William Harding School. Policy for Assessment

Similar documents
Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Somerset Progressive School Planning, Assessment, Recording & Celebration Policy

Ferry Lane Primary School

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

5 Early years providers

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Eastbury Primary School

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Qualification handbook

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Knowle DGE Learning Centre. PSHE Policy

Sample Reports. for Progress Test in Maths.

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

School Improvement Plan

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Guide for primary schools

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Milton Keynes Schools Speech and Language Therapy Service. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. Additional support for schools

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Social Work Placement Handbook BA & MA First and Final Placement

Newlands Girls School

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

Primary School Experience Generic Handbook

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Creative Media Department Assessment Policy

Quality Assurance of Teaching, Learning and Assessment

Putnoe Primary School

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

We seek to be: A vibrant, excellent place of learning at the heart of our Christian community.

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Practice Learning Handbook

Special Educational Needs School Information Report

Charlton Kings Infants School

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Practice Learning Handbook

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Bramcote Hills Primary School Special Educational Needs and Disability Policy (SEND) Inclusion Manager: Miss Susan Clarke

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

St Philip Howard Catholic School

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Special Educational Needs Assessment for Learning. Phil Dexter, British Council, Teacher Development Adviser

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Feedback, Marking and Presentation Policy

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Joint Board Certification Project Team

Local offer aspect. a) General information. Admission arrangements to schools, settings or FE Colleges

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

East Riding of Yorkshire SACRE Report 2012/13

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Aurora College Annual Report

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Liverpool Hope University ITE Partnership Handbook

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

Transcription:

William Harding School Policy for Assessment Aim Our aim at William Harding School is to produce confident, resilient and independent learners. We encourage our pupils to be creative and imaginative and develop a lifetime love of learning. Research has shown that formative assessment can improve both children s motivation and capacity to learn. Consequently the strategies used within this policy and our policy on Learning and Teaching, can have a considerable impact on raising achievement. We believe the key purpose of assessment is to move all pupils on in their learning in order for them to be secondary ready. Continued monitoring of each pupils progress gives a clear picture of what each child is doing and their next steps. It is important that each teacher knows what has been remembered, what skills have been acquired, and what concepts have been understood. This enables teachers to reflect on what pupils are doing and informs future planning. The outcomes of our assessments will help pupils become involved in raising their own expectations. Through assessing, recording and reporting on pupils work, we aim to: Enable pupils to understand what they have to do to reach end of Year and Key stage expectations Allow staff and pupils to plan more effectively Involve pupils and their families in their own learning Provide our school with information to evaluate teaching Give pupils helpful feedback on their achievements and areas for development, in order that they can learn more effectively Ensure that our practices in this area adhere to the equal opportunities policy of the school The Purpose of Assessment Effective assessment is tied clearly to its purpose. Our assessments will be designed to be clear: Why pupils are being assessed The things which the assessment is intended to measure What the assessment is intended to achieve How the assessment information will be used Different forms of assessment will serve different purposes for different people, including pupils, families, teachers, support staff, school leaders, governors and Ofsted. Page 1 of 8

There are three broad overarching forms of assessment that will be used at William Harding, each with its own purposes. These are: Day-to-day in school formative assessment, for example: Question and answer during lessons Marking of pupils work Observational assessment Regular short re-cap quizzes Scanning work for pupil attainment and progress In school summative assessment, for example Reception Baseline (Early Excellence, EExBA) End of year tests Short end of topic or unit tests Reviews for pupils with SEN and disabilities Nationally standardised summative assessment, for example: Early Years and Foundation Stage assessments at the end of Reception Key Stage 1 phonics check at the end of Year 1 and Year 2 if necessary National Curriculum teacher assessments at the end of Key Stage 1 National Curriculum tests and teacher assessments at the end of Key Stage 2 The primary purposes of day-to-day in-school formative assessment For pupils: In-school formative assessment helps pupils to measure their knowledge and understanding against learning objectives and wider outcomes and to identify where they need to target their efforts to improve. For families: With effective communication, in-school formative assessments provide families with a broad picture of where their children s strengths and next steps lie and what they need to do to improve. For teachers: In-school formative assessments are an integral part of teaching and learning. It allows teachers to understand pupil performance on a continuing basis. It enables teachers to identify when pupils are struggling, when they have consolidated learning and when they are ready to progress. In this way, it supports teachers to provide appropriate support or extension as necessary. It also enables teachers to evaluate their own teaching of particular topics or concepts and to plan future lessons accordingly. Page 2 of 8

