IM SYLLABUS 2018 ITALIAN IM 20 SYLLABUS

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Language Center. Course Catalog

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Lower and Upper Secondary

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Language Acquisition Chart

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

November 2012 MUET (800)

Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Syllabus. Cambridge International AS Level Japanese Language Syllabus code 8281 For examination in November 2013

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

ADVANCED PLACEMENT SPANISH

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

World Languages Unpacked Content for Classical Language Programs What is the purpose of this document?

South Carolina English Language Arts

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

One Stop Shop For Educators

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Intermediate Academic Writing

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

lgarfield Public Schools Italian One 5 Credits Course Description

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Legal English/ Inglés Jurídico

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Study Center in Santiago, Chile

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Russian 0015: Russian for Heritage Learners 2 MoWe 3:00PM - 4:15PM G13 CL

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

W O R L D L A N G U A G E S

Timeline. Recommendations

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Aviation English Solutions

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Assistant Professor, Department of Economics and Finance, University of Rome Tor Vergata

Learning and Retaining New Vocabularies: The Case of Monolingual and Bilingual Dictionaries

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

How long did... Who did... Where was... When did... How did... Which did...

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Course Syllabus Advanced-Intermediate Grammar ESOL 0352

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): A Critical and Comparative Perspective

Geographical Location School, Schedules, Classmates, Activities,

Example answers and examiner commentaries: Paper 2

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, INTERMEDIATE LEVEL

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Characteristics of the Text Genre Realistic fi ction Text Structure

The History of Language Teaching

The Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension. Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities.

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 11 : 3 March 2011 ISSN

4 th Grade Reading Language Arts Pacing Guide

Description: Pricing Information: $0.99

Transcription:

IM SYLLABUS 2018 ITALIAN IM 20 SYLLABUS

Italian IM 20 1 Paper: Aural/Oral (1 hour: 45 minutes + 15 minutes) + Written (3 hours) Syllabus 1. AIMS The aims of a course in Italian leading to the Intermediate examination are to: 1. develop the candidates ability to understand the spoken and written forms from a variety of registers; 2. encourage candidates to communicate confidently, clearly and effectively both through speaking and writing, using accurate linguistic forms which are appropriate in the context in which they are used; 3. develop candidates insights into, and encourage contact with, the contemporary society, cultural background, literature and heritage of Italy; 4. provide a suitable foundation for further study and/or practical use of the foreign language. 2. SUBJECT CONTENT In order to sit for the Intermediate level examination, candidates should normally have acquired the knowledge, understanding and skills equivalent to those specified in the Italian SEC syllabus. Candidates will be examined on the following aspects pertaining to the four language abilities (listening, reading, speaking, writing): 1. their extent of understanding of the Italian contemporary society, cultural background, literature and heritage of Italy; 2. their extent of knowledge and understanding of the prescribed literature textbooks; 3. their listening and comprehension skills and their ability to respond and interact after being exposed to a variety of spoken/oral texts; 4. their ability to read and comprehend and to respond to questions based on written texts; 5. their ability to use appropriate linguistic forms when communicating both in speech and in writing; 6. their ability to use appropriate registers, both in spoken and in written communication; 7. their accurate use of Italian in order to organize facts and ideas, to explain oneself, to express opinions and to provide information both in speech and writing; 8. their understanding of grammatical structures and their ability to use them correctly, especially in writing. 3. ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES 1. to understand and respond, in speech and writing, to spoken language; 2. to understand and respond, in speech and writing, to written language; 3. to show knowledge of grammar and syntax and the ability to apply these; 4. to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of aspects of Italian society. 2

