Tuition and Fee Discussion

Similar documents
Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

The University of Michigan-Flint. The Committee on the Economic Status of the Faculty. Annual Report to the Regents. June 2007

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Program Change Proposal:

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

NC Community College System: Overview

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Financing Education In Minnesota

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Tale of Two Tollands

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA ADMINISTRATIVE / PROFESSIONAL PAY PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2015 BENEFITS-ELIGIBLE EXEMPT (MONTHLY) EMPLOYEES

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

WHY GRADUATE SCHOOL? Turning Today s Technical Talent Into Tomorrow s Technology Leaders

Trends in College Pricing

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Fiscal Years [Millions of Dollars] Provision Effective

State Budget Update February 2016

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Program budget Budget FY 2013

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

Program Review

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Enter Samuel E. Braden.! Tenth President

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

Partnerships and sponsorships: beverage pouring rights, on-campus ATMs and banking center, athletics sponsorships.

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

A New Compact for Higher Education in Virginia

Michigan State University

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

Understanding University Funding

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Mission Statement To achieve excellence in our Pharm.D. and graduate programs through innovative education and leading edge research.

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

ADDIE: A systematic methodology for instructional design that includes five phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

UCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012

Study of Higher Education Faculty in West Virginia. Faculty Personnel Issues Report

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

University of Plymouth. Community Engagement Strategy

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Student Transportation

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University

Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

FY STATE AID ALLOCATIONS AND BUDGET POLICIES

Georgia Department of Education

Transcription:

Tuition and Fee Discussion Board of Trustees Meeting June 18, 2015 1

Overview Mission, Vision, Core Values Resource and Expenditure Overview Budget and Tuition Overview 2015-16 Controlling Costs, Quality, Access, and Affordability Competitive Tuition and Fees 2

NMU Mission Northern challenges its students and employees to think independently and critically, develop lifelong learning habits, acquire career skills, embrace diversity, and become productive citizens in the regional and global community. 3

NMU Vision Northern will become the university of choice in the Midwest for students seeking a quality academic program with individualized attention in a hightech learning environment Key elements: o Quality academic programs o High-touch o High-tech 4

Core Values (Draft) Distinctly Northern COMMUNITY Northern has a distinctive sense of place some refer to it as the upper hand. We are a warm, friendly, caring, and helpful university. We are collaborative, on campus and off, valuing partnerships and service to each other, the community, and the region. Our focus is always on students. OPPORTUNITY Like Lake Superior s vastness, there is depth and breadth to Northern s wide range of academic, research and scholarship, international travel, and student service programs. We are affordable and accessible. We aspire to use our many resources to achieve deep personal and professional growth in ourselves and provide it for others. RIGOR A Northern education is like the black rocks that protect Gichigami s shores a solid foundation that will endure the waves of time and change. We achieve academic excellence through top-caliber teaching, learning, research, and service. Our work ethic and integrity are powered by discipline, courage, pride, sisu (determination), perseverance, and the desire to help others succeed, in and out of the classroom. ENVIRONMENT The unparalleled rugged beauty of the physical environment at our campus doorstep is something we admire, study, learn from, strive to protect, and enjoy year-round., And like the Anishinaabe, we see a responsibility to plan for sustainability seven generations into the future. 5

Core Values (Draft) Distinctly Northern INNOVATION Michigan s Upper Peninsula has always been home to bold, creative risk-takers and problem-solvers. Here, we excel at being inquisitive in looking beyond what is to what could be. We believe exploration unleashes and builds strength of mind and character. We endeavor to be entrepreneurs, discoverers, and the best within our chosen fields. CONNECTIONS At Northern, we make connections in dynamic ways, creatively using resources and technology to link people, ideas, and projects. We nurture strong ties to the environment, community, disciplines, and our rich history and traditions. Like the Northern Lights (Aurora Borealis), these connections are often luminous and inspiring. INCLUSION Northern is a safe and welcoming place. We aspire to learn from and encourage each other as global citizens, neighbors, colleagues, and family. We desire to be a role model in embracing all types of diversity and diverse points of view, engaging in civil society and governance, protecting human rights, and promoting social justice. 6

