General Studies/General Education eportfolio Holistic Assessment Rubric Salt Lake Community College 1

Similar documents
eportfolio Assessment of General Education

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

BPS Information and Digital Literacy Goals

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

DIGITAL GAMING & INTERACTIVE MEDIA BACHELOR S DEGREE. Junior Year. Summer (Bridge Quarter) Fall Winter Spring GAME Credits.

Page 1 of 8 REQUIRED MATERIALS:

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Secondary English-Language Arts

Senior Project Information

Chemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

SAMPLE SYLLABUS. Master of Health Care Administration Academic Center 3rd Floor Des Moines, Iowa 50312

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Syllabus for GBIB 634 Wisdom Literature 3 Credit hours Spring 2014

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Unit purpose and aim. Level: 3 Sub-level: Unit 315 Credit value: 6 Guided learning hours: 50

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Graduate Program in Education

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Multi-genre Writing Assignment

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Writing Effective Program Learning Outcomes. Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

Lucy Caulkins Writing Rubrics

Syllabus for ART 365 Digital Photography 3 Credit Hours Spring 2013

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Kindergarten Foundations of America

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Stakeholder Debate: Wind Energy

Space Travel: Lesson 2: Researching your Destination

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

What does Quality Look Like?

The Multi-genre Research Project

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Communication Skills for Architecture Students

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Table of Contents. Course Delivery Method. Instructor Information. Phone: Office hours: Table of Contents. Course Description

eportfolio for Your Professional Teaching Practice

GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK Master of Science Programs in Biostatistics

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Co-op Placement Packet

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

A Guide to Student Portfolios

MULTIMEDIA Motion Graphics for Multimedia

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17. Syllabus

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies Master of Professional Studies in Human Resources Management Course Syllabus Summer 2014

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Florida Reading for College Success

An Introduction to LEAP

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

THE WEB 2.0 AS A PLATFORM FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS, IMPROVE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND DESIGNER CAREER PROMOTION IN THE UNIVERSITY

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

Syllabus for PRP 428 Public Relations Case Studies 3 Credit Hours Fall 2012

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Lesson Plan. Preparation

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

My Identity, Your Identity: Historical Landmarks/Famous Places

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

Transcription:

Student S#: General Studies/General Education eportfolio Holistic Assessment Rubric Salt Lake Community College 1 URL: Organization of the eportfolio Effective Communication (Based upon assignments) Quantitative Literacy (Based on assignments) Indicators Performance Levels Not Done Poor Satisfactory Exemplary 1. Welcome Section 2. My Goals Section 3. Learning Outside the Classroom Section 4. Reflective Writing 5. Resume Section Not Done Done But No Resume Done And Resume Included 6. Platform Used: Yola Wordpress Weebly Other: 7. The student writes in multiple genres. 8. When making an argument, the student puts forward a thesis or assertion that is supported by credible evidence and/or logic. 9. The student organizes and presents ideas and information orally according to standard usage. 10. The student approaches practical problems by choosing and applying appropriate mathematical techniques. 11. The student can use and interpret information represented as data, graphs, tables, or schematics in a variety of disciplines. 1 Permission granted to third parties to use this rubric in whole or in part, if attribution is given to Salt Lake Community College. 1

Critical Thinking (Based only on assignments, except items 18 and 19) Civic and Professional Engagement (Based on assignments, reflection, and learning outside the classroom entries) 12. The student demonstrates problem- solving skills. 13. The student makes connections across disciplines. (Check assignments and reflection) 14. The student engages in creative expression. (Check assignments and reflection) 15. The student demonstrates higher- order skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. 16. The student uses the scientific method or demonstrates that they understand it. 17. The student demonstrates knowledge of the politics, economics, and/or historical development of the United States. 18. The student demonstrates knowledge of global politics, economics, historical development, and/or geography. 19. The student works with others in a professional and constructive manner. 20. The student grapples with the contemporary and historical significance of diversity in American life. 21. Evidence of the Service Learning Student Student Life and Lead student s engagement in Athletics Government COOP extra and co- curricular Clubs Internship Other Activities: activities at SLCC. Globe Media Intramural Sports 2

