MACRO-TRENDS SHAPING OPEN LIFELONG LEARNING

Similar documents
SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

National Academies STEM Workforce Summit

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Introduction Research Teaching Cooperation Faculties. University of Oulu

Summary and policy recommendations

National Pre Analysis Report. Republic of MACEDONIA. Goce Delcev University Stip

Challenges for Higher Education in Europe: Socio-economic and Political Transformations

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

The Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) provides a picture of adults proficiency in three key information-processing skills:

May To print or download your own copies of this document visit Name Date Eurovision Numeracy Assignment

CALL FOR PARTICIPANTS

Department of Education and Skills. Memorandum

The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

The development of national qualifications frameworks in Europe

ehealth Governance Initiative: Joint Action JA-EHGov & Thematic Network SEHGovIA DELIVERABLE Version: 2.4 Date:

Overall student visa trends June 2017

The development of ECVET in Europe

DISCUSSION PAPER. In 2006 the population of Iceland was 308 thousand people and 62% live in the capital area.

SECTION 2 APPENDICES 2A, 2B & 2C. Bachelor of Dental Surgery

Twenty years of TIMSS in England. NFER Education Briefings. What is TIMSS?

Impact of Educational Reforms to International Cooperation CASE: Finland

06-07 th September 2012, Constanta Romania th Sept 2012

NA/2006/17 Annexe-1 Lifelong Learning Programme for Community Action in the Field of Lifelong Learning (Lifelong Learning Programme LLP)

Teaching Practices and Social Capital

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Science and Technology Indicators. R&D statistics

UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY IN EUROPE II

Students with Disabilities, Learning Difficulties and Disadvantages STATISTICS AND INDICATORS

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

The development of ECVET in Europe

2001 MPhil in Information Science Teaching, from Department of Primary Education, University of Crete.

EQE Candidate Support Project (CSP) Frequently Asked Questions - National Offices

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Welcome to. ECML/PKDD 2004 Community meeting

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

Financiación de las instituciones europeas de educación superior. Funding of European higher education institutions. Resumen

Universities as Laboratories for Societal Multilingualism: Insights from Implementation

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

CEN/ISSS ecat Workshop

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

PIRLS. International Achievement in the Processes of Reading Comprehension Results from PIRLS 2001 in 35 Countries

Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities

International House VANCOUVER / WHISTLER WORK EXPERIENCE

Lifelong Learning Programme. Implementation of the European Agenda for Adult Learning

WHAT IS AEGEE? AEGEE-EUROPE PRESENTATION EUROPEAN STUDENTS FORUM

Summary Report. ECVET Agent Exploration Study. Prepared by Meath Partnership February 2015

international PROJECTS MOSCOW

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the

North American Studies (MA)

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes

Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for apprenticeship

Rethinking Library and Information Studies in Spain: Crossing the boundaries

A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education Using the case study approach to contribute to evidence-based policy

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

HIGHLIGHTS OF FINDINGS FROM MAJOR INTERNATIONAL STUDY ON PEDAGOGY AND ICT USE IN SCHOOLS

Developing ICT-rich lifelong learning opportunities through EU-projects DECTUG case study

TERTIARY EDUCATION BOOM IN EU COUNTRIES: KEY TO ENHANCING COMPETITIVENESS OR A WASTE OF RESOURCES?

TIMSS Highlights from the Primary Grades

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

Free Education for Open Learning: Open educational policies, strategies & access for all

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

A TRAINING COURSE FUNDED UNDER THE TCP BUDGET OF THE YOUTH IN ACTION PROGRAMME FROM 2009 TO 2013 THE POWER OF 6 TESTIMONIES OF STRONG OUTCOMES

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Interview on Quality Education

Key concepts for the insider-researcher

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

Qualification Guidance

EUROPEAN STUDY & CAREER FAIR

Inspiring Science Education European Union Project

Ten years after the Bologna: Not Bologna has failed, but Berlin and Munich!

Innovative e-learning approach in teaching based on case studies - INNOCASE project.

