Boise State University Foundational Studies Program Course Application Form

Similar documents
Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

EQuIP Review Feedback

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

CMST 2060 Public Speaking

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Graduate Program in Education

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Language Arts Methods

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Teachers Guide Chair Study

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

BIOH : Principles of Medical Physiology

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

A Guide to Student Portfolios

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Timeline. Recommendations

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Topic 3: Roman Religion

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Writing the Personal Statement

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Florida Reading for College Success

Assessment Method 1: RDEV 7636 Capstone Project Assessment Method Description

Mater Dei Institute of Education A College of Dublin City University

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

What does Quality Look Like?

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

ADVANCED PLACEMENT SPANISH

College of Liberal Arts (CLA)

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Spring 2015 CRN: Department: English CONTACT INFORMATION: REQUIRED TEXT:

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

PHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus

Sul Ross State University Spring Syllabus for ED 6315 Design and Implementation of Curriculum

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Course Syllabus Art History II ARTS 1304

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

Table of Contents. Course Delivery Method. Instructor Information. Phone: Office hours: Table of Contents. Course Description

Training materials on RePro methodology

Secondary English-Language Arts

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

Austin Community College SYLLABUS

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

TASK 1: PLANNING FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Transcription:

Boise State University Foundational Studies Program Course Application Form Due to the Foundational Studies Program by August 19, 2011 After the Foundational Studies Program has approved a course, departments will continue through the regular department and college procedures. The approved course should be submitted to the University Curriculum Committee by October 1, 2011. Table of Contents (Click title to go to that section) Instructions: Instructions:... 1 Part I. Course Information... 1 Part II. Syllabus Statement... 2 Part III. Design for Accessibility... 2 Part IV. Evidence of Quality Course Design... 3 Part V. Additional Justification (Optional)... 3 Review Committee Checklist... 3 Feedback from Review Committee:... 4 Course Design Table... 5 1. Complete one form per course. 2. Attach this Foundational Studies Course Application Form to the back of the University Curriculum Committee Request for Curriculum Action form. Both forms should be submitted to the Foundational Studies Program Office by August 19, 2011. Part I. Course Information Course Number and Title: LATIN 212 Advanced Classical Latin Language and Literature Type of Foundational Studies Course (Choose One): [ ] DLS (Disciplinary Lens Social Science) [x] DLL (Disciplinary Lens Literature and Humanities) [ ] DLV (Disciplinary Lens Visual and Performing Arts) [ ] DLM (Disciplinary Lens Mathematics) [ ] DLN (Disciplinary Lens Natural, Physical, and Applied Sciences) Includes Lab: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] CID (Communication in the Discipline) [ ] FF (Finishing Foundations) Delivery Format(s) (Check all that apply): [x] Face to Face [ ] Fully Online [ ] Hybrid [x] Concurrent Enrollment [x] Other (briefly describe): Video Conferencing 1

Part II. Syllabus Statement In the space below, include the syllabus statement for this course which will appear on the first page of the syllabus for each section of this course. (Template and examples are appended to this application form.) Boise State s Foundational Studies Program provides undergraduates with a broad-based education that spans the entire university experience. LATIN 212: Advanced Classical Latin Language and Literature satisfies 4 units of the Foundational Studies Program s Disciplinary Lens-Literature and Humanities (DLL) requirement. It supports the following University Learning Outcomes, along with a variety of other course-specific goals. 10. Apply knowledge and the methods of inquiry characteristic of literature and other humanities s to interpret and produce texts expressive of the human condition. LATIN 212: Advanced Classical Latin Language and Literature is designed to provide students with a working knowledge of Latin grammar, syntax, and vocabulary at the advanced level and experience translating a variety of extant Latin texts. This course helps to achieve the goals of the Foundational Studies Program by focusing on the following course learning outcomes. After successful completion of this course, students will be able to: Read, interpret, analyze, and translate written discourse in Latin at an advanced level; Accurately pronounce phonetics and translate Latin into English from a variety of source documents at an advanced level; Identify information sources for translating written discourse in Latin and make appropriate use of the material; Exhibit reasoning and problem solving skills during the study and translation of a variety of Latin texts; Negotiate meaning within translations in regard to grammar, vocabulary and syntax in a variety of written contexts appropriate to an advanced level; Compare the ancient cultural context of various texts and authors to their own cultural context; Use knowledge of linguistics and Roman history, culture and literature to inform the translation of texts; Apply an analytical approach to problem solving during translation; Discuss the historic use and preservation of texts and the problems preservation techniques have placed on the task of translation. Part III. Design for Accessibility In the space below, briefly describe plans for providing access to course materials and activities (or equivalent alternatives) to all students in adherence with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Although these plans may vary from instructor to instructor, the descriptions provided below should be representative of intended departmental and instructor practices. (See example statements appended to this form.) 2