RESOURCE AND EXPENDITURE OVERVIEW GENERAL FUND 7

Total General Fund Revenue History (Source: Actual General Fund Revenues - State of Michigan Database) Tuition and fees 27.9% Tuition and Fees 31.0% Other income 3.7% State Appropriation 68.4% Other Income 1.6% State Appropriation 67.4% 1984 1994 Tuition and fees 47.8% State Appropriation 33.8% State Appropriation 50.2% Other income 2.0% To maintain financial reporting consistency with fiscal years 84, 94, and 04 data, financial aid was not deducted from 14 tuition and fee revenue. Tuition and fees 64.3% * FY2003 appropriation after both Executive Orders and the State Supplemental 2004 2014 Other income 1.9% 8

General Fund Expenditures Fiscal Years 2009 to 2014 Note: Total expenditures exclude financial aid $120,000,000 $102,199,966 $100,000,000 Total percentage expenditure change: FY09 to FY14: 6.3% (average annual % change = 1.22%) $108,612,708 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 9

General Fund Expenditures Per FYES Fiscal years 2009 to 2014 Note: Total expenditures exclude financial aid $16,000.0 Total percentage expenditure change: FY09 to FY14: 11.4% (average annual % change = 2.18%) $14,000.0 $13,524.2 $12,000.0 $12,142.1 $10,000.0 $8,000.0 $6,000.0 $4,000.0 $2,000.0 $0.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 10

NMU Total Costs per FYES History $14,000 $13,500 $13,000 $12,500 $12,000 Inflation Impact if inflationary adjustments were applied to FY2002 total costs Actual total costs per FYES from FY2002 through FY2014 $11,500 $11,000 $10,500 $10,000 $9,500 $9,000 Actual Costs w/inflation Actual Costs Note: Total costs exclude financial aid; actual expenditures 11

Expenditure Mix Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Actual NMU M15 Institutional Support 11.5% Plant Operations 11.6% Transfers 6.9% Auxiliary Enterprises 2.2% Instruction 45.0% Plant Operations 10.8% Institutional Support 10.3% Transfers 9.2% Auxiliary Enterprises 0.9% Instruction 42.2% Student Services 8.1% Student Services 5.2% Public Service 0.4% Academic Support 13.5% Research 0.7% Public Service 0.8% Academic Support 13.9% Research 6.6% Source: State of Michigan database 12

Expenditure Mix Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Actual NMU M12 Plant Operations 11.6% Transfers 6.9% Auxiliary Enterprises 2.2% Plant Operations 10.4% Transfers 6.8% Auxiliary Enterprises 1.9% Institutional Support 11.5% Instruction 45.0% Institutional Support 11.8% Instruction 46.2% Student Services 8.1% Student Services 6.3% Public Service 0.4% Academic Support 13.5% Research 0.7% Public Service 1.0% Academic Support 13.8% Research 1.6% Source: State of Michigan database 13

Michigan 15: Cost per FYES Comparison Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Average cost per FYES (total costs excluding financial aid) for FY2013-14 = $20,164 NMU cost per FYES for FY2013-14 = $13,524 If NMU costs were at the average cost per FYES for the state, we expend an additional $53.33 million ($6,640 * 8,031 FYES) above current level Michigan 12: Average cost per FYES (total costs excluding financial aid) for FY2013-14 = $14,357 NMU cost per FYES for FY2013-14 = $13,524 If NMU costs were at the average cost per FYES for the state, we expend an additional $6.69 million ($833 * 8,031 FYES) above current level 14