For school leaders: In-school formative assessment provides a level of assurance for school leaders. If school leaders are confident their staff are carrying out effective formative assessment, they can be assured that problems will be identified at the individual level and that every child will be appropriately supported to make progress and meet expectations. For external validation: Ofsted will want to be assured that teachers are making effective use of formative assessment to support teaching and learning. It forms part of Ofsted s wider judgements about the quality of teaching in schools. The primary purposes of in-school summative assessment For pupils: In-school summative assessment provides pupils with information about how well they have learned and understood a topic or course of work taught over a period of time. It will be used to provide feedback on how they can continue to improve. For families: In-school summative assessments will be reported to families termly to inform them about the achievement, progress and wider outcomes of their children across the school year. For teachers: In-school summative assessment enables teachers to evaluate both pupil learning at the end of a unit or period and the impact of their own teaching. Both these purposes help teachers to plan for subsequent teaching and learning. For school leaders: In-school summative assessment enables school leaders to monitor the performance of pupil cohorts, to identify where interventions may be required and to work with teachers to ensure pupils are supported to achieve sufficient progress and expected attainment. For external validation: Ofsted will want to be assured that schools are operating effective systems of assessment for monitoring and supporting pupil performance. The primary purposes of nationally standardised summative assessment For pupils and families: Nationally standardised summative assessment provides information on how pupils are performing in comparison to pupils nationally. Page 3 of 8

For families: Nationally standardised summative assessment also provides families with information on how the school is performing in comparison to schools nationally. This enables families to hold schools to account and can inform families choice of schools for their children. For teachers: Nationally standardised summative assessment helps teachers understand national expectations and assess their own performance in the broader national context. For school leaders and school governors: Nationally standardised summative assessment enables school leaders and school governors to benchmark their school s performance against other schools locally and nationally, and make judgements about the school s effectiveness. For external validation: Nationally standardised summative assessment provides a starting point for Ofsted s discussions with schools when making judgements about their performance, as part of Ofsted s wider judgements of a school s overall effectiveness. Principles The principles that underpin assessment at William Harding are: Every child can achieve: teachers at William Harding have the mindset, What do I need to do next to enable pupils in my class to achieve? The National Curriculum objectives will be used as the expectations for all pupils Pupils will make age appropriate progress 12 months in 12 months, those who need to close the gap will be required to make more progress Teachers are experts at assessment - assessment will be effectively used to ensure the correct support is being built into lessons to ensure all pupils achieve All learners need to understand what they are being asked to learn and more importantly, why Success Criteria are discussed and agreed with or formulated by the pupils during each lesson, work is assessed against the success criteria Procedures All teachers assess their class or group on a daily basis so that they can plan the next stage in each child's learning. It helps teachers monitor progress, provide motivation for the children and helps inform planning. These types of assessment take place on a regular basis: Self and Peer assessment Next step (SIT) marking (see feedback policy) Learning conversations Rich, probing questioning Page 4 of 8

