Key Performance Indicators

Key Performance Indicators EXECUTIVE REPORT Updated: July 27 This document displays the progress made towards achieving the key performance indicator targets set by the Alamo Colleges. Many of these institutional measures are based on those of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Achieving the Dream initiative. Prepared by the Institutional Research and Effectiveness Services (IRES) Department. DRIVER : RECRUITMENT 3. Contact Hours (Credit Funded and CE Funded ). Participation Rate in Service Area (Fall Term) (State Peer Best: 5.3%) 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.%.% 3.7% 3.8% 3.5% 2,,,5, 9,, 7,5, 6,, 4,5, 3,,,5, - 252,685 7,38,528 25 Total, 7,39,23 6,62,68 78,35 Total, 6,798,959 26 29,499 3,965,888 25 Total, 4,95,387,49 3,967,44 Total, 4,67,93 26 37,684 2,645,2 25 Total, 2,682,84 39,444 2,746,784 Total, 2,786,228 26 77,497 5,57,352 Total, 5,34,849 25 48,963 5,248,888 26 Total, 5,297,85 3,84 623,2 25 Total, 636,34 92,368 9,788 Total, 94,56 26.% Fall 24 Fall 25 Fall 26 See Footnote 3 for more information. State benchmark institution is El Paso Community College District. Please See Footnote for further information. 2. Contact Hours (Credit Funded and CE Funded ) By College of Section Location (Formerly College of Attendance) 9,, 7,5, 6,, 4,5, 3,,,5, - 252,685 6,8,44 25 Total, 6,434,25 78,35 6,7,536 26 Total, 6,85,887 3,965,888 29,499 Total, 4,95,387 25,49 3,967,44 Total, 4,67,93 26 2,645,2 37,684 Total, 2,682,84 25 2,746,784 39,444 Total, 2,786,228 26 77,497 5,57,352 25 Total, 5,34,849 48,963 5,248,888 Total, 5,297,85 26 3,84,58,28 Total,,593,392 25 SAC** SPC PAC NVC NLC 9,788,533,44 26 Total,,553,228 Please See Footnote 2 for further information. **Excludes students in courses taught at NLC. of

DRIVER : RECRUITMENT continued 6. Fall Credit Contact Hours (State Funded Only) By College of Section Location (Formerly College of Attendance) 4. Total Credit Student Headcount (Fall Term) By College of Section Location (Formerly College of Attendance) 2, 8, 6, 4, 2,, 8, 6, 4, 2, 8,3 8,248 7,43,54,98,64 8,376 8,67 9,8 Fall 24 Fall 25 See Footnote 4 for more information. 5,797 6,656 6,793 5. Total Credit Student Headcount (Fall Term) 25, 5,3 5,37 4,854 Fall 26 3,,,5, 2,394,752 2,285,92 2,25,44,43,66,475,24,476,84 See Footnote 6 for more information. **Excludes students in courses taught at NLC 7. Fall Credit Contact Hours (State Funded Only) By College of Section Owner (Formerly College of Registration),24,28,29,36,4,744 2,4,896 2,25,448 2,25,46 655,824 637,54 63,44 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 SAC** SPC PAC NVC NLC Fall 24 Fall 25 Fall 26 2, 5,, 5, 2,28 2,638 9,28,54,98,64 8,376 8,67 9,8 5,797 6,656 6,793 2,325 3,332 3,484 Fall 24 See Fall 25 Fall 26 Footnote 5 for more information. 3,,,5, - 2,838,752 2,58,72 2,432,96,43,66,475,24,476,84,24,28,29,36,4,744 2,4,896 2,25,448 2,25,46 2,824 34,984 43,488 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 Fall 24 Fall 25 Fall 26 See Footnote 7 for more information. 2 of

DRIVER 2: RETENTION 8. Within Term Retention (Total Population) By College of Section Owner (Formerly College of Registration).% 9.% 8.% 7.% 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.%.%.% See Footnote 8 for more information. 9. Fall to Spring Persistence FT FTIC (Statewide Benchmark 78.5%) % 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% % % 82.5% 78.% 8.2% 82.% 77.2% 74.8% 78.% 77.9% 8.% 84.2% 84.% 86.6% 87.6% 83.9% 87.4% 87.2% 6.% 7.5% 78.8% 82.% Fall 22 to Spring 23 Fall 23 to Spring 24 Fall 24 to Spring 25 Fall 25 to Spring 26 See Footnote 9 for more information. Benchmark is from THECB Perkins Measures and Standards 26-7.. Fall to Spring Persistence PT FTIC College of Section Owner (Formerly College of Registration) (Statewide Benchmark 66%) 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% % % 94.4% 94.3% 9.7% 92.9% 64.% 6.6% 6.5% 59.5% 94.9% 95.7% 94.8% 95.2% 54.9% 58.7% 58.9% 6.% 94.7% 94.9% 93.5% 94.7% 66.3% 67.7% 62.5% 66.4% 95.9% 96.% 94.% 94.5% 73.9% 69.5% 69.2% 7.% 94.9% 95.% 86.9% 9.7% Fall 23 Fall 24 Fall 25 Fall 26 34.7% 46.% 6.8% 6.6% Fall 22 to Spring 23 Fall 23 to Spring 24 Fall 24 to Spring 25 Fall 25 to Spring 26 See Footnote for more information. Benchmark is from THECB Perkins Measures and Standards 26-7.. Fall to Fall Persistence FT FTIC (State Best Benchmark San Jacinto South 7.7%) Focus Area: THECB Accountability System Success Measure 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% % % 54.4% 58.