Michigan 15: Tuition and Fee Comparison Fiscal Year 2014-15 Average tuition and fees for FY2014-15 = $11,452 NMU tuition and fees for FY2014-15 = $9,383 If NMU was at the average tuition and fee rate, we would have had $16.60 million more in revenue ($2,069 * 8,031 FYES) Michigan 12: Average tuition and fees for FY2013-14 = $10,928 NMU tuition and fees for FY2014-15 = $9,383 If NMU was at the average tuition and fee rate, we would have had $12.41 million more in revenue ($1,545 * 8,031 FYES) 15

$8,691 $11,550 $11,461 $11,452 $11,335 $11,310 $11,273 $11,028 $10,279 $10,204 $9,685 $9,383 $12,350 $14,940 $14,336 $13,954 Tuition and Fee Rates Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Annual resident undergraduate tuition and fee rates MTU UM-AA MSU WSU CMU OU AVG UM-D FSU WMU GVSU LSSU UM-F EMU NMU SVSU Source: State of Michigan database 16

$13,274 $12,947 $12,240 $11,648 $11,433 $10,623 $10,570 $10,460 $10,113 $10,091 $9,514 $8,475 $8,382 $7,783 $15,975 $22,832 Net Tuition and Fee Revenue per FYES Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Tuition and fee revenue less scholarships/financial aid per FYES UM-AA MSU MTU UM-D WSU AVG UM-F FSU GVSU CMU WMU OU EMU SVSU LSSU NMU Source: State of Michigan database 17

BUDGET AND TUITION OVERVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 18

State Appropriation $45.1 $45.1 $38.4 $40.8 $42.0 $44.3 $45.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 19

Tuition and Fee Revenues (net of financial aid) $55.2 $56.0 $61.1 $61.8 $60.7 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20

Total Enrollment (Final Fall Headcount) 9,417 9,405 9,159 8,918 8,781 8,781 8,676 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (est 1) 2015 (est 2) 21

Total Fiscal Year Equated Student (FYES) Federal and state calculation based on credit hours and level (undergraduate, graduate, doctoral) of students 8,588 8,611 8,569 8,258 8,031 7,700 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (proj.) 22

Cumulative Projected Change in Student Headcount (Fall 2010 through Fall 2016 based on past trend) 0-100 -200-300 -400-500 -600 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (est. 1) -11-23 (-$98,000) (-$205,000) -269 (-$2.4 Million) -510 (-$4.5 Million) 2015 (est. 2) * -700-800 * Projected Final Fall counts based on prior trends. Note: Revenue loss amounts are based on FY14 average headcount revenue. -647-647 (-$5.8 Million) (-$5.8 Million) -752 (-$7.3 Million) 23

General Fund Base Budget Overview Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Budget Timeline February 11, 2015 Governor s recommended budget released February 24, 2015 Testified at Joint Senate and House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing May 7, 2015 House Higher Education Budget Approved May 14, 2015 Senate Higher Education Budget Approved May 28, 2015 Conference Report Approved June 2015 Board of Trustees FY16 tuition and fee rates June 2015 State approval of higher education budget 24

General Fund Base Budget Overview Fiscal Year 2015-16 Revenue Factors Impacting Budget: State Appropriation [36% of revenue] Conference report [1.68% increase for NMU] Tuition and Fees and Enrollment [63% of revenue] Tuition and fees [3.2% state tuition restraint cap] Enrollment change [projection: flat to -1.4%; enrollment mix change] 25

FY2015-2016 Budget Summary Higher Education Conference Report PROJECTED REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS State appropriation adjustment [1.68% increase] $743,000 Tuition and fees [3.2% rate increase; -105 enrollment and mix change] $1,000,000 Rate change [+3.2% increase; +$2.5 million] Enrollment increase from athletic initiatives [+40 students; +$500,000] Enrollment decline excluding athletics [-145 students/-1.4%; -$1.5 million] Decrease due to change in student enrollment mix [-0.8%; -$500,000] Less: Financial aid/scholarship adjustments -$1,500,000 Prior year scholarships over budget [FY 2014-15; -$800,000] Tuition-based scholarships and financial aid [FY 2015-16; -$500,000] Athletics [new athletic programs [W-golf; M-swim/diving; -$200,000] Conference Report Appropriation increase +1.68%; Tuition restraint +3.2% Net Revenue Adjustments +$243,000 +0.2% 26

