Toronto-Danforth Secondary Schools. Pupil Accommodation Review Committee

Similar documents
Toronto District School Board

Options for Elementary Band and Strings Program Delivery

St. Paul, St. Michael, Our Lady of Lourdes: Pupil Accommodation Review. December 7, 2016

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

LAKE COUNTRY FOCUS GROUP OKANAGAN MISSION SECONDARY SCHOOL GEORGE ELLIOT SECONDARY

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Compilation of Data: Ecole Christine Morrison Ecole Mission Central French Immersion & English Programs

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

INSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Saugeen District Secondary School

Santiago Canyon College 8045 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA AGENDA CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION COUNCIL Monday, October 30, :30pm B-104

Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie Britannique. Literacy Plan. Submitted on July 15, Alain Laberge, Director of Educational Services

VISUALIZING SUCCESS PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE PUBLIC FORUM DECEMBER 17, 2013

Notice of Restraining Order under clause 46 (1) of the Private Career Colleges Act, 2005

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

GLOBAL INSTITUTIONAL PROFILES PROJECT Times Higher Education World University Rankings

CURRICULUM VITAE CECILE W. GARMON. Ground Floor Cravens Graduate Library 104 Fine Arts Center

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

SELF: CONNECTING CAREERS TO PERSONAL INTERESTS. Essential Question: How Can I Connect My Interests to M y Work?

Internship Program. Employer and Student Handbook

Nez Perce Tribe Multi-Program Facility Business Plan Project Project Work Group (PWG) Meeting #2 February 17, 9:30am-12pm PST

Gr. 9 Geography. Canada: Creating a Sustainable Future DAY 1

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Spring North Carolina Community Colleges Golden LEAF Scholars Program Two-Year Colleges

November 19, The King William County School Board held its regular meeting on Tuesday,

Weekly Update June 21, 2015 LAST UPDATE FOR Items of Interest

Evening and Weekend College. College on YOUR time!

Class Dates June 5th July 27th. Enroll Now! Visit us on Facebook

WORKPLACE USER GUIDE

George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

Proposed Bell Time Change and Possible Grade Reconfiguration For BES and BJSHS

INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH PROGRAMS INFORMATION BOOKLET UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO NEW COLLEGE

LMS - LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM END USER GUIDE

Qualification Guidance

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

IMSH 2018 Simulation: Making the Impossible Possible

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

The Teaching and Learning Center

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

PRD Online

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

HARLOW COLLEGE FURTHER EDUCATION CORPORATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE. Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 12 May 2016

Announcement of Vacancy Superintendent of Schools. Frontier Central School District. Apply by October 20, 2017 to:

Examination Timetables Series to Series

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Earl Grey School. February, 2016

State Parental Involvement Plan

PEIMS Submission 1 list

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

PeopleSoft Class Scheduling. The Mechanics of Schedule Build

The Woodlands School

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Everton Library, Liverpool: Market assessment and project viability study 1

North Carolina Community Colleges Golden LEAF Scholars Program Two-Year Colleges Student Application

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES Curriculum Program Applications Fast Track for Action [FTFA*]

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A NEW GRADUATE DEGREE

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Environmental Literacy Indicator Tool (Self-Assessment) DRAFT

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

2016 School Performance Information

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator

GOING GLOBAL 2018 SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Hampton Falls School Board Meeting September 1, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie.

Specialized Equipment Amount (SEA)

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

Understanding University Funding

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

SCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY

University of Toronto

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

STUDENT GOVERNMENT BOARD MINUTES September 27, The minutes of September 11, 2011 were approved.

Palomar College Curriculum Committee Meeting Agenda Wednesday March 1, 2017 Room AA 140 at 3:00 pm

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) ON THE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMME

1. Amend Article Departmental co-ordination and program committee as set out in Appendix A.

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Ontario Tourism Workforce Development Strategy Project. AUDIT REPORT January 2012

Certificate III in Business (BSB30115)

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

Subject: Regulation FPU Textbook Adoption and Affordability

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

Transcription:

Toronto-Danforth Secondary Schools Pupil Accommodation Review Committee PARC Public Meeting November 23, 2015 This presentation is available on the TDSB public web site at www.tdsb.on.ca. Click on Accommodation Reviews at the bottom of the page.

