SUPERINTENDENT MID-YEAR EVALUATION

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Program Change Proposal:

School Leadership Rubrics

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

State Budget Update February 2016

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Entry Plan for the First 100 Days for Tari N. Thomas. Interim Superintendent of Schools Orange, Petersham and RC Mahar Regional

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

State Parental Involvement Plan

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Frequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS)

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

Program Information. The Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators' Association together with TEACHERS21

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)


STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Practice Learning Handbook

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

School Executive Standard 7: Micro-political Leadership. Dr. Kimberly Simmons NCEES Coordinator

Practice Learning Handbook

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

What Am I Getting Into?

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Administrative Services Manager Information Guide

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

University of Toronto

Subject: Regulation FPU Textbook Adoption and Affordability

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

SPORT CLUB POLICY MANUAL. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINoIS at CHICAGO

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

Holbrook Public Schools

SCRANTONONESTRATEGIC PLAN Working Together for a Brighter Future

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

College Action Project Worksheet for CAP Projects March 18, 2016 Update

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Faculty governance especially the

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Nearing Completion of Prototype 1: Discovery

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Trends & Issues Report

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Transcription:

SUPERINTENDENT MID-YEAR EVALUATION DECEMBER, 2017 Please complete the form below with your assessment of the qualities displayed and priorities met by the Superintendent and the work towards priorities. Please assess based on the Superintendent s time working for the Framingham Public Schools (April-December, 2017) using the data that was provided by Dr. Tremblay as well as your own observation. Please provide comments in reference to your assessments. Please note that the qualities and priorities listed here came directly from the focus groups with the community, teachers, parents and staff during the superintendent search process in December, 2016. NOVEMBER 1-15: NOVEMBER 15-30: DECEMBER 1: DECEMBER 1-11: DECEMBER 12: DECEMBER 12-14: DECEMBER 15: DECEMBER 19: DECEMBER 20: TIMELINE: Dr. Tremblay provides data for evaluation School Committee Members complete evaluation forms School Committee Members submit evaluation forms to Jodi Heather/Jodi compile evaluation responses Draft of evaluation submitted to the School Committee Committee submits any edits and changes to Jodi Jodi sends final version of mid-year evaluation to the School Committee Final Mid-Year Evaluation voted on at the School Committee Meeting Mid-Year Evaluation filed with Human Resources QUALITIES The Superintendent demonstrates strong and effective communication across all stakeholder groups. The Superintendent is engaged in the schools and the community. Indicator IV-F. Managing Conflict: Employs strategies for responding to disagreement and dissent, constructively resolving conflict and building consensus throughout a district or school community. The Superintendent demonstrates integrity in his role and is able to put his ego aside. 1

DESE Standard II: Management and Operations Indicator II-A. Environment: Develops and executes effective plans, procedures, routines, and operational systems to address a full range of safety, health and emotional and social needs. QUALITIES The Superintendent is innovative and is forward looking in planning and decision-making. DESE Standard I: Instructional Leadership Indicator I-A. Curriculum: Ensures that all instructional staff designs effective and rigorous standards-based units of instruction consisting of well-structured lessons with measurable outcomes. Indicator I-B. Instruction: Ensures that practices in all settings reflect high expectations regarding content and quality of effort and work, engage all students, and are personalized to accommodate diverse learning styles, needs, interests, and levels of readiness. Indicator I-C. Assessment: Ensures that all principals and administrators facilitate practices that propel personnel to use a variety of formal and informal methods and assessments to measure student learning, growth, and understanding and make necessary adjustments to their practice when students are not learning. Indicator I-D. Evaluation: Provides effective and timely supervision and evaluation of all staff in alignment with state regulations and contract provisions. Indicator I-E. Data-Informed Decision Making: Uses multiple sources of evidence related to student learning, including state, district, and school assessment results and growth data, to inform school and district goals and improve organizational performance, educator effectiveness, and student learning. Indicator IV-D. Continuous Learning: Develops and nurtures a culture in which staff members are reflective about their practice and use student data, current research, best practices and theory to continuously adapt practice and achieve improved results. Models these behaviors in the administrator s own practice. The Superintendent takes initiative and gets things done. DESE Standard II: Management and Operations Indicator II-B. Human Resources Management and Development: Implements a cohesive approach to recruitment, hiring, induction, development, and career growth that promotes high-quality and effective practice. Indicator II-E. Fiscal Systems: Develops a budget that supports the district s vision, mission, and goals; allocates and manages expenditures consistent with district-and school-level goals and available resources. 2

Indicator III-A. Engagement: Actively ensures that all families are welcome members of the classroom and school community and can contribute to the effectiveness of the classroom, school, district and community. Indicator III-B. Sharing Responsibility: Continuously collaborates with families and community stakeholders to support student learning and development at home, school and in the community. PRIORITES: FIRST 6 MONTHS The Superintendent is getting to know the schools and the community by spending time in the schools and engaging with community members, teachers and staff. Indicator III-A. Engagement: Actively ensures that all families are welcome members of the classroom and school community and can contribute to the effectiveness of the classroom, school, district and community. Indicator III-B. Sharing Responsibility: Continuously collaborates with families and community stakeholders to support student learning and development at home, school and in the community. Indicator IV-A. Commitment to High Standards: Fosters a shared commitment to high standards of service, teaching and learning with high expectations for achievement for all. Indicator IV-B. Cultural Proficiency: Ensures that policies and practices enable staff members and students to interact effectively in a culturally diverse environment in which students backgrounds, identities, strengths, and challenges are respected. Indicator IV-F. Managing Conflict: Employs strategies for responding to disagreement and dissent, constructively resolving conflict and building consensus throughout a district or school community. The Superintendent is beginning to move the district toward equity in curriculum and services. 3

DESE Standard I: Instructional Leadership Indicator I-A. Curriculum: Ensures that all instructional staff designs effective and rigorous standards-based units of instruction consisting of well-structured lessons with measurable outcomes. Indicator I-B. Instruction: Ensures that practices in all settings reflect high expectations regarding content and quality of effort and work, engage all students, and are personalized to accommodate diverse learning styles, needs, interests, and levels of readiness. Indicator I-C. Assessment: Ensures that all principals and administrators facilitate practices that propel personnel to use a variety of formal and informal methods and assessments to measure student learning, growth, and understanding and make necessary adjustments to their practice when students are not learning. Indicator I-D. Evaluation: Provides effective and timely supervision and evaluation of all staff in alignment with state regulations and contract provisions. Indicator I-E. Data-Informed Decision Making: Uses multiple sources of evidence related to student learning, including state, district, and school assessment results and growth data, to inform school and district goals and improve organizational performance, educator effectiveness, and student learning. DESE Standard II: Management and Operations Indicator II-A. Environment: Develops and executes effective plans, procedures, routines, and operational systems to address a full range of safety, health and emotional and social needs. Indicator II-B. Human Resources Management and Development: Implements a cohesive approach to recruitment, hiring, induction, development, and career growth that promotes high-quality and effective practice. Indicator II-C. Scheduling and Management Information Systems: Uses systems to ensure optimal use of data and time for teaching, learning and collaboration, minimizing disruptions and distractions for school-level staff. Indicator II-D. Laws, Ethics and Policies: Understands and complies with state and federal laws and mandates, school committee policies, collective bargaining agreements, and ethical guidelines. Indicator II-E. Fiscal Systems: Develops a budget that supports the district s vision, mission, and goals; allocates and manages expenditures consistent with district-and school-level goals and available resources. The Superintendent is demonstrating clear and strong communication within the schools, and about the schools to the larger Framingham community on both positive and negative elements. 4

Additional 5