Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Similar documents
FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Trends in College Pricing

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Anatomy and Physiology. Astronomy. Boomilever. Bungee Drop

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

Brian Isetts University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Anthony W. Olson PharmD University of Minnesota, Twin Cities,

Career Services JobFlash! as of July 26, 2017

NC Community College System: Overview

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

Canada and the American Curriculum:

EPA Approved Laboratories for UCMR 3

National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training Program. Planning and Logistics Guide

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Findings from the 2005 College Student Survey (CSS): National Aggregates. Victor B. Saenz Douglas S. Barrera

James H. Walther, Ed.D.

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Measures of the Location of the Data

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

136 Joint Commission Accredited Organizations (1273 sites*) with Primary Care Medical Home (PCMH) Certification (by state) as of 1/1/2015

93 percent of local providers will not be awarded competitive bidding contracts 2.

The Economic Impact of College Bowl Games

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

Margaret Parnell Hogan. Focus Areas. Overview

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

King-Devick Reading Acceleration Program

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Objective: Add decimals using place value strategies, and relate those strategies to a written method.

STRONG STANDARDS: A Review of Changes to State Standards Since the Common Core

A Math Adventure Game Pi and the The Lost Function Episode 1 - Pre-Algebra/Algebra

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

CURRICULUM VITAE LAWRENCE A. DUBIN

Memorandum RENEWAL OF ACCREDITATION. School School # City State # of Years Effective Date

YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO JOIN THE EAGL ZETA COHORT, STARTING IN JUNE COMPLETE YOUR APPLICATION ONLINE AT:

Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America Educational Scholarship Program

Journal Article Growth and Reading Patterns

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

How Living Costs Undermine Net Price As An Affordability Metric

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

NETWORK DEVELOPMENT GRANTEES

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

THE LUCILLE HARRISON CHARITABLE TRUST SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION. Name (Last) (First) (Middle) 3. County State Zip Telephone

Sung-Wook Kwon. Texas Tech University Phone: Box Fax: Lubbock, TX 79409

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

WELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS!

Practical Strategies for Using Guided Math to Help Your Students Meet or Exceed the

Community Power Simulation

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Daniel B. Boatright. Focus Areas. Overview

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY

Measurement & Analysis in the Real World

Leveraging MOOCs to bring entrepreneurship and innovation to everyone on campus

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

The Consistent Positive Direction Pinnacle Certification Course

RC-FM Staff. Objectives 4/22/2013. Geriatric Medicine: Update from the RC-FM. Eileen Anthony, Executive Director; ;

Global Television Manufacturing Industry : Trend, Profit, and Forecast Analysis Published September 2012

Financing Education In Minnesota

Plainview Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School 50 Kennedy Drive Plainview, NY Guidance Office: Fax:

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Jon N. Kerr, PhD, CPA August 2017

Living on Campus. Housing and Food Services

Virginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Urban Analysis Exercise: GIS, Residential Development and Service Availability in Hillsborough County, Florida

B.A., Amherst College, Women s and Gender Studies, Magna Cum Laude (2001)

Intellectual Property

Faculty Schedule Preference Survey Results

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Unit 3: Lesson 1 Decimals as Equal Divisions

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

Printable Poetry Task Cards

Sung-Wook Kwon. Texas Tech University Phone: Box Fax: Lubbock, TX 79409

JANIE HODGE, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Special Education 225 Holtzendorff Clemson University

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

The newly revised NCSSFL-ACTFL Can-Do Statements offer language educators a

ATTRIBUTES OF EFFECTIVE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

P-4: Differentiate your plans to fit your students

School Physical Activity Policy Assessment (S-PAPA)

Close Up. washington, Dc High School Programs

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

Transcription:

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of: Comments on Petitions Regarding ) CC Docket No. 02 06 Off Campus Use of Existing E rate ) WC Docket No. 10 90 Supported Connectivity ) WC Docket No. 13 184 COMMENTS OF FUNDS FOR LEARNING, LLC on Petitions Regarding Off Campus Use of Existing E rate Supported Connectivity Funds For Learning, LLC ( FFL ) is a national, E rate compliance consulting and web services firm. Since the E rate program began 19 years ago, FFL has dedicated itself exclusively to the needs of E rate stakeholders. Our clients include some of the country s smallest and largest E rate applicants. The Commission is seeking comments on two petitions that seek to allow schools and school districts to leverage existing E rate supported services to allow Internet traffic originating at students homes to be directed to and carried over E rate supported networks without creating an obligation on the applicant to cost allocate out the portion of the traffic attributable to off campus use. FFL fully supports both petitions and urges the Commission to adopt rules and/or rule clarifications to implement them as quickly as possible. What the petitioners are essentially proposing is a logical, long overdue extension of the E rate program s 2010 Community Use rules. Those rules expanded affordable broadband access to the Internet by allowing schools to invite the general public into their buildings to use their E rate supported services when school was not in session and so long as the additional use cost nothing to provide. Because the Community Use rules expanded the public benefits of using E rate funds at no additional cost to the E rate program, the Commission was justifiably enthusiastic about enacting them.

Comments of Funds For Learning, LLC Off Campus Use of Existing E rate Supported Connectivity November 3, 2016 The Commission should adopt the changes and/or clarifications being proposed with even greater enthusiasm. Their positive impact on public policy will be even more profound, as they will virtualize the Community Use rules. Instead of having to physically enter a school building after school hours to use its Internet connection, students (and the local community we hope) could access the Internet by simply visiting the school building electronically. Besides the obvious benefits of this kind of change, an added bonus would be increased school security and public safety: no one would physically have to enter the school building or venture out into the dark or in bad weather to get to the school building to use the Internet connectivity there. The instant petitions bear witness to the unfortunate fact that there exists today in America an electronic homework gap that must be bridged. According to Pew Research, a third of all households in America lack broadband Internet access, and nearly half of those without Internet do so not out of choice but because they cannot afford it. 1 Every child in this country is entitled to a quality education, and in today s fast paced, electronic world, that requires high speed Internet access at home. 2 Commissioner Rosenworcel in particular has gone to great lengths to publicize this problem and to champion solutions to it. We applaud all of the Commissioners for their efforts in this regard. THIS is the Commission s opportunity to step up to the plate and to hit the ball out of the park. Data Supporting the Petitions The E rate program has been largely responsible for connecting our nation s schools and libraries to the Internet. Now, at no additional cost to the program, to the service providers who fund the USF, or to the American telecom consumers who fund it indirectly, the E rate program has the opportunity to achieve even more. The data shows that the program can easily open up the Internet to large numbers of low income families in their homes because of how close E rate supported networks are to where they live. Using data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development 3, combined with FFL s own database of E rate funding recipients, we have analyzed the distance 4 from every public housing development in the United States to the nearest school or library facility with an 1 http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/12/21/home broadband 2015/ 2 https://www.fundsforlearning.com/blog/2016/03/bringing broadband home 3 Public Housing Development dataset available at http://egis.hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets 4 Geocoding services were provided by the Texas A&M University GeoInnovation Center Page 2

Comments of Funds For Learning, LLC Off Campus Use of Existing E rate Supported Connectivity November 3, 2016 E rate funded Internet connection. The table below summarizes this first of its kind analysis. Count of Public Housing Developments and Population By Distance from E rate Funded School or Library 5 Distance to School or Library Housing Count Population Count % Pop'l <.1 miles 571 310,534 15.2%.1 to.24 miles 1,782 631,277 30.8%.25 to.49 miles 2,297 609,462 29.8%.50 to.99 miles 1,512 378,993 18.5% 1.0 to 2.0 miles 350 75,006 3.7% 2.0 or more miles 322 41,628 2.0% Total 6,834 2,046,900 As the table above shows, there are 941,811 Americans living in public housing developments who reside within less than a quarter mile of a school or library with an E rate supported network. It shows too that over 94% of the public housing population, a staggering 1,930,266 people, live less than a mile from an E rate funded facility. To illustrate the significance of this data, we have attached several charts and tables, which you will find in. For hundreds of thousands of low income individuals and families, E rate funded networks are within walking distance of home. The bottom line, therefore, is this: By allowing community members, such as those who reside in public housing developments, to connect to E rate funded networks, the FCC will open up new opportunities for last mile connections for many millions of Americans who are currently residing on the wrong side of the digital divide. 5 E rate sites are based on the schools and libraries listed on FY2016 Form 471 applications. Page 3

