Sample: 982 registered voters, margin of error +/- 3.5 percent 277 likely Republican caucus goers, margin of error +/- 6.0 percent

Similar documents
SUMMARY REPORT MONROE COUNTY, OH OFFICIAL RESULTS PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 6, 2012 RUN DATE:03/20/12 11:03 AM STATISTICS REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001

Opinion on Private Garbage Collection in Scarborough Mixed

APPENDIX 2: TOPLINE QUESTIONNAIRE

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Camas School levy passes! 69% approval! Crump! Truz! GOP homies tussle for Camas primary votes! Trump trumps with 42%, vs. 24% for Cruz!

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Simple Random Sample (SRS) & Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: A Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: Systematic Sample Best Used When

The First Annual Survey of the Community

Lessons on American Presidents.com


National Survey of Student Engagement

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities

Revision activity booklet for Paper 1. Topic 1 Studying society

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Introduction to Questionnaire Design

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

FACT: FACT: The National Coalition for Public Education. Debunking Myths About the DC Voucher Program

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Creating the Student Platform Fall 2008

Red Flags of Conflict

Principal vacancies and appointments

AC : PREPARING THE ENGINEER OF 2020: ANALYSIS OF ALUMNI DATA

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

DOCENT VOLUNTEER EDUCATOR APPLICATION Winter Application Deadline: April 15, 2013

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

The patient-centered medical

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions

Assessing and Providing Evidence of Generic Skills 4 May 2016

The Honorable John D. Tinder, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7 th Circuit (retired) Clerk

teacher, peer, or school) on each page, and a package of stickers on which

RURAL SOCIOLOGY 1500 INTRODUCTION TO RURAL SOCIOLOGY

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY SOCY 1001, Spring Semester 2013

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Shyness and Technology Use in High School Students. Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford

Imperial Avenue Holbrook High. Imperial Valley College. Political Science 102. American Government & Politics. Syllabus-Summer 2017

Over-Age, Under-Age, and On-Time Students in Primary School, Congo, Dem. Rep.

American Journal of Business Education October 2009 Volume 2, Number 7

MANA 7A97 - STRESS AND WORK. Fall 2016: 6:00-9:00pm Th. 113 Melcher Hall

A Mobile Audience Response System and Learning Platform for Student Engagement

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Left, Left, Left, Right, Left

The BG News November 5, 2012

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS DEVELOPMENT STUDENTS PERCEPTION ON THEIR LEARNING

Updated: December Educational Attainment

AP Statistics Summer Assignment 17-18

Syllabus: PHI 2010, Introduction to Philosophy

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE STUDENTS OPINION ABOUT THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND CAREER PROSPECTS

Valdosta State University Master of Library and Information Science MLIS 7130 Humanities Information Services Syllabus Fall 2011 Three Credit Hours

Educational Attainment

CALCULUS III MATH

Colorado

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

Course Description: Technology:

SCHOLARSHIP/BURSARY APPLICATION FORM

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

Promoting the Wholesome Professor: Building, Sustaining & Assessing Faculty. Pearson, M.M. & Thomas, K. G-SUN-0215h 1

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Standards, Accountability and Flexibility: Americans Speak on No Child Left Behind Reauthorization. soeak

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

STT 231 Test 1. Fill in the Letter of Your Choice to Each Question in the Scantron. Each question is worth 2 point.

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

User Education Programs in Academic Libraries: The Experience of the International Islamic University Malaysia Students

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

How to Apply for Fellowships & Internships Connecting students to global careers!

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

2007 Advanced Advising Webinar Series. Academic and Career Advising for Sophomores

4:021 Basic Measurements Fall Semester 2011

CONDUCTING SURVEYS. Everyone Is Doing It. Overview. What Is a Survey?

