FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 28 AT 8:30 AM

Similar documents
Cross-Program Consolidated Monitoring 4-Year Cycle ( )

FY STATE AID ALLOCATIONS AND BUDGET POLICIES

Report to the North Carolina General Assembly

North Carolina Teacher Corps Final Report

Northern Vance High School Athletic Director. Dr. Michael Applewhite. Until Filled

Alternative!Education!in!North!Carolina!

NORTH CAROLINA. Massage Therapist

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Opinion on Private Garbage Collection in Scarborough Mixed

NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY

2017 Women s Individual Tennis Regional Contacts and Playoff Berth Information

Price Sensitivity Analysis

SUMMARY REPORT MONROE COUNTY, OH OFFICIAL RESULTS PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 6, 2012 RUN DATE:03/20/12 11:03 AM STATISTICS REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

THE MEN BEHIND THE PULPIT (RICHMOND HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, YADKIN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION) - NCCF. November June 1901

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

State of New Jersey

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

APPENDIX 2: TOPLINE QUESTIONNAIRE

Mentoring and Partnerships: Research and Practice

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

MAGNET PROGRAM REVIEW. Authors : Anisa Rhea Ph.D., WCPSS Evaluation and Research Department Roger Regan Ph.D., WCPSS Magnet Programs ABSTRACT

Virtual Learning in Virginia

Board of Directors OFFICERS. John B. Smith, Jr., MD, Chairman Physician

STUDENT GOVERNMENT BOARD MINUTES September 27, The minutes of September 11, 2011 were approved.

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Vance County Summer Fun

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Queens University of Charlotte

Lenoir-Rhyne College

Simple Random Sample (SRS) & Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: A Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: Systematic Sample Best Used When

Charity Cayton 3921A Granada Dr, Winterville, NC Phone: (336) ,

2017 Polk County City Election Polling Locations

Executive Summary. Mt. Mourne School - An IBO World School

Professor Soni Martin Fayetteville State University Performing and Fine Arts (910)

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014


Exhibit 2. WJMZ-FM, WHZT (FM) WJMZ-FM, Anderson, South Carolina / WHZT (FM), Seneca, South Carolina May 3, July 31, 2013

Upward Bound Program

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Vast Inequality in Wealth Means Poor School Districts Are Less Able to Rely on Local Property Taxes

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Lessons on American Presidents.com

The First Annual Survey of the Community

Resume. Christine Ann Loucks Telephone: (208) (work)

520 HISTORY.ORG CIVICS HOW DO PEOPLE WORK TOGETHER TO SOLVE PROBLEMS?

STT 231 Test 1. Fill in the Letter of Your Choice to Each Question in the Scantron. Each question is worth 2 point.

Financing Education In Minnesota

that when ONE ISSUE NUMBER e Education Chair House Rep. Harry Brooks favor. evaluations, Jim Coley of on their own evaluated

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

Gena Bell Vargas, Ph.D., CTRS

University of Massachusetts Amherst

TOWARDS A NEW HISTORY: IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. A Thesis by JAMIE LEANNE HAGER

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Psi Lambda Chapter Beta Beta Beta. The University of North Carolina at Pembroke

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

NC Community College System: Overview

STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES Curriculum Program Applications Fast Track for Action [FTFA*]

PBL, Projects, and Activities downloaded from NextLesson are provided on an online platform.

Create Quiz Questions

Today s Agenda Welcome New Hires Updates and Notable News Show & Tell: Show & Tell: Featured Event:

Bulletin. Volume 63, Number 2 Winter 2011

Professional Development Connected to Student Achievement in STEM Education

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Educational Attainment

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

FACT: FACT: The National Coalition for Public Education. Debunking Myths About the DC Voucher Program

The Louis Stokes Scholar Internship A Paid Summer Legal Experience

Social, Economical, and Educational Factors in Relation to Mathematics Achievement

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

PENNSYLVANIA. A review of the. for the school year. Department of Education

Adult Community Learning. Course Programme 2017/18

EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR MODEL IN ELECTRONIC LEARNING: A PILOT STUDY

Between the Stacks. New Bern-Craven County Public Library WINTER Our Region Reads: Rocket Boys/October Sky

Republican and Democratic Nominations are to be made for the following Federal, State, County and Municipal Offices:

September 21, I had expected Stewart to win the September 2 primary and planned to

HSMP 6611 Strategic Management in Health Care (Strg Mgmt in Health Care) Fall 2012 Thursday 5:30 7:20 PM Ed 2 North, 2301

Peter N. Tabbot Phone: Summary of Qualifications. Professional Experience

Algebra 2- Semester 2 Review

FORSYTH COUNTY VOTER GUIDE. Funding Our Schools. Good Jobs and Clean Water. Racial Justice. Health Care ELECTION DAY IS NOV. 4