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review Agenda Time: 7:00 9:00 p.m. 1. Trustee s Welcome: Jennifer Story 2. Welcome and Introductions Mike Gallagher, Family of Schools Superintendent WR10 3. Why are we here? Pupil Accommodation Review Audrey Amo, Facilitator 4. Information about Schools in the Review Nechama Hirchberg, Educational Planning Officer 5. TDSB Central Staff Option Mike Gallagher 6. Other Possible Options Your Ideas! Mike Gallagher, Audrey Amo and Nechama Hirchberg 7. Next Steps Audrey Amo 8. Closing and Thank You 2

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process Why are we here? The Toronto District School Board is looking at its schools across the system to ensure that: Neighbourhood secondary schools offer a wide range of programming to meet the needs of all students, and Space in buildings is used effectively and efficiently, with a target utilization rate of 80% to 90%. When school boards look at the future of a school or group of schools to enhance programming for students, the Ministry of Education requires boards to follow a Pupil Accommodation Review process that includes specific tasks and timelines, including consultation with the community. School boards also set up policies and procedures for this process. 3

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process Why are we here? The Board must establish a Pupil Accommodation Review Committee (PARC) to help gather community input about the future of the schools under review. The PARC is composed of parents, students, community representatives, principals and local trustees from the schools in the review. The PARC is also supported by central staff. The PARC s role is advisory; it makes recommendations to the Board but it is the Board that will make any decisions about the schools involved in the review. The PARC: Reviews data on each school in the accommodation review; Receives input from the community; Analyzes and comments on the accommodation option that staff must present; Identifies other possible accommodation options that are consistent with the TDSB Terms of Reference; and, Makes recommendations to the Board about pupil accommodation in the schools in the review. 4

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process Why are we here? The work of the PARC is guided by: o Ministry of Education s applicable Pupil Accommodation Review Guideline o TDSB s Accommodation and Program Review Policy (P068) and Pupil Accommodation Review Operational Procedure (PR598) o TDSB Terms of Reference for Pupil Accommodation Review Committees (Secondary Schools) o Information Profiles for each of the schools involved in this Pupil Accommodation Review 5

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process Timelines The Ministry of Education sets mandatory timelines, including the following: A PARC must have its first Public Meeting no less than 30 days following the Board s approval of the PARC process; the Board approved this PARC at its meeting on March 9, 2015. There must be a minimum of four Public Meetings to allow the public to engage in conversations about their schools. Public Meetings for this review will occur on: November 23 and 26 (the agenda will be the same for these two meetings) December 7 at this meeting more possible options are discussed and deputations are heard March 9, 2016 at this meeting the PARC s findings and draft recommendations will be presented All four Public Meetings will take place at Danforth CI (800 Greenwood Ave), from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. Child care will be available. 6

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process Timelines The PARC will submit its report to the Director of Education at the end of March/first week of April. The PARC report will then be placed on the TDSB s public website. Staff must respond to the PARC s report: A public meeting will be announced so that members of the public can hear the staff response to the PARC report. This meeting will likely take place early in May. Our target is to have this report and staff recommendations go to the Board in June 2016. 7

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process TDSB Terms of Reference for PARCs These criteria must guide our work: Offer a wide range of program opportunities for the benefit of all students in the review area; Maintain a good distribution of schools with access to public transit and address redundancy by reducing the number of schools in close proximity; and, Maximize the use of Board facilities over the long term. 8

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Overview of PARC Process Guiding Principles for Decisions Utilization rates of 80% to 90% and efficient use of space Viable program and co-curricular offerings Fair access to specialized programs and schools Long term ability to improve or expand facilities Minimal use of portables Financially sustainable Integration of services Ensured safety for students Derived from the Long-Term Program and Accommodation Strategy 2015-2024 9

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review Schools in this Pupil Accommodation Review Danforth CTI East York CI Eastern Commerce CI/ Subway Academy 1 Riverdale CI East York Alternative SS Greenwood SS/ SOLE Monarch Park CI Eastdale CI 10

