average and median gift amounts among U.S. donor households to charity. In general, the higher the number of respondents in a group, the more reliable the result (the more likely the same result would be found if we had an opportunity to conduct the same study repeatedly with multiple representative samples at the same time). Statistics calculated for a group with fewer than 100 observations are starred in this report in order to indicate that the result should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, the analysis presented in this report does not control for any other variable. Households that answered the philanthropy questions were asked first if they made charitable donations totaling $25 or more in 2014. Households responding yes were asked further questions about how much they gave to each of 11 different types of charities. Over 9,000 households participated in the 2015 wave of the PSID. The analysis for this report is based on the 8,925 households that responded to the philanthropy questions. In our analysis, we used the sampling weights provided by the PSID research team at the University of Michigan to yield nationally representative results. Overview of Charitable Giving in 2014 Giving Rate Average amount per donor household Overall Giving 55.5% $2,514 $900 Median amount per donor household 55.5 percent of all U.S. households gave to charity in 2014 $2,514 was the average giving amount to charity per U.S. donor household in 2014 $900 was the median giving amount to charity per U.S. donor household in 2014 4

Overall Giving Rate by Head of Household s Age Group 73.1% 57.4% 38.1% <=40 41-64 65+ This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to charity in 2014 by the age of the head of household. The data suggests that the charitable giving rate increased with the head of household s age. Over seven out of ten households headed by an individual 65 or older gave to charity. Almost six out of ten households headed by an individual between 41 and 64 years old gave to charity. Slightly less than four out of ten surveyed households headed by an individual 40 or younger gave to charity. Overall, 55.5 percent of responding households contributed to charity in 2014. 5

Overall Giving by Head of Household s Age Group Median Average $2,626 $2,901 $1,657 $500 $900 $1,200 <40 n=1,409 41-64 n=1,900 65+ n=854 This graph shows the total average and median amounts given to charity in 2014 by the age of the head of household, among U.S. donor households. Donor households headed by an older individual gave higher average and median gift amounts to charity. Among those that gave, households headed by an individual 65 or older gave $275 more on average to charity than households headed by an individual between 41 and 64 years old. Among those that gave, households headed by an individual 65 or older gave $1,244 more on average to charity than households headed by an individual 40 or younger. Among all U.S. donor households, the average total gift was $2,514 (median=$900). 6

Overall Giving Rate by Household Income Level 82.8% 61.7% 38.0% <=$50,000 $50,001-$99,999 $100,000+ This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to charity in 2014 by household income level. Households with higher income levels gave at higher rates to charity. Over eight out of ten households with income levels of $100,000 or more gave to charity. Over six out of ten households with income levels between $50,001 and $99,999 gave to charity. Almost four out of ten households with income levels of $50,000 or less gave to charity. Overall, 55.5 percent of responding households contributed to charity in 2014. 7

Overall Giving by Household Income Level Median Average $3,944 $2,193 $1,259 $914 $1,350 $500 <$50,000 n=1,310 $50,001-$99,999 n=1,351 $100,000+ n=1,502 This graph shows the average and median amounts given to charity in 2014 by household income level, among U.S. donor households. Donor households with higher income levels gave higher average and median gift amounts to charity. Among those that gave, the average gift from households with income levels of $100,000 or more was nearly twice that from households with income levels between $50,001 and $99,999. Among those that gave, the median gift amount from households with income levels of $100,000 or more was more than two times that from households with income levels of $50,000 or less. Among all U.S. donor households, the average total gift was $2,514 (median=$900). 8

Overall Giving Rate by Household Wealth Level 73.6% 86.3% 41.0% <=$50,000 $50,001-$199,999 $200,000+ This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to charity in 2014 by household wealth level. For this analysis, wealth did not include the value of the equity in the household home. Households with higher wealth levels gave at higher rates to charity in 2014. Four in ten households with wealth levels of $50,000 or less gave to charity. Donor households with wealth levels of $200,000 or more gave at a rate that was 12.7 percentage points higher than that of households with wealth levels between $50,001 and $199,999. Nearly nine out of ten households with wealth levels of $200,000 or more gave to charity. Overall, 55.5 percent of responding households contributed to charity in 2014. 9

Overall Giving by Household Wealth Level Median Average $4,276 $1,435 $2,109 $1,850 $525 $830 <$50,000 n=2,350 $50,001-$199,999 n=765 $200,000+ n=1,048 This graph shows the average and median amounts given to charity in 2014 by household wealth level, among U.S. donor households. For this analysis, wealth did not include the value of the equity in the household home. Donor households with higher wealth levels gave higher average and median gift amounts to charity. Donor households with wealth levels between $50,001 and $199,999 gave $674 more on average than those with wealth levels of $50,000 or less. On average, donor households with wealth levels of $200,000 or more gave $2,167 more than those with wealth levels between $50,001 and $199,999 and $2,841 more than those with wealth levels of $50,000 or less. Among all U.S. donor households, the average total gift was $2,514 (median=$900). 10

