Improving Conversational Interaction for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Similar documents
cmp-lg/ Jan 1998

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Guru: A Computer Tutor that Models Expert Human Tutors

Dialog Act Classification Using N-Gram Algorithms

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Language Acquisition Chart

Modeling Dialogue Building Highly Responsive Conversational Agents

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

REVIEW OF CONNECTED SPEECH

Client Psychology and Motivation for Personal Trainers

Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction

An Analysis of Gender Differences in Minimal Responses in the conversations in the two TV-series Growing Pains and Boy Meets World

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

MYCIN. The MYCIN Task

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

How to analyze visual narratives: A tutorial in Visual Narrative Grammar

Section 7, Unit 4: Sample Student Book Activities for Teaching Listening

Part I. Figuring out how English works

BODY LANGUAGE ANIMATION SYNTHESIS FROM PROSODY AN HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY

Communication Strategies for Children who have Rett Syndrome: Partner-Assisted Communication with PODD

Lecturing in the Preclinical Curriculum A GUIDE FOR FACULTY LECTURERS

Conversation Starters: Using Spatial Context to Initiate Dialogue in First Person Perspective Games

GROUNDING IN COMMUNICATION

Pragmatic Functions of Discourse Markers: A Review of Related Literature

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

How to make an A in Physics 101/102. Submitted by students who earned an A in PHYS 101 and PHYS 102.

Assessing Entailer with a Corpus of Natural Language From an Intelligent Tutoring System

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit I Careers in Law Enforcement

Language-driven nonverbal communication in a bilingual. Conversational Agents

AN INTRODUCTION (2 ND ED.) (LONDON, BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC PP. VI, 282)

Handout 2.10a: 24 Operating Principles and the Verbal Behaviors That Go with Them Cultivating Classroom Discourse to Make Student Thinking Visible

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Multi-modal Sensing and Analysis of Poster Conversations toward Smart Posterboard

On Human Computer Interaction, HCI. Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC

MAKING YOUR OWN ALEXA SKILL SHRIMAI PRABHUMOYE, ALAN W BLACK

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Effective Practice Briefings: Robert Sylwester 03 Page 1 of 12

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Lecturing Module

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta

CO-ORDINATION OF SPEECH AND GESTURE IN SEQUENCE AND TIME: PHONETIC AND NON-VERBAL DETAIL IN FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION. Rein Ove Sikveland

Master s Thesis. An Agent-Based Platform for Dialogue Management

Eyebrows in French talk-in-interaction

Ontologies vs. classification systems

Why Misquitoes Buzz in People s Ears (Part 1 of 3)

Rhythm-typology revisited.

MULTIMEDIA Motion Graphics for Multimedia

The Strong Minimalist Thesis and Bounded Optimality

What is a Mental Model?

DIGITAL GAMING & INTERACTIVE MEDIA BACHELOR S DEGREE. Junior Year. Summer (Bridge Quarter) Fall Winter Spring GAME Credits.

Eliciting Language in the Classroom. Presented by: Dionne Ramey, SBCUSD SLP Amanda Drake, SBCUSD Special Ed. Program Specialist

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Schedule Preference Survey Results

teaching issues 4 Fact sheet Generic skills Context The nature of generic skills

Stephanie Ann Siler. PERSONAL INFORMATION Senior Research Scientist; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

LQVSumm: A Corpus of Linguistic Quality Violations in Multi-Document Summarization

Phonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

Segmented Discourse Representation Theory. Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure

UC Santa Cruz Graduate Research Symposium 2016

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Linking object names and object categories: Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month-olds

Non-Secure Information Only

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Getting a Sound Bite Across. Heather Long, MD ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting Clearwater, FL March 28, 2015

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

An Architecture to Develop Multimodal Educative Applications with Chatbots

E-3: Check for academic understanding

WORKSHOP PAPERS Tutorial Dialogue Systems

Knowledge Elicitation Tool Classification. Janet E. Burge. Artificial Intelligence Research Group. Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Discourse Cues That Respondents Have Misunderstood Survey Questions

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

SCHEMA ACTIVATION IN MEMORY FOR PROSE 1. Michael A. R. Townsend State University of New York at Albany

Is There a Role for Tutor in Group Work: Peer Interaction in a Hong Kong EFL Classroom