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review Why are we looking at these schools? Some of these schools have low enrolments and that impedes a school s ability to offer as wide a program offering as possible. Many of the schools have low utilization rates and thus have space to take in other programs/schools. One school has space (East York CI) but the Board has already decided to move French Immersion into the school in the near future. Thus it might not make sense to look at moving other programs into the building at this time. Riverdale CI is already at capacity. Eastern Commerce has experienced declining enrolment over the past few years, and last year the school had extremely low enrolment. As a result, the students were placed in other schools and the purpose of this process is to determine the future of the school; if it should remain open or be closed. Regardless of the PARC recommendation, the Eastern Commerce building will continue to be used by its existing user groups and by the First Nations School of Toronto. 11

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: TDSB System Enrolment TDSB Enrolment Trends Elementary enrolment is projected to grow gradually Secondary enrolment is projected to decline and then to grow minimally 300,000 275,000 250,000 225,000 200,000 175,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 0 150,000 140,000 130,000 120,000 110,000 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 Year 12 Head Count Enrolment 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 Head Count Enrolment Year

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Information about Schools in the Review Full Time Student Enrolment History, 2005 to 2015 Danforth CTI East York CI Monarch Park CI Riverdale CI 2000 1500 1000 Capacity = 2,130 2000 1500 1000 Capacity = 1,503 2000 1500 1000 Capacity = 1,284 2000 1500 1000 Capacity = 1,116 500 500 500 500 0 0 0 0 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 East York Alt SS Capacity = 84 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Eastdale CI Capacity = 390 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Eastern Commerce CI/ Subway Academy I Capacity = 1,113 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Greenwood SS/SOLE Capacity = 402 Main Secondary School in Facility Alternative Secondary School in Facility (Subway Academy I and SOLE) Facility capacity based on 2015 capacity refresh 13

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Information about Schools in the Review School Danforth Collegiate and Technical Institute East York Collegiate Institute 14 Key Features of the 10 Schools Grade Organization Full year Grades 9-12 Semestered Grades 9-12 Is there space? Yes 2015 utilization rate of 41% Projected 2020 utilization rate of 45% Yes but French Immersion is slated to be moved into the school in the future 2015 utilization rate of 67% Projected 2020 utilization rate of 64% Key Features Comprehensive School offers all pathways and programs for students with Autism, Developmental, and Learning Disabilities MaST Program (Math, Science, and Technology Specialized Program) Hospitality & Tourism Specialist High Schools Major Ontario Youth Apprenticeship Program in Auto Collision Repair and Cook/Baker Centre of Innovation for Skills in Technology Phase 1 Comprehensive School offering all pathways Manufacturing Specialist High Schools Major Intensive Support Programs Centre of Innovation for Skills in Technology Phase 3

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Information about Schools in the Review Key Features of the 10 Schools School Grade Organization Is there space? Key Features Monarch Park Collegiate Institute Semestered Grades 9-12 Yes 2015 utilization rate of 67% Projected 2020 utilization rate of 72% Comprehensive School offering all pathways and programs for students with Developmental and Physical Disabilities International Baccalaureate (IB) Program Centre of Innovation for Skills in Technology Phase 2 Riverdale Collegiate Institute Full year Grades 9-12 No 2015 utilization rate of 101% Projected 2020 utilization rate of 100% Comprehensive School offering all pathways and a French Extended Program The building houses a child care 15

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Information about Schools in the Review Key Features of the 10 Schools School Grade Organization Is there space? Key Features Eastdale Collegiate Institute Semestered Grades 9-12 Yes, 2015 utilization rate of 35% Projected 2020 utilization rate of 38% System-wide school that offers credit and non-credit courses Intensive Support Programs Eastern Commerce Collegiate Institute Yes, the school has no students now and offers no programs The Board approved that a First Nations JK-12 school be established in the building in the near future The building houses Subway Academy 1, a child care, staff office space, and the TDSB Museum, Archives, and Fine Art Collection The Board approved that a First Nations JK-12 school be established in the building in the near future Greenwood Secondary School Semestered Grades 9-12 Yes, 2015 utilization rate of 76% Projected 2020 utilization rate of 74% System-wide school that serves only ESL students; students usually spend 1-3 semesters in the school before transitioning to other secondary schools The building houses SOLE 16

