Boise State University Foundational Studies Program Course Application Form

Similar documents
Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Graduate Program in Education

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

CMST 2060 Public Speaking

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Creating Travel Advice

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Language Center. Course Catalog

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

ONLINE COURSES. Flexibility to Meet Middle and High School Students at Their Point of Need

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Teachers Guide Chair Study

COURSE NUMBER: COURSE NUMBER: SECTION: 01 SECTION: 01. Office Location: WSQ 104. (preferred contact)

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

MBA 510: Critical Thinking for Managers

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

The Keele University Skills Portfolio Personal Tutor Guide

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS BUS 261 BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Cindy Rossi January 25, 2014

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Timeline. Recommendations

Intensive Writing Class

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Language Arts Methods

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

A Guide to Student Portfolios

MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP

What does Quality Look Like?

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

Language Acquisition Chart

EQuIP Review Feedback

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Course Specifications

CEEF 6306 Lifespan Development New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

BRAZOSPORT COLLEGE LAKE JACKSON, TEXAS SYLLABUS. POFI 1301: COMPUTER APPLICATIONS I (File Management/PowerPoint/Word/Excel)

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Modern Languages. Introduction. Degrees Offered

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Technical Skills for Journalism

Course Syllabus Chem 482: Chemistry Seminar

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta

One Stop Shop For Educators

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

SPCH 1315: Public Speaking Course Syllabus: SPRING 2014

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ADVANCED STUDIES IN TEACHING AND LEARNING PROGRAM

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

HONORS OPTION GUIDELINES

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

HSMP 6611 Strategic Management in Health Care (Strg Mgmt in Health Care) Fall 2012 Thursday 5:30 7:20 PM Ed 2 North, 2301

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

New Program Process, Guidelines and Template

Transcription:

Boise State University Foundational Studies Program Course Application Form Due to the Foundational Studies Program by August 19, 2011 After the Foundational Studies Program has approved a course, departments will continue through the regular department and college procedures. The approved course should be submitted to the University Curriculum Committee by October 1, 2011. Table of Contents (Click title to go to that section) Instructions: Instructions:... 1 Part I. Course Information... 1 Part II. Syllabus Statement... 2 Part III. Design for Accessibility... 2 Part IV. Evidence of Quality Course Design... 3 Part V. Additional Justification (Optional)... 3 Review Committee Checklist... 4 Feedback from Review Committee:... 4 Course Design Table... 5 1. Complete one form per course. 2. Attach this Foundational Studies Course Application Form to the back of the University Curriculum Committee Request for Curriculum Action form. Both forms should be submitted to the Foundational Studies Program Office by August 19, 2011. Part I. Course Information Course Number and Title: JAPANESE 111 Elementary Japanese Online 101A; Japanese 112 Elementary Japanese Online 101B Type of Foundational Studies Course (Choose One): [ ] DLS (Disciplinary Lens Social Science) [x] DLL (Disciplinary Lens Literature and Humanities) [ ] DLV (Disciplinary Lens Visual and Performing Arts) [ ] DLM (Disciplinary Lens Mathematics) [ ] DLN (Disciplinary Lens Natural, Physical, and Applied Sciences) Includes Lab: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] CID (Communication in the Discipline) [ ] FF (Finishing Foundations) Delivery Format(s) (Check all that apply): [ ] Face to Face [x] Fully Online [ ] Hybrid [ ] Concurrent Enrollment [ ] Other (briefly describe): Video Conferencing 1