Lifetime Wellness (Based on assignments and reflection for LW courses) Computer and Information Literacy (Based on assignments) 22. The student understands the importance of physical activity and its connection to lifelong wellness which may include how participation in a fitness, sport or leisure activity results in daily benefits including stress reduction, endorphin release, and a sense of well- being. 23. The student gathers information using technology, library resources and other modalities. 24. The student uses credible sources in their work. 25. The student appropriately cites his/her sources. 26. The student uses contemporary hardware and software to effectively complete college- level assignments. Hardware Digital Camera Video Camera Audio Recording Eq. Scanner Software Word Processing Presentation Spreadsheet Database Image Manipulation Video Editing Audio Editing... 3

Indicators #1-3 Decision Rules for eportfolio Holistic Assessment Rubric Decision Rules First check to see if the eportfolio has the appropriate section. Then check the quality of the page and its written and graphical contents: Poor The page is confusing (or clear but very basic), with little or no content or elaboration. Satisfactory The page is representative of good work from a typical college sophomore: It is clearly organized and contains elaboration or significant content. Exemplary The page meets the Satisfactory designation AND the rater would pick out this page to show to an external audience or as an example for other students to emulate. #4 The rater examines the reflective writing in the eportfolio, using the Commonsense Reflective Writing Rubric as a guide. Not Done The eportfolio does not contain reflective writing. Poor The majority of the reflective writing falls into the Clearly Below Expectations or Progressing Towards Expectations categories of the Commonsense Reflective Writing Rubric. Satisfactory The majority of the reflective writing falls into the Meets Expectations category. Exemplary The majority of the reflective writing falls into the Exceeds Expectations category. #5 Self explanatory check one box. #6 Self- explanatory. If Other write the platform name. 4

#7 The rater counts the number of written artifacts in the portfolio that represent distinct genres. No double counting within a given genre (i.e., two lab reports represents ability to write in one genre). Genres to look for include: argument papers; analysis papers, lab reports, critiques, business writing, Powerpoint/Keynote presentations, poster presentations. No Evidence One or zero artifacts representing different genres. Little Two artifacts representing different genres. Some Three or four artifacts representing different genres. Considerable Five or more artifacts representing different genres. #8 The rater examines only those artifacts in which the student is formulating an argument. No Evidence No artifacts that put forth an argument. Little The artifacts tend to not have recognizable theses and/or little solid supporting evidence or logic. Some The artifacts have identifiable theses and supporting evidence or logic. Considerable The artifacts have strong theses and excellent supporting evidence or logic. #9 The rater examines only audio or video files in which the student is making an oral presentation. No Evidence The portfolio contains no oral presentations. Little The portfolio contains one oral presentation. Some The portfolio contains two oral presentations. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more oral presentations. #10 The rater checks assignments to see if the student approaches practical problems by choosing and applying appropriate mathematical techniques. No Evidence No use of mathematical tools to solve problems. Little Students apply more than one mathematical tool to attempt to solve problems but are unable to interpret the result correctly. Some Students apply mathematical tools to solve most problems and are able to comprehend the results. Considerable Students apply the most effective mathematical tools to solve all problems and are able to synthesize the results concisely. 5

#11 The rater examines artifacts in which the student was asked to use and interpret information represented as data, graphs, tables, or schematics. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts in which the student used and/or interpreted information represented as data, graphs, tables, or schematics. Little The portfolio contains one artifact in which the student used and/or interpreted information represented as data, graphs, tables, or schematics. Some The portfolio contains two artifacts in which the student used and/or interpreted information represented as data, graphs, tables, or schematics. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more artifacts in which the student used and/or interpreted information represented as data, graphs, tables, or schematics. #12 The rater examines artifacts in which the student was asked to deal with an unstructured problem. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts in which the student addressed an unstructured problem. Little The portfolio contains one artifact in which the student addressed an unstructured problem. Some The portfolio contains two artifacts in which the student addressed an unstructured problem. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more artifacts in which the student addressed an unstructured problem. #13 The rater examines artifacts from assignments and reflection. No Evidence There appear to be no cross- disciplinary connections being made in the eportfolio. Little The eportfolio contains one attempt to connect assignments or entire courses across disciplines. Some The eportfolio contains two or three attempts to connect assignments or entire courses across disciplines. Considerable The eportfolio contains four or more attempts to connect assignments or entire courses across disciplines. #14 The rater examines artifacts from assignments and reflection. No Evidence The portfolio contains no assignments or reflection that exhibit creative expression. Little The portfolio contains one strong instance of creative expression. Some The portfolio contains two strong instances of creative expression. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more strong instances of creative expression. 6

