Criteria. Use scientific thinking to question the natural and designed world.

Similar documents
Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Practical Research. Planning and Design. Paul D. Leedy. Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbus, Ohio

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

new research in learning and working

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Software Maintenance

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Shockwheat. Statistics 1, Activity 1

Self Study Report Computer Science

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Dublin City Schools Mathematics Graded Course of Study GRADE 4

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

Florida Reading for College Success

SAT MATH PREP:

UF-CPET SSI & STARTS Lesson Plan

EQuIP Review Feedback

Statewide Framework Document for:

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Montana Content Standards for Mathematics Grade 3. Montana Content Standards for Mathematical Practices and Mathematics Content Adopted November 2011

Unit 3 Ratios and Rates Math 6

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Science Fair Project Handbook

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

Mathematics subject curriculum

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

Creating Coherent Inquiry Projects to Support Student Cognition and Collaboration in Physics

Writing an Effective Research Proposal

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Kristin Moser. Sherry Woosley, Ph.D. University of Northern Iowa EBI

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

What is Thinking (Cognition)?

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

ASSESSMENT TASK OVERVIEW & PURPOSE:

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

learning collegiate assessment]

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

Introduction to Forensics: Preventing Fires in the First Place. A Distance Learning Program Presented by the FASNY Museum of Firefighting

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Blank Table Of Contents Template Interactive Notebook

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

On Human Computer Interaction, HCI. Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC

This document has been produced by:

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Unit: Human Impact Differentiated (Tiered) Task How Does Human Activity Impact Soil Erosion?

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

SAMPLE. PJM410: Assessing and Managing Risk. Course Description and Outcomes. Participation & Attendance. Credit Hours: 3

Information for Candidates

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

ADDIE MODEL THROUGH THE TASK LEARNING APPROACH IN TEXTILE KNOWLEDGE COURSE IN DRESS-MAKING EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

DSTO WTOIBUT10N STATEMENT A

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Bud, Not Buddy. By Christopher Paul Curtis. A novel study with comprehension questions, activities, strategies and writing that align with CCSS.

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Digital Media Literacy

CS Machine Learning

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

Lecture 1: Machine Learning Basics

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Lecturing Module

How to read a Paper ISMLL. Dr. Josif Grabocka, Carlotta Schatten

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Sagor s Model: The Action Research Cycle (Sagor, 2005)

Transcription:

Enduring Skills List for M.S. Science Madison County Schools Enduring Skill Reference to Standards Criteria Use scientific thinking to question the natural and designed world. What s Mastery Look Like at your Grade Level? Ask questions that arise from careful observations of phenomena, models, or unexpended results, to clarify and/or seek additional information Sources of Evidence: What is available or needs to be developed? Bellringer, exit slip, experimental design, peer evaluation, MS-ETS1-1, Asking Questions & Defining Problems 06-PS2-1 07-PS2-3, 07-PS4-3 08-ESS3-1, 08-ESS1-4, 08, 08-ESS3-4, 08- ESS3-5, 08-ESS3-5 Use scientific thinking to define problems within the natural and design world. Define a design problem that can be solved through the development of an object, tool, process or system and includes multiple criteria and constraints, including scientific knowledge that may limit possible solutions Refine Questions To clarify/ and or refine a model, an explanation, or an engineering problem Developing and Using Models MS-ETS1-4 06-PS1-1, 06-ESS2-1, 06-PS1-4, 06-LS2-3, 06-ESS2-4, 06ESS2-6, Develop and refine models to explain, predict, and investigate the natural and designed world. Develop and/or revise a model to show the relationships among variables, including those that are not observable but Construct a model, identify limitations of models, explanation of real world application of model (lab report), use a model to test

06-ESS1-1, 06-ESS1-2 07-PS1-5, 07-PS3-3, 07-LS1-2, 07-PS3-2, 07-PS4-2, 07-LS1-7 08-ESS3-3, 08-LS2-5, 08-LS3-1, 08-LS3-2 Use models to explain, predict, and investigate the natural and designed world, including identifying the limitations of the models. predict observable phenomena. Develop and/or use a model to predict and/or describe phenomena. possible solutions to a problem, communicate results, develop questions based on models. Planning and Carrying Out Investigations 06-PS2-2 07-PS3-4, 07-LS1-1 08-ESS3-3 Develop and/or use a model to generate data. Planning investigations Develop and/or use a model to generate data to test ideas about phenomena in natural or designed systems, including those representing inputs and outputs, and those at unobservable scales. Plan an investigation individually and collaboratively, and in the design: identify independent and dependent variables and controls, what tools are needed to do the gathering, how measurements will be recorded, and how much data are needed to support a claim. Conduct investigations based on multiple variables (independent and dependent), evaluate and revise the experimental design to produce data, evaluate the accuracy data collection, data collection (data tables & graphs),

Carry out investigations Make observations and/or measurements to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence for an explanation of a phenomenon or test a design solution. Make predictions about what would happen if a variable changes. Organize and use data to support claims or conclusions. Test two different models of the same proposed object, tool, or proses to determine which better meets criteria for success. Evaluate the accuracy of various methods for collecting data. Collect data to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to answer scientific questions or test design solutions under a range of conditions. Collect data about the performance of a proposed object, tool, process or system under a range of conditions.