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

BLASKI, POLAND Introduction. Italian partner presentation

NATIONAL REPORTS

What is the added value of a Qualifications Framework? The experience of Malta.

AUTHORING E-LEARNING CONTENT TRENDS AND SOLUTIONS

Analysis of European Medical Schools Teaching Programs

An Example of an E-learning Solution for an International Curriculum in Manufacturing Strategy

SEDRIN School Education for Roma Integration LLP GR-COMENIUS-CMP

IAB INTERNATIONAL AUTHORISATION BOARD Doc. IAB-WGA

Clicks, Bricks and Spondulicks

ICDE SCOP Lillehammer, Norway June Open Educational Resources: Deliberations of a Community of Interest

The Rise of Populism. December 8-10, 2017

EU Education of Fluency Specialists

The Economic Impact of International Students in Wales

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading

Open Education and Quality: The Need for Changing Strategies and Learning UNESCO IITE 2016, St. Petersburg by Christian M.

Launching an International Web- Based Learning and Co-operation Project: YoungNet as a Case Study

OCW Global Conference 2009 MONTERREY, MEXICO BY GARY W. MATKIN DEAN, CONTINUING EDUCATION LARRY COOPERMAN DIRECTOR, UC IRVINE OCW

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY CONTACTS: ADDRESS. Full Professor Saša Boţić, Ph.D. HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT. Assistant Professor Karin Doolan, Ph.D.

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Transcription:

MACRO-TRENDS SHAPING OPEN LIFELONG LEARNING WS OER FOR LLL, Seville, 28-29 April 2013 Jonatan Castaño Muñoz Christine Redecker

MACRO TRENDS Demographics Educational Environment Globalization Open Education ICT Revolution Economic Environment

MACRO TRENDS DEMOGRAPHICS - Increasing adult population - Increasing adult learners. - Learning and cultural needs of many older people. - Workers & family responsibilities - Lifelong & on-work learning Adult learners Active Aging Inclusion of disadvantaged groups in education Source: OECD, 2013.

MACRO TRENDS GLOBALIZATION Global cultures Global content Cross-border collaborations Global cultures - Interconnected world & shared cultures - But also local English as Internet Lingua Franca? And in education? - How the use of different languages is linked to the quality and quantity of available information? How does it varies according to the language used? Local needs Language barriers

MACRO TRENDS ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT Knowledge economies Non-rivals goods New skills Continuous Update Specialization Employability Economic crisis Mismatch of skills.

MACRO TRENDS ICT REVOLUTION Wide Internet Connexion Mobile Connexion: Ubiquity Web 2.0: Prosumer & Social component Closing the Skills gap? But what about the Ends divide? ICT REVOLUTION Internet Users in the European Union EUROPEAN UNION Internet Users, Penetration Facebook 30-Jun-12 (% Population) 31-Dec-12 Austria 6,559,355 79.80% 2,915,240 Belgium 8,489,901 81.30% 4,922,260 Bulgaria 3,589,347 51.00% 2,522,120 Cyprus 656,439 57.70% 582,600 Czech Republic 7,426,376 73.00% 3,834,620 Denmark 4,989,108 90.00% 3,037,700 Estonia 993,785 78.00% 501,680 Finland 4,703,480 89.40% 2,287,960 France 52,228,905 79.60% 25,624,760 Germany 67,483,860 83.00% 25,332,440 Greece 5,706,948 53.00% 3,845,820 Hungary 6,516,627 65.40% 4,265,960 Ireland 3,627,462 76.80% 2,183,760 Big data & Learning Analythics Augmented reality Semanthic web Internet of things Italy 35,800,000 58.40% 23,202,640 Latvia 1,570,925 71.70% 414,520 Lithuania 2,293,508 65.10% 1,118,500 Luxembourg 462,697 90.90% 227,520 Malta 282,648 69.00% 217,040 Netherlands 15,549,787 92.90% 7,554,940 Poland 24,940,902 64.90% 9,863,380 Portugal 5,950,449 55.20% 4,663,060 Romania 9,642,383 44.10% 5,374,980 Slovakia 4,337,868 79.10% 2,032,200 Slovenia 1,440,066 72.10% 730,160 Spain 31,606,233 67.20% 17,590,500 Sweden 8,441,718 92.70% 4,950,160 United Kingdom 52,731,209 83.60% 32,950,400 Total European Union 368,021,986 73.00% 192,746,920 Source: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats9.htm