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Information about Schools in the Review Key Features of the 10 Schools School Grade Organization Key Features East York Alternative Secondary School Semestered Grades 10-12 Currently located in a small standalone building on the East York CI site Review the current mandate? SOLE Semestered Grades 10-12 Currently located in the Greenwood building Review the current mandate? Subway Academy 1 Semestered Grades 10-12 Currently located in the Eastern Commerce CI building Review the current mandate? 17

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review TDSB Central Staff Option The Ministry guideline requires the Board to present an initial program and accommodation option for the students and schools in this review. TDSB Staff has developed an initial option for the schools in this review. This option was shared with members of the PARC and now with the public. Other potential options will be developed based on the work of the PARC and the input the committee receives from the Public Meetings. 18

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option To Keep in Mind: School: the Ministry defines a school as a group of students who are registered to receive instruction; each school in Ontario has a Ministry identification number (MIDENT) Site/Building: a physical structure housing one or more schools, tenants, or user groups Technical/Commercial/Collegiate Boundary: in the former Toronto Board of Education, students had an opportunity to attend different types of schools commercial (business), technical (trades) or academic (collegiate), and boundaries were established to direct students based on their home addresses to those schools. Since amalgamation into the Toronto District School Board, ALL schools are required to provide programming if there are appropriate facilities in 5 post-secondary destinations Independent Living, Workplace, College, Apprenticeship, and University TDSB Classification: Secondary schools in the TDSB are classified as Alternative, Regular, or Specialized Mission and Vision: TDSB procedures require that Alternative Schools reconfirm their mission and vision statement every 5 years to articulate the unique program of the school Program Viability: a determination that the school program serves a need for learners in the board 19

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option TDSB Central Staff Option SCHOOL BUILDING STAFF OPTION Danforth Keep the school in its present building with its existing user groups Move Greenwood SS into the building Eastern Commerce Formally close the Eastern school program (Ministry requirement) Keep Subway Academy 1 and the existing users in the building; review Subway Academy 1 s mission and vision Move the Aboriginal Education Centre, the First Nations JK-12 school and the First Nations child care centre into the building (Board motion passed previously) RELATED/SEPARATE PROCESS ISSUES Convert Danforth to a semestered school Remove Danforth s technical boundary Confirm Greenwood s mission statement and TDSB classification Remove Eastern Commerce s commercial boundary 20

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option TDSB Central Staff Option SCHOOL BUILDING STAFF OPTION RELATED/SEPARATE PROCESS ISSUES Monarch Park Keep the school in its present building Move SOLE into the building from the Greenwood building and review its mission and vision Riverdale Keep the school in its present building with its existing user groups, including Woodgreen Child Care Remove Monarch Park s commercial boundary 21

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option TDSB Central Staff Option SCHOOL BUILDING STAFF OPTION RELATED/SEPARATE PROCESS ISSUES East York Keep the school in its present building with its existing user groups Receive French Immersion (Board motion) Feeder schools for French Immersion to be determined in a separate process East York Alternative Keep the school in its separate building and review its mission and vision 22

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option TDSB Central Staff Option SCHOOL BUILDING STAFF OPTION RELATED/SEPARATE PROCESS ISSUES Eastdale Keep the school in its present building with its existing users and review its program focus Review the school s TDSB classification Greenwood Move Greenwood SS into the Danforth building Move SOLE into the Monarch Park building Declare this building surplus (Conseil Scolaire Viamonde may be interested in this site) The future of the building if it is declared surplus will be decided by the Board 23

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option Map of Staff Option Proposed Moves Greenwood SS relocates into Danforth CTI Eastern Commerce CI closes as a school. SOLE relocates into Monarch Park CI Subway Academy 1 remains as-is. Riverdale CI remains as-is. 24

