Foreign Language: Chinese (Mandarin) (126)

Similar documents
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Teachers Guide Chair Study

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

November 2012 MUET (800)

Language Center. Course Catalog

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the Illinois Certification Testing System Examinations

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Language Acquisition Chart

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

South Carolina English Language Arts

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit I Careers in Law Enforcement

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Primary English Curriculum Framework

SLINGERLAND: A Multisensory Structured Language Instructional Approach

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

One Stop Shop For Educators

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

Secondary English-Language Arts

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

This publication is also available for download at

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL DIPLOMA EMPLOYMENT ENGLISH I: NINTH, TENTH, ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH GRADES

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY

Assessment and Evaluation

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Longman English Interactive

APA Basics. APA Formatting. Title Page. APA Sections. Title Page. Title Page

success. It will place emphasis on:

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

CX 101/201/301 Latin Language and Literature 2015/16

Read the passage above. What does Chief Seattle believe about owning land?

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

UNIT 3: Research & Methodology

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Lower and Upper Secondary

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Transcription:

Purpose Foreign Language: Chinese (Mandarin) (6) The purpose of the Foreign Language: Chinese (Mandarin) test is to identify examinees who have demonstrated the level of knowledge and skills required of entry-level educators in Illinois. The test is based upon the Foreign Language Content-Area Standards for Educators. Information on who is required to pass the test and when the test should be taken may be obtained from program advisors, campus certification officers, regional offices of education, and the Illinois State oard of Education's Certification Web site: www.isbe.net/teachers.htm. Test Characteristics Number of test items: seven constructed-response assignments Score scale: The Foreign Language: Chinese (Mandarin) test is scored on a scale from 00 to 00. Passing score: a scaled total test score of 0 or above Test Structure The Foreign Language: Chinese (Mandarin) test contains the following subareas and test item structure. Subarea No. Subarea Title No. of Scorable Constructed- Response Assignments I. Listening Comprehension II. Reading and Vocabulary III. Language Structures IV. Cultural Knowledge V. Written Expression VI. Oral Expression VII. Language Acquisition Test Framework The complete test framework for this field, containing the test objectives and descriptive statements for each subarea, can be found on the ICTS Web site at www.icts.nesinc.com. The test framework correlation table can be found on the ICTS Web site at www.icts.nesinc.com.

Test Administration The Foreign Language: Chinese (Mandarin) test is a full-session test administered during the morning or afternoon test sessions at scheduled test administrations. The test session is five hours long. Scoring Results are reported as scaled scores in a range from 00 to 00, with a total test score of 0 or above required to pass. The total test score is based on an examinee's performance on the entire test. Subarea scores are based on an examinee's performance on each subarea. Please note: Subarea scores are presented on the same scale as the total test score. Subarea scores will help assess an examinee's areas of relative strength and weakness. Interpreting the Constructed-Response Scores The constructed responses on the Foreign Language tests are scored according to standardized procedures during scoring sessions held after each test administration. Scorers with relevant professional backgrounds receive training and use a process called focused holistic scoring. The process yields a score based on overall quality of the response rather than on an analysis of response components. Each response is scored on a scale from to, with representing an undeveloped response and representing a response that is very well developed. No information about the examinee who prepared the response (e.g., name, institutional affiliation) is provided to the readers. A score of 8 for a constructed-response assignment would indicate that the first scorer assigned a score of and that the second scorer assigned a score of. This would indicate that the response to the assignment was very well developed in regard to the performance characteristics. Similarly, a score of would indicate that the first scorer assigned a score of and that the second scorer assigned a score of. This would indicate that the response was totally undeveloped in regard to the performance characteristics. The range of reader-assigned scores for each constructed-response assignment is from: 8 ( + ), which would represent a constructed response that is very well developed and that received the highest scores from the two scorers who rated the response, to ( + ), which would represent a constructed response that is totally undeveloped and that received the lowest scores from the two scorers who rated the response. This combined raw score is then converted to a scaled score, on a scale from 00 to 00, which is the score that appears on the score report for the constructed-response assignments. The designation of a (unscorable) is assigned to responses that are off topic, illegible, written in a language other than the required language, of insufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the topic. A designation of is assigned if the constructed-response form is blank.