Atypical Prosodic Structure as an Indicator of Reading Level and Text Difficulty

MATH 205: Mathematics for K 8 Teachers: Number and Operations Western Kentucky University Spring 2017

The Indiana Cooperative Remote Search Task (CReST) Corpus

THE ALLEGORY OF THE CATS By David J. LeMaster

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

CLIL across Contexts: A scaffolding framework for CLIL teacher education

Case study Norway case 1

Grammar Lesson Plan: Yes/No Questions with No Overt Auxiliary Verbs

Longest Common Subsequence: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Handwritten Essays

A Dialog-Based Intelligent Tutoring System For Practicing Battle Command Reasoning. Joan M. Ryder CHI Systems, Inc.

TA Certification Course Additional Information Sheet

Digital Fabrication and Aunt Sarah: Enabling Quadratic Explorations via Technology. Michael L. Connell University of Houston - Downtown

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

Discourse Structure in Spoken Language: Studies on Speech Corpora

Transcription:

Improving Conversational Interaction for Intelligent Tutoring Systems Tanner Jackson, Heather Hite Mitchell, Art Graesser, and Max Louwerse University of Memphis

What is AutoTutor? An intelligent tutoring system that incorporates teaching strategies modeled after human tutors. Originally designed to teach computer literacy in three topic areas (hardware, operating systems, and the internet). The redesigned, web-enabled versions include tutoring for computer literacy and conceptual physics.

What does AutoTutor do? Asks questions and presents problems Comprehends student answers (keyboard, not speech) Gives feedback on student answers Agent displays emotions and conversational responses Corrects bugs and misconceptions Adds information that is missed Provides the student with hints Prompts for specific information Answers student questions Manages mixed-initiative tutorial dialog

AutoTutor Language Extraction Topic/Problem Selection Speech act classifier Dialog Management Latent Semantic Analysis Curriculum Script Animated Agent

How does AutoTutor Interact? Makes use of the Dialog Advancer Network (DAN) Used to improve the structure of conversational turntaking during the tutoring sessions. Determines appropriate thresholds for the Discourse Markers and Short Feedback. Uses Discourse Markers to improve the smoothness and naturalness of conversation. Uses an Animated Agent to display selected Discourse Markers and Short Feedback, as well as emphasize important aspects in a topic.

What is a discourse marker? Discourse Markers (Schiffrin, 1987) devices for marking transition points in discourse Cue Words (Grosz & Sidner, 1986; Knott, 1996) devices cueing hearer to a change in discourse structure Discourse Operators (Polanyi & Scha, 1985) Devices marking movement between two discourse units Cohesion Relations (Louwerse, 2001) markers cueing comprehenders how to build a mental representation

DM s: Previous Versions of AutoTutor DM were generated intuitively Transition DM: randomly selected from small bags of words or phrases e.g. and, furthermore, moving on Feedback DM : used to serve a pedagogical function Only 21 markers covering Positive, Neutral, and Negative feedback

Toward a Data-driven Taxonomy: Method Substitution test (Knott, 1996) Synonyms (x and y replace each other) Hypernyms (x replaces y but not vice versa) Hyponyms (y replaced by x but can t replace x) yes oh yeah yeah alright no doubt that s nice yes no way

Toward a Data-driven Taxonomy: Materials Santa Barbara Corpus 14 natural dialogs 7557 turns with 3125 DM tokens & 170 types Additional DM Penn Treebank Project CELEX database Other studies

Toward a Data-driven Taxonomy: Procedure 196 start-of-turn discourse markers Markers start of 3817 turns, yielding 748132 needed substitutions Formula used: (5 substitutions per DM) + (5% of total DM freq) Resulted in 747 tokens and 145665 substitutions Two trained grad students (Alpha =.797)

Initial Results apparently that's right Kind of I know yeah No doubt Of course exactly Oh that's right Oh yes yep yes that's true Oh yeah unhunh mhm basically since hell right That's fine because and man definitely sure cause In fact

4 Categories of Data-driven 1) DIRECTION backward & forward Taxonomy 2) CONTINUITY continuous, neutral & discontinuous 3) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT acknowledge & part. acknowledge 4) EMPHATICS emphatic & non-emphatic