% 6.7% 49.5% 58.6% 57.2% See Footnote for more information. Benchmark is from THECB Accountability System. 2. Fall to Fall Persistence PT FTIC 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% % % See Footnote 2 for more information. 3. 2-Year Fall to Fall Persistence FT FTIC (State Peer Benchmark El Paso 43.%) Focus Area: THECB Accountability System Success Measure See Footnote 3 for more information. Benchmark is from THECB Accountability System. 4. 2-Year Fall to Fall Persistence PT FTIC 4% See Footnote 4 for more information. 62.% 62.8% 67.2% 63.5% 66.6% 67.7% 54.5% 64.4% 52.7% Fall 23 to Fall 24 Fall 24 to Fall 25 Fall 25 to Fall 26 4.% 4.6% 42.% 36.8% 39.6% 4.4% 4.3% 39.4% 43.% 5.4% 49.% 49.2% 27.5% 44.% 44.8% Fall 23 to Fall 24 Fall 24 to Fall 25 Fall 25 to Fall 26 45% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 5% % 5% % 35% 3% 25% 2% 5% % 5% % 36.2% 37.5% 35.4% 32.3% 29.2% 33.3% 34.7% 38.5% 34.% 33.4% 36.8% 36.5% 38.7% 35.% 37.7% 38.6% 3.3%.9% 2.5% 25.% 2-Year Fall 2 to Fall 23 2-Year Fall 22 to Fall 24 2-Year Fall 23 to Fall 25 2-Year Fall 24 to Fall 26 25.9% 26.9% 27.6% 26.% 9.2% 9.% 24.% 23.5% 22.7% 26.8% 3.2% 24.7% 33.3% 34.% 34.6% 32.2% 7.2% 3.% 7.7% 22.3% 2-Year Fall 2 to Fall 23 2-Year Fall 22 to Fall 24 2-Year Fall 23 to Fall 25 2-Year Fall 24 to Fall 26 3 of

DRIVER 2: RETENTION continued DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION 5a. Percentage of FTIC Students who were Successful in Gatekeeper Math after Completing their Developmental Math Sequence 3 Years After Term of Entry: 9.% 8.% 7.% 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.%.%.% 79.3% 73.% 73.% 69.5% 74.5% 7.2% 7.% 69.3% See Footnote 5a for more information. 5b. Percentage of FTIC Students who were Successful in Gatekeeper English after Completing their Developmental English Sequence 3 Years After Term of Entry: 2.%.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% See Footnote 5b for more information 77.2% 68.2% 67.9% 75.4% 8.4% 8.7% 8.8% 83.% 75.3% 68.7% 67.9% 62.9% FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 22 FTIC Fall 23 73.2% 78.9% 78.% 76.2% 69.2% 69.3% 66.7% 7.5% 83.3% 78.7% 78.6% 77.% 8.8% 8.2% 79.% 84.%.% 87.% 84.2% 72.6% FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 22 FTIC Fall 23 5c. Percentage of FTIC Students who were Successful in History 3 after Completing their Developmental Reading Sequence 3 Years After Term of Entry: 9.% 8.% 7.% 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.%.%.% 65.2% 59.9% 6.3% 68.7% 75.% 69.3% 7.6% 76.2% See Footnote 5c-d for more information. 75.% 76.3% 8.% 74.8% 5d. Percentage of FTIC Students who were Successful in Biology 48 after Completing their Developmental Reading Sequence 3 Years After Term of Entry: 2.%.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 78.8% 76.% 74.8% 8.% See Footnote 5c-d for more information. **No attempts were made at NLC for FTIC Fall 22 cohort 82.4% 59.% 58.8% 76.7% FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 22 FTIC Fall 23 8.8% 58.8% 66.7%.% 9.7% 88.9% 83.3% 9.% 55.6% 5.% 66.7% 5.% 7.4% 66.7% SAC SPC PAC NLC** FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 2 FTIC Fall 22 FTIC Fall 23.% 4 of

DRIVER 3: COMPLETION 6. Number of Certificate and Degree Awards (Associates and Certificates) 6, 5, 4, 3, 2,, -,56 2,8 Total, 4,36,6 3,432 Total, 5,32 98 75 Total,,73 78,3 Total,,8 See Footnote 6 for more information. 7. Number of Certificate and Degree Awards: Other Completers 3, 2,5 2,,5, 5 - See Footnote 7 for more information. 282 883 Total,,65 243,2 Total,,363 87 2,3 Total, 2,487 3,468 2 Total, 3,679 8 Total, 8 24 Total, 24 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26 27,565 Total,,836 3 2,8 Associate's Degrees Certificates Total Total, 2,48 7 4 Total, 57 85 494 Total, 579 73 Total, 73 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26 25 26 863 Total, 863 7,826 Total,,897 99 2,6 Total, 2,6 CCC ESC FOS MSAC Total 69 Total, 69 222 Total, 222 8. FT FTIC 3-Year Graduation Rate (Statewide Benchmark 7.6%) Focus Area: THECB Accountability System Success Measure 3% 25% 2% 5% % 5% % 6.5% 8.%.4% 4.5% 5.5% 8.2% 6.5%.5% 2.3% 6.2% 8.9% 3.3% 5.8% See Footnote 8-2 for more information. 2.9% 25.5% 4.6%.% 2.4% 23.2% 25.9% 9. FT FTIC 4-Year Graduation Rate (Statewide Benchmark 2.%) Focus Area: Measure 35% 3% 25% 2% 5% % 5% 5.7% 3.% 6.6% 8.5% Fall 29 Cohort Fall 2 Cohort Fall 2 Cohort Fall 22 Cohort.2% 9.6% 4.4% 6.9% 22.% Fall 23 Cohort 22.7% THECB Accountability System Success.6%.3%.4% 7.8% 6.6%.2% 3.6% 8.2% 2.3% 7.5% 2.4% 7.% 27.6% 29.% 6.3% 3.3% 8.2%.6% 5.3% % Fall 28 Cohort Fall 29 Cohort Fall 2 Cohort Fall 2 Cohort Fall 22 Cohort See Footnote 8-2 for more information. 29.2% 5 of