If the number of examinees for this test is large for a given test date, each response is read and scored independently by two scorers. If the two scores differ by more than one point, the response is scored by a third reader. The sum of the two raters' scores is the examinee's total score on that response. If the number of examinees for this test is small for a given test date, each scorer is given a copy of each examinee's response. The score for each assignment is reached through group discussion in reference to the performance characteristics and scoring scale. The group arrives at a consensus decision on the examinee's score for each response. Scoring Scale The scoring scale that is used to assign scores to examinees' responses to the constructedresponse assignments in this test field can be found on the following pages. Score Report Explanation Each score report contains a section titled "How to Read Your Score Report" to help examinees interpret their test results accurately. Examples can be found on the ICTS Web site at www.icts.nesinc.com. Study Guide The study guide for this field can be found on the ICTS Web site at www.icts.nesinc.com.

Performance Characteristics for the Listening Comprehension Assignment Candidate responses are scored holistically based on the extent to which the response reflects a command of the skills included in the following performance characteristics. Listening Comprehension Listening Inference accuracy and completeness in comprehending the literal content of a spoken passage demonstrated ability to infer information implied in a spoken passage, including subtleties such as tone Scoring Scale for the Listening Comprehension Assignment Score Point The "" response reflects a strong command of the performance characteristics for the listening The candidate demonstrates thorough comprehension of the literal content of a sample of spoken language. The candidate accurately infers implied information, including correctly characterizing tone when it is a factor in comprehension. The "" response reflects a general command of the performance characteristics for the listening The candidate demonstrates a general comprehension of the literal content, though some details may be misunderstood or missed. The candidate shows some ability to infer implied information, though some subtleties may be misinterpreted or missed. The "" response reflects a limited command of the performance characteristics for the listening The candidate shows partial comprehension of the literal content, discerning the main idea but failing to understand significant supporting ideas and details, or vice versa. The candidate shows little or no ability to infer information or discern tone. The "" response reflects a lack of command of the performance characteristics for the listening The candidate fails to demonstrate understanding of any significant ideas, showing comprehension only of isolated words and phrases. The candidate fails to infer information or discern tone. The response is unscorable because it is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, not written in the required language, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the There is no response to the

Performance Characteristics for the Reading and Vocabulary Assignment Candidate responses are scored holistically based on the extent to which the response reflects a command of the skills included in the following performance characteristics. Reading Comprehension Reading Inference accuracy and completeness in comprehending the literal content of a written passage demonstrated ability to infer information implied in a written passage, including subtleties such as tone Scoring Scale for the Reading and Vocabulary Assignment Score Point The "" response reflects a strong command of the performance characteristics for the reading The candidate demonstrates thorough comprehension of the literal content of a sample of written language. The candidate accurately infers implied information, including correctly characterizing tone when it is a factor in comprehension. The "" response reflects a general command of the performance characteristics for the reading The candidate demonstrates a general comprehension of the literal content, though some details may be misunderstood or missed. The candidate shows some ability to infer implied information, though some subtleties may be misinterpreted or missed. The "" response reflects a limited command of the performance characteristics for the reading The candidate shows partial comprehension of the literal content, discerning the main idea but failing to understand significant supporting ideas and details, or vice versa. The candidate shows little or no ability to infer information or discern tone. The "" response reflects a lack of command of the performance characteristics for the reading The candidate fails to demonstrate understanding of any significant ideas, showing comprehension only of isolated words and phrases. The candidate fails to infer information or discern tone. The response is unscorable because it is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, not written in the required language, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the There is no response to the

Performance Characteristics for the Language Structures Assignment Grammatical tasks related to language structures in scoring consist of: Grammar Transformation Correction Part A ( ) supplying the grammatically correct term Part ( 6) making a specified transformation Part C (7 0) correcting errors Romanization Part D ( ) transliterating Chinese sentences into the Roman alphabet Note: Examinees will be scored on the number of grammatical items they handle successfully, out of a total of. Scoring Scale for the Language Structures Assignment The examinee's response for the item is correct if, and only if, it is described by the following: Part Part A (Items ) Part (Items 6) Part C (Items 7 0) Part D (Items ) Description of Correct Response Correct the examinee's response is grammatically correct and appropriate within the context of the presented statement (i.e., the response satisfies all of the target language's rules of grammar demanded by the instructions and intended by the context of the statement). Correct the examinee's response correctly transforms the sentence or passage as instructed (i.e., the response follows all applicable grammatical rules of the target language and accurately supplies a transformed word, phrase, or clause construction as directed). Correct the examinee's response acceptably corrects the syntactic or linguistic errors found in the passage (i.e., the response has located and corrected the errors of language structure found within the passage and has retained the original meaning). Correct the examinee correctly transliterates the given sentence from Chinese characters into the Roman alphabet, using a standard system of Romanization. Mandarin must use pinyin, including diacritical marks to indicate correct tones. The examinee's response for the item is not correct if it is described by the following: Part Parts A,, C (Items 0) Part D (Items ) Description of Incorrect Response Not correct the examinee's response does not accurately follow the target language's rules of grammar or the response is incomplete. Not correct the examinee makes three or more errors in transliterating the given sentence from Chinese characters into the Roman alphabet. Score Point 0 to tasks handled correctly 5 to 9 tasks handled correctly 0 to tasks handled correctly 0 to 9 tasks handled correctly nscorable the candidate's response is illegible or is not in the target language. lank the candidate provides no response whatsoever.

