Trends in For-Profit Postsecondary Education: Enrollment, Prices, Student Aid and Outcomes By Sandy Baum & Kathleen Payea

Similar documents
Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Trends in College Pricing

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

What You Need to Know About Financial Aid

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Updated: December Educational Attainment

EARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation

Best Colleges Main Survey

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

College Pricing. Ben Johnson. April 30, Abstract. Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Question No: 1 What must be considered with completing a needs analysis for a family saving for a child s tuition?

2010 DAVID LAMB PHOTOGRAPHY RIT/NTID FINANCIAL AID AND SCHOLARSHIPS

Alex Robinson Financial Aid

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Paying for College. Marla Lewis Office of Student Financial Aid

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Scholarship Reporting

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

State Budget Update February 2016

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Shelters Elementary School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Paying for. Cosmetology School S C H O O L B E AU T Y. Financing your new life. beautyschoolnetwork.com pg 1

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

LIM College New York, NY

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

UCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

FINANCING YOUR COLLEGE EDUCATION

Transportation Equity Analysis

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Educational Attainment

Federal Update. Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Dept. of ED, Federal Student Aid WHITE HOUSE STUDENT LOAN INITIATIVES

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Program Integrity Regs: Clock Hour Programs. To Be or Not To Be a Clock Hour Program? NCASFAA Fall Conference. November 7-9, 2011.

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

How Do Colleges Respond to Accountability Pressures? Examining the Relationship between Cohort Default Rates and College Pricing

Raw Data Files Instructions

Rural Education in Oregon

WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS

Overview of Access and Affordability at UC Davis


Bellevue University Admission Application

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & TECHNOLOGIES - 45 Months. On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates)

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

ANALYSIS: LABOUR MARKET SUCCESS OF VOCATIONAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

Financial Aid & Merit Scholarships Workshop

Cooper Upper Elementary School

How to Prepare for the Growing Price Tag

Braiding Funds. Registered Apprenticeship

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Clock Hour Workshop. June 28, Clock Hours

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Arkansas Beauty School-Little Rock Esthetics Program Consumer Packet 8521 Geyer Springs Road, Unit 30 Little Rock, AR 72209

BASIC EDUCATION IN GHANA IN THE POST-REFORM PERIOD

Swarthmore College Common Data Set

In 2010, the Teach Plus-Indianapolis Teaching Policy Fellows, a cohort of early career educators teaching

Ready, willing, and unable:

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

Principal vacancies and appointments

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

STUDENT 16/17 FUNDING GUIDE LOANS & GRANTS FOR FULL-TIME POST-SECONDARY STUDIES

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Transcription:

Trends in For-Profit Postsecondary Education: Enrollment, Prices, Student Aid and Outcomes By Sandy Baum & Kathleen Payea This policy brief provides data on enrollments, prices, student characteristics, student aid, and completion rates at for-profit postsecondary institutions. The evidence provided here is intended to inform discussions of the rapid growth of the sector in recent years. Enrollments Between fall 2000 and fall 2009, full-time enrollment in degree-granting institutions in the for-profit sector increased from 366,000 to 1.5 million. In just nine years, the sector went from enrolling 4% of full-time students (and 3% of all students) to enrolling 11% of full-time students (and 9% of all students). Among students in this sector, 61% are enrolled in institutions that offer four-year degrees, are in two-year institutions, and 15% attend less-than-two-year institutions. Undergraduates account for 86% of the total. Among students in the for-profit sector, 76% are enrolled full-time, compared to 62% of postsecondary students overall. 1 FIGURE 1: Enrollment Status, Fall 2009 Part-Time Full-Time 36% 38% 77% 76% 64% 62% Undergraduates All Students Undergraduates All Students For-Profit Institutions All Institutions Source: National Center for Education Statistics, Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2009; Graduation Rates 2003 & 2006 Cohorts; and Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 2009. NCES 2011-230, Table 1. The for-profit sector plays a relatively larger role in awarding certificates and two-year degrees, but it has a presence at all levels. In 2007-08, 58,000 students earned graduate degrees from this sector. The 7% of all graduate degrees awarded in the for-profit sector represented an increase from just 1% a decade earlier. Among students who earned bachelor s degrees, 76,000 (5% of the total) came from the for-profit sector in 2007-08. The for-profit sector awarded 127,000 associate degrees 17% of the total. 2 www.collegeboard.org/trends 1

