University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. FCE and CAE exam specifications from December 2008

Similar documents
Handbook for Teachers

Lower and Upper Secondary

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Information for Candidates

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Special Edition. Starter Teacher s Pack. Adrian Doff, Sabina Ostrowska & Johanna Stirling With Rachel Thake, Cathy Brabben & Mark Lloyd

Cambridge English Empower: bringing Learning Oriented Assessment into the classroom

3. Examinations and final assessment of the degree programmes

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Running head: LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF UNIVERSITY REGISTERS 1

English for Specific Purposes World ISSN Issue 34, Volume 12, 2012 TITLE:

The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme at Carey

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

EXAMINER PROMPTS. 10 Places (Can be used with three candidates) 18

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report

Testing Reading Through Summary

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Master s Degree Programme in East Asian Studies

Book Catalogue Hellenic American Union Publications. English Language Teaching

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Cambridge English First Masterclass Students Book

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Technical Skills for Journalism

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

We would like to thank you for your interest in the part-time CELTA program at LSI Toronto.

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust: delivering excellence in children and young people s health services

The Eaquals Self-help Guide for Curriculum and Syllabus Design Maria Matheidesz and Frank Heyworth

Programme Specification

Creating Travel Advice

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

5 Early years providers

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Casual, approximately 8 hours per week. Director, CLIPP. Employee Name Signature Date

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Intermediate Algebra

The following information has been adapted from A guide to using AntConc.

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Teaching ideas. AS and A-level English Language Spark their imaginations this year

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Primary English Curriculum Framework

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

FCE Speaking Part 4 Discussion teacher s notes

Cambridge NATIONALS. Creative imedia Level 1/2. UNIT R081 - Pre-Production Skills DELIVERY GUIDE

Writing the Personal Statement

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Programme Specification

teaching issues 4 Fact sheet Generic skills Context The nature of generic skills

Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Grindelwald Tasmania 7277 Australia Tel: ++ (613)

MFL SPECIFICATION FOR JUNIOR CYCLE SHORT COURSE

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

Languages. Languages. Teachers Handbook GCSE French (J730) / German (J731) / Spanish (J732) Version 1 September 2012

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

EQuIP Review Feedback

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Writing Research Articles

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Writing a composition

VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATION IN YOUTH AND LEISURE INSTRUCTION 2009

Transcription:

FCE and CAE exam specifications from December 2008 Bulletin 5, November 2006

FCE and CAE - exam specifications from December 2008 Over the last two years, Cambridge ESOL has carried out a thorough review of the FCE and CAE examinations, two of the world s best known and most widely recognised qualifications for learners of English. Cambridge ESOL s specialist exam development and research teams, working closely with external consultants and senior examiners, looked at possible improvements in every aspect of the exams, and carried out consultation with exam centres, teachers and learners around the world. As a result of this review, a number of improvements to the exams will be introduced in December 2008. These will not affect the level of the exams or the reliability of the results. Summary of changes The overall length of the FCE and CAE exams will be reduced by approximately one hour The tests will focus on a wider range of skills and functions Some components of the exams will include new and/or improved task types Some components will be more standardised in content, making them user-friendly for students preparing for the exams What happens next? New exam specifications and sample exam materials will be available from December 2006 Teacher training seminars will start from April 2007 onwards. Information will be available on the website (www.cambridgeesol.org/exams) The changed FCE and CAE exams will be administered for the first time in December 2008 Benefits Benefits to test takers, teachers and stakeholders: 1. A shorter exam will be more appealing for test takers. 2. There will be a more straightforward progression from FCE to CPE as the exams will be structured more similarly, thus encouraging candidates to progress from one level to the next: from B2 to C1 to C2 in the Council of Europe s Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). 3. The updated structure of the exams will also help teachers who teach FCE, CAE and CPE. 4. Cambridge ESOL is looking into the presentation of results in order to assist candidates in understanding how they have performed. This will also help other users in the interpretation of results. 5. The changed exam formats will allow the use of new technologies in the future to speed up postexam processes such as marking of exam papers. Enhancements such as these will ultimately bring benefits to test takers and test users, which may include faster turnaround of results.

