REFERENCES. American Institute of Physics. (1997, July) Initial Employment Follow-up of 1995

Similar documents
WHY SOLVE PROBLEMS? INTERVIEWING COLLEGE FACULTY ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF PROBLEM SOLVING

Cognitive Apprenticeship Statewide Campus System, Michigan State School of Osteopathic Medicine 2011

Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance. Abstract

Just in Time to Flip Your Classroom Nathaniel Lasry, Michael Dugdale & Elizabeth Charles

A Study of the Effectiveness of Using PER-Based Reforms in a Summer Setting

A Metacognitive Approach to Support Heuristic Solution of Mathematical Problems

Foundational Studies, Boise State University

Seeking instructional specificity: an example from analogical instruction

Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools

Introduction. Research Questions

Improving Conceptual Understanding of Physics with Technology

The Search for Strategies to Prevent Persistent Misconceptions

Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems

An Asset-Based Approach to Linguistic Diversity

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY KUTZTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA COE COURSE SYLLABUS TEMPLATE

Lecturing for Deeper Learning Effective, Efficient, Research-based Strategies

Third Misconceptions Seminar Proceedings (1993)

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY KUTZTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Billett, S. (1994). Situating learning in the workplace: Having another look at Apprenticeships. Industrial and Commercial Training, 26(11) 9-16.

Sheila M. Smith is Assistant Professor, Department of Business Information Technology, College of Business, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.

Ontology-based smart learning environment for teaching word problems in mathematics

Teaching a Laboratory Section

A Model of the Effective Dimensions of Interactive Learning on the World Wide Web

POLA: a student modeling framework for Probabilistic On-Line Assessment of problem solving performance

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY-ACCRA COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY COURSE SYLLABUS, Spring 2011

Effect of Rusbult s Problem Solving Strategy on Secondary School Students Achievement in Trigonometry Classroom

Sociology 521: Social Statistics and Quantitative Methods I Spring Wed. 2 5, Kap 305 Computer Lab. Course Website

Sociology 521: Social Statistics and Quantitative Methods I Spring 2013 Mondays 2 5pm Kap 305 Computer Lab. Course Website

Epistemic Cognition. Petr Johanes. Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale

Running head: COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY IN COMPLEX JUDGMENT TASKS

SAM - Sensors, Actuators and Microcontrollers in Mobile Robots

English English 1,2,3,4 Textbooks used as a resource Using new curriculum - building novel library editions. rbooks - consumables

Educating Students with Special Needs in Secondary General Education Classrooms. Thursdays 12:00-2:00 pm and by appointment

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences SHS 726 Auditory Processing Disorders Spring 2016

Stephanie Ann Siler. PERSONAL INFORMATION Senior Research Scientist; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University

The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document.

self-regulated learning Boekaerts, 1997, 1999; Pintrich, 1999a, 2000; Wolters, 1998; Zimmerman, 2000

Reflective problem solving skills are essential for learning, but it is not my job to teach them

The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions

Students Understanding of Graphical Vector Addition in One and Two Dimensions

Effect of Cognitive Apprenticeship Instructional Method on Auto-Mechanics Students

Room: Office Hours: T 9:00-12:00. Seminar: Comparative Qualitative and Mixed Methods

Inspired instructors across campus are responding to President Clark s

The Effect of Time to Know Environment on Math and English Language Arts Learning Achievements (Poster)

THE EFFECT OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY INSTRUCTION ON LISTENING PERFORMANCE PRE-INTERMEDIATE IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS

Progress Monitoring & Response to Intervention in an Outcome Driven Model

LIS 681 Books and Media for Children Spring 2009

CONQUERING THE CONTENT: STRATEGIES, TASKS AND TOOLS TO MOVE YOUR COURSE ONLINE. Robin M. Smith, Ph.D.

SCIENCE DISCOURSE 1. Peer Discourse and Science Achievement. Richard Therrien. K-12 Science Supervisor. New Haven Public Schools

Facilitating E-Learning Using Collaborative and Social Methods in the 21 st Century

Scaffolding Students' Reflection for Science Learning. Elizabeth Anna Davis

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Defining Expertise in the Use of Constraint-based CAD Tools by Examining Practicing Professionals

B.A., Amherst College, Women s and Gender Studies, Magna Cum Laude (2001)

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

How People Learn Physics

Adult Education and Learning Theories Georgios Giannoukos, Georgios Besas

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

We will analyze, with respect of our formative module on kinematic and relative motion, the following research questions:

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR MODEL IN ELECTRONIC LEARNING: A PILOT STUDY

NANCY L. STOKEY. Visiting Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Chicago,

Designing Case Study Research for Pedagogical Application and Scholarly Outcomes

INTRODUCTION TO DECISION ANALYSIS (Economics ) Prof. Klaus Nehring Spring Syllabus

MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management

DIDACTIC MODEL BRIDGING A CONCEPT WITH PHENOMENA

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

MABEL ABRAHAM. 710 Uris Hall Broadway mabelabraham.com New York, New York Updated January 2017 EMPLOYMENT

Approaches to Teaching Second Language Writing Brian PALTRIDGE, The University of Sydney

Albright College Reading, PA Tentative Syllabus

University of Toronto Physics Practicals. University of Toronto Physics Practicals. University of Toronto Physics Practicals

ONE TEACHER S ROLE IN PROMOTING UNDERSTANDING IN MENTAL COMPUTATION

Concept mapping instrumental support for problem solving

Module 12. Machine Learning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Using Moodle in ESOL Writing Classes

LEAD 612 Advanced Qualitative Research Fall 2015 Dr. Lea Hubbard Camino Hall 101A

Laura A. Riffel

Using Foldables in the Classroom

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Timeline. Recommendations

On-the-Fly Customization of Automated Essay Scoring

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

A cautionary note is research still caught up in an implementer approach to the teacher?