Published Prices Average published tuition and fees for full-time students at for-profit institutions are about half as high as those at private nonprofit colleges and universities, but they are much higher than those in the public sector. In 2010-11, the average price of a year at a public two-year college is 19% of the average price of a year at a for-profit institution, and public four-year tuition and fees average 55% of the for-profit price. Table 1: Average Published Tuition and Fees for Full-Time Undergraduates (Enrollment-Weighted), 2010-11 2010-11 Sector Tuition and Fees Relative to For-Profit Institutions Difference Public Two-Year $2,713 0.19 -$11,222 Public Four-Year In-State $7,605 0.55 -$6,330 Public Four-Year Out-of-State $19,595 1.41 $5,660 Four-Year $27,293 1.96 $13,358 For-Profit $13,935 1.00 $0 Source: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Table 1a. Family Incomes Most students enrolled in for-profit institutions are independent of their parents for purposes of federal financial aid. To be in this category, they must be age 24 or older; be married or have dependents; or be in the military, be veterans, be orphans or be wards of the court. Dependent students enrolled in for-profit institutions tend to come from families with lower incomes than students enrolled in other sectors. Figure 2: Family Income Distribution of Dependent Students Within Postsecondary Sectors, 2007-08 Less than $40,000 $40,000 $79,999 $80,000 $119,999 $120,000 or More Postsecondary Sector Doctorate-Granting Four-Year Non-Doctorate-Granting Public Doctorate-Granting Public Four-Year Non-Doctorate-Granting Public Two-Year For-Profit 17% 25% 21% 34% 35% 37% 54% 26% 29% 34% 15% 19% 10% 11% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage of Students Source: The College Board, Education Pays 2010, Figure 2.4b. In 2007-08, 75% of students at for-profit institutions were independent, compared to 36% of those enrolled in public two-year colleges and lower percentages in other sectors. Among dependent students in the for-profit sector, 54% came from families with incomes below $40,000. This compares to 35% of public two-year students, about 25% of public four-year students, and about 20% of private nonprofit students. www.collegeboard.org/trends 2

Student Aid Thirty-four percent of all independent students received Pell Grants in 2007-08, compared to 22% of dependent students. Because of the disproportionate representation of independent and low-income dependent students at for-profit institutions, a relatively large share of federal aid goes to students in this sector. 3 Table 2: Percentage of Federal Financial Aid Going to Students in the For-Profit Sector, 2008-09 2008-09 Pell Grants Campus-Based Aid 8% Academic Competitiveness Grants 3% SMART Grants 8% Subsidized Stafford Loans 25% Unsubsidized Stafford Loans PLUS Loans 12% Source: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 7. Although students in the for-profit sector received of all Pell Grant funds in 2008-09, and slightly higher percentages of both subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford Loans, they accounted for 12% of PLUS Loans, 8% of SMART Grants and Campus-Based Aid, and only 3% of Academic Competitiveness Grants. Despite their high Pell Grant eligibility, dependent students in for-profit institutions receive less total grant aid on average than do students in private nonprofit and public four-year colleges and universities. Table 3: Average Grant Aid per Full-Time Dependent Undergraduate Student, by Sector, 2007-08 Federal Grants State Grants Institutional Grants Total Grants Total $870 $760 $2,270 $4,340 Public Two-Year $770 $320 $160 $1,380 Public Four-Year $830 $960 $1,140 $3,370 Four-Year $880 $980 $7,290 $9,930 For-Profit $1,570 $230 $140 $2,100 Note: Public four-year includes out-of-state students. Total grants include grants from employers and other private sources, in addition to the grants itemized in the table. Source: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) 2008. www.collegeboard.org/trends 3

Students in the for-profit sector are less likely to receive either state grants or institutional grants than students in other sectors. In 2007-08, full-time undergraduate students in private nonprofit institutions received an average of over $7,000 in institutional grant aid, compared to about $140 for those in for-profit institutions. Public four-year college students received slightly more than $1,100 per student. Average total grant aid per full-time undergraduate student was over $9,900 in private nonprofit colleges and about $3,400 in public four-year institutions, compared to $2,100 in the for-profit sector, where students are from lower-income backgrounds. In 2007-08, undergraduate students in the for-profit sector received three-quarters of their grant aid from the federal government and only 7% from the institutions they attended. In contrast, only 9% of the grant aid to students in the private nonprofit sector was from the federal government, while about three-quarters was from institutional sources. Figure 3: Sources of Grant Aid to All Full-Time Dependent Undergraduate Students, by Sector, 2007-08 % Federal % State % Institutional % Other For-Profit 75% 11% 7% 8% Public Two-Year 56% 12% 9% Public Four-Year 25% 34% 13% Four-Year 9% 10% 73% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage of Aid Note: Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. Source: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) 2008. Net Prices Table 4: Net Prices of Low-Income, Full-Time Dependent Students, by Sector, 2007-08 Public Two-Year Public Four-Year In-State For-Profit (Lowest T&F (2nd T&F (3rd T&F (Highest T&F Published Tuition and Fees $1,420 $5,330 $11,970 $9,330 $20,800 $27,130 $34,380 Total Grants $3,130 $7,050 $3,610 $7,700 $14,550 $17,620 $21,860 Net Tuition and Fees $0 $0 $8,360 $1,630 $6,250 $9,510 $12,520 Net Room and Board and Other Costs $6,480 $9,030 $8,150 $10,400 $11,150 $11,060 $11,620 Net Cost of Attendance $6,480 $9,030 $16,510 $12,030 $17,400 $20,570 $24,140 Note: Low income is defined as annual income less than $32,500. Grants are from all sources, including federal and state governments, institutions, and private sources. Other costs include books and supplies, transportation, and basic living costs as reported by institutions in student budget calculations. Net prices for private nonprofit four-year colleges and universities are reported by level of tuition and fees. Source: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figures 8a, 8b, 9a, and 9b. www.collegeboard.org/trends 4