Review process The purpose of the FCE and CAE review was to ensure that the exams continue to meet the user s needs in terms of content and length. Among other issues, the review addressed the question of whether a reduction in the length of exams would make them more accessible to candidates; while of course maintaining the thoroughness of assessment. The FCE and CAE review followed the standard review process as shown below: INITIAL SURVEY External Consultation MEETINGS WITH CONSULTANTS Trialling SPECIFICATIONS DRAFTED Ongoing Research CONSULTATION SEMINARS WITH TEACHERS CONSULTATION WITH EXAMINERS TRIAL TASKS WRITTEN CONSULTATION FEEDBACK REVIEWED SPECIFICATIONS REVIEWED TRIAL TASKS TRIALLED SPECIFICATIONS AMENDED TRIAL TASKS REVIEWED SPECIFICATIONS REDRAFTED & APPROVED * * Current status Research activity Using sophisticated research methodologies Cambridge ESOL s enquiry into and analysis of various possible changes to the FCE and CAE exams have been led by an extensive programme using the latest research and validation techniques which provided an input for internal investigations and consultations (see above). Validating and testing The mapping of the exams to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) will ensure that the changes are properly validated and will provide a useful guideline for describing changes to test takers and test users. How the exams will change The tables on the following pages show the changes to all the papers in both FCE and CAE that will be introduced from the December 2008 examinations. There is also a summary of the changes in terms of exam timings, task types and test focus.

FCE: Specification from December 2008 Paper Timing/Length Task Types and Format Test Focus Reading 1 hour 30 questions length of texts: about 550 700 words per text about 2,000 words overall Part 1 - multiple choice Part 2 - gapped text task sentences removed Part 3 - multiple matching Part 1 - detail, opinion, gist, attitude, deducing meaning, text organisation features (exemplification, comparison, reference), tone, purpose, main idea Part 2 - text structure, cohesion and coherence Part 3 - specific information, detail, opinion and attitude Writing 1 hour 20 minutes 2 parts Part 1 - compulsory letter or email (120-150 words) Part 2 - Q2-4 choice of one task from the following: article, letter, report, essay, review, story Q.5 task based on set texts task types from: article, essay, report, review, letter; two set books to be used, with a question on each text (120-180 words) Part 1 - focus on expressing opinions, justifying, persuading, comparing, recommending, suggesting, advising, apologising, describing and explaining Part 2 - varying focuses according to task, including: expressing opinions, justifying, comparing, recommending, advising, describing and explaining Use of English 45 minutes 42 questions Part 1 - multiple choice cloze Part 2 - open cloze Part 3 - word formation Part 4 - key word transformations Part 1 - lexical/lexico-grammatical Part 2 - grammatical/lexico-grammatical Part 3 - lexical/lexico-grammatical Part 4 - lexical and grammatical Listening 40 minutes 30 questions Part 1 - multiple choice eight short unrelated extracts; monologues or exchanges between interacting speakers; one question per text Part 2 - sentence completion a monologue or text with interacting speakers Part 3 - multiple matching five short related monologues. One task, requiring selection from list of six options. Part 4 - multiple choice a monologue or text involving interacting speakers. Part 1 - general gist, detail, function, purpose, attitude, opinion, relationship, topic, place, situation, genre, agreement Part 2 - detail, specific information, stated opinion Part 3 - as for Part 1 Part 4 - opinion, attitude, gist, main idea, specific information All texts will be heard twice. Speaking 14 minutes 4 parts Part 1 - conversation between the interlocutor and each candidate (spoken questions) Part 2 - individual one-minute long turn for each candidate with a brief response from the second candidate (each candidate is given two photographs with a question) Part 3 - two-way conversation between the candidates (visual and written stimuli, with spoken instructions) Part 4 - discussion on topics related to Part 3 (spoken questions) Part 1 - general interactional and social language Part 2 - organising a larger unit of discourse; comparing, describing, expressing opinions Part 3 - sustaining an interaction; exchanging ideas, expressing and justifying opinions, agreeing and/or disagreeing, suggesting, speculating, evaluating, reaching a decision through negotiation, etc. Part 4 - expressing and justifying opinions, agreeing and/or disagreeing Total Time: 3 hours 59 minutes