DRIVER 3: COMPLETION continued 2. FT FTIC 6-Year Graduation Rate (Statewide Benchmark 9.% Focus Area: THECB Accountability System Success Measure 35% 3% 25% 32.% 2% 5% % 5%.3% 2.%.3% 4.% 7.3% 4.9% 7.% 2.5% 4.2% 4.2% 3.7%.9% 2.% 3.6% 2.8% 6.% 8.8% 8.9% 9.2% 7.9% 2.5% 2.3% 7.2% % Fall 26 Cohort Fall 27 Cohort Fall 28 Cohort Fall 29 Cohort Fall 2 Cohort See Footnote 8-2 for more information. 2. Percent of FTIC Students Who Transfer to a Texas Senior Institution in Six Years (FTIC All Transfers) (Statewide Benchmark 2.5%, VLCC Best NLC 27.6%) 5% 4% 3% 2% % 9.% 8.5% 9.7% 8.4% 8.7% 2.3%.7% 2.2%.3% 8.4% 8.6% 9.% 9.3% 7.6% 6.4% 29.6% 33.8% 3.8% 29.3% 27.2% 35.6% 27.8% 26.% 27.6% % 22 23 24 25 26 See Footnote 2 for more information. 6 of

DRIVER 4: CLUSTERS 22. Number of Certificate and Degree Awards by Closing the Gaps Critical Area (State Standard: 5 Graduates Over 3 Year Period) COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 84 66 79 See Footnote 22 for more information. ENGINEERING 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 26 36 26 47 3 53 See Footnote 22 for more information. 32 65 54 7 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 7 44 43 29 4 35 34 56 73 77 75 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 MATH 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 7 6 5 3 9 6 7 6 2 9 2 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 See Footnote 22 for more information. PHYSICAL SCIENCE 6 5 4 3 2 5 4 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 See Footnote 22 for more information. NURSING / ALLIED HEALTH 6 5 4 3 2 469 492 36 3 393 363 239 28 3 46 4 82 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 24 25 26 See Footnote 22 for more information. 7 of

Footnotes and Definitions for KPI Report 27. Participation Rate in Service Area (Fall Term) Counties in Service Area: Atascosa (5%), Bandera, Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe (98%), Kendall, Kerr, and Wilson Definition: Alamo Colleges Fall unduplicated headcount (Total at the fall census date including dual credit; excluding summer II late flex from the prior term) divided by service area population, ages 8 64, projections from the Texas State Data Center for the current year (migration scenario.). Data source for Alamo Colleges Unduplicated Headcount: Certified - THECB Accountability System. Preliminary - preliminary CBM files (SAS Program KPI - Headcount -with Flex5Yr CBM Term.sas). Data Source for Service Area Population Projections: Texas State Data Center. 2. Contact Hours (Credit Funded + CE Funded) By College of Section Location Definition: Total annual funded credit and funded CE contact hours attributed to the college at which a student attended courses. Contact hours for CE reflect those reported as of each quarter s census date. If a student attended a course at the NLC location, then that course s contact hours were counted for NLC. Data source: XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_ CBMC_ACCD, and XST_IRE_SC. To find out where the student attended courses, the College of Section Location was joined with C4_Colllege field. DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_ Funded Contact Hours by Location_DBK.KPI Driver - Funded Contact Hours by Location_CSV DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_ CE Funded Contact Hours by Owner_DBK.KPI Driver - CE Contact Hours by Owner_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver Measure 2 CH CSL.sas 3. Contact Hours (Credit Funded + CE Funded) By College of Section Owner Definition: Total annual funded credit and funded CE contact hours attributed to the college at which a student registered. Contact hours for CE reflect those reported as of each quarter s census date. Data source: XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_ CBMC_ACCD. DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_ Funded Contact Hours by Owner_DBK.KPI Driver - Funded Contact Hours by Owner_CSV DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_ CE