Part II. Syllabus Statement In the space below, include the syllabus statement for this course which will appear on the first page of the syllabus for each section of this course. (Template and examples are appended to this application form.) Boise State s Foundational Studies Program provides undergraduates with a broad-based education that spans the entire university experience. JAPANESE 111-112 satisfies 4 credits of the Foundational Studies Program s Disciplinary Lens-Literature and Humanities (DL-L) requirement. It supports the following University Learning Outcome, along with a variety of other course-specific goals. 10. Apply Knowledge and the methods of inquiry characteristic of literature and other humanities s to interpret and produce texts expressive of the human condition. JAPANESE 111-112 is designed to help students cultivate an active command of Japanese. Emphasis is placed on acquiring the four language skills listening, speaking, reading and writing within a cultural context, in order to achieve communicative proficiency at level. This course helps to achieve the goals of the Foundational Studies Program by focusing on the following course learning outcomes. After successful completion of this course, students will be able to: Read and understand written discourse in Japanese at level; Write and speak clearly and suitably in Japanese for a variety of purposes and for different audiences at level; Negotiate meaning in a variety of situations and contexts appropriate to level; Identify and use culturally appropriate information sources in both written and spoken discourse in Japanese at level; Explain their own cultural perspective and compare their own cultural perspective with other cultural perspectives at level; Demonstrate understanding of the culturally-based lens through which people develop world views; Employ speaking, listening and interpersonal skills in Japanese at level. Part III. Design for Accessibility In the space below, briefly describe plans for providing access to course materials and activities (or equivalent alternatives) to all students in adherence with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Although these plans may vary from instructor to instructor, the descriptions provided below should be representative of intended departmental and instructor s. (See example statements appended to this form.) JAPANESE 111-112: Accommodations will be provided to students as needed per the policies of the Disability Resource Center. Whenever available, videos chosen for use in the course will be those that have been close-captioned by the content producer to provide access to students with disabilities. Boise State University s Disability Resource Center (DRC) works with students and faculty to arrange reasonable accommodations and promote an environment that is free of both physical and attitudinal barriers. 2

Part IV. Evidence of Quality Course Design Please use the table below (column headings for this table should not be changed) to provide evidence that the course has been carefully designed and is clearly aligned with Foundational Studies Program desired ULOs. All sections of the course should share similar student learning outcomes. Teaching and Learning Activities and Assessment Methods may vary from instructor to instructor. Please use the table to report representative strategies that may be used. Assessment activities used for reporting to the Foundational Studies Program should be consistent across different sections of the course. Please see below. Part V. Additional Justification (Optional) If the brief justification provided to the University Curriculum Committee in the proposal to accompany the Request for Curriculum Action is not sufficient to make the case for including the course in the Foundational Studies Program, additional (optional) narrative can be added here. The human condition is such that not everyone in the world communicates in the same language. JAPANESE 111-112 provides students with the foundational skills to negotiate meaning in a variety of situations and contexts appropriate to level. Students will initiate their capacity to speak, understand, read and write Japanese at level. JAPANESE 111 is the first half of JAPANESE 101. JAPANESE 112 represents the second half of JAPANESE 101. JAPANESE 111-112 are offered only online. Upon completion of both courses, students will have fulfilled the equivalent of JAPANESE 101 and therefore the equivalent DLL ULOs and CLOs. Students who complete only JAPANESE 111 will not fulfill the DLL requirements. Students may not take both JAPANESE 101 and JAPANESE 111-112 because they are equivalent courses offered in different formats. The precedent for this arrangement exists in the current catalog with FRENCH 111-112 and SPANISH 111-112. In all cases, 111 and 112 are each 2-credit courses. 101 is a 4-credit course. Thus, students taking the 111-112 sequence will require two semesters to complete the 4 credits equivalent to 101. JAPANESE 111-112 are new courses currently under design with an equip grant: JAPANESE 111: First half of JAPANESE 101. Students who successfully complete this course may not receive credit for JAPANESE 101 and must successfully complete JAPANESE 112 with a grade of C- or higher in order to receive DLL credit for JAPANESE 111. JAPANESE 112: Second half of JAPANESE 101. Students who successfully complete this course may not receive credit for JAPANESE 101 and must successfully complete JAPANESE 111 with a grade of C- or higher in order to receive Area I credit for JAPANESE 112. PREREQ: JAPANESE 111. 3

Review Committee Checklist _X Syllabus Statement - statement introduces the student to the purpose and role of the course in the Foundational Studies Program curriculum. _X An appropriate number of Course Learning Outcomes are specified for the course and are clearly designed to support the Foundational Studies Program ULOs. _X_ Course Learning Outcomes are appropriately designed for level of the course and address both content mastery and skill-based outcomes. _X_ The types and numbers of assessments planned for the course are appropriate for measuring the content or skills being assessed _X X_ Course learning activities are likely to promote the achievement of the stated outcomes Course design and materials have considered best s for accessibility to course materials and ideas by all students (e.g., alternatives to auditory and visual content) Feedback from Review Committee: This looks like a robust and well-planned course, especially if it can take advantage of the resources available for online learning. The range of learning activities and assessments provide a good variety of opportunities for students both to develop skills in Japanese language and literature and to gain an understanding of how to communicate in a variety of situations. The opportunities that students may have to observe and interview Japanese speakers, as well as to in the language lab, appear to be especially valuable. The course seems to fit well with ULO 10 if students understand that texts can be both written and spoken and that there is an essential relationship between spoken and written language. CERTIFIED FOR APPROVAL 9-8-2011. Foundational Studies Program Director Signature Date 4