LATIN 212: Advanced Classical Latin Language and Literature: Slides and visual aids used in class lectures, insofar as they contain graphs or other visual representations of content, will be verbally described to students on an as-needed basis. A tutoring session is required of all students for assistance and extra practice. Students with documented disabilities may arrange for oral tests, extra time on tests, the provision of note-takers, ASL translators or other accommodations as per the policies of Boise State University s Disability Resource Centre. See the website at http://drc.boisestate.edu. To schedule an appointment contact the DRC at 208-426-1583, or visit the DRC office in the Administration Building, room 114. Part IV. Evidence of Quality Course Design Please use the table below (column headings for this table should not be changed) to provide evidence that the course has been carefully designed and is clearly aligned with Foundational Studies Program desired ULOs. All sections of the course should share similar student learning outcomes. Teaching and Learning Activities and Assessment Methods may vary from instructor to instructor. Please use the table to report representative strategies that may be used. Assessment activities used for reporting to the Foundational Studies Program should be consistent across different sections of the course. Please see below. Part V. Additional Justification (Optional) If the brief justification provided to the University Curriculum Committee in the proposal to accompany the Request for Curriculum Action is not sufficient to make the case for including the course in the Foundational Studies Program, additional (optional) narrative can be added here. The study of Latin language and literature complements all fields of study and promotes diversity through the understanding of culture, which is implicit in the study of any language. Latin language and literature are foundational to modern Western thought, as Latin is the language of law, medicine, and history, and the literature of its various ages continues to influence politicians, philosophers, theologians, tacticians and writers of modern literature. Studying Latin will increase students cognitive skills, language skills and vocabulary, and will prepare them for other university classes requiring writing skills as well as the Graduate Records Exam, should they desire to pursue graduate study. Latin 212: Advanced Latin Language and Literature is the second half of a two-semester sequence on Latin grammar and vocabulary and Roman authors. It focuses on advanced grammar and more complex translations. Review Committee Checklist _X Syllabus Statement - statement introduces the student to the purpose and role of the course in the Foundational Studies Program curriculum. _X An appropriate number of Course Learning Outcomes are specified for the course and are clearly designed to support the Foundational Studies Program ULOs. _X_ Course Learning Outcomes are appropriately designed for level of the course and address both content mastery and skill-based outcomes. 3

_X_ The types and numbers of assessments planned for the course are appropriate for measuring the content or skills being assessed _X_ Course learning activities are likely to promote the achievement of the stated outcomes _X_ Course design and materials have considered best practices for accessibility to course materials and ideas by all students (e.g., alternatives to auditory and visual content) Feedback from Review Committee: The learning objectives do a nice job of explaining how this course will help students to gain skills with Latin language and literature, as well as gain understanding of the cultural context in which the different texts were written. The explanation about accessibility is detailed and complete. Will all sections of the class use all the assignments in the assessment and activities columns on the worksheet (e.g. Moot court)? If not, you might revise the worksheet to clarify that element of the course. This looks like an interesting and challenging course, and certainly fits well with ULO 10 s emphasis on literature. CERTIFIED FOR APPROVAL 9-8-2011. Foundational Studies Program Director Signature Date 4