FCE: Summary of changes and rationale Paper Change Rationale Paper 1 Reading three tasks (instead of four) reduced to one hour by removing Part 1 testing focus for the multiple choice is widened gapped task will only be in sentence form (without paragraphs as an alternative) From 1 hour 15 minutes, 35 questions To 1 hour, 30 questions the new format is shorter, but has a broader test focus item numbers will be fixed by part which simplifies the format no alternative tasks will be available, which will make it more accessible for preparation Paper 2 Writing Paper 3 Use of English includes the production of emails reduction in word length for Part 1 includes a review task type includes a rationalisation of the set text question From 1 hour 30 minutes To 1 hour 20 minutes reduced to 45 minutes by removing Part 4 (error correction) and amending lengths of the other parts From 1 hour 15 minutes, 65 questions To 45 minutes, 42 questions writing more briefly is a relevant real life skill, so the output required from Part 1 is reduced. The letter or email are compulsory because writing these is an important skill relevant to the candidature the writing of email messages is added because they are used in modern life a review task is added to Part 2 to increase the choices and broaden the candidates experience the set text questions will be related to a specific book set books are reduced from five to two, as not all are well used four of the five current tasks remain the same the grammar that the error correction task tests is tested elsewhere in the paper the skill of error correction can be tested through the writing paper Paper 4 Listening format to be standardised with other ESOL general English listening tests by having only one task available in each section the length and test focus are not affected a single task type in each section will improve comparability between versions of the test and standardise the candidate experience. Candidates will know exactly which tasks to expect the sentence completion task will be retained in Part 2 as this is more suitable to the level than note-taking For Part 4, the multiple-choice task will be the only task retained; ensuring reliability between versions and over time Paper 5 Speaking questions to be added to the visuals page in Parts 2 and 3 no change to the overall timing adding questions to the visuals page will help candidates to recall the tasks. This will standardise their responses and improve the comparability of the tasks Part 4 is enhanced with additional prompts for the interlocutor

CAE: Specification from December 2008 Paper Timing/Length Task Types and Format Test Focus Reading 1 hour 15 minutes 34 questions length of texts: about 550 850 per part about 3,000 words overall Part 1 - three themed texts with two multiple-choice questions on each text Part 2 - gapped text task paragraphs removed Part 3 - multiple choice Part 4 - multiple matching Part 1 - detail, opinion, tone, purpose, main idea, implication, attitude, text organisation features (exemplification, comparison, reference) Part 2 - text structure, cohesion and coherence Part 3 - as for Part 1 Part 4 - specific information, detail, opinion and attitude Writing 1 hour 30 minutes 2 parts Part 1 - compulsory task from: article, report, proposal, letter (180-220 words) Part 2 - Q.2-4 choice of one task from the following: article, letter, report, proposal, review, competition entry, contribution to a longer piece, essay, information sheet Q.5 task based on set texts task types from: essay, review, article, report; two set books to be used, with a question on each text (220-260 words) Part 1 focus on evaluating, expressing opinions, hypothesising, persuading Part 2 varying focuses according to task; including giving opinions, persuading, justifying, giving advice, comparing Use of English 1 hour 50 questions Part 1 - multiple-choice cloze Part 2 - open cloze Part 3 - word formation Part 4 - gapped sentences Part 5 - key word transformations Part 1 - lexical/lexico-grammatical Part 2 - grammatical/lexico-grammatical Part 3 - lexical/lexico-grammatical Part 4 - lexical Part 5 - lexical and grammatical Listening 40 minutes 30 questions Part 1 - multiple choice three short unrelated extracts; exchanges between interacting speakers; two questions per text Part 2 - sentence completion a monologue (could be introduced by a presenter) Part 3 - multiple choice a conversation between interacting speakers Part 4 - multiple matching five short themed monologues. Two linked tasks, requiring selection from list of eight options. Part 1 - feeling, attitude, opinion, purpose, function, agreement, course of action, general gist, detail, etc. Part 2 - specific information, stated opinion Part 3 - attitude and opinion Part 4 - gist, attitude, main points, interpreting context All texts will be heard twice. Speaking 15 minutes 4 parts Part 1 - conversation between the interlocutor and each candidate (spoken questions) Part 2 - individual one-minute long turn for each candidate with brief response from second candidate; each candidate is given three visual stimuli, with questions Part 3 - two-way conversation between the candidates (visual and written stimuli, with spoken instructions) Part 4 - discussion on topics related to Part 3 (spoken questions) Part 1 - general interactional and social language Part 2 - organising a larger unit of discourse; comparing, describing, expressing opinions and speculating Part 3 - sustaining an interaction; exchanging ideas, expressing and justifying opinions, agreeing and/or disagreeing, suggesting, speculating, evaluating, reaching a decision through negotiation, etc. Part 4 - expressing and justifying opinions, agreeing and/or disagreeing Total Time: 4 hours 40 minutes