#15 The rater examines artifacts from assignments and reflection. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts or reflection in which the student exhibits analysis, synthesis, or evaluation. Little The portfolio contains one artifact or reflective writing in which the student exhibits analysis, synthesis, or evaluation. Some The portfolio contains two artifacts or reflective writing in which the student exhibits analysis, synthesis, or evaluation. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more artifacts or reflective writing in which the student exhibits analysis, synthesis, or evaluation. #16 The rater examines artifacts from assignments and reflection. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts or reflection in which the student demonstrates understanding of the scientific method. Little The portfolio contains one strong example of the student s understanding of the scientific method. Some The portfolio contains two strong examples of the student s understanding of the scientific method. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more strong examples of the student s understanding of the scientific method. #17 The rater examines artifacts from assignments. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts demonstrating knowledge of the politics, economics, social issues, and/or historical development of the United States. Little The portfolio contains one artifact demonstrating knowledge of the politics, economics, social issues, and/or historical development of the United States. Some The portfolio contains two artifacts demonstrating knowledge of the politics, economics, social issues, and/or historical development of the United States. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more artifacts demonstrating knowledge of the politics, economics, social issues, and/or historical development of the United States. 7

#18 The rater examines artifacts from assignments. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts demonstrating knowledge of global politics, economics, historical development, and/or geography. Little The portfolio contains one artifact demonstrating knowledge of global politics, economics, historical development, and/or geography. Some The portfolio contains two artifacts demonstrating knowledge of global politics, economics, historical development, and/or geography. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more artifacts demonstrating knowledge of global politics, economics, historical development, and/or geography. #19 The rater examines artifacts from assignments and reflection. No Evidence The portfolio contains no evidence that the student can work with others in a professional and constructive manner. Little The portfolio contains one piece of evidence that the student can work with others in a professional and constructive manner. Some The portfolio contains two pieces of evidence that the student can work with others in a professional and constructive manner. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more pieces of evidence that the student can work with others in a professional and constructive manner. #20 The rater examines artifacts from assignments and reflection. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts or reflection in which the student has grappled with the contemporary and historical significance of diversity in American life. Little The portfolio contains one artifact or example of reflection in which the student has grappled with the contemporary and historical significance of diversity in American life. Some The portfolio contains two artifacts or examples of reflection in which the student has grappled with the contemporary and historical significance of diversity in American life. Considerable The portfolio contains three or more artifacts or examples of reflection in which the student has grappled with the contemporary and historical significance of diversity in American life. #21 Self Explanatory check the appropriate boxes. #22 The rater examines the assignment (s) and reflection from LW courses. No Evidence The portfolio contains no artifacts or reflection in which the student expresses an understanding of the importance of physical activity and its connection to lifelong wellness. 8

Little At least one artifact or instance of reflection in which the student minimally expresses an understanding of the importance of physical activity and its connection to lifelong wellness. Some At least one artifact or instance of reflection in which the student adequately expresses an understanding of the importance of physical activity and its connection to lifelong wellness. Considerable At least one artifact or instance of reflection in which the student effectively expresses an understanding of the importance of physical activity and its connection to lifelong wellness. #23 The rater examines the sources the student has cited in the portfolio, looking for instances of outside- of- class resources that indicate the student relied on the library, online databases, or other modalities to do research. No Evidence No outside- of- class resources appear to have been used by this student. Little One artifact indicates the use of sources that required research outside of class. Some Two or Three artifacts indicate the use of sources that required research outside of class. Considerable Four or more artifacts indicate the use of sources that required research outside of class. #24 The rater examines the sources the student has cited in the portfolio, looking for use of credible sources. No Evidence Credible sources appear not to have been used by this student. Little One artifact indicates the use of credible sources that required research outside of class. Some Two or Three artifacts indicate the use of credible sources that required research outside of class. Considerable Four or more artifacts indicate the use of credible sources that required research outside of class. #25 The rater examines the sources the student has cited in the portfolio, looking at whether those sources were sufficiently documented. No Evidence Sources appear not to have been documented by this student. Little One artifact indicates the use of sufficiently documented sources. Some Two or Three artifacts indicate the use of sufficiently documented sources. Considerable Four or more artifacts indicate the use of sufficiently documented sources. #26 Self explanatory check the appropriate boxes. 9