The Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges

Similar documents
A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Financing Education In Minnesota

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

State Budget Update February 2016

How Might the Common Core Standards Impact Education in the Future?

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

Fiscal Years [Millions of Dollars] Provision Effective

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

UCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Draft Budget : Higher Education

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

KSBA Staff Review of HB 520 Charter Schools Rep. Carney - (as introduced )

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Series IV - Financial Management and Marketing Fiscal Year

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

Program Change Proposal:

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Executive Guide to Simulation for Health

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

The City University of New York

Keystone Opportunity Zone

Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

YOU RE SERIOUS ABOUT YOUR CAREER. SO ARE WE. ONLINE MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK

Scholarship Reporting

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

CLASSROOM USE AND UTILIZATION by Ira Fink, Ph.D., FAIA

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Music Chapel House Rules and Policies hapelle Musicale Reine Elisabeth, fondation d'utilité publique

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

The Role of Trustee. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Seeking student trustee candidates at Slippery Rock University

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

CAREER SERVICES Career Services 2020 is the new strategic direction of the Career Development Center at Middle Tennessee State University.

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

NC Community College System: Overview

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

2. Related Documents (refer to policies.rutgers.edu for additional information)

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Question No: 1 What must be considered with completing a needs analysis for a family saving for a child s tuition?

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Presentation of the English Montreal School Board To Mme Michelle Courchesne, Ministre de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport on

Nearing Completion of Prototype 1: Discovery

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Federal Update. Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Dept. of ED, Federal Student Aid WHITE HOUSE STUDENT LOAN INITIATIVES

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Supplemental Focus Guide

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING THROUGH ONE S LIFETIME

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY CONTRACT TO CHARTER A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO: (A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY)

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

Student Transportation

MINUTES. Kentucky Community and Technical College System Board of Regents. Workshop September 15, 2016

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

21 st Century Apprenticeship Models

Application for Fellowship Leave

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Indiana Last Updated: October 2011

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

Transcription:

The Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS DATE: May 16, 2016 SUBJECT: 2017-18 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan Item Number: 2.3 Attachment: Yes CATEGORY: College Finance and Facilities Planning TYPE OF BOARD CONSIDERATION: Recommended By: Consent/Routine First Reading Approved for Consideration: Mario Rodriguez, Acting Vice Chancellor Erik Skinner, Acting Chancellor Action Information X ISSUE: This item requests approval of the California Community Colleges 2017-18 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan prepared pursuant to the requirements of Government Code sections 13100-13102 and Education Code sections 67500-67503. BACKGROUND: The California Community Colleges comprise the largest postsecondary system of education in the world. Approximately 2.1 million students are enrolled each year at 72 districts encompassing 113 campuses, 78 approved off-campus centers and 24 separately reported district offices. The districts assets include over 24,479 acres of land, 5,720 buildings, and 85.1 million gross square feet of space that includes 51.3 million assignable square feet of space. In addition, the California Community Colleges have many off-campus outreach centers at various locations. The California Community Colleges are currently serving approximately three-quarters of California s public undergraduate college enrollment in both vocational and academic program offerings. (Background cont.) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Governors approve the California Community Colleges 2017-18 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan. 49

(Background cont.) Government Code sections 13100-13102 require the Governor to submit annually a five-year capital infrastructure plan to the Legislature in conjunction with the Governor s Budget. To accomplish this, every entity of state government is required to provide to the Department of Finance an estimate of capital infrastructure needs and costs for a five-year period. Additionally, Education Code sections 67501 and 67503 require the California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office to prepare a five-year capital outlay plan identifying the statewide needs and priorities of the California Community Colleges. ANALYSIS: STATE FUNDING AVAILABILITY All of the existing state bond funds for California Community Colleges a total of $1.67 billion from Proposition 47 (2002) and Proposition 55 (2004), and $1.5 billion from Proposition 1D (2006) have either been spent or are committed to projects. Since the passage of Proposition 39 in November 2000, which lowered the threshold for voter approval of local bonds to 55 percent, 67 districts have passed $28.8 billion in local bonds. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS District Master Plans The districts five-year capital outlay plans are based on the local education master plan and facilities master plan for each campus. California Code of Regulations, title 5, section 51008 requires districts to establish policies for, and approve, comprehensive master plans which include academic master plans and long-range master plans for facilities. An education master plan is a prerequisite to the preparation of a facilities master plan. The preparation of a facilities master plan is in turn necessary for the preparation of the five-year capital outlay plans districts submit annually to the Facilities Planning and Utilization unit of the Chancellor s Office. Education Master Plans An education master plan defines how a district will meet the needs of its students and the community and outlines the short and long-range goals for a community college district and its campus(es). Districts use education master plans as a tool to periodically reevaluate educational programs and facilities needs in terms of past experience, current community requirements, projected enrollment and future goals. An education master plan describes current programs and details how those programs should develop in the future. The plan may introduce new programs and describe how the programs will be integrated into the curriculum and the direction in which they will grow in the future. Districts must consider state codes and regulations, long-term budget considerations, staffing requirements, and new educational delivery methods and technology when developing their education master plans. 50