CAE: Summary of changes and rationale Paper Change Rationale Paper 1 Reading removal of one matching task introduction of themed texts (similar to those in CPE Paper 1) use of wider range of text types From 1 hour 15 minutes, approx. 45 questions To 1 hour 15 minutes, 34 questions the range of text types, sources and task focuses in the paper is widened by the addition of themed texts in Part 1 currently there are two matching tasks with some similarities, so Part 1 s matching task is replaced by the themed texts Paper 2 Writing Paper 3 Use of English Paper 4 Listening Paper 5 Speaking reductions in Part 1 input and output addition of set text questions in Part 2 From 2 hours To 1 hour 30 minutes reduction to one hour by removing the register transfer, gapped text and error correction, and adding gapped sentences and key word transformations From 1 hour 30 minutes, 80 questions To 1 hour, 50 questions introduction of a fixed format inclusion of short extracts (as in FCE and CPE) inclusion of only one productive task all texts to be heard twice From 45 minutes, 30 40 questions To 40 minutes, 30 questions Part 1 has two sections (instead of three) in which candidates are asked questions about themselves section 2 of the current Part 1, which invites candidates to ask each other something about, is removed questions will be included on the visuals page to support the candidate (as in FCE) no change to the overall timing writing more briefly is a relevant real life skill, so the output required in Part 1 is reduced Part 1 input is reduced to a number of words that falls between FCE and CPE requirements to reduce processing required the nature of task output remains the same trialling and research into shorter input and output for Part 1 shows that candidates can be successfully assessed with this length of words reduction in input and output were found to be a positive development in research with examiners on the new tasks these changes will result in a more streamlined paper, which will be more similar to other Cambridge ESOL general English exams key word transformations and gapped sentences are introduced: key word transformations appear in other levels and are efficient at testing grammar and vocabulary gapped sentences proved successful in CPE, testing vocabulary productively as register transfer and error correction can be tested through the Writing paper, both of these tasks are removed research into the CAE construct shows that the gapped text task has a similar test focus to the gapped text in Reading; its removal does not reduce the range of what is being tested a fixed format enhances standardisation between versions a standard format will appeal more to candidates short extracts will be introduced in Part 1; these work well in FCE and CPE as they test a wide range of focuses and introduce a range of texts, interaction patterns and topics the section which is once heard will be heard twice, following consultation and academic advice the matching task will be retained as it discriminates well and tests gist listening effectively for Part 1, the new approach is more natural and will fit better with the other Speaking tests in the Cambridge ESOL general English exams as in FCE, Parts 2 and 3 will have questions provided on the visuals page to assist candidates in recalling the task Part 4 is enhanced with prompts for the interlocutor We would welcome any comments about the exam specifications to: ESOLconsultation@CambridgeESOL.org

www.cambridgeesol.org University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom Tel. +44 1223 553355 Fax. +44 1223 460278 email ESOL@CambridgeESOL.org UCLES 2006 EMC/4158/6Y10