Carry out a baseline study to research current position. 1.1 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should:

Similar documents
e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

An APEL Framework for the East of England

Qualification handbook

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Student Experience Strategy

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

Continuing Competence Program Rules

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

School Leadership Rubrics

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

Qualification Guidance

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Kinesiology. Master of Science in Kinesiology. Doctor of Philosophy in Kinesiology. Admission Criteria. Admission Criteria.

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

PATHE subproject Models

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Interview on Quality Education

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

University of Toronto

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

College of Liberal Arts (CLA)

Apprenticeships in. Teaching Support

Using Open Badges in your organisation

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Programme Specification

Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Briefing document CII Continuing Professional Development (CPD) scheme.

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

GRAND CHALLENGES SCHOLARS PROGRAM

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

BSc (Hons) Property Development

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Using research in your school and your teaching Research-engaged professional practice TPLF06

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Report of External Evaluation and Review

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Curricular Innovations Outcomes Assessment and ABET 2000

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

Teaching Excellence Framework

ROLE DESCRIPTION. Name of Employee. Team Leader ICT Projects Date appointed to this position 2017 Date under review Name of reviewer

Quality Assurance of Teaching, Learning and Assessment

Development and Innovation in Curriculum Design in Landscape Planning: Students as Agents of Change

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Transcription:

1.1 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Carry out a baseline study to research current position To what extent are there already student engagement initiatives across the institution? To what extent are students and staff ready and motivated to work and learn in partnership?»» To what extent are institutional practices, policies and processes ready for student partnerships? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can002

Carry out a baseline study to research current position Areas to research include: Policy and strategy Institutional processes and systems Infrastructure Support services LT&A practice, expertise Staff CPD (inc. digital literacy) MIS and infrastructure Communications, stakeholder needs, views and expectations Other institutional initiatives Student employability skills, graduate attributes and digital literacy Use base-lining to inform planning at project and institutional levels Develop a set of impact indicators and measures of success to allow change and impact to be evaluated and measured Use both qualitative and quantitative approaches Use research/evaluation data from a range of sources e.g. student surveys, data from research projects As well as established research techniques (e.g. focus groups, surveys), use multi-media/technology-based approaches e.g. process maps, rich pictures, video interviews, social media Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.2 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Establish the case for student partnerships and align with strategies and policies Is there a clearly identified rationale and case for student partnerships? Which institutional policies and initiatives will student partnerships benefit? Will student partnerships support employability skills and graduate attributes? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can003

Establish the case for student partnerships and align with strategies and policies Identify drivers and needs for students, staff, the institution and others stakeholders such as employers Identify potential benefits and impact for students, staff, employers and the institution Map the potential benefits and impact to institutional strategies and policies (e.g. relating to student experience, employability, career planning, LT&A enhancement) Don t be afraid to think big, though ensure there is buy-in to a clear vision Where possible, try to keep partnership voluntary and focus on recognition and rewards (e.g. enhanced employability and potential accreditation) Establish cross-institutional approaches to working collaboratively Ensure issues and opportunities identified in base-lining are considered Engage stakeholders from across the institution in establishing the case for student partnerships Engage employers and professional and sector bodies in establishing the case for student partnerships Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.3 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Establish motivation, reward and recognition options for students and staff To what extent have the pros and cons of different ways of motivating and rewarding students and staff been considered? To what extent should recognition for student partnership work support students in gaining employment and in developing their employability skills?»» To what extent should a student partnership initiative align with the work of other institutional departments which focus on e.g. employability, careers Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can004

Establish motivation, reward and recognition options for students and staff Identify incentives for students, such as: Remuneration Improving job prospects Developing personal, academic and professional skills Working with employers Academic and professional accreditation and recognition Consider the pros and cons of alternative ways of engaging students e.g. Paid interns Casual employees of the institution Unpaid volunteers Participants on an accredited module of study Participants on a co-curricular programme which contributes to e.g. a graduate award, e-portfolio or HEAR record of achievement Participants engaged in research projects as part of scholarly culture Work with partners to establish recognition pathways for students e.g. professional institutions, HE/FE sector bodies and aim to build on established accreditation frameworks Work with institutional employability and careers departments to join-up approaches and initiatives Ensure there is mutual benefit for both staff and students Provide multiple opportunities to allow students to showcase their achievements, including with external audiences such as employers and professional bodies Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.4 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Devise novel recruitment and induction approaches for students (1) Have the skills and attributes for students been defined? Are traditional recruitment processes suitable for identifying students with the appropriate skills and attributes?»» To what extent have suitable guidance and induction resources been developed to help students decide whether they want to engage in partnership work? Jisc Guide to Instituting Student Partnerships http://tiny.cc/can005