Research Brief. Literacy across the High School Curriculum

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM

George E. Sims, Jr. Nursing Scholarship Application PERSONAL INFORMATION. WellStar West Georgia Medical Center s

Alabama

HIDDEN RULES FOR OFFICE HOURS W I L L I A M & M A R Y N E U R O D I V E R S I T Y I N I T I A T I V E

Legal Research Methods CRCJ 3003A Fall 2013

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Fall 2017 Student Org. Fair - Participating Student Organizations

SYLLABUS: RURAL SOCIOLOGY 1500 INTRODUCTION TO RURAL SOCIOLOGY SPRING 2017

Introduction to CRC Cards

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

WELCOME! Of Social Competency. Using Social Thinking and. Social Thinking and. the UCLA PEERS Program 5/1/2017. My Background/ Who Am I?

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

Dana Chisnell, UsabilityWorks Ethan Newby, Newby Research (consultant on statistics) Sharon Laskowski, NIST Svetlana Lowry, NIST

MKT ADVERTISING. Fall 2016

Transcription:

University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll Topline Results December 12, 2011 December 2011 poll of Iowa respondents Sample: 982 registered voters, margin of error +/- 3.5 percent 277 likely Republican caucus goers, margin of error +/- 6.0 percent The Hawkeye Poll was conducted by telephone with live callers from Nov. 30 to Dec. 7, 2011. The poll is conducted by the Hawkeye Poll Cooperative, comprised of UI faculty and students in the University of Iowa Department of Political Science. The faculty adviser for the poll is UI Associate Professor of Political Science Frederick Boehmke. UI Professor of Political Science Caroline Tolbert is a member of the Hawkeye Poll Cooperative and author of Why Iowa? The poll is a teaching, research, and service project of the UI Department of Political Science in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS). CLAS and the Office of the Provost fund the poll. The research team used the facilities of the Iowa Social Science Research Center, directed by UI Sociology Professor Kevin Leicht, in Iowa City to design the survey and conduct call sessions. The team programmed the survey for use with WinCATI, a questionnaire interface created by Sawtooth Technologies, and calls were made with the automatic dialing feature. Media contacts: Frederick Boehmke, Hawkeye Poll, 319-335- 2342 (office), 716-866- 9277 (cell), frederick- boehmke@uiowa.edu; Caroline Tolbert, Hawkeye Poll, 319-335- 2358 (office), 319-621- 8452 (cell), caroline- tolbert@uiowa.edu; Tom Snee, University News Services, 319-541- 8434 (cell), tom- snee@uiowa.edu; Kelli Andresen, University News Services, 319-384- 0070 (office), 319-330- 9951 (cell), kelli- andresen@uiowa.edu; Natasha Altema, Hawkeye Poll, 404-625- 3372 (cell), 319-335- 3844 (office), natasha- altema@uiowa.edu Respondent identification: A registered voter sample was acquired for each of Iowa s five congressional districts. An initial attempt was made on answering the phone to reach the youngest male who is 18 years or older. Alternatively, a female age 18 or older was interviewed. All who stated they were over age 18 and willing to participate in the survey were included. Weighting: The caucus survey results are weighted according to partisanship and gender by congressional district. Likely caucus attendees: Caucus- goers are self- identified. Participants were asked how likely they were to caucus, and for which party. A total of 277 respondents indicated they were somewhat likely or very likely to attend the 2012 Republican caucuses. * All topline results equal approximately 100 percent. Candidate % Mitt Romney 20.3 Rick Perry 8.2 Ron Paul 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 8.5 Newt Gingrich 29.8 Herman Cain 4.4