Facilities Master Plans A facilities master plan is derived from the education master plan and provides a blueprint for the facilities and technology that will be required to fully implement the education master plan of a district for each campus. The decisions a district makes in developing a facilities master plan are critical due to the permanent nature of college facilities. This is evidenced by the fact that 63 percent of buildings in the California Community Colleges are over 25-years old and 49 percent are over 40-years old. DISTRICT AND THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL OUTLAY PLANS Education Code sections 81820-81823 require the governing board of each community college district to annually prepare and submit to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges a five-year plan for capital construction. These district five-year capital outlay plans are typically due to the Facilities Planning and Utilization unit by July 1 of each year. The Facilities Planning and Utilization unit reviews and approves the districts five-year capital outlay plans as part of the annual capital outlay grant application process (please refer to Attachment A for further explanation of this process). The California Code of Regulations, title 5, section 57014 requires that, prior to receiving state funding, capital construction projects must be included in a district s approved five-year capital outlay plan. Once the local five-year capital outlay plans are approved by the Facilities Planning and Utilization unit, the California Community Colleges Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan is compiled using information from the districts approved plans. As required by state law, the plan identifies the statewide needs, costs, and priorities of the California Community Colleges (Government Code sections 13100-13102; Education Code sections 67501 and 67503). The California Community Colleges Five- Year Capital Outlay Plan presented to the Board of Governors for approval in this item is intended to satisfy all of these statutory and regulatory requirements and define the facilities needs of the California Community Colleges irrespective of whether there are sufficient funds available. The California Community Colleges Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan is submitted to the Department of Finance and the Legislature after approval by the Board of Governors. The plan is the culmination of the annual state capital outlay grant application process. CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES 2017-18 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL OUTLAY PLAN SUMMARY The 2017-18 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan identifies a projected need of $20.1 billion in capital facilities needs for the California Community Colleges over the five-year time frame of the plan (2017-18 to 2021-22). Of this amount, $8.8 billion is for construction of new facilities and $11.3 billion is for modernization of existing facilities. An additional $7.9 billion of currently identified facilities needs are deferred to future years with $5 billion in out-year costs for continuing phases of projects started within the five-year plan time frame and $2.9 billion of need carryover into subsequent plan years, primarily for modernization projects (see Attachment B). The total unmet facilities needs for the California Community Colleges for the five-year period of the plan are therefore estimated to be approximately $28 billion. This unmet need includes estimated costs for the construction of an additional 8.5 million assignable square feet for new facilities to meet 51