FY2015-2016 Budget Summary Higher Education Conference Report PROJECTED EXPENDITURE INCREASES Compensation and support inflationary costs [2.5%] $2,600,000 Compensation salary, benefits, and promotions [$2.4 million] Support property and liability insurance, software maintenance, CRM software, financial analysis software, federal compliance, database data defense software, and library acquisitions [$200,000] Conference Report Appropriation increase +1.68%; Tuition restraint +3.2% Increased state mandates [minimum wage increase - $0.35/hr.] $120,000 Facilities maintenance and infrastructure $800,000 Athletic initiatives [2 new sports: W-golf; M-swim/diving] $165,000 Total Projected Expenditure Adjustments $3,685,000 3.4% 27

FY2015-2016 Budget Summary Higher Education Conference Report SUMMARY PROJECTED REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS: State appropriation [+1.68% increase] $743,000 Tuition and fees [+3.20% rate increase; changes in enrollment] +$1,000,000 Less: Financial aid/scholarships -$1,500,000 Revenue Adjustments [before tuition rate change] +$243,000 Percentage change +0.2% SUMMARY PROJECTED EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS Total projected expenditure adjustments -$3,685,000 Percentage change -3.4% Net Revenue and Expenditure Shortfall -$3,442,000 Percentage budget shortfall [before tuition and fee change] -3.2% Equivalent additional tuition increase to cover shortfall: +5.5% (total tuition increase 8.7% + 1.25% if exceed cap = 9.95%) 28

CONTROLLING COSTS, QUALITY, ACCESS, AND AFFORDABILITY 29

Controlling Costs, Access, Affordability, and Productivity State revenues have significantly decreased as percent of total resources 1994: 67% of funding 2014: 34% of funding Shifted burden from the state to tuition and fees 1994: 31% of funding 2014: 64% of funding Controlled costs to maintain affordable tuition and fees Cost increases below rate of inflation (CPI) [1.22% per year over past 5 years] 2 nd lowest tuition and fees in the state Lowest tuition and fees in the Upper Peninsula Organizational efficiency Organizational structure and increased productivity = lower cost NMU consistently has higher overall staffing efficiency ratios among the Michigan public universities Invested in quality academic programs, student services, infrastructure, and technology Implemented significant cost controls and budget reductions over the past decade 30

Budget Challenge Limited resources: Tuition restraint language and level of NMU tuition State funding moving forward Enrollment declines since 2006 Challenge our ability to: Invest in new and growing academic programs Preserve quality of academic programs Invest in, maintain, and repair aging facility infrastructure Invest in, replace, and maintain academic equipment and technology infrastructure Deliver quality student support programs, services, and experience 31

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction/Reallocation Process Preliminary targets identified based on an across-the-board cut by division at varying levels of reduction Divisions identify potential reductions based on targets Review and identify university-wide operational saving opportunities Identify savings from severance incentive plan that could be utilized Prioritize reductions based on impact to strategic goals, mission, vision, core values, and critical operations of the university Review and implement reductions 32

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million Academic Affairs [Reduction Target: -$2.0 million; -3.9%] Academic Affairs Administration [$1.0 million] o Strategic faculty reinvestment fund (equivalent to 10 FTE) $1.0 million o Faculty Search Budget Reduction $40,000 College of Arts and Sciences [$465,000] o Term Faculty Expiration (5 positions) $320,000 o Tenure-track/Tenured Faculty Attrition (1 position) $80,000 o Graduate Assistant Reduction (5 positions) $65,000 33