In 2007-08, dependent students from families with incomes below $32,500 who enrolled full-time in public two-year and four-year institutions received, on average, enough grant aid to cover their entire tuition and fees. In contrast, similar students enrolled in for-profit institutions paid average net tuition and fees of about $8,400. Their average total grant aid was similar to that received by public two-year college students and lower than that received by public and private nonprofit four-year college students. Net tuition prices in the for-profit sector were higher than not only those in the lowest-price quartile of private nonprofit colleges, which have lower sticker prices, but also than those in the second quartile, where sticker prices are higher but grant aid diminishes the net prices. Students in the more expensive half of private nonprofit colleges paid average net prices higher than those in the for-profit sector. Graduation Rates Bachelor s degree completion rates are much lower in the for-profit sector than in other sectors. Of first-time full-time students who began studying for a bachelor s degree at a four-year institution in 2002, 57% earned a B.A. at the institution at which they began within six years. Completion rates averaged 65% at private nonprofit, 55% at public four-year, and 22% at private for-profit institutions. Within each racial/ethnic group, four-year degree completion rates are over twice as high in the private nonprofit sector as in the for-profit sector. Among whites and blacks, the proportion of entrants who earned a bachelor s degree within six years was almost three times as high at private nonprofit colleges and universities as it was in the for-profit sector. Among those students at for-profit four-year institutions, 16% of blacks and of Hispanics who enrolled in 2002 had earned a bachelor s degree six years later. Among those who enrolled at public four-year colleges and universities, 39% of blacks and 46% of Hispanics had earned degrees. The gaps between completion rates for black first-time full-time students and those for white and Asian students are larger in the forprofit sector than in the public and private nonprofit sectors. Figure 4: Percentage of First-Time Full-Time Students Beginning Bachelor s Degree Programs in 2002 Who Earned a B.A. at the Original Institution Within Four Years, Five Years, or Six Years, by Sector 80% Four Years Five Years Six Years Completion Rate 60% 40% 20% 0% 61% 65% 55% 57% 51% 49% 52% 36% 30% 22% 14% 17% Public For-Profit Total Four-Year Sector Source: The College Board, Education Pays 2010, Figure 2.6a. www.collegeboard.org/trends 5

Figure 5: Percentage of First-Time Full-Time Students Beginning Bachelor s Degree Programs in 2002 Who Earned a B.A. at the Original Institution Within Six Years, by Sector and Race/Ethnicity Four-Year Public Four-Year For-Profit Four-Year 80% Completion Rate 60% 40% 20% 0% 67% 57% 26% White, Non-Hispanic 75% 65% 60% 45% 46% 39% 36% 16% Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander Race/Ethnicity Source: The College Board, Education Pays 2010, Figure 2.6b. Reported completion rates for two-year institutions include both two-year degrees and certificates earned over shorter periods of time. These completion rates for students who began their studies in 2004 were highest in the for-profit sector, where 60% of full-time students completed their credentials within three years, compared to 50% of those in private nonprofit and 22% of those attending public two-year colleges. Endnotes: 1 College Board (2010). Trends in College Pricing, Figure 17a; National Center for Education Statistics (2011). Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2009; Graduation Rates, 2003 & 2006 Cohorts; and Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 2009. NCES 2011-230. 2 College Board (2010). Trends in College Pricing, Figure 19. 3 National Center for Education Statistics (2008). National Postsecondary Student Aid Study 2008. 2011 The College Board. College Board and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. All other products and services may be trademarks of their respective owners. Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org. 11b-3376 www.collegeboard.org/trends 6