Tennessee State Board of Education April 19, 2013 Final Reading Item: IV. F. Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (TILS)

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

School Leadership Rubrics

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

The 21st Century Principal

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Title II, Part A. Charter Systems and Schools

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Testing Schedule. Explained

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

EVALUATION PLAN

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

State Parental Involvement Plan

Copyright Corwin 2015

Timeline. Recommendations

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Power of Ten Leadership Academy Class Curriculum

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

SHINE. Helping. Leaders. Reproduced with the permission of choice Magazine,

LANGUAGES SPEAK UP! F 12 STRATEGY FOR VICTORIAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Digital Media Literacy

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

Executive Summary. Lava Heights Academy. Ms. Joette Hayden, Principal 730 Spring Dr. Toquerville, UT 84774

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Executive Summary. Abraxas Naperville Bridge. Eileen Roberts, Program Manager th St Woodridge, IL

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

We seek to be: A vibrant, excellent place of learning at the heart of our Christian community.

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

NC Global-Ready Schools

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

Transcription:

Tennessee State Board of Education Agenda April 19, 2013 Final Reading Item: IV. F. Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (TILS) The Background: In 2005 Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) received a significant grant from the U.S. Department of Education to work with two Tennessee universities to reinvent the principal preparation process. Further, SREB requested that the SBE, TDOE and THEC jointly appoint a commission to oversee the development and implementation of a new system of instruction leadership development. The resulting learning centered instructional leadership system policy laid out the research-based changes needed to guarantee that every public school had an effective instructional leader. In July 2011, Tennessee became one of the first states in the country to implement a comprehensive, student outcomes-based, statewide educator evaluation system. This implementation was a key tenet of Tennessee s First to the Top Act, adopted by the General Assembly with bipartisan support during 2010 s extraordinary session under the backdrop of the federal Race to the Top competition. This landmark legislation established the parameters of a new teacher and principal evaluation system and committed to implementation during the 2011-12 school year. The act required 50 percent of the evaluation to be comprised of student achievement data 35 percent based on student growth as represented by the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) or a comparable measure and the other 15 percent based on additional measures of student achievement adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE) and chosen through mutual agreement by the educator and evaluator. The remaining 50 percent of the evaluation is determined through qualitative measures such as teacher observations, personal conferences and review of prior evaluations and work. The resulting implementation of the evaluation system emphasized, in part, several leadership skills for leaders (developing shared leadership structures, coaching teachers with specific feedback related to the evaluation process, and differentiated professional learning opportunities for teachers) that were not evident in the existing TILS.

Similarly, a revised state-level leadership strategy was needed to reflect the changing skill sets required by educators in Tennessee to move from an individual manager as leader model to a shared instructional leader model. This shared instructional leader model demanded a bold, comprehensive strategy to integrate all of the elements of the leadership talent life cycle (preparation, recruitment and hiring, licensure, evaluation, and professional learning and support) to both redefine our understanding of leadership and deepen the pool of highly effective teacher-leaders capable of leading from either the classroom or the main office. By developing all aspects of the leadership talent life cycle, the State of Tennessee will redefine leadership Highly Effective Leaders though the early identification, recruitment, and development of our most effective educators. Tennessee seeks to transform what it means to be an effective instructional leader at all phases of a leader s career. This aim is accomplished by setting high standards for effective leadership based upon research and best practice, supporting leaders to reach those standards, and empowering districts to build a network of exceptional instructional leaders who get results. Operating from the belief that ethical behavior permeates the mindset and actions of every effective leader, the revised Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (TILS) embed the phrase, ethical and effective instructional leader, into the opening stem of each leadership standard. The purposeful placement of this phrase articulates the intrinsic nature of ethical behavior in all facets of school leadership. Attributes such as honesty, respect, sound judgment, commitment, fairness, compassion, work ethic, and a genuine belief that all children can learn and grow, contribute to the foundation of ethical behavior connected to leadership. Effectiveness pertains to educators capacity to meet performance expectations, implement evidence-based practices, create and sustain conditions for effective learning, and increase student learning (Learning Forward, 2011, p. 20). Based upon best practice and current research, and sharpened by the wisdom of experienced educators, the Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (TILS) identify core performance indicators of ethical and effective instructional leaders. The Recommendation: The Department of Education recommends adoption of this item on final reading. SBE staff concurs with this recommendation.