MACRO TRENDS EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Global lack of HE supply Fuzzy boundaries formal and informal learning Education for profit ICT and Openness in Education: - MOOCS - OER - MIT Open Courseware - cmoocs: Research on the future of Open Education - 133 million total visits by 95 million visitors from all over the world - Average of 1 million visits per month - 42% are students, 43% self-learners, 9% educators, 6% other - Usual number of course students: about 50,000 (to 180.000) - Usual completion rates: about 10% (best rates about 20%) - Coursera : 2,8 Milions of users from 200 countries. 327 Courses (march 2013) - Share My Lesson: 254.000 Learning Resources ( by teacher, for teachers ) - Wikiwijs (NL): 8 million gov. funding 2011-2013; 65.000 lessons/courses and 800.000 objects (June 2012); 350.000 visits (year 2011) Poland Digital School programme ( 13 million for creation of free, open Textbooks) Glasgow Caledonian University Team Inventory European Commission Initiative on Opening Up Education

Past IPTS research 2005 2006-2008 2009-2011

Learning Spaces 9 Teaching activity Learning 2 Student user Learner 2 Individual action Social 0 Teacher mediator Guide 0 1 Hierarchical interaction Heterarchical 2 0 Rote Learning Institutional pedagogy certification/validation Learning by doing Multiple ways 0 Formal context Informal and Lifelong

Future of Learning Starting Point I m bored. Why can t I go to uni already? Why don t they teach you at uni what you need to find a job? School? Forget it! I m not going back there! I don t understand a word. I want to go home. I would like to open my own business... I am highly qualified but my job has become obsolete... I need to improve my soft skills, but I don t want them to know... Pedagogy remains important, teachers need to learn from one another How do I qualify for a new job with my poor CV? How will E&T meet future learning needs? How can demand & supply of skills be matched? 16 years 8 years 14 years 23 years 42 years 59 years 55 years 75 years 32 years

Future of Learning Storyline Demography Globalisation Immigration Technology Labour Market Drivers Labour market trends & demands New skills Education & Training New ways of learning Initiative, resilience Responsibility Risk-taking, creativity Personal skills Personalisation Learnercentred Tailormade & targeted Active & constructive Motivating & engaging Team-, networking Empathy, compassion Co-constructing Managing, organising Meta-cognitive skills Failing forward Social skills Learning skills Collaboration Informalisation Social learning Lifewide learning Peer-learning Sharing & collaborating In communities Anywhere, anytime Blending virtual & real Combining sources/providers Augmented Reality 3D virtual worlds Data mining ICT Trends??? Learning analytics Social networks Games Mobiles e-books OER? Electronic tutors eportfolios LMS

Demography Globalisation Technology Drivers Labour Market Labour market trends & demands New skills Initiative, resilience Responsibility Risk-taking, creativity Personal skills Education & Training Personalisation Learnercentred New ways of learning Tailormade & targeted Active & constructive Motivating & engaging Team-, networking Empathy, compassion Co-constructing Managing, organising Meta-cognitive skills Failing forward Augmented Reality 3D virtual worlds Social skills Learning skills Data mining Collaboration Informalisation ICT Trends Social learning Lifewide learning??? Learning analytics Social networks Games Mobiles e-books OER? Peer-learning Sharing & collaborating In communities Anywhere, anytime Blending virtual & real Combining sources/providers Electronic tutors eportfolios LMS Source: IPTS (2011): The Future of Learning: Preparing for Change, http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=4719 European Commission, 2011