Funded Contact Hours by Owner_DBK.KPI Driver - CE Contact Hours by Owner_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver Measure 3 CH CSO.sas 4. Total Credit Student Headcount (Fall Term) - By College of Section Location Definition: Fall unduplicated headcount within the college at which a student attended courses (total at the fall census date including dual credit). If a student attended at least one course at the NLC location, then that student was counted as attending NLC. Please note that if a student attended courses at both NLC and SAC (SPC), then that student was counted for both colleges. Data source: XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_ CBMC_ACCD, and XST_IRE_SC. DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_Headcount by Location - Fall & Spring.KPI Driver - Headcount by Location_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver Measure 4 Headcount CSL.sas 5. Total Credit Student Headcount (Fall Term) - By College of Section Owner Definition: Fall unduplicated headcount within the college at which a student registered (total at the fall census date including dual credit). This definition originates from the THECB. Please note that NLC students are also counted in either the SAC or SPC totals, depending on where the student registered. Data source: XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_ CBMC_ACCD. DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_Headcount by Owner - Fall & Spring.KPI Driver # - Headcount by Owner_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KKPI Driver Measure 5 Headcount CSO.sasPI Driver.egp 6. Fall Contact Hours (Credit Funded) By College of Section Location Definition: Fall funded credit contact hours attributed to the college at which a student attended courses. If a student attended a course at the NLC location, then that course s contact hours were counted for NLC. Data source: XST_ CBM4_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. To find out where the student attended courses, the College of Section Location was joined with C4_Colllege field. DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_ Funded Contact Hours by Location_DBK.KPI Driver - Funded Contact Hours by Location_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver Measure 6 - Fall Contact Hours (CSL).sas 7. Fall Contact Hours (Credit Funded) By College of Section Owner Definition: Fall funded credit contact hours attributed to the college at which a student registered. Data source: XST_ CBM4_ACCD DBKs.KPIs.Driver.KPI Driver #_ Funded Contact Hours by Owner_DBK.KPI Driver - Funded Contact Hours by Owner_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver Measure 7 - Fall Contact Hours (CSO).sas 8. Within Term Retention (Total Population) Definition: The rate at which credit students persist within the same term (excludes Fall late flex, includes dual credit). For example, if a student dropped all courses within a semester, then that student was not retained; if a student was still enrolled in at least one course by the end of the semester, then that student was retained. Data source: XST_ CBM_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. DBKs.KPIs.Driver 2.KPI Driver #2_Within Term Retention_DBK.KPI Driver #2_Within Term Retention_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \KPI Driver 2 Measure 8 Within Term Retention.sas 9. Fall to Spring Persistence FT FTIC Definition: The rate at which full-time, FTIC, degree-seeking credit students persist from Fall term of entry (at census date) to the subsequent Spring term (at census date) at the same college. Full-time is defined as a student taking 2 or more semester credit hours. Students who earned awards and did not persist during the interval were excluded (starting with the Fall 28 cohort). Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \KPI Driver 2 Measure 9 & Fall to Spring Persitence.sas. Fall to Spring Persistence PT FTIC Definition: The rate at which part-time, FTIC, degree-seeking credit students persist from the Fall term of entry (at census date) to the subsequent Spring term (at census date) at the same college. Part-time is defined as a student taking less than 2 semester credit hours. Students who earned awards and did not persist during the interval were excluded (starting with the Fall 28 cohort). Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \KPI Driver 2 Measure 9 & Fall to Spring Persitence.sas 8 of