Revised Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (2013) Recognizing the importance of engaging in a continuous improvement process, Tennessee seeks to transform what it means to be an effective instructional leader at all phases of a leader s career. This aim is accomplished by setting high standards for effective leadership based upon research and best practice, supporting leaders to reach those standards, and empowering districts to build a network of exceptional instructional leaders who get results. Operating from the belief that ethical behavior permeates the mindset and actions of every effective leader, the revised Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (TILS) embed the phrase, ethical and effective instructional leader, into the opening stem of each leadership standard. The purposeful placement of this phrase articulates the intrinsic nature of ethical behavior in all facets of school leadership. Attributes such as honesty, respect, sound judgment, commitment, fairness, compassion, work ethic, and a genuine belief that all children can learn and grow, contribute to the foundation of ethical behavior connected to leadership. Effectiveness pertains to educators capacity to meet performance expectations, implement evidence-based practices, create and sustain conditions for effective learning, and increase student learning (Learning Forward, 2011, p. 20). Based upon best practice and current research, and sharpened by the wisdom of experienced educators, the Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards (TILS) identify core performance indicators of ethical and effective instructional leaders. Standard A: Instructional Leadership for Continuous Improvement An ethical and effective instructional leader facilitates professional practice that continually improves student learning. 1. Collaborates with stakeholders to establish and communicate a clear, compelling vision for continuous improvement. 2. Builds capacity of educators to provide all students a rigorous curriculum, aligned with Tennessee-adopted state standards. 3. Collaborates with educators to analyze and use multiple forms of data throughout the year to establish specific goals and strategies targeting student achievement and growth. 4. Leads educators to develop and execute interventions to address all students learning needs, grounded in multiple sources of data (academic, social, and/or emotional). 5. Systematically monitors and adjusts progress toward established goals and facilitates procedures and practices leading to continuous improvement.

Standard B: Culture for Teaching and Learning An ethical and effective instructional leader collaborates with stakeholders to create and sustain an inclusive, respectful and safe environment conducive to learning and growth for all. 1. Collaborates with stakeholders to establish and communicate a clear, compelling vision for a culture conducive to teaching and learning. 2. Leverages educator strengths to engage all students in meaningful, relevant learning opportunities. 3. Fosters a safe, respectful, and orderly environment for all. 4. Takes measures to actively involve families in the education of their children. 5. Models and communicates expectations for individual and shared ownership of student, educator, and school success. 6. Recognizes and celebrates improved educator and student performance related to school vision and goals. Standard C: Professional Learning and Growth An ethical and effective instructional leader develops capacity of all educators by designing, facilitating, and participating in collaborative learning informed by multiple sources of data. 1. Collaborates with stakeholders to establish, communicate, and facilitate a clear, compelling vision for professional learning and growth. 2. Implements and monitors a rigorous evaluation system using an approved Tennessee evaluation model. 3. Uses educator evaluation data to inform, assess, and adjust professional learning goals and plans. 4. Engages faculty and self in data-informed, differentiated professional learning opportunities for educators, aligned with the Tennessee Standards for Professional Learning. 5. Collaborates with others to induct, support, retain and grow/extend effective educators based on evidence of student and educator outcomes. 6. Identifies and supports potential teacher-leaders and provides growth opportunities in alignment with the Tennessee Teacher Leadership Standards. 7. Improves self-practice based on multiple sources of feedback, including performance evaluation results and self-reflection. Standard D: Resource Management An ethical and effective instructional leader facilitates the development of a highly effective learning community through processes that enlist diverse stakeholders and resources.

1. Strategically utilizes community resources and partners to support the school s mission, vision, and goals. 2. Includes a diverse set of educators and stakeholders in school improvement decisions. 3. Establishes, communicates, and enforces a set of standard operating procedures and routines aligned with district, state, and federal policy. 4. Performs all budgetary responsibilities with accuracy, transparency, and in the best interest of students and staff.