Comments of Funds For Learning, LLC Off Campus Use of Existing E rate Supported Connectivity November 3, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ John D. Harrington John D. Harrington Chief Executive Officer Funds For Learning, LLC jharrington@fundsforlearning.com 405 341 4140 2575 Kelley Pointe Parkway, STE 200 Edmond, OK 73034 November 3, 2016 cc: Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel Page 4

COMMENTS OF FUNDS FOR LEARNING, LLC on Petitions Regarding Off Campus Use of Existing E rate Supported Connectivity EXHIBIT A

Public Housing Near E rate Funded Sites Cumulative % of Population by Distance (miles) 100% 90% 80% 70% 0.5, 76% 60% 50% 0.28, 51% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Distance from E rate Site (miles) Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning Sources: E rate Manager, HUD egis System

700,000 600,000 Public Housing Population Near E rate Funded Sites 631,277 609,462 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 310,534 378,993 100,000 75,006 41,628 less than tenth.1 to.24 miles.25 to.49 miles.50 to.99 miles 1.0 to 2.0 miles 2.0 or more miles Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning Sources: E rate Manager, HUD egis System

Public Housing Developments Near E rate Funded Schools or Libraries Housing less than 0.10 miles Population Distance to E rate Site Housing Developments: 571 Count of Population: 310,534 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning

Public Housing Developments Near E rate Funded Schools or Libraries Housing 0.10 to 0.24 miles Population Distance to E rate Site Housing Developments: 1,782 Count of Population: 631,277 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning

Public Housing Developments Near E rate Funded Schools or Libraries Housing 0.25 to 0.49 miles Population Distance to E rate Site Housing Developments: 2,297 Count of Population: 609,462 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning

Public Housing Developments Near E rate Funded Schools or Libraries Housing 0.50 to 0.99 miles Population Distance to E rate Site Housing Developments: 1,512 Count of Population: 378,993 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning

Public Housing Developments Near E rate Funded Schools or Libraries Housing 1.0 to 2.0 miles Population Distance to E rate Site Housing Developments: 350 Count of Population: 75,006 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning

Public Housing Developments Near E rate Funded Schools or Libraries Housing 2.0 or more miles Population Distance to E rate Site Housing Developments: 322 Count of Population: 41,628 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning

Number and Population of Public Housing Developments by Distance from E rate Funded Sites and by State Public Housing Developments Population by Distance (miles) to E rate School/Library Distance (miles) to E rate Site 0.10 0.25 0.50 1.00 Grand State Count Median MIN MAX <0.10 to 0.24 to 0.49 to 0.99 to 2.00 2.00+ Total AK 11 0.43 0.07 49.05 515 491 1,458 126 57 2,647 AL 276 0.53 0.01 15.45 3,020 7,529 20,439 28,610 7,912 4,288 71,798 AR 116 0.43 0.01 14.03 1,350 3,489 9,000 8,586 578 908 23,911 AZ 48 0.26 0.04 1.30 888 6,274 7,180 1,653 499 16,494 CA 211 0.28 0.02 2.02 9,636 33,938 26,690 10,349 2,658 121 83,392 CO 70 0.44 0.03 25.48 1,264 4,782 3,831 6,102 1,205 257 17,441 CT 131 0.25 0.01 0.99 4,204 9,235 8,811 5,432 27,682 DC 61 0.19 0.05 0.41 2,001 8,828 4,631 15,460 DE 23 1.10 0.09 12.17 113 0 600 928 1,734 1,107 4,482 FL 227 0.37 0.04 13.57 4,103 20,405 25,804 15,430 2,245 947 68,934 GA 327 0.45 0.00 11.51 3,815 14,595 23,413 23,616 5,063 1,749 72,251 HI 17 0.28 0.05 2.86 1,861 2,844 7,313 710 309 567 13,604 IA 54 0.39 0.07 12.60 61 1,025 2,443 1,308 780 570 6,187 ID 10 0.40 0.20 0.64 190 550 663 1,403 IL 363 0.28 0.01 8.10 13,018 26,341 31,569 11,885 1,670 1,882 86,365 IN 105 0.37 0.02 1.23 1,570 7,874 9,363 6,533 1,950 27,290 KS 109 0.30 0.04 5.76 1,274 3,817 6,727 2,445 47 81 14,391 KY 165 0.39 0.01 13.36 3,482 8,383 14,614 10,681 3,325 854 41,339 LA 173 0.38 0.01 4.26 2,430 8,927 17,209 10,214 2,002 411 41,193 MA 207 0.25 0.02 4.12 7,360 25,878 23,248 6,184 550 49 63,269 MD 106 0.23 0.02 10.65 4,947 16,803 4,032 2,417 221 317 28,737 ME 26 0.30 0.04 6.05 741 1,582 3,876 1,595 481 235 8,510 MI 200 0.50 0.01 7.76 1,755 6,863 10,703 13,634 5,036 659 38,650 MN 159 0.34 0.03 15.84 2,333 13,096 10,188 8,471 1,064 1,056 36,208 MO 163 0.36 0.04 13.66 2,020 8,056 10,705 7,414 2,073 1,124 31,392 MS 80 0.45 0.01 16.76 1,373 2,873 6,933 8,157 3,033 400 22,769 MT 20 0.39 0.07 1.25 134 696 2,321 837 299 4,287 NC 286 0.38 0.00 7.84 5,305 10,657 28,534 16,608 3,389 1,366 65,859 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning Page 1 of 2