Boise State University Foundational Studies Course Course Number and Title: LATIN 212 Advanced Classical Latin Language and Literature Course Design Table Foundation Foundation ULO 10 Course Learning Assessment Method: Planned Teaching & ULO 10 Outcomes: Learning Activities / Notions of By the end of this Evidence of Student Pedagogy Criteria Exemplary Work course, each student should be able to Learning ULO 10: Skillfully uses Read, interpret, Paragraph translations Written homework per Critical disciplinary tools analyze, and translate of prose and/or poetry chapter for practice and reading skills and vocabulary written discourse in to be handed in and feedback opportunities. within the appropriate for the Latin at an advanced graded on basis of word course Accurately comprehends appropriate texts Convincingly interprets appropriate texts Insightfully analyzes assigned texts level. selection and sentence structure in English as they correspond with Latin. and reflection on a relevant author will satisfy final assessment. Language lab activities. In-class reading of homework and vocabulary exercises for correction. ULO 10: Articulates Accurately In-class readings and In-class reading, Writing complex ideas in pronounce phonetics paragraph translations pronunciation and and/or clear and coherent and translate Latin of prose and/or poetry discussion of material in speaking language into English from a to be handed in and chapter homework, within the appropriate to the variety of source graded show degree language lab activities, and Demonstrates exemplary skill with grammar and style appropriate for the course documents at an advanced level. Identify information sources for translating written discourse in the Latin language and make appropriate use of the material. of analysis through word choice and English sentence structure. and reflection on a relevant author will satisfy final assessment. quiz materials. Individual translation assignments. Moot Court group activity. Personal reflection journal entries. 5

Foundation Foundation ULO 10 Course Learning Assessment Method: Planned Teaching & ULO 10 Outcomes: Learning Activities / Notions of By the end of this Evidence of Student Pedagogy Criteria Exemplary Work course, each student should be able to Learning ULO 10: Demonstrate a Exhibit reasoning and Moot Court oral Homework assignments Reasoning high level of skill problem solving examinations wherein and language lab activities. within the in logical skills during the students will argue for reasoning in written and oral work appropriate for the course Identify important underlying assumptions Distinguishes pertinent facts from opinions Differentiates claims from reasons Arranges relevant evidence in concise and clear language appropriate for the course study and translation of a variety of Latin texts. Negotiate meaning within translations in regard to grammar, vocabulary and syntax in a variety of written contexts appropriate to the advanced level. or against the adequacy of selected translations. Moot Court reflections will address students experience with assumptions and facts. The reflections will satisfy final assessment criteria. Quizzes and in-class reviews. Reflections on Moot Court. Exams on grammar, syntax and vocabulary test grammatical underpinnings. ULO 10: Exhibits Compare the ancient Exam questions on In-class lecture and Cultural, awareness of and cultural context of relevant Roman discussion on historical historical, sensitivity to various texts and authors, literature and material relating to Roman conceptual, human values by authors to their own the historical context of authors. and linguistic demonstrating cultural context. both. awareness knowledge and appreciation of cultural, historical, conceptual or linguistic differences Explain one s own cultural perspectives make meaningful comparisons with the cultural perspectives of others Use knowledge of linguistics and Roman history, culture and literature to inform their translation of texts. and reflection on a relevant author will satisfy final assessment. Personal reflection journal entries. Exams on grammar, syntax, vocabulary and history. Homework assignments and language lab activities. 6

Foundation Foundation ULO 10 Course Learning Assessment Method: Planned Teaching & ULO 10 Outcomes: Learning Activities / Notions of By the end of this Evidence of Student Pedagogy Criteria Exemplary Work course, each student should be able to Learning ULO 10: Responsibly Apply an analytical Moot Court oral In-class discussion on Personal entertain and approach to problem examinations wherein material in chapter development evaluate views that differ from one s own Actively explore and navigate ambiguity and difference solving during translation. Discuss the historic use and preservation of texts and the problems students will argue for or against selected translations. homework, language lab activities, and quiz materials. Personal reflection journal entries and reflections on Moot Court. Ask probing preservation and reflection on a questions relevant techniques have relevant author will to the placed on the task of satisfy final assessment. Approach translation. problems imaginatively and creatively 7