Jon Huntsman 1.5 Rick Santorum 5.3 Someone Else 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 10.5 Total 100.0 Likelihood of Attending 2012 Caucus: In talking to people about the Iowa caucuses, we often find that a lot of people are not able to attend because they aren t registered, they are sick, or they just don t have time. Which of the following statements best describes how likely you are to attend the caucuses in January 2012? 1 Very Likely, 2 Somewhat likely, 3 Not very likely, 4 Not at all likely Candidate Very Likely % Somewhat Likely % Total % Mitt Romney 22.6 16.0 20.3 Rick Perry 7.1 10.3 8.2 Ron Paul 7.0 17.8 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 11.2 3.2 8.5 Newt Gingrich 29.0 31.2 29.8 Herman Cain 6.0 1.2 4.4 Jon Huntsman 2.2 0.0 1.5 Rick Santorum 5.0 5.8 5.3 Someone Else 0.4 1.8 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 9.4 12.7 10.5 Results taken from before and after Cain suspended his presidential campaign. Candidate With Cain % After Cain % Total % Mitt Romney 22.0 19.3 20.3 Rick Perry 4.8 10.4 8.2 Ron Paul 7.1 13.0 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 10.2 7.4 8.5 Newt Gingrich 37.7 24.4 29.8 Herman Cain 6.5 2.9 4.4 Jon Huntsman 2.7 0.7 1.5 Rick Santorum 2.7 7.0 5.3 Someone Else 0.7 1.0 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 5.6 13.8 10.5 Strong Republican: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? 1 Strong, 2 Not very strong

Candidate Strong GOP % Not Strong GOP % Total % Mitt Romney 23.1 20.7 22.3 Rick Perry 8.0 6.1 7.3 Ron Paul 5.0 8.6 6.2 Michelle Bachmann 8.9 6.4 8.1 Newt Gingrich 28.9 35.9 31.2 Herman Cain 5.3 5.6 5.4 Jon Huntsman 1.0 2.2 1.4 Rick Santorum 7.5 1.9 5.6 Someone Else 0.0 1.3 0.4 Don't Know/Refused 12.3 11.4 12.0 Perceived sex of respondent: Candidate Male % Female % Total % Mitt Romney 17.6 23.7 20.3 Rick Perry 8.9 7.4 8.2 Ron Paul 11.5 9.6 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 11.3 5.1 8.5 Newt Gingrich 34.4 24.1 29.8 Herman Cain 3.6 5.3 4.4 Jon Huntsman 0.8 2.2 1.5 Rick Santorum 3.1 8.0 5.3 Someone Else 1.6 0.0 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 7.2 14.7 10.5 Age Candidate 18-34 % 35-54 % 55-69 % 70 and over % Total % Mitt Romney 11.7 16.6 18.8 27.9 20.3 Rick Perry 11.3 5.7 10.3 7.2 8.2 Ron Paul 20.8 14.3 8.3 7.2 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 3.3 10.4 12.3 3.9 8.5 Newt Gingrich 25.2 35.8 24.6 31.5 29.8 Herman Cain 14.8 2.2 1.4 6.9 4.4 Jon Huntsman 5.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.5 Rick Santorum 4.2 0.0 9.4 5.6 5.3

Someone Else 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 3.2 15.0 9.5 9.8 10.5 100.0 100.0 Independents: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Democratic or Republican party? 1 Closer to Democratic, 2 Closer to Republican, 3 Neither Candidate Lean Dem % Lean GOP % Neither % Total % Mitt Romney 36.4 13.2 14.2 14.5 Rick Perry 0.0 9.4 6.0 8.3 Ron Paul 29.9 18.5 20.9 19.6 Michelle Bachmann 0.0 6.6 8.7 6.7 Newt Gingrich 33.6 32.3 28.1 31.4 Herman Cain 0.0 4.1 0.0 3.0 Jon Huntsman 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.9 Rick Santorum 0.0 4.7 8.7 5.4 Don't Know/Refused 0.0 8.6 13.5 9.3 100.0 Satisfaction with Candidate Choice: Given the current candidates in the race to be the Republican presidential nominee, how satisfied are you with your choices? Would you say you are: 1 Very satisfied, 2 Somewhat satisfied, 3 Not satisfied Candidate Very satisfied % Somewhat satisfied Not satisfied % Total % % Mitt Romney 19.5 21.7 17.7 20.4 Rick Perry 5.1 11.2 4.4 8.2 Ron Paul 10.9 9.8 14.1 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 11.2 7.3 6.3 8.5 Newt Gingrich 35.9 29.1 16.1 29.9 Herman Cain 6.7 3.9 0.0 4.4 Jon Huntsman 0.0 2.8 0.0 1.5 Rick Santorum 7.6 3.8 5.1 5.3 Someone Else 0.0 0.5 5.1 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 3.1 10.1 31.2 10.2 100.0 Satisfaction with Candidate Choice: Given the current candidates in the race to be the Republican presidential nominee, how satisfied are you with your choices? Would you say you are: 1 Very satisfied, 2 Somewhat satisfied, 3 Not satisfied