Public Housing Developments Distance (miles) to E rate Site State Count Median MIN MAX <0.10 Number and Population of Public Housing Developments by Distance from E rate Funded Sites and by State Population by Distance (miles) to E rate School/Library 0.10 to 0.24 0.25 to 0.49 0.50 to 0.99 1.00 to 2.00 2.00+ Grand Total ND 23 2.17 0.15 52.60 377 29 979 1,563 2,948 NE 127 0.32 0.06 22.49 319 2,914 6,058 2,864 86 240 12,481 NH 26 0.36 0.17 1.87 2,010 3,422 1,022 390 6,844 NJ 239 0.21 0.01 1.23 8,669 28,215 18,088 4,546 237 59,755 NM 40 0.32 0.05 12.53 384 2,253 4,358 1,899 217 9,111 NV 20 0.24 0.14 1.03 3,162 3,119 794 303 7,378 NY 382 0.18 0.01 4.44 185,548 176,930 54,356 20,493 1,811 1,425 440,563 OH 241 0.35 0.03 2.71 8,198 19,577 33,211 18,589 3,750 751 84,076 OK 112 0.42 0.03 9.94 1,630 2,519 8,549 7,603 1,889 117 22,307 OR 74 0.41 0.10 15.39 70 2,261 4,625 2,924 374 574 10,828 PA 427 0.32 0.02 14.66 8,059 36,913 33,664 23,708 3,909 4,843 111,096 PR 31 0.64 0.13 2.17 199 3,758 8,560 948 876 14,341 RI 67 0.20 0.04 1.19 2,546 8,256 3,144 1,224 56 15,226 SC 103 0.52 0.01 6.61 64 5,273 11,824 9,811 2,463 669 30,104 SD 24 0.41 0.07 13.36 159 338 920 779 180 113 2,489 TN 192 0.41 0.05 2.47 4,818 15,866 23,643 17,916 4,165 102 66,510 TX 476 0.40 0.02 37.92 3,959 39,092 37,682 21,403 2,647 7,644 112,427 UT 16 0.82 0.09 43.61 19 901 1,574 533 615 3,642 VA 135 0.32 0.02 2.44 1,954 12,772 16,464 8,085 1,485 411 41,171 VT 11 0.40 0.07 2.19 272 217 799 761 212 2,261 WA 126 0.30 0.01 1.16 1,347 8,143 8,751 5,431 292 23,964 WI 139 0.34 0.07 14.42 821 6,498 7,699 3,842 138 875 19,873 WV 52 0.52 0.06 3.86 1,125 1,760 2,167 3,598 1,227 276 10,153 WY 7 13.43 0.15 30.41 261 46 1,100 1,407 Overall 6,834 0.34 0.00 52.60 310,534 631,277 609,462 378,993 75,006 41,628 2,046,900 Copyright 2016 Funds For Learning Page 2 of 2