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Program Evaluation Spring Online

Every Picture Tells a Story: The Roundhouse Process in the Digital Age. DR. ROBIN WARD McCARTNEY University of Louisiana at Lafayette

(1) The History, Structure & Function of Urban Settlements; (2) The Relationship Between the Market and the Polis in Economics, Policy and Planning;

Study Abroad Housing and Cultural Intelligence: Does Housing Influence the Gaining of Cultural Intelligence?

Human Development (18:820:543:01) Rutgers University, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology Fall, 2013

ITED350.02W Spring 2016 Syllabus

Developing True/False Test Sheet Generating System with Diagnosing Basic Cognitive Ability

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Strategy Draw a Diagram as a Cognitive Tool for Problem Solving

POLSC& 203 International Relations Spring 2012

Learnings from our book project

Is There a Back of the Room When the Teacher Is in the Middle?

AC : TEACHING COLLEGE PHYSICS

UNIVERSITY of CALGARY

104 Immersive Learning Simulation Strategies: A Real-world Example. Richard Clark, NextQuestion Deborah Stone, DLS Group, Inc.

RM 2234 Retailing in a Digital Age SPRING 2016, 3 credits, 50% face-to-face (Wed 3pm-4:15pm)

Stochastic Calculus for Finance I (46-944) Spring 2008 Syllabus

Transcription:

REFERENCES American Institute of Physics. (1997, July). 1996 Initial Employment Follow-up of 1995 Physics Degree Recipients (AIP Pub No. R-282.19). College Park, MD: Author. Arons, A. B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: Wiley. Blue, J. M. (1997). Sex differences in physics learning and evaluations in an introductory course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Bolton, J. & Ross, S. (1997). Developing students' physics problem-solving skills. Physics Education, 32 (3), 176-185. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Selfexplanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorizations and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Teaching and Instruction: Essays in hhonor of Robert Glaser (pp 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Culotta, E. (1992). The calculus of education reform. Science, 255, 1060-1062. dejong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1986). Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (4), 279-288. 1

Eylon, B. & Reif, F. (1984). Effects of knowledge organization on task performance. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (1), 5-44. Finegold, M. & Mass, R. (1985). differences in teh process of solving physics problems between good problem solvers and poor problem solvers. Research in Science and Technology Education, 3, 59-67. Fishbane P.M., Gasiorowizc, S., & Thornton, S.T. (1994). Physics for scientists and engineers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Foster, T., Heller, P., & Heller, K. (in press). Consumer-oriented physics: What do engineering instructors really want? Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional method: A six-thousandstudent survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64-74. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1055. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183. Heller, J. I. & Reif, F. (1984). Prescribing effective human problem solving processes: Problem descriptions in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (2), 177-216. Heller, K. (1995). [Course syllabus]. Unpublished raw data. Heller, K. and Heller, P. (1995). The competent problem solver, calculus version, second edition. Minneapolis, MN: Author. 2

Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 637-644. Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 627-636. Hestenes, D. & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. Physics Teacher, 33, 502, 504-506. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158. Huffman, D. W. (1994). The effect of explicit problem solving instruction on students conceptual understanding of Newton's laws. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Huffman, D., & Heller, P. (1995a), What does the force concept inventory actually measure? Physics Teacher, 33, 138-143. Huffman, D., & Heller, P. (1995b), Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun. Physics Teacher, 33, 503, 507-511. King, P. (1986). Formal reasoning in adults: A review and critique. In Mines, R. & Kitchener, K. (eds.) Adult Cognitive Development. Praeger: New York. Larkin, J. H. (1979). Processing information for effective problem solving. Engineering Education, 285-288. 3

Larkin, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 75-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Larkin, J. H. & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem-solving in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 1 (2), 191-203. Larkin, J. H. (1980). Skilled problem solving in physics: A hierarchical planning model. Journal of Structured Learning, 1, 271-297. Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342. Laws, P. (1991). Calculus-based physics without lectures. Physics Today, 44(12), 24-31. Maloney, D. P. (1993). Research on problem solving: Physics. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 327-356). New York: Macmillan. Mazur, E. (1997) Peer Instruction. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. McDermott, L. C., (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, July, 24-32. Mestre, J. P., Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Hardiman, P. T., & Touger, J. S. (1993). Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (3), 303-317. Miller, G. A. (1957). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 63, 81-97. 4

Ornstein, A. C. (1991). Teacher Effectivness research: Theorectical Cosiderations. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.). Effective Teaching: Current Research (pp. 63-80). Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Redish, E.F., Saul, J.M., & Steinberg, R.N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66,(3), 212-224. Reif, F. (1996). Guest Comment: Standards and measurement in physics - Why not in physics education? American Journal of Physics. 64, 687-688. Reif, F. & Heller, J. I. (1982). Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics. Educational psychologist, 17 (2), 102-127. Reif, F., Larkin, J. H., & Brackett, G. C. (1976). Teaching general learning and problemsolving skills. American Journal of Physics, 44 (3), 212-217. Sabella, M.S. & Stienburg, R.N. (1997). Performance on multiple-choice diagnostics and complementary exam problems. Physics Teacher, 35, 150-153. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Schultz, K., & Lockhead, J. (1991). A view from physics. In M. U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving: Views from the content domains (pp. 99-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285. 5

Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R., (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics 58, 858-867. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second teir. Tuscon, AZ: Research Corporation. Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L.C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one-dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49, 242-253. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A view of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59 (10), 891-897. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Overview, case study physics. American Journal of Physics, 59 