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

Enrollment Forms Packet (EFP)

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Left, Left, Left, Right, Left

Cleveland State University Introduction to University Life Course Syllabus Fall ASC 101 Section:

Allendale Hillside Elementary School Brookside Elementary School Special School District/Technical Schools Woodridge Saddlebrook 3

Meet the Preceptors. Jeremy Rose, Pharm.D., BCPS Preceptor for Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Stewardship

Report of the Athletic Council Academic Year

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

CONTENT AREA: Theatre Arts

What's My Value? Using "Manipulatives" and Writing to Explain Place Value. by Amanda Donovan, 2016 CTI Fellow David Cox Road Elementary School

Dana Chisnell, UsabilityWorks Ethan Newby, Newby Research (consultant on statistics) Sharon Laskowski, NIST Svetlana Lowry, NIST

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Transcription:

North Carolina In North Carolina, interviews with 1,010 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on September 22-25, 2014. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points. The North Carolina sample also includes 860 interviews among registered voters (plus or minus 3.5 percentage points) and 595 interviews among likely voters (plus or minus 4 percentage points). In North Carolina, 709 interviews were conducted among landline respondents and 301 interviews among cell phone respondents. FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 28 AT 8:30 AM

1. If the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Kay Hagan, the Democrat, Thom Tillis, the Republican, and Sean Haugh, the Libertarian who would you be more likely to vote for? (IF UNSURE:) As of today, who do you lean more toward? (RANDOM ORDER) Other Neither No Hagan Tillis Haugh (vol.) (vol.) opinion Sept. 22-25, 2014 46% 43% 7% * 3% 1% Sept. 22-25, 2014 46% 39% 9% * 4% 2% 2. Is your mind made up about who you will vote for, or is it possible you would change your mind? Mind Might No made up change mind opinion Sept. 22-25, 2014 73% 25% 2% Sept. 22-25, 2014 61% 36% 3% No opinion includes respondents with no first choice in Q.1. -2- September 22-25, 2014

3. We'd like to get your overall opinion of those candidates, regardless of whether or not you plan to vote for them. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of that person -- or if you have never heard of them before today. (RANDOM ORDER) Favor- Unfavor- Never No able able heard of opinion Kay Hagen Sept. 22-25, 2014 46% 47% 2% 5% Sept. 22-25, 2014 45% 43% 4% 8% Thom Tillis Sept. 22-25, 2014 47% 40% 5% 7% Sept. 22-25, 2014 41% 41% 9% 10% 4. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president? No Approve Disapprove opinion Sept. 22-25, 2014 38% 58% 3% Sept. 22-25, 2014 43% 53% 5% All Respondents Sept. 22-25, 2014 42% 52% 7% -3- September 22-25, 2014

METHODOLOGY In North Carolina, a total of 1,010 adults were interviewed by telephone. All respondents were asked questions concerning basic demographics, and the entire sample was weighted to reflect statewide Census figures for gender, race, age, education and region of the state. Registered voters were asked questions about their likelihood of voting, past voting behavior, and interest in the campaign; based on the answers to those questions, 595 respondents were classified as likely voters. Among those likely voters, 34% described themselves as Democrats, 36% described themselves as Independents, and 30% described themselves as Republicans. In the North Carolina crosstabs, the state regions are composed of the following counties: the "East" region is composed of Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hyde, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne and Wilson counties; the "-Durham Triangle" region is composed of Chatham, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Johnston, Orange, Person, Vance, Wake and Warren counties; the "Charlotte Area" region is composed of Cabarrus, Gaston, Lincoln, Mecklenburg and Union counties; the "Piedmont/Central" region is composed of Alamance, Anson, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Scotland, Stanly and Stokes counties; and the "West" region is composed of Alexander, Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Catawba, Cherokee, Clay, Cleveland, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Iredell, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin and Yancey counties. Crosstabs on the following pages only include results for subgroups with enough unweighted cases to produce a sampling error of +/- 8.5 percentage points or less. Some subgroups represent too small a share of the population of North Carolina to produce crosstabs with an acceptable sampling error. Interviews were conducted among these subgroups but results for groups with a sampling error larger than +/-8.5 percentage points are not displayed. -4- September 22-25, 2014