Workshop Methodology Step 1: Identifying the critical issues Scenario A -/+ High Y +/+ Scenario B Low X -/- Scenario D Low Y +/- High X Scenario C Step 2: Identifying the (two) key tensions Step 3: Describing the emerging scenarios Step 4: Milestones & Roadmap

Critical Factors for seizing the potential of OER for Lifelong Learning in the Future A Group Exercise Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Dimension Ideal vision Means of achieving the vision Barriers to be overcome Knowledge gap / Inclusion How can the access to open education be broadened in the future? Production of OER Who should produce the OER for LLL? Quality How should quality of OER be assured in LLL? Pedagogy How should learning and teaching with OER be different? Recognition What should the certification, accreditation and recognition system be? Economics of OER How should Open Education be financed? Which business models should be used? Legal framework Which are the best legal instruments and incentives to support openness in LLL? Any other dimension that is missing?

Inclusion Importance Difficulty Universal Internet Access ICT skills for all Self-regulated learning Career advice Participative culture Multilingual content Resources adapted to context Specific OER for LLL users Common EU OER portal All learning materials accessible online Discoverability

Pedagogy Importance Difficulty Guidance Peer support Communities of practice Self-directed learning Importance of teacher as guide/mentor/career advisor Social learning Co-creation Subject communities Fluid learning Personalised learning ecologies eportfolios Prosumers Teachers and learners jointly produce and consume content No change Modularity Personalised instruction Competence-based Assessment Personalised combination of courses/modules/resources from different sources Adapted to learning needs/preferences/paces Ubiquitous learning: anywhere anytime Flexibility in rhythms, schedules Self-Assessment Game-based learning Contextualisation of online courses

Quality Assurance Importance Difficulty Official common quality frameworks Common International frameworks Common standards EU-wide framework Cross-sectoral University leadership Social and public rating No established quality mechanisms Quality assurance for technical aspects Success as key indicator Same control mechanisms than now Universities as reference for quality Peer review Rating by users Expert recommendations Users judge themselves what they find useful Instructor chooses Interoperability standards Quality measured by output: user satisfaction; performance rates; student numbers etc. Refinement through use Quality emerges as a result of re-using and remixing

Technological Enablers Importance Difficulty Ambient Intelligence Internet of things Semantic web Easy to use creation tools Learning Analytics Big Data Automatic Language translation Augmented Reality

Production of OER Importance Difficulty Everyone is producer Production is something normal everybody does all the time Learners are producers The learning process is based on learners' production and sharing of content Subject-/Topic communities Networks networks of different kind of producers social production collaborative production embedded social production Market forces Publishers/Experts Public procurement or For profit Educators/Teachers Disaggregation Fragmentation Unbundling Multiple providers Outsourcing

Recognition Importance Difficulty e-portfolios Peer recognition Open Badges Endorsement Expert recognition Open Badges Endorsement Institutional certification of informal learning External certification Common standards International Boards Accreditation by recognised (public/private) bodies Universal credit transfer Automatic recognition

Economics Importance Difficulty Free competition Public funding Re-channelling the funding from publishers to OER Institutional funding Re-channelling money at institutional level Foundation/donation/sponsors hip Crowd-funding Micro-donations Freemium Content free, extra services for payment Volunteer work coordination Wikipedia model Membership

Legal Framework Importance Difficulty Open licenses Creative commons Public domain Legal agreements on global collaboration Legal agreements on EU/international level to facilitate OE What is publicly funded should be publicly available

What to do? Read and understand all options listed Is there: Any important issue missing? Add it! Any issue irrelevant/redundant? Discard it! Any two issues similar? Merge it! Any issue ill-defined? Re-phrase it! Rate each issue on a scale from 0 to 10 on: "important to achieve by 2030" (0=unimportant; 10=very important) "difficult to achieve by 2030" (0=very easy; 10=very difficult) Place each issue on the poster (according to the rating) Fill in the excel sheet (according to the group rating)