Boise State University Foundational Studies Course Course Number and Title: JAPANESE 111 Elementary Japanese Online 101A; JAPANESE 112 Elementary Japanese Online 101B Course Design Table Foundation Foundation ULO Course Learning Assessment Method: Planned Teaching & ULO 10 10 Outcomes: By the end of this Evidence of Student Learning Activities / Pedagogy Criteria Notions of Exemplary Work course, each student should be able to Learning Critical reading skills within the Writing and/or speaking within the Skillfully uses disciplinary tools and vocabulary appropriate for the course Accurately comprehends appropriate texts Convincingly interprets appropriate texts Insightfully analyzes assigned texts Articulates complex ideas in clear and coherent language appropriate to the Demonstrates exemplary skill with grammar and style appropriate for the course Read and understand written discourse in Japanese at the elementary level Write and/or speak clearly and suitably in Japanese for a variety of purposes and for different audiences at level; Negotiate meaning in a variety of situations and contexts appropriate to level. Exams and/or Quizzes (These will assess comprehension of written Japanese at the elementary level.) Composition in Japanese. (Work will be evaluated on the basis of accuracy of expression, integration of new vocabulary and creative content at level.) Interview in Japanese. Exams and/or Quizzes (These will assess writing in Japanese at the elementary level.) best- pedagogies Instructor presentation (via Lecture Capture for example) Reading and discussing texts via discussion board on Blackboard Written and/or oral reflections on texts online Language lab (via Skype for example) o Tutoring best- pedagogies Video Projects and/or presentations Discussion board Online workbook Language lab (via Skype for example) o Tutoring 5

Foundation Foundation ULO Course Learning Assessment Method: Planned Teaching & ULO 10 10 Outcomes: By the end of this Evidence of Student Learning Activities / Pedagogy Criteria Notions of Exemplary Work course, each student should be able to Learning Reasoning within the Cultural, historical, conceptual, and linguistic awareness Demonstrate a high level of skill in logical reasoning in written and oral work appropriate for the course Identify important underlying assumptions Distinguishes pertinent facts from opinions Differentiates claims from reasons Arranges relevant evidence in concise and clear language appropriate for the course Exhibits awareness of and sensitivity to human values by demonstrating knowledge and appreciation of cultural, historical, conceptual or linguistic differences Explain one s own cultural perspectives make meaningful comparisons with the cultural perspectives of others Identify and use culturally appropriate information sources in both written and spoken discourse in Japanese at the elementary level. Explain their own cultural perspective and compare their own cultural perspective with other cultural perspectives at level; Demonstrate understanding of the culturallybased lens through which people develop world views. Oral presentations (May be in Japanese or in English) Exams Research Project (Students will complete a cultural research project which will consist of preliminary research (videos, books, articles, interviews, etc.) on a cultural topic of choice related to Japanese best pedagogies Discussion board Instructor presentation (via Lecture Capture for example) Language lab o Tutoring. best- pedagogies Instructor Presentation (via Lecture Capture for example) Assigned reading or topic for discussion board Ethnography: Observe social setting where people speak Japanese, online or in person Case study: Interview online or in person a highly fluent or a native speaker of Japanese. 6

Foundation ULO 10 Criteria Foundation ULO 10 Notions of Exemplary Work Course Learning Outcomes: By the end of this course, each student should be able to Assessment Method: Evidence of Student Learning Planned Teaching & Learning Activities / Pedagogy Personal development Responsibly entertain and evaluate views that differ from one s own Actively explore and navigate ambiguity and difference Ask probing questions relevant to the Approach problems imaginatively and creatively Employ speaking, listening and interpersonal skills in Japanese at the elementary level. Negotiate meaning in Japanese in a variety of situations and contexts appropriate to level. Greater participation in the online course leads to a higher participation grade. best- pedagogies Videoed presentations or projects Discussion board Language lab o Tutoring 7