Analyzing and Interpreting Data MS-ETS1-3 06-ESS1-3, 06-ESS2-5, 06-ESS2-3 07-PS3-5, 07-PS2-4, 07-PS1-2 08-ESS1-4, 08-ESS3-4, 08-ESS3-1, 08LS4-2, 08-ESS3-2 Organize and use data to support claims or conclusions. Analyze data to make sense of phenomena or determine an optimal design solution. Construct, analyze, and/or interpret graphical displays of data (charts, graphs, and/or tables) to identify relationships in data. Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for phenomena. Apply concepts of statistics and probability to analyze and characterize data. Define an optimal operational range for a proposed object, tool, process or system that best meets criteria for success. Construct graphical displays of data, analyze graphical displays of data, interpret graphical displays of data, apply concepts of statistics and probability (mean, median, mode, & variability), analysis of data collected in student investigations, identify areas of improvement, interpret data to determine similarities and differences in peer results and communicating differences. Use digital tools to analyze and interpret data. Use digital tools (calculator, excel, LabQuest) to analyze and interpret data. Using mathematics and computational thinking. MS-ETS1-2 06-PS1-4, 06-PS2-2, 06-PS2-1, 06-ESS1-3 07-PS1-2, 07-PS3-3, 07-PS2-3, 07-PS2-3 08-LS4-1, 08-LS4-6, 08-ESS3-2 Use mathematics to make quantitative predictions or qualitative solutions when problems cannot be calculated precisely. Appropriate use of qualitative or quantitative data. Use mathematical representations to describe and/or support scientific conclusions and design solutions to represent physical variables and their relationships Using multiple digital tools to collect, record, and analyze data, identifying mathematical trends, patterns, and sequences, using digitals tools to validate experimental findings, creating algorithms (series of steps) to solve a problem, compare proposed solutions to an engineering

Engage in computational thinking by organizing data, creating sequences, and developing new simulations of natural and designed systems. Computational thinking is relevant and correct in determining whether a proposed object or tool meets criteria for success. Use digital tools (e.g., computers) to analyze very large data sets for patterns and trends in the natural and designed world. design problem Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions MS-ETS1-1 06-ESS1-1, 06ESS1-2, 06ESS2-2, 06-ESS2-5, 06-PS2-1 07-PS1-6, 07-PS4-3, 07-LS1-6, 07-LS1-4, 07-LS1-5, 07-PS2-5 08-LS4-1, 08LS4-4, 08- ESS1-4, 08-ESS3-1, 08ESS3-4, 08-LS2-5 Create, analyze and interpret data, graphs, diagrams Construct explanations based on scientific evidence. Use mathematical representations to create, describe, measure, estimate, and/or graph quantities to address scientific and engineering questions and problems with no mistakes Construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources and the assumption that theories and laws that describe the natural world operate today as they did in the past and will continue to do so in the future. Construct and explanation based on observations or models, construct a scientific explanation on reliability of evidence, use the engineering design process (test, revise, retest) to find a systematic solution to problems that are based on scientific knowledge and models, construct theories that provide explanatory accounts of the world.

Design and refine solutions to problems. Apply scientific ideas, principles, and/or evidence to construct, revise and/or use an explanation for realworld phenomena, examples, or events Engaging in Argument from Evidence MS-ETS1-2 06-ESS2-2, 06-PS2-2 07-PS3-5, 07-PS2-4, 07-LS1-3, 07-LS1-4, 07-PS2-5, 07-LS1-1, 07-LS1-5 08-LS2-4, 08-LS2-5 Apply scientific reasoning. Argue using scientific evidence. Use evidence to evaluate claims. Apply scientific reasoning to show why the data or evidence is adequate for the explanation or conclusion. Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support or refute an explanation or a model for a phenomenon or a solution to a problem. Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts. Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic, analyze arguments for similarities and differences, construct or present an oral and written argument supported by evidence and scientific reasoning, evaluate competing design solutions.

Obtaining, Evaluation, and Communicating Information 06-LS2-1, 06-LS2-2, 06-PS1-3, 06-PS2-2 07-PS4-1, 07-PS2-5, 07-PS4-3, 07-LS1-6, 07-LS1-4 08-LS1-8, 08-LS4-5, 08-ESS1-4, 08-ESS3-1, 08-ESS3-4 Make a claim on scientific evidence. Obtain information to determine patterns in and/or evidence about the natural or designed world. Evaluate information to determine usefulness and value. Make an oral or written argument that supports or refutes the advertised performance of a device, process, or system based on empirical evidence concerning whether or not the technology meets relevant criteria and constraints. Gather, read, and synthesize information from multiple appropriate sources and assess the credibility, accuracy, and possible bias of each publication and methods used, and describe how they are supported or not supported by evidence. Evaluate data, hypotheses, and/or conclusions in scientific and technical texts in light or competing information or accounts. Communicate information and ideas in multiple ways (tables, diagrams, models, graphs), gather, read, and synthesis information from multiple appropriate sources, answer critical thinking questions after reading an informational text, produce visual displays to clarify claims and findings (poster, powerpoint, ibook, comic strip), evaluate (credibility, accuracy, and possible bias) data, hypotheses, and/or conclusions in scientific text. Communicate information in a variety of developmentally appropriate formats. Communicate scientific and/or technical information in writing and/or through oral presentations.