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million Academic Affairs [Reduction Target: -$2.0 million; -3.9%] College of Health Sciences/Professional Studies [$338,000] o Term Faculty Reduction (1 position) $88,000 o Tenure Track/Tenured faculty attrition (1 position) $110,000 o Program Elimination (2-year phase-out, 1 NMUFA Faculty Line) $85,000 o Administrative Staff Reduction (1 position) $48,000 o Academic Restructuring (administrative savings) $7,000 College of Business [$170,000] o Term Faculty Reduction (1 position) $140,000 o Savings from retirement/replacement -- $30,000 34

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million Academic Affairs Division [Reduction Target: -$2.0 million; -3.9%] Academic Information Services [$16,000] o Student Worker Reduction (3 or 4 students affected) $12,000 o Staff reduction (.08 positions) $4,000 Registrar [$10,000] o Retirement salary savings (1 position) $10,000 Graduate Education and Research [$10,000] o Retirement salary savings (1 position) $10,000 35

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets Finance and Administration [Reduction Target: -$620,000; -3.9%] Facilities [$238,000] TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million o Reduce FTE for custodial summer staffing (3 positions 1.00 FTE) $61,000 o Eliminate remaining FTE funding for supervisor position (0.17 FTE) $19,000 o Reduce FTE for facilities maintenance attendant (0.17 FTE) $12,000 o Reduce custodial and building and grounds student labor (14 positions 7,330 hours) $57,000 o Reduce supplies to support facilities cleaning $6,000 o Reduction in outside contracting for professional and trade services $22,000 o Reduce FTE of Preventive Maintenance Technician position (0.17 FTE) and support costs $12,000 o Adjust departmental billing rates for technical trade services to actual $49,000 36

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million Finance and Administration [Reduction Target: -$620,000; -3.9%] Information Technology [$132,000] o Restructuring of programming staffing (move to business analytics/programming) $32,000 o Reduce planned network infrastructure improvements $100,000 Controller/Financial Services [$230,000] o Restructuring of staffing [0.50 FTE] $30,000 o Institute convenience fee for credit card charges on tuition/room and board (3.25%) (FY2017) $200,000 Finance and Planning/Business Services [$10,000] o Positions savings due to change in staffing $5,000 o Reduce student labor $5,000 37

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million Finance and Administration [Reduction Target: -$620,000; -3.9%] Human Resources [$5,000] o Reduce departmental support funds $5,000 Internal Audit and Risk Management [$5,000] o Position savings $5,000 38

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million Enrollment Management and Student Services [Reduction Target: -$316,000; -3.9%] Reorganize/restructure International Programs Operation (IPO) staffing and support (1.0 FTE) $90,000 Non-renewal of Student Paths contract [Marketing] $40,000 Shift all Orientation operations to self-funded [Dean of Students] $143,000 o To fund above reduction, need to increase Orientation fee (2,600 annual participants) by $55/participant over 2 year period staged increases starting in FY17 Shift ½ time support for Orientation Director to Housing $43,000 39

FY2015-16 Budget Reduction Targets President s Division [Reduction Target: -$236,000; 3.9%] Administrative position [1.0 FTE] $60,000 Change in campus shuttle program and contract $39,000 Athletics and recreational services consolidation of support positions [1.0 FTE] $67,000 Reduce PEIF operations support $50,000 Coaching and athletic staff professional development support $10,000 Reduce public safety vehicle budget [lengthen rotation schedule] $5,000 President s supplies and support budget $5,000 Advancement Division [Reduction Target: -$30,000; -3.9%] Advancement administrative staffing reduction [0.5 FTE] $19,000 Reduce Alumni events $11,000 TOTAL REDUCTION TARGET: -$3.4 million General University [Reduction Target: -$198,000; -3.9%] Reduce equipment and general reserves $198,000 40