Likely Voter Question 1/1A Q1. If the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Kay Hagan, the Democrat, and Thom Tillis, the Republican, and Sean Haugh, the Libertarian who would you be more likely to vote for -- Q1A. As of today, do you lean more toward --? Base = Likely voters Hagan, lean Hagan 46% 42% 49% 35% N/A 32% 37% Tillis, lean Tillis 43% 46% 40% 53% N/A 56% 51% Haugh, lean Haugh 7% 8% 5% 6% N/A 8% 5% None of the above 3% 3% 3% 3% N/A 3% 3% Other * * * * N/A * * No opinion 1% 1% 2% 2% N/A 1% 2% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.5 +/-4.5 +/-6.5 +/-6.5 Hagan, lean Hagan 46% N/A N/A 51% 43% N/A 47% Tillis, lean Tillis 43% N/A N/A 37% 50% N/A 43% Haugh, lean Haugh 7% N/A N/A 7% 4% N/A 6% None of the above 3% N/A N/A 2% 2% N/A 2% Other * N/A N/A * * N/A * No opinion 1% N/A N/A 3% * N/A 2% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 +/-4.5 Hagan, lean Hagan 46% 44% 51% 45% 46% 59% 38% 41% Tillis, lean Tillis 43% 40% 43% 45% 43% 27% 53% 49% Haugh, lean Haugh 7% 8% 4% 4% 7% 8% 5% 6% None of the above 3% 7% 1% 4% 3% 4% 2% 3% Other * * * * * * * * No opinion 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.5 +/-8.0 +/-5.0 +/-6.5 +/-7.5 +/-7.0 Hagan, lean Hagan 46% 87% 39% 8% N/A 57% 20% Tillis, lean Tillis 43% 5% 40% 89% N/A 26% 71% Haugh, lean Haugh 7% 4% 12% 3% N/A 9% 6% None of the above 3% 3% 6% * N/A 5% 3% Other * * * * N/A 1% * No opinion 1% 1% 2% * N/A 2% * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 Hagan, lean Hagan 46% 47% 59% N/A 41% N/A Tillis, lean Tillis 43% 43% 31% N/A 45% N/A Haugh, lean Haugh 7% 7% 8% N/A 5% N/A None of the above 3% 3% 1% N/A 9% N/A Other * * * N/A * N/A No opinion 1% * 1% N/A * N/A Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-8.5 +/-8.5 +/-8.5-5- September 22-25, 2014

Likely Voter Question 2 Is your mind made up about who you will vote for, or is it possible you would change your mind? Base = Likely voters Mind made up 73% 76% 71% 73% N/A 76% 70% Might change mind 25% 22% 27% 25% N/A 22% 28% No opinion 2% 3% 2% 2% N/A 2% 2% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.5 +/-4.5 +/-6.5 +/-6.5 Mind made up 73% N/A N/A 77% 80% N/A 78% Might change mind 25% N/A N/A 20% 19% N/A 20% No opinion 2% N/A N/A 3% * N/A 2% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 +/-4.5 Mind made up 73% 70% 75% 71% 74% 78% 76% 65% Might change mind 25% 27% 24% 26% 25% 19% 22% 34% No opinion 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.5 +/-8.0 +/-5.0 +/-6.5 +/-7.5 +/-7.0 Mind made up 73% 79% 61% 81% N/A 68% 73% Might change mind 25% 20% 34% 19% N/A 28% 26% No opinion 2% 1% 5% * N/A 3% 1% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 Mind made up 73% 65% 80% N/A 73% N/A Might change mind 25% 31% 18% N/A 27% N/A No opinion 2% 3% 1% N/A * N/A Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-8.5 +/-8.5 +/-8.5-6- September 22-25, 2014

Likely Voter Question 3 We'd like to get your overall opinion of those candidates, regardless of whether or not you plan to vote for them. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of that person -- or if you have never heard of them before today. A. Kay Hagan Base = Likely voters Favorable Opinion 46% 42% 50% 39% N/A 36% 41% Unfavorable Opinion 47% 51% 43% 58% N/A 61% 55% Heard of, no opinion 4% 5% 4% 3% N/A 3% 3% Never heard of 2% 2% 2% 1% N/A * 1% No opinion 1% * 1% * N/A * * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.5 +/-4.5 +/-6.5 +/-6.5 Favorable Opinion 46% N/A N/A 48% 44% N/A 46% Unfavorable Opinion 47% N/A N/A 45% 50% N/A 47% Heard of, no opinion 4% N/A N/A 5% 3% N/A 4% Never heard of 2% N/A N/A 1% 2% N/A 1% No opinion 1% N/A N/A 1% 1% N/A 1% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 +/-4.5 Favorable Opinion 46% 46% 50% 47% 45% 55% 40% 44% Unfavorable Opinion 47% 44% 44% 43% 49% 37% 58% 47% Heard of, no opinion 4% 6% 3% 5% 4% 5% 2% 6% Never heard of 2% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% * 3% No opinion 1% 1% * * 1% * * 1% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.5 +/-8.0 +/-5.0 +/-6.5 +/-7.5 +/-7.0 Favorable Opinion 46% 84% 37% 14% N/A 58% 20% Unfavorable Opinion 47% 7% 56% 81% N/A 32% 75% Heard of, no opinion 4% 5% 6% 2% N/A 6% 3% Never heard of 2% 3% 1% 2% N/A 3% 2% No opinion 1% 1% * * N/A 1% * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 Favorable Opinion 46% 49% 57% N/A 44% N/A Unfavorable Opinion 47% 43% 36% N/A 51% N/A Heard of, no opinion 4% 5% 6% N/A 4% N/A Never heard of 2% 3% * N/A 1% N/A No opinion 1% * 2% N/A * N/A Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-8.5 +/-8.5 +/-8.5-7- September 22-25, 2014