enrollment growth and 28.4 million assignable square feet for the modernization of existing facilities. The Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan includes individual projects, both state and locally funded, submitted by districts for all five years of the plan, plus systemwide facilities needs identified for each campus for the final three years of the plan to provide a more comprehensive picture of the California Community Colleges facility needs. Specifically, systemwide enrollment growth need is determined by converting the estimated enrollment need (after excluding needs addressed by alternative delivery methods, projects submitted by districts, etc.) to ASF based on the space standards adopted by the Board of Governors. Systemwide modernization need is established based on the need to modernize existing buildings that are over 40 years old (after adjusting for projects submitted by districts). The annual Capital Outlay Spending Plan is the basis for the first year of the California Community Colleges Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan and reflects the projects, following approval by the Board of Governors, to be submitted to the Department of Finance for consideration of funding in the following January 10 Governor s Budget. At the time the 2017-18 Five-Year Plan was developed, the draft 2017-18 Spending Plan consisted of 32 projects at a total cost of $1.2 billion-- $746 million to be funded by the state (see Attachment C) and $492.6 million to be provided by the districts. Since then, a project has been withdrawn by a district. Funding for all new projects in the spending plan is dependent upon the passage of a statewide general obligation bond being approved by the voters in fall 2016. Another 124 projects are planned in the first year of the plan to be funded solely by the districts at a cost of approximately $888 million. The projects in the last four years of the plan have been scheduled based on facility needs and logistics, irrespective of funding availability. This scheduling is a crucial step in moving toward a California Community Colleges Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan that truly demonstrates the unmet facility needs of the California Community Colleges rather than one that simply reflects available funding. TEN-YEAR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CAPITAL OUTLAY NEEDS The plan also contains an analysis of the 10-year (2017-18 to 2026-27) facilities needs for the California Community Colleges. The first half of the 10-year analysis represents the proposed Five- Year Capital Outlay Plan of $20.1 billion and out-year costs for continuing projects of $5 billion or a total of $25.1 billion. The second half of the 10-year includes carryover modernization need ($2.9 billion) and extends the projection methodologies used in the Five-Year Capital Plan as the basis for years 6-10. Total estimate for years 6-10 is projected to be $14.9 billion and includes new facilities based on the enrollment level projected in the Five-Year Capital Plan and adjusted for future growth; modernization needs to replace/renovate existing buildings that will be over 25 years old by 2026-27 plus critical/life safety projects; and assumptions to cover projected capital outlay needs for new centers and inflation. The 10-year need is estimated to be approximately $40 billion ($25.1 billion for year 1-5 and $14.9 billion for years 6-10). 52

STUDENT ENROLLMENT Enrollment at the California Community Colleges peaked in 2008-09 with 2.7 million students. However, due to the state s budget deficit from declining tax revenues, the budget for the California Community Colleges was reduced by a total of $1.5 billion, resulting in a 25 percent reduction of course offerings. The outcome was a 22 percent drop in enrollment, reducing the peak enrollment in 2008-09 of 2.7 million students to 2.1 million students in 2013-14. The passage of Proposition 30, the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012, provides additional revenue relief to California s education budget through fiscal year 2018-19. The increased funding from Proposition 30 is helping the California Community Colleges to restore access to students turned away during the state s financial crisis and be better positioned to meet the increasing demand for college-educated workers. HOW ARE WE DOING? The California Community Colleges 2017-18 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan identifies the need to construct a total of 36.9 million assignable square feet at a cost of $28 billion. This amount includes $10.6 billion for the construction of an additional 8.5 million assignable square feet for new facilities to meet enrollment growth and $17.4 billion for 28.4 million assignable square feet of modernization needs. The first California Community Colleges Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan was completed for the 2002-03 fiscal year. That plan identified the need for 36.4 million assignable square feet of facilities in the California Community Colleges at a cost of $12.1 billion. This included $4.5 billion for the construction of an additional 10.2 million assignable square feet for new facilities to meet enrollment growth and $7.6 billion for 26.2 million assignable square feet of modernization needs. Since that first plan, the total statewide costs have increased by $15.9 billion (131 percent increase). The reasons for the increase in space needed and costs are varied and include: The 2002-03 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan was based on 1,052,963 Full-Time Equivalent Students in 2000-01 whereas the 2016-17 plan is based on 1,163,710 Full-Time Equivalent Students in 2013-14. This represents an average 10.5 percent increase in Full- Time Equivalent Students throughout the California Community Colleges. Construction of new space is more expensive than modernization of existing space and the type of space currently being constructed is the more expensive space such as laboratory, learning resource centers, and career technical spaces. In recognition that projects throughout the state were bidding at substantially over authorized amounts, the Chancellor s Office cost guidelines were increased by 30 percent in 2007. This was followed by a change in the way inflation is calculated for state-funded projects per the Department of Finance that accounted for an additional 53

25-30 percent increase in construction costs. These two changes resulted in substantial increases to project costs to meet the realities of the market. In the past decade, the California Community Colleges have received a total of approximately $3.5 billion in state funding to support approximately 522 projects (new start and continuing). The Legislature has not placed an education bond on the ballot for voter approval since 2006, creating a backlog of community college projects. The proposed 2017-18 Capital Outlay Spending Plan is dependent upon a new bond. Given the uncertainty of a new bond and the level of funding, the 2017-18 Capital Outlay Spending Plan reflects only those highest priority projects under the assumption of an annual funding level of approximately $750 million. The Facilities Planning and Utilization unit has received proposals for projects totaling over $2 billion. This amount does not reflect the additional projects that would have been developed and submitted by the districts had state funding been made available to fund these projects under the normal budget process. Without state bond funds, the backlog of community college projects will continue to grow. 54