FY2015-16 Graduate Tuition and Fees Graduate Tuition and Fees Current o o o o Lowest in the state [-$39.75 per credit hour below closest university] Limits ability to deliver classes (higher break-even on class size) Limits resources to grow graduate programs Quality perception issue based on low rate Proposed o o o o o o Close tuition gap with 3 closest peers while maintaining affordable tuition [EMU, LSSU, SVSU] Raise graduate tuition rate over a 3-year period at or near lowest institution level [increase rate by 7.5% in FY2015-16] Increase ability to make investments in new programs Increase graduate assistantship stipends Raise the profile on NMU Graduate Education Lower break-even enrollments to deliver existing program courses 41

COMPETITIVE TUITION AND FEES 42

Tuition and Fee Comparison Fiscal Year 2014-15 2014-15 Annual Resident Undergraduate Tuition and Fees University 2014-15 Rate Rank Difference vs. NMU MTU $14,940 1 $5,557 UM-AA $14,336 2 $4,953 MSU $13,954 3 $4,571 WSU $12,350 4 $2,967 CMU $11,550 5 $2,167 OU $11,460 6 $2,077 UM-D $11,335 7 $1,952 FSU $11,310 8 $1,927 WMU $11,273 9 $1,890 GVSU $11,028 10 $1,645 LSSU $10,279 11 $896 UM-F $10,204 12 $821 EMU $9,685 13 $302 NMU $9,383 14 SVSU $8,691 15 -$692 AVG $11,452 $2,069 43

Annual Resident Undergraduate Tuition and Fee Differential NMU vs. State Average 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 -$1,801 -$1,828 -$1,944 -$2,001 -$2,049 -$2,069 44

FY2015-16 Tuition and Fee Recommendation Budget reductions/tuition rate increase Impact: Pros: -$3.4 million in budget reductions/reallocations o Affordable tuition and fees (2 nd lowest in the state +3.2% Undergraduate rate increase o Complies with tuition restraint cap (3.2%) +7.5% Graduate rate increase Implement select course fees [included in formals CAPS lab; emergency health care lab; mountain bicycling course] Cons: o o Depletes strategic academic reinvestment fund (10 tenure-track positions) Reduction of additional tenure-track position o Reduction in graduate assistantships and student workers o Reductions in staff (administrative and support personnel) 45

FY2015-16 Tuition and Fee Comparison Based on Recommendation * Utilized 3.20% state tuition cap increase for universities that have yet to set 2015-16 tuition and fee rates University 2015-16 Rate * 2015-16 Rate Incr. * Rank MTU $15,418 3.20%* 1 UM-AA $14,795 3.20%* 2 MSU $14,401 3.20%* 3 WSU $12,745 3.20%* 4 CMU $11,850 2.60% 5 OU $11,827 3.20%* 6 UM-D $11,698 3.20%* 7 WMU $11,633 2.86% 8 FSU $11,610 2.65% 9 GVSU $11,381 3.20%* 10 LSSU $10,553 2.67% 11 UM-F $10,531 3.20%* 12 EMU $10,439 7.79% 13 NMU $9,683 3.20%* 14 SVSU $8,969 3.20%* 15 AVG $11,835 46

Tuition and Fees Based on Recommendation Fiscal Year 2015-16 Note: Tuition restraint at 3.2% for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 FY2014-15 per semester tuition and fees: $4,691 FY2014-15 annual tuition and fees: $9,383 Category Recommendation at 3.20% Per semester tuition and fees $4,840 Annual tuition and fees $9,680 Per semester $ increase per student Per year $ increase per student $149/semester $297/year Annual tuition and fees per State of Michigan Database 47

Next Steps Current: Refine and implement structural budget reductions Identify one-time funding to offset student and graduate assistant worker reductions Finalize new community outreach academic program rates distance learning off campus, online programs [July board meeting] Future: Identify new investment and revenue opportunities for enrollment and revenue growth Implement and expand new distance learning and online programming Restructure financial aid programs reduce discount rate Identify one-time resources to fund aggressive institutional imaging campaign Re-institute name buying program prior to NL recommendations 48

QUESTIONS 49