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Staff Option 25 Summary of Accommodation and Enrolment: Status Quo and Staff Option Status Quo October 31, 2015 Prelim Actual October 31, 2020 Projection October 31, 2025 Projection Facility Capacity Total Utilizatioables Head Count zation ables Head Count zation ables Port- Total Utili- Port- Total Utili- Port- Head Count Danforth CTI/Greenwood 2,130 883 41% 0 1,197 56% 0 1,215 57% 0 East York CI 2 1,503 1,007 67% 1 1,044 69% 1 1,168 78% 1 East York Alternative SS 84 134 160% 0 116 138% 0 116 138% 0 Eastdale CI 390 135 35% 0 149 38% 0 176 45% 0 First Nations School of Toronto / Subway Academy I 1 912 158 17% 0 520 57% 0 735 81% 0 Greenwood Building 0 378 94% 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 Monarch Park CI/SOLE 1,284 866 67% 0 1,081 84% 0 1,145 89% 0 Riverdale CI 1,116 1,129 101% 0 1,116 100% 0 1,168 105% 0 Total 7,419 4,690 63% 1 5,223 70% 1 5,723 77% 1 1. Enrolment at the Eastern building includes the First Nation School of Toronto, which is projected to have a total enrolment of 650 JK-Grade 12 students at full implementation. The capacity of the Eastern building will be reduced due to non-instructional users entering the building, including the First Nations Childcare and the Aboriginal Educational Centre. The previous capacity of the building was 1,113. 2. The East York CI Staff Option enrolment includes a French Immersion program to the school, with a projected entry Grade 9 class of 60 students at full implementation. October 31, 2015 Prelim Actual October 31, 2020 Projection October 31, 2025 Projection Facility Capacity Total Utilizatioables Head Count zation ables Head Count zation ables Port- Total Utili- Port- Total Utili- Port- Head Count Danforth CTI 2,130 883 41% 0 958 45% 0 976 46% 0 East York CI 1,503 1,007 67% 1 963 64% 1 966 64% 1 East York Alternative SS 84 134 160% 0 116 138% 0 116 138% 0 Eastdale CI 390 135 35% 0 149 38% 0 176 45% 0 Eastern Commerce CI / First Nations School of Toronto / 912 158 17% 0 520 57% 0 735 81% 0 Subway Academy I 1 Greenwood SS / SOLE 402 378 94% 0 391 97% 0 391 97% 0 Monarch Park CI 1,284 866 67% 0 929 72% 0 993 77% 0 Riverdale CI 1,116 1,129 101% 0 1,116 100% 0 1,168 105% 0 Total 7,821 4,690 60% 1 5,142 66% 1 5,521 71% 1 Staff Option

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: PARC Discussion Other Possible Options: Your Turn! The PARC has begun looking at other options and we invite you to help us tonight. We would like your response to the following questions: What do you like about the staff option? What do you not like about the staff option? Do you have any questions about the process or the staff option? Do you have other options you would like the PARC to consider? We invite you to come to the microphone with your comments/ questions/suggestions. You may also write your thoughts on a post-it note and stick it on one of the posters. 26

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review NEXT STEPS The committee will continue to work and will review the ideas presented tonight and at Thursday's Public Meeting Public Meetings: all meetings are from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. at Danforth CTI: o Monday, November 23, 2015 o Thursday, November 26, 2015 (same material as November 23 rd meeting) o Monday, December 7, 2015 (more discussion of possible options and receiving deputation meeting) o Wednesday, March 9, 2016 27

Toronto-Danforth Pupil Accommodation Review: Next Steps Delegations at Public Meeting #3 Members of the public may ask to make a deputation which will be scheduled for presentation at the third Public Meeting on December 7, 2015. Process: The request must be made in writing to accommodationreviews@tdsb.on.ca These requests must be made by 4:00 p.m. at least five business days before the Public Meeting (i.e. by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, November 30). Include a brief note on the focus of the presentation along with the speaker s name, address and contact information (plus the name of the organization or group that the speaker is representing, if applicable). Each delegation will be given a maximum of 5 minutes to make the presentation. The chair and/or the facilitator may ask a brief follow-up question or comment after the presentation. 28

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION! Public Website: www.tdsb.on.ca/accommodationreviews From the drop down menu, select: Pupil Accommodation Reviews, then select: 2015 - Toronto-Danforth Review Questions? Contact us at accommodationreviews@tdsb.on.ca (Please write Toronto-Danforth PARC in the subject line) 29