Candidate Very satisfied % Somewhat satisfied Not satisfied % Total % % Mitt Romney 33.5 56.1 10.4 100.0 Rick Perry 21.7 71.9 6.4 100.0 Ron Paul 35.7 48.4 15.8 100.0 Michelle Bachmann 46.0 45.1 8.9 100.0 Newt Gingrich 42.1 51.5 6.5 100.0 Herman Cain 53.1 46.9 0.0 100.0 Jon Huntsman 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Rick Santorum 50.4 38.0 11.6 100.0 Someone Else 0.0 30.5 69.5 100.0 Don't Know/Refused 10.8 52.3 37.0 100.0 Total 35.0 52.9 12.0 100.0 Economic Conditions: How would you rate economic conditions in this country very good, somewhat good, somewhat poor, or very poor? Candidate Good % Poor % Total % Mitt Romney 27.4 19.5 20.5 Rick Perry 8.3 7.9 8.0 Ron Paul 7.5 11.2 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 2.8 9.4 8.6 Newt Gingrich 35.4 29.2 30.0 Herman Cain 4.1 3.9 3.9 Jon Huntsman 0.0 1.7 1.5 Rick Santorum 2.8 5.7 5.3 Someone Else 2.1 0.7 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 9.6 10.8 10.6 Obama Job Approval: Do you approve or disapprove of the way that Barack Obama is handling his job as President? Candidate Strongly Approve Neutral % Disapprove % Strongly Total% approve % % Disapprove % Mitt Romney 0.0 37.8 31.4 22.9 15.6 20.4 Rick Perry 0.0 20.3 0.0 8.3 7.4 7.9 Ron Paul 0.0 7.0 24.7 9.3 10.1 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 10.7 8.5

Newt Gingrich 0.0 30.7 12.5 25.8 34.6 29.8 Herman Cain 100.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 3.9 4.4 Jon Huntsman 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.9 1.5 Rick Santorum 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 7.9 5.3 Someone Else 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.5 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 0.0 4.2 22.7 14.4 7.5 10.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 Tea Party Movement Support: Given your current knowledge of the Tea Party movement and their positions on the issues, would you say that you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the Tea Party movement? Candidate Support % Neither Support nor Oppose % Total % Oppose % Mitt Romney 16.0 38.6 36.9 20.7 Rick Perry 7.3 0.0 9.9 7.1 Ron Paul 10.8 11.6 9.8 10.7 Michelle Bachmann 11.5 0.0 0.0 9.0 Newt Gingrich 33.8 9.6 20.1 30.1 Herman Cain 5.6 0.0 0.0 4.3 Jon Huntsman 1.2 0.0 4.5 1.6 Rick Santorum 6.1 0.0 3.0 5.2 Someone Else 0.0 3.9 4.5 0.9 Don't Know/Refused 7.7 36.4 11.3 10.3 100.0 Opinion on Gay Marriage: Of the following statements, which comes closest to your view? 1 gay couples should be allowed to legally marry, 2 gay couples should be allowed to form civil unions but not legally marry, 3 there should be no legal recognition of a gay couple s relationship. Candidate Legally Civil Unions but not No Legal Total % marry % Marriage % Representation % Mitt Romney 25.1 25.7 14.4 20.5 Rick Perry 3.5 10.9 7.8 8.4 Ron Paul 22.8 6.6 10.3 10.6 Michelle Bachmann 2.5 5.6 13.5 8.7 Newt Gingrich 17.0 31.7 30.4 29.0 Herman Cain 3.4 3.7 5.5 4.5 Jon Huntsman 6.0 1.6 0.0 1.5 Rick Santorum 2.8 5.6 6.1 5.4 Someone Else 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.9

Don't Know/Refused 16.9 8.7 10.1 10.5 100.0