Likely Voter Question 3 We'd like to get your overall opinion of those candidates, regardless of whether or not you plan to vote for them. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opin ion of that person -- or if you have never heard of them before today. B. Thom Tillis Base = Likely voters Favorable Opinion 47% 50% 45% 58% N/A 58% 58% Unfavorable Opinion 40% 38% 42% 33% N/A 32% 34% Heard of, no opinion 7% 8% 7% 6% N/A 6% 5% Never heard of 5% 3% 6% 3% N/A 3% 3% No opinion * 1% * 1% N/A 1% * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.5 +/-4.5 +/-6.5 +/-6.5 Favorable Opinion 47% N/A N/A 41% 50% N/A 45% Unfavorable Opinion 40% N/A N/A 48% 39% N/A 44% Heard of, no opinion 7% N/A N/A 6% 6% N/A 6% Never heard of 5% N/A N/A 4% 5% N/A 4% No opinion * N/A N/A 1% 1% N/A 1% Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 +/-4.5 Favorable Opinion 47% 45% 48% 50% 46% 34% 56% 53% Unfavorable Opinion 40% 42% 40% 34% 44% 53% 32% 35% Heard of, no opinion 7% 7% 6% 9% 6% 9% 7% 6% Never heard of 5% 6% 6% 7% 4% 4% 5% 5% No opinion * * * * * 1% * * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.5 +/-8.0 +/-5.0 +/-6.5 +/-7.5 +/-7.0 Favorable Opinion 47% 13% 47% 88% N/A 37% 72% Unfavorable Opinion 40% 71% 39% 7% N/A 49% 18% Heard of, no opinion 7% 9% 10% 2% N/A 9% 6% Never heard of 5% 8% 3% 3% N/A 5% 3% No opinion * * 1% * N/A 1% * Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 Favorable Opinion 47% 47% 40% N/A 49% N/A Unfavorable Opinion 40% 43% 51% N/A 33% N/A Heard of, no opinion 7% 6% 6% N/A 12% N/A Never heard of 5% 4% 3% N/A 7% N/A No opinion * * * N/A * N/A Sampling Error +/-4.0 +/-8.5 +/-8.5 +/-8.5-8- September 22-25, 2014

Question 5 Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president? Base = Total Sample Approve 42% 39% 44% 26% 75% 24% 28% Disapprove 52% 54% 50% 68% 16% 72% 65% No opinion 7% 7% 7% 6% 9% 4% 7% Sampling Error +/-3.0 +/-4.5 +/-4.5 +/-3.5 +/-6.5 +/-5.0 +/-5.0 Approve 42% 46% 38% 45% 36% 43% 41% Disapprove 52% 44% 56% 49% 60% 49% 54% No opinion 7% 10% 6% 6% 4% 8% 5% Sampling Error +/-3.0 +/-8.5 +/-7.5 +/-5.5 +/-5.0 +/-5.5 +/-4.0 Approve 42% 45% 40% 44% 40% 49% 39% 36% Disapprove 52% 47% 57% 48% 54% 45% 57% 54% No opinion 7% 8% 3% 8% 6% 6% 4% 10% Sampling Error +/-3.0 +/-5.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.0 +/-4.0 +/-5.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.5 Approve 42% 81% 34% 6% 66% 47% 25% Disapprove 52% 14% 56% 90% 27% 45% 73% No opinion 7% 5% 10% 4% 7% 9% 3% Sampling Error +/-3.0 +/-5.5 +/-5.0 +/-6.0 +/-7.5 +/-5.0 +/-5.0 Approve 42% 39% 57% 46% 33% 34% Disapprove 52% 54% 39% 46% 59% 58% No opinion 7% 7% 3% 7% 8% 8% Sampling Error +/-3.0 +/-6.0 +/-7.0+/-8.0 +/-7.0+/-7.0-9- September 22-25, 2014