DIRECTION BACKWARD relations - relate to previous utterance but does not require any further communicative act - AutoTutor s feedback - (e.g. okay) FORWARD relations - relate to the previous utterance but requires a further communicative act in addition to the relation. - (e.g. In addition) - AutoTutor s Transition Discourse Markers

CONTINUITY CONTINUOUS relations: follow up the response expected by the speaker (e.g. no doubt) DISCONTINUOUS relations: violate the response expected by the speaker (e.g. Oh no) NEUTRAL relations: don t explicitly follow the implicature of the speech act, but do not violate it either. (e.g. I guess)

Continuous Relations really like Oh yeah definitely exactly talking about n'kay surely You bet I ll bet n'yes I bet There you go that's nice there you have it course Oh good I know mhm That's fine No doubt

Continuous DM in AutoTutor TUTOR: STUDENT: TUTOR: TUTOR: STUDENT: TUTOR: TUTOR: TUTOR: Which container will accelerate less? the one with the larger mass good Now, When the same force is applied to both containers, the larger mass will accelerate? less right accelerate less Once again, Since mass times acceleration is equal to force, the larger mass will accelerate less for the same force.

Discontinuous Relations Oh no oh shit uh-oh Too bad man shit oh great ugh no oh gosh Oh man oh dear jeez ew gee tough oh boy yuck dang hell

Discontinuous DM in AutoTutor TUTOR: TUTOR: STUDENT: TUTOR: TUTOR: TUTOR: What's more, So what about If the man speeds up, will the egg land behind the man a little bit? behind the man a lot? next to the man? or in front of the man? behind the man a little bit not really That is not right. next to the man

Neutral Relations just maybe ooo look possibly on the other hand I guess so then otherwise possibly

ACKNOWLEDGMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT relations: fully acknowledge the implicature of the utterance expressed by the speaker e.g. alright PART-ACKNOWLEDGMENT relations: acknowledge the general implicature of the speech act expressed by the speaker, but add some comments to it e.g. but then again

EMPHATICS EMPHATIC relations: emphasize the continuity or discontinuity e.g. Bravo, Nonsense NON-EMPHATIC relations: dispassionate about the continuity or discontinuity e.g. hm

Improved Discourse markers in AutoTutor Bags of discourse markers now based on taxonomy continuous - neutral - discontinuous LSA scores determine choice of marker Conversational dialog!

Animated Conversational Agent

Animated Conversational Agent Purpose To aid in conversational interaction To display appropriate feedback Design Created in Poser 4, by Curious Labs Compiled using ACE Displayed using MS Agent Selection Discourse Markers Short Feedback Back Channel Feedback

Animated Conversational Agent Discourse Markers right speaks phrase while nodding head nope speaks phrase while shaking head kind of speaks phrase and tilts head Short Feedback Pumps Hints Prompts Normal Conversational Dialog Discusses the topics Used to explain pictures / images

Animated DM Examples Yeah Big Yeah Hesitant Yeah Yeah with Proclivity

Conversational Behaviors Head Movements Facial Expressions Intonation Gaze Behaviors Hand Gestures Blinking Patterns

Head Movements Nodding/Shaking Behaviors Short feedback dialog moves Back-channel feedback cues Complex dialog moves Scripted in the introduction

Facial Expressions Convey affective states appropriate for tutoring Short feedback dialog moves Other discourse functions: Emphasis Replace utterances Agreement

Intonation Intonation parameters Rate Pitch Pause duration Word Emphasis Some dialog moves require discourse sensitive cues

Gaze Behaviors Primarily used to regulate turn taking Gazes at student: during longer tutor turns when relinquishing the floor during shorter tutor turns when answering questions Looks away from student: at grammatical boundaries when asking a question when graphical displays appear

Gestures Hand Gestures Deictic gestures Attentional gestures Skeptical gestures Blinking Can serve as conversational signals Accentuate a word Denote a pause

AutoTutor By incorporating these animated behaviors into the delivery of the new discourse markers we are making another step toward improving the overall interaction with tutoring systems. http://www.psyc.memphis.edu/autotutor.html

Funding Agencies This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (SBR 9720314 and REC 0106965) and the Department of Defense Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) administered by the Office of Naval Research under grant N00014-00-1-0600. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of ONR or NSF.