Overall Giving Rate by Head of Household s Education Level 74.5% 73.2% 55.6% 39.1% HS or Less Some College BA/BS Graduate School Notes: HS or Less high school education or less BA/BS bachelor s degree This graph shows U.S. household charitable giving rates in 2014 by education level of the head of household. Generally, households headed by an individual with a higher level of education gave at higher rates to charity in 2014. The charitable giving rate of households headed by an individual with some college education was 16.5 percentage points higher than that of households headed by an individual with a high school education or less. The charitable giving rate of households headed by an individual with a bachelor s degree is 1.3 percentage points more than that of households headed by an individual with at least some graduate coursework. Overall, 55.5 percent of responding households contributed to charity in 2014. 11

Overall Giving by Head of Household s Education Level Median Average $3,739 $3,043 $2,019 $1,524 $1,120 $1,400 $600 $700 HS or Less n=1,181 Some College n=1,168 BA/BS n=995 Graduate School n=819 Notes: HS or Less high school education or less BA/BS bachelor s degree This graph shows the average and median amounts given to charity in 2014 by the head of household s education level, among U.S. donor households. Donor households headed by an individual with a higher education level gave higher average and median gift amounts to charity. On average, donor households headed by an individual with at least some graduate coursework gave more than twice as much as households headed by an individual with a high school education or less. On average, donor households headed by an individual with a bachelor s degree gave $696 less than households headed by an individual with at least some graduate coursework. Among all U.S. donor households, the average total gift was $2,514 (median=$900). 12

Overall Giving Rate by Household Geographic Region 72.3% 61.9% 51.4% 58.3% 54.2% 49.3% 49.2% 59.0% 54.5% North East Mid Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to charity in 2014 by U.S. geographic region. A 23.1 percentage-point difference separated the region with the highest charitable giving rate (North East) and the lowest (West South Central). Overall, 55.5 percent of responding households contributed to charity in 2014. The regions as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau are described below. North East Mid Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington, DC, West Virginia Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington 13

Overall Giving by Household Geographic Region Median Average $2,963 $3,006 $2,955 $2,470 $2,708 $2,475 $2,623 $2,251 $1,840 $1,450 $750 $700 $900 $1,100 $1,000 $1,000 $1,125 $700 North East n=153 Mid Atlantic n=458 East North Central n=634 West North Central n=358 South Atlantic n=983 East South Central n=314 West South Central n=423 Mountain n=251 Pacific n=560 This graph shows the average and median amounts given to charity in 2014 by U.S. geographic region, among U.S. donor households. Though West South Central region households gave at the lowest rate, those that did give donated the most on average ($3,006) among the geographic regions. Mid Atlantic region households gave at the second highest rate. However, donor households in that region donated $1,166 less on average than donating West South Central region households. Among all U.S. donor households, the average total gift was $2,514 (median=$900). Region definitions can be found on previous page. 14

Overall Giving Rate by Head of Household s Marital Status 70.6% 69.1% 46.9% 33.2% 30.8% Married Never Married Widowed Divorced Separated This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to charity in 2014 by marital status of the head of household. Households headed by a married individual gave at a slightly higher rate (by 1.5 percentage points) than those headed by a widowed individual. Households headed by a never married individual gave at a higher rate (by 2.4 percentage points) than those headed by a separated individual. The charitable giving rate of households headed by a married individual was 39.8 percentage points higher than that of households headed by a separated individual. Overall, 55.5 percent of responding households contributed to charity in 2014. 15

Overall Giving by Head of Household s Marital Status Median Average $3,314 $2,118 $1,563 $1,200 $1,166 $1,100 $1,292 $400 $500 $500 Married n=2,509 Never Married n=721 Widowed n=259 Divorced n=561 Separated n=113 This graph shows the average and median amounts given to charity in 2014 by the marital status of the head of household, among U.S. donor households. The average charitable gift from donor households headed by a married individual was more than twice that from both donor households headed by a divorced individual and donor households headed by a separated individual. The average gift amount to charity from donor households headed by a never married individual was about a third of that from households headed by a married individual. Among those that gave, the median gift amount from households headed by a widowed individual was almost three times that from households headed by a never married individual. Among all U.S. donor households, the average total gift was $2,514 (median=$900). 16