Devise novel recruitment and induction approaches for students (1) Define the skills and attributes of students that are wanted e.g. A diverse skill set A high degree of intrinsic motivation The ability to work autonomously and communicate with a broad range of stakeholders Ability to work as a dynamic member of a research team and across disciplines and academic years Ability to show initiative, creativity and working in a range of situations Develop contract and compliance documents covering e.g. data protection, H&S, privacy, ethics, copyright, IPR etc. Set-up and facilitate an online social media forum to support student recruitment and networking Design recruitment processes to allow students to demonstrate their strengths, attributes and abilities e.g. Effective working in diverse groups Motivation to work on a project Ability to research and present new ideas in a clear way using a variety of digital tools Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.4 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Devise novel recruitment and induction approaches for students (2) Have the skills and attributes for students been defined? Are traditional recruitment processes suitable for identifying students with the appropriate skills and attributes?»» To what extent have suitable guidance and induction resources been developed to help students decide whether they want to engage in partnership work? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can005

Devise novel recruitment and induction approaches for students (2) Develop clear briefing guides and resources to explicitly describe the why, what, how, when, where, who of the project covering e.g. Needs and benefits Remuneration Activities Roles and boundaries What can be expected from others such as staff Reward and recognition Making use of digital tools Participate in workshops where they have to engage with teams to carry out a range of activities (using digital tools) Consider branding student-led initiatives (e.g. the University of Greenwich Interdisciplinary Research Group - IRG) Develop and run briefing sessions for students, building on the briefing guides and resources Instead of traditional recruitment techniques consider techniques such as: Asking students to prepare some artefact for a defined purpose (e.g. a video, web-resource) Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.5 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Identify a partnership model that encompasses options for different student roles together with a range of stakeholders (1) Have a range of different student roles been considered? Have a broad range of opportunities for student partnerships been identified?»» To what extent will student partnerships align with employability agendas and initiatives? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can006

Identify a partnership model that encompasses options for different student roles together with a range of stakeholders (1) Identify at what level to set-up partnerships e.g. institutional, faculty, disciplinary, cross-disciplinary Identify who should be involved e.g. Academics Professional support staff Students Alumni Prospective students Employers, Local community Employer/sector/professional bodies External experts Mentors and assessors Review the various models of student partnerships that different institutions have adopted and develop an appropriate model for the institutional and/or local contexts which may be phased Integrate with employability agendas and activities Develop an academic lead/champion at each local level Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.5 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Identify a partnership model that encompasses options for different student roles together with a range of stakeholders (2) Have a range of different student roles been considered? Have a broad range of opportunities for student partnerships been identified?»» To what extent will student partnerships align with employability agendas and initiatives? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can006

Identify a partnership model that encompasses options for different student roles together with a range of stakeholders (2) Identify a broad range of opportunities for student partnerships in educational innovation and change to focus on e.g. Curriculum design and delivery Assessment and feedback Digital literacies Library and information services Student experience, support and guidance Digital resources Staff development Learning resources Student records, administration, management and information systems Institutional processes e.g. QA, induction Institutional polices Based on the defined partnership model, develop options for different student roles e.g. Student as researcher Student as resource creator Student as expert Student as mentor Student as change agent student as trainer (staff and peer trainer) Student as evaluator Student advisor Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.6 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Identify an outline project plan including resources and funding To what extent has the development of a project plan been a collaborative exercise? Have measures/indicators of impact been identified? Are there appropriate governance measures in place? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can007

Identify an outline project plan including resources and funding Develop an outline project plan for setting up and implementing student partnerships Use the practice points from this guide as a check-list for the project plan Adopt an agile and flexible approach to project planning in order to allow the project to adapt to problems, emerging opportunities and changing contexts Ensure that the project plan has clear overall aims and objectives as well as defining outputs and outcomes particularly potential impact on institutions, sector and individuals Ensure representatives of all key stakeholder groups help to develop the plan Place considerable focus on stakeholder communications and engagement both formal and informal - and using social media to underpin this Develop appropriate governance structures including the formation of a steering group that represents a broad cross-section of roles and interests (including external representatives) Aim to develop indicators of impact, though this might need to wait post-baselining Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk

1.7 Good practice in setting up student partnerships should: Identify and learn from exemplars and case studies of student partnerships To what extent have experiences and lessons learnt from other student partnership initiatives been researched and contextualised?»» To what extent have these experiences and lessons learnt been shared with all stakeholders? Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships http://tiny.cc/can008

Identify and learn from exemplars and case studies of student partnerships There has been a considerable number of student partnership and engagement projects undertaken by institutions and much can be learnt from their experiences, therefore it is worthwhile taking the time to learn from these to supplement this guide Identify likely issues and challenges and how other institutions and projects have addressed and managed them Look for partnerships in your own institution these are not always actively promoted Ensure you share the lessons learnt from the exemplars/ case studies with all those involved with setting up and implementing student partnerships and facilitate dialogue on how such lessons can be adapted to you own needs and contexts Maintain a shared online resource of links to exemplars and case studies Use the lessons learnt to inform the development of your principles of good practice in student partnerships Jisc Guide to instituting student partnerships - Based on the Viewpoints model: viewpoints.ulster.ac.uk