Performance Characteristics for the Cultural Knowledge Assignment Candidate responses are scored holistically based on the extent to which the response reflects a command of the knowledge and skills included in the following performance characteristics. Identification Cultural Context Cultural Issues accuracy and completeness in identification of the figure, feature, event, institution, work of art, issue, etc., that is the topic of the assignment ability to describe the appropriate cultural context of the topic (e.g., historical period, belief system, geographic location) clarity, accuracy, and thoroughness in relating the topic to broad movements or issues in the target culture Scoring Scale for the Cultural Knowledge Assignment Score Point The "" response reflects a strong command of the performance characteristics for the cultural knowledge The candidate accurately and fully identifies the figure, feature, event, institution, work of art, issue, etc., that is the topic of the The candidate describes the appropriate cultural context of the topic. The candidate provides a thorough and accurate explanation of the relationship of the topic to the target culture. The "" response reflects a general command of the performance characteristics for the cultural knowledge The candidate identifies the figure, feature, event, institution, work of art, issue, etc., that is the topic of the The candidate generally provides accurate information regarding cultural context. The candidate provides some explanation of the relationship of the topic to the target culture, with only minor factual errors, if any. The "" response reflects a limited command of the performance characteristics for the cultural knowledge The candidate provides minimal information to identify the figure, feature, event, institution, work of art, issue, etc., that is the topic of the The candidate provides little information on the cultural context of the topic. The candidate provides an inadequate explanation of the relationship of the topic to the target culture. The "" response reflects a lack of command of the performance characteristics for the cultural knowledge The candidate fails to identify the figure, feature, event, institution, work of art, issue, etc., that is the topic of the The candidate does not place the topic in the appropriate cultural context. The candidate fails to explain the relationship of the topic to the target culture or reveals a significant misunderstanding of cultural trends or issues. The response is unscorable because it is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, not written in the required language, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the There is no response to the

Performance Characteristics for the Language Acquisition Assignment Candidate responses are scored holistically based on the extent to which the response reflects a command of the knowledge and skills included in the following performance characteristics. Purpose Subject-Matter Knowledge Support Rationale the extent to which the response achieves the purpose of the assignment accuracy and appropriateness in the application of the subject-matter knowledge quality and relevance of supporting details soundness of argument and degree of understanding of the subject matter Scoring Scale for the Language Acquisition Assignment Score Point The "" response reflects a thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. The purpose of the assignment is fully achieved. There is a substantial, accurate, and appropriate application of subject-matter knowledge. The supporting evidence is sound; there are high-quality, relevant examples. The response reflects an ably reasoned, comprehensive understanding of the topic. The "" response reflects a general knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. The purpose of the assignment is largely achieved. There is a generally accurate and appropriate application of subject-matter knowledge. The supporting evidence is general; there are some relevant examples. The response reflects a general understanding of the topic; some reasoning is evident. The "" response reflects a limited knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. The purpose of the assignment is partially achieved. There is a limited, possibly inaccurate or inappropriate, application of subject-matter knowledge. The supporting evidence is limited; there are few relevant examples. The response reflects a limited, poorly reasoned understanding of the topic. The "" response reflects a weak knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. The purpose of the assignment is not achieved. There is little or no appropriate or accurate application of subject-matter knowledge. The supporting evidence, if present, is weak; there are few or no relevant examples. The response reflects little or no reasoning about or understanding of the topic. The response is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, not written in the required language, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the There is no response to the