This formative assessment is recorded by teachers manually and electronically on Target Tracker for all year groups Tracking and Data Snap-shots In order to inform discussions at our Pupil Progress Meetings and future planning, data snap-shots of individual pupil s progress and achievement take place six times a year, towards the end of each half term. Data snap-shots take place for reading, writing, mathematics and science. Pupil attainment is recorded in Target Tracker as beginning to work within (b or b+), working within (w or w+) and secure in (s or s+) relevant to their Band (year group). Our Age Related Expectation (ARE) for the end of each school year is pupils working at step w+ in their appropriate year band. Progress is tracked using Steps, there are six steps in each Band, expected progress is six steps in school years 2 to 6. Pupils in Year 1 are expected to make at least four steps progress in the year, leading to an ARE of 1w+. Depth of Learning In addition to assessing curriculum knowledge we also assess the way pupils apply their skills and knowledge; this is known as the Depth of Learning, sometimes known as Mastery. We will use three Depth of Learning ratings to record and report to families: #1 Basic Learning Style #2 Advancing Learning Style #3 Deep Learning Style The depth and application of a child s learning is an important marker of their achievement and progress. To assess Depth of Learning pupil s learning will be examined over a period of time. Pupils' assessments are made up of two components, their Step and their Depth of Learning rating, for example: A pupil who has been assessed as 3W+, #3 has achieved the expected outcomes for Year 3 and has achieved above the standard expected for their depth and understanding of learning, they have a good application of the knowledge they have learnt. Early Years (EYFS) Class teacher's use a combination of the EYFS profile and the baseline assessment to measure children's progress: Baseline: William Harding uses Early Excellence Reception Baseline Assessment (EExBA) The baseline assessment will result in a score that forms part of each child s baseline profile. By having a good understanding of the child s abilities when they start school, class teachers are able to measure each child's progress and plan for next steps in learning Page 5 of 8

The baseline assessment is face-to-face with a mixture of tasks and observational checklists EYFS Profile: The EYFS profile assessment is carried out in the final term of Reception The main purpose of the EYFS profile is to provide a reliable, valid and accurate assessment of individual children at the end of the EYFS. EYFS profile data is used to: Inform families about their child s development against the early learning goals (ELGs) and the characteristics of their learning. Help year 1 teachers plan an effective, responsive and appropriate curriculum that will meet the needs of each child. Children in Reception are assessed against the Prime and Specific areas of Learning in the EYFS Profile; these are recorded on our Target Tracker system. Assessments are based on observation of daily activities and events. At the end of Reception for each Early Learning Goal, teachers will judge whether a child is meeting the level of development expected at the end of the Reception year: Emerging, not yet reached the expected level of development Expected Exceeding, beyond the expected level of development for their age Summative Assessment Summative assessments are used to assess what a child can do at a particular time, and are be used for comparison. The following formal summative assessments take place at William Harding: End of Key Stage assessments Year 2 and 6 (summer term) End of Year 1 Phonics Check (summer term) Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (summer term) Moderation and Standardisation Standardisation of the Reception Baseline outcomes takes place during the Autumn term following the collection of baseline evidence Standardisation takes place each half term during year team Pupil Progress Meetings (PPMs) baseline evidence Cross Phase moderation will take place at least once each term. When selected, Local Authority moderation also takes place. Page 6 of 8

An inclusive approach to assessment In addition to the assessments above, the school will make use of additional diagnostic assessments to contribute to the early and accurate identification of children s special education needs and any requirements for support and intervention. Reporting Reporting not only fulfils legal requirements but also is vital part of our relationship with families and the wider community, serving to support and promote the child s learning. Reporting to Families Termly interim reports End of year report to families Discussion with families at termly Consultation evenings. Reporting to Governors Headteacher s report to Governing Body termly. Training for staff After joining William Harding, all teachers will be provided will be provided with a copy of this policy and it will form part of the induction program. In all staff meetings and training, there will be an emphasis on teachers having a good understanding of assessment and assessment practice. William Harding makes use of technology to assess and in order to support staff, training in the use of Early Excellence Reception Baseline Assessment (EExBA) and Target Tracker school assessment information system will be given. Continuing professional development may take various forms including the provision of direct face to face training and online training. The Assessment Leader will ensure that best practice is shared and endeavour to keep up to date with latest research. William Harding, in making use of external assessment systems will continually review and evaluate them to ensure that they support the delivery of the school s assessment policy and are in line with the aims and principles outlined. Monitoring and Evaluation The Assessment Leader is responsible for updating this policy in line with any new developments in the school and new government guidance. All staff are expected to follow the policy and the Leadership Team, following ongoing regular reviews of classroom practice, will be responsible for ensuring the effectiveness of practice across the school, reporting to the Governor s Teaching and Learning Committee. This policy has been written with consideration for the findings published in the Final Report of the Commission on Assessment Without Levels, September 2015 Page 7 of 8

Policy updated: January 2016 Staff responsible: Dominic Hughes/Carla Holborow This policy was ratified by the Governing body on: 23 rd February 2016 Signed on behalf of the Governing Body: (signature) (printed) Page 8 of 8