SCHEME OF ASSESSMENT WEIGHTINGS READING WRITING LISTENING SPEAKING CONTENT PAPER 1 (Aural/oral) G Listening/Communicative task/topic 10% 10% 10% Presentation PAPER II ( and Reading) (Cultural/Literary 20% 20% 30% Topics) TOTAL 20% 20% 10% 10% 40% The examination will consist of two papers: Paper I Aural/Oral (1 hour: 45 minutes + 15 minutes) 30% A) Listening Comprehension A text of approx. 400 words will be read three times to the candidates who can take notes during the listening phase, as from the first reading. Candidates will then have to answer to a set of questions on the text. 10% B) Conversation (5 minutes): Verb al communication skills may be tested by such stimuli as a text for reading and commentary, pictures for description and discussion, or a choice of topics to be discussed further by the candidate. 10% C) Topic Presentation* (10 minutes): Candidates will select a topic of their choice related to Italian Culture and Civilization and present it during the oral test. During the presentation, candidates can present visual material and/or notes in point form. Topics include: a) La politica italiana b) Il cinema italiano c) Sviluppi tecnologici e scientifici in Italia d) Un pittore o un movimento artistico italiano e) Un musicista o un genere musicale f) Il turismo in Italia g) L industria in Italia h) L ambiente in Italia i) Un epoca della storia italiana o un personaggio storico italiano j) Lo sport in Italia k) La gastronomia italiana l) La televisione italiana 10% *(Only the above topics are accepted for oral presentation) Part II Written (3 hours) A) Language: 1. Comprehension Test. The exercise will contain two texts for comprehension of approx. 300-350 words each. 20% 2. Essay: A choice of titles will be given which may include a letter, a dialogue, a report, and comments on general aspects of life in Italy and Malta. Candidates are expected to write about 300-350 words on the topic of their choice. 20% Suggested Textbooks for Comprehension: J. Eynaud, Ciak, si legge!, Cesati, Firenze. T. Marin, Nuovo Progetto Italiano 3. Libro dello studente, Edilingua, Roma. Suggested Textbooks for Language and Grammar: M. Silvestrini C. Bura R. Pavese E. Chiacchella V. Giunti Armanni, L italiano e l Italia. Grammatica con note di stile, Guerra, Perugia. M. Silvestrini C. Bura R. Pavese E. Chiacchella V. Giunti Armanni, L italiano e l Italia. 3

Esercizi e prove per la Certificazione. Medio e superiore, Guerra, Perugia. B) Literature: The following three texts are set. Two reference to the context questions will be set on each text. The candidates will have to answer one question, either from text 1, text 2 or text 3. 30% Text 1: Niccolò Ammaniti: Io non ho paura. Text 2: Carlo Cassola: La ragazza di Bube. Text 3: Stefano Benni: Margherita Dolcevita. 5. GRADE DESCRIPTIONS Grade A Candidates are able to respond readily and to speak fluently. They are willing to take the initiative and to develop their answers. They have a good command of idiom and vocabulary and deploy this naturally. Candidates show clear understanding of a wide range of complex spoken and written texts in a variety of registers. They have a very good understanding of grammatical markers, and a high level of awareness of structure, style and register. They not only understand the detail of the text but also show an ability to infer and appreciate. Candidates are able to communicate information, concepts and opinions clearly. Language and expression are generally appropriate to the subject and sufficiently varied and mature to convey effectively their thought and argument. They use a wide and varied range of syntax and lexis, including idiom and specialized vocabulary with a high level of accuracy and fluency. Errors, which do occur, will normally be of a minor nature. Candidates demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the literature/topics studied while focusing appropriately on the aspects of the texts/topics to be dealt with. Detailed knowledge, views, arguments and insights are presented clearly and logically. Grade C Candidates have few problems of comprehension and respond without undue hesitation. They show competent use of relevant idiom and vocabulary and avoid significant influence from the mother tongue. Grammar accuracy is adequate. Errors are more frequent when they attempt to use more complex language. Candidates understand a range of spoken and written texts in a variety of registers. They show understanding of grammatical markers and show some awareness of structure and register. They grasp the significant details of the text and are able to identify points of view, attitudes and emotions. Candidates are able to communicate information and opinions clearly. Language and expression are generally appropriate to the subject, and although limited in range and variety, are adequate to convey their thought and argument. There are relatively few errors of a serious kind and the general quality of the work tends to demonstrate that errors are due to lapses of attention or incomplete recall, rather than ignorance or failure to understand the problem involved. 4

Candidates demonstrate a sound knowledge of the literature/topics studied. Detailed knowledge is presented clearly and logically although there is a preponderance of content and limited evidence of insight. Grade E When speaking, candidates production is often hesitant and lacking in fluency and their vocabulary is restricted. The message is clear despite a high frequency of errors, particularly if an attempt is made to use more complex language. They are not willing to develop responses beyond the minimum. Candidates respond to straightforward questions competently. They may experience difficulties with abstract or complex language. In the case of answers in the target language they may resort to copying parts of the texts because of their lack of comprehension. Candidates communicate their ideas in a style which is unsophisticated but appropriate to the purpose, e.g. giving factual information and narrating events. Over a limited range of expression, spelling and grammar they are often inaccurate and inconsistent and include even some very basic errors. Their vocabulary is likely to be restricted and repetitive and there may be excessive use of simple sentences. They use a limited range of tenses and are prone to native language interference. They have a tendency to use stereotypical phrases. Candidates display adequate knowledge of the literature/topics studied but do not always focus on the aspects under consideration. Narration rather than analysis tends to characterize the work of such candidates. References to factual information may be vague or at times inaccurate. 5