Performance Characteristics for the Written Expression Assignment Purpose Organization Vocabulary Grammar the fulfillment of the objective of the assignment in reference to the intended audience, purpose, and occasion the organization, development, and support of ideas the selected vocabulary and idiomatic expressions the constructed grammatical forms, character formations, and syntactic constructions, including spelling, diacritical marks, and punctuation Scoring Scale for the Written Expression Assignment Score Point The "" response reflects a strong command and thorough application of the performance characteristics for the written expression The response thoroughly achieves the objective of the assignment and is completely appropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The ideas are clearly expressed in a unified discussion, and the supporting details are relevant and fully develop the stated ideas. The vocabulary reflects a broad command of the language and appropriate use of idiomatic expressions. The response shows a comprehensive command of grammar and syntax and mastery of spelling, diacritical marks, and punctuation, with few, if any, errors. The "" response reflects a general command and application of the performance characteristics for the written expression The response largely achieves the objective of the assignment and is generally appropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The expressed ideas are generally clear and organized, and the supporting details develop some of the stated ideas. The vocabulary and idiomatic expressions reflect a general command of the language for communicating a complete message. The response shows a general command of grammar and syntax and may contain minor errors in spelling, diacritical marks, and punctuation that do not interfere with communication. The "" response reflects a limited command and a partial application of the performance characteristics for the written expression The response partially achieves the objective of the assignment and may not be entirely appropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The expressed ideas are somewhat unclear, partially organized, and developed in a limited way with minimal relevant support. The vocabulary is simple and lacks key words and expressions but is sufficient for communicating a partial message. The response shows a limited command of grammar and syntax and contains frequent errors in spelling, diacritical marks, and punctuation that partially impede communication of ideas. The "" response reflects a lack of command and little or no application of the performance characteristics for the written expression The response fails to achieve the objective of the assignment and may be inappropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The expressed ideas are unclear, disjointed, and inadequately developed and may lack relevant supporting details. The vocabulary is not adequate for communicating a complete message and contains word usage errors that impede communication. The response shows little command of basic elements of grammar or syntax and contains errors in spelling, diacritical marks, and punctuation so numerous that they impede communication. The response is unscorable because it is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, not written in the required language, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the There is no response to the

Performance Characteristics for the Oral Expression Assignment Candidate responses are scored holistically based on the extent to which the response reflects a command of the knowledge and skills included in the following performance characteristics. Purpose Fluency Pronunciation Vocabulary Grammar the fulfillment of the objective of the assignment in reference to the intended audience, purpose, and occasion the fluent and developed communication of the message the articulation and pronunciation of words and phrases the selected vocabulary and idiomatic expressions the constructed grammatical forms and syntactic constructions Scoring Scale for the Oral Expression Assignment Score Point The "" response reflects a strong command and a thorough application of the performance characteristics for the oral expression The response thoroughly achieves the objective of the assignment and is completely appropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The response is well developed and shows an elaboration of ideas, demonstrating a consistent flow of speech with few, if any, hesitations or pauses. The response demonstrates easily intelligible pronunciation with few, if any, errors. The response demonstrates an extensive command of appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic expressions with few, if any, errors. The response demonstrates a comprehensive command of grammar and syntax, with only minor errors. The "" response reflects a general command and application of the performance characteristics for the oral expression The response largely achieves the objective of the assignment and is generally appropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The response is developed with some elaboration and maintains a steady flow of speech with occasional hesitations and pauses. The response demonstrates intelligible pronunciation, with occasional errors. The response demonstrates a general command of appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic expressions. The response demonstrates a general command of grammar and syntax, though some errors interrupt comprehension. The "" response reflects a limited command and a partial application of the performance characteristics for the oral expression The response partially achieves the objective of the assignment and may not be entirely appropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The response shows limited development of ideas, which are sometimes unclear, and is occasionally difficult to understand because of an inconsistent flow of speech with frequent hesitations and pauses. The response demonstrates frequent errors in pronunciation. The response demonstrates a limited range of expression, using a very simple vocabulary that lacks key words and phrases. The response shows a limited command of grammar and syntax, as evidenced by frequent errors that partially impede comprehension. The "" response reflects a lack of command and little or no application of the performance characteristics for the oral expression The response fails to achieve the objective of the assignment and may be inappropriate for the intended audience, purpose, and occasion. The response presents few, if any, comprehensible ideas and does so with minimal development; the response fails to maintain any flow of speech, as evidenced by frequent hesitations and pauses that interrupt comprehensibility. The response demonstrates inadequate pronunciation that contains numerous errors and is at times unintelligible. The response demonstrates little knowledge of vocabulary beyond the most common words and may include numerous misused and ill-formed words and expressions. The response has little command of basic elements of grammar or syntax, as evidenced by numerous and frequent errors that significantly impede comprehension. The response is unscorable because it is unrelated to the assigned topic, inaudible/incomprehensible, not spoken in the required language, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the There is no response to the