. Fall to Fall Persistence FT FTIC Definition: The rate at which full-time, FTIC, degree-seeking credit students persist from the Fall term of entry (at census date) to the Fall term of the following year (at census date) at the same college. Full-time is defined as a student taking 2 or more semester credit hours. Students who earned awards and did not persist during the interval were excluded. Data source: THECB Accountability System, XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Aggregated\KPI Driver 2 Measure & 2 Fall to Spring Persitence.sas 2. Fall to Fall Persistence PT FTIC Definition: The rate at which part-time, FTIC, degree-seeking credit students persist from the Fall term of entry (at census date) to the Fall term of the following year (at census date) at the same college. Part-time is defined as a student taking less than 2 semester credit hours. Students who earned awards and did not persist during the interval were excluded (starting with the Fall 28 cohort). Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Aggregated\KPI Driver 2 Measure & 2 Fall to Spring Persitence.sas 3. 2-Year Fall to Fall Persistence FT FTIC Definition: The rate at which full-time, FTIC, degree-seeking credit students persist from the Fall term of entry (at census date) to the Fall term two years later (at census date) at the same college. Part-time is defined as a student taking less than 2 semester credit hours. Students who earned awards and did not persist during the interval were excluded. Data source: THECB Accountability System, XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Aggregated\ KPI Driver 2 Measure 3 & 4 Two- Year Fall to Fall Persitence.sas 4. 2-Year Fall to Fall Persistence PT FTIC Definition: The rate at which part-time, FTIC, degree-seeking credit students persist from the Fall term of entry (at census date) to the Fall term two years later (at census date) at the same college. Part-time is defined as a student taking less than 2 semester credit hours. Students who earned awards and did not persist during the interval were excluded. Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \ KPI Driver 2 Measure 3 & 4 Two-Year Fall to Fall Persitence.sas 5a. Percentage of FTIC Developmental Math Students Who Attempted and Successfully Complete their Developmental Math Sequence and Gatekeeper 3 Years Later Definition: The number of FTIC students who successfully completed the highest developmental Math course across the district and subsequently earned an A, B, or C in Gatekeeper Math (MATH 34 College Algebra) within 3 years divided by all FTIC students who and successfully completed the highest developmental math course (MATH 33, MATH 32, MATH 442 for NVC only) and attempted Gatekeeper Math across the district. Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \ FTIC DevEd - College MATH to GateKeeper English Success - KB Mod.egp 5b. Percentage of FTIC Developmental English Students Who Attempted and Successfully Completed their Developmental English Sequence and Gatekeeper 3 Years Later Definition: The number of FTIC students who successfully completed the highest developmental English course across the district and subsequently earned an A, B, or C in Gatekeeper English (ENGL 3) within 3 years divided by all FTIC students who completed the highest developmental English course (ENGL 3, INRW 42) and attempted Gatekeeper English across the district. Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \ FTIC DevEd - College ENGL to GateKeeper English Success - KB Mod.egp 5c-d. Percentage of FTIC Developmental Reading Students Who Attempted and Successfully Completed their Developmental Reading Sequence and Gatekeeper 3 Years Later Definition: The number of FTIC who successfully completed the highest developmental reading course across the district and subsequently earned an A, B, or C in Gatekeeper Reading (HIST 3 or BIOL 48) within 3 years divided by all FTIC students who successfully completed the highest developmental reading course (READ33, INRW 42) and attempted either History 3 or Biology 48 across the district. Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_ CBM4_ACCD and XST_IRE_SC. SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \ FTIC DevEd - College ENGL to GateKeeper Biology Success - KB Mod.egp SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\ Current Code \ FTIC DevEd - College ENGL to GateKeeper History Success - KB Mod.egp 6. Number of Certificate and Degree Awards (Associates and Certificates) Degrees include: AA, AAS, AAT, and AS; Certificates include: ATC, CERT, CERT2, and CERT3. THECB Accountability System does not include CERT3 in its counts. Definition: The number of degrees and certificates awarded throughout the academic year. This number may be duplicated per student, as a student may earn multiple awards throughout the school year. Please note that CERT3 awards are not included here. Source: Certified data - THECB Accountability System; Preliminary Data source: XST_CBM9_ACCD Preliminary data Argos DBK: Institutional Research (IRES).IRES INTERNAL DBKs.KPIs.Driver 3.KPI Driver #3_Certificates & Degrees_(Associates & Certs).KPI Driver 3 - Certificates & Degrees (Associates & Certs)_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver 3 Measure 6 Graduates.sas 7. Number of Certificate and Degree Awards (Other Completers) Other completers include students who earn a MSAC, ESC,CCC, or FOS. THECB Accountability System includes CERT3 in its counts. Definition: The number of students who complete programs other than degrees or certificates throughout the academic year. This number may be duplicated per student, as a student may complete multiple programs throughout the school year. Source: Certified data - THECB Accountability System; Preliminary Data source: XST_CBM9_ACCD, XST_CBMM_ACCD Preliminary data Argos DBK: Institutional Research (IRES).IRES INTERNAL DBKs.KPIs.Driver 3.KPI Driver #3_Certificates & Degrees_(Other Completers).KPI Driver 3 - Certificates & Degrees (Other Completers)_CSV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\KPI Driver 3 Measure 7 Completers.sas 8-2. FT FTIC Graduation Rates Definition: Three, four, and six-year graduation rates of first-time, fulltime, credential-seeking undergraduates. Credential seeking students are those with a code of =earn an associate s degree, 2=earn a certificate, 3=earn credits for transfer, or 6=did not respond to from the student intent field on the CBM. Graduation rates include students who graduate with a Certificate, Certificate 2, Advanced Technology Certificate, or Associate s Degree. Please note that only FTIC students that graduated from an Alamo Colleges college across the district are included in preliminary data, while THECB Accountability System graduation rates include degrees students earned from any Texas public or private higher education institution. Source: Certified data - THECB Accountability System; Preliminary Data source: XST_CBM_ACCD, XST_CBM9_ACCD SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Current Code\ COLG KPI 3-4-6 YR Grad Rates by FT PT Status.egp 9 of

2. Percent of FTIC Students Who Transfer to a Texas Senior Institution in Six Years ( FTIC All Transfers) Definition: A cohort of first-time students who started six years ago is followed. Those who attempted college-level credit hours at the same institution/district then transferring to a university are attributed to an institution/district. Those who attempted college-level credit hours at more than one community college /district will appear in the statewide transfer rate. Source: THECB Accountability System. The data displayed is the most current available. 22. Number of Certificate and Degree Awards by Closing the Gaps Critical Areas Critical Area and Associated 2 or 4 digit CIP Codes for Closing the Gaps Critical Areas listing: Computer Science =, Engineering = 4 & 5, Mathematics = 27, Physical Science = 4 & 3., (5.2, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 5,, 5.6 (nursing, not allied health), Nursing/Allied Health = 56, 538, 539, 52, 56, 57, 58, 59, 5, 58, 523, 526, 527, 53, 532, 533, 534, 599) Definition: Total number of students who earned awards in the same CIP codes as Closing the Gaps critical areas. This measure includes students who graduate with a Certificate, Certificate 2, Advanced Technology Certificate, or Associate s Degree. Source for each critical area: Certified data - THECB Accountability System; Preliminary Data source: XST_CBM9_ACCD Preliminary data DBKs.KPIs.Driver 4.KPI Driver #4 - Closing the GAPS Critical Area # of Certs & Degrees.Driver#4 - Closing the GAPS Critical AreaCerts&Degrees_QV SAS: Z:\Projects\KPI\Script\Aggregated\KPI Driver 4 Measure 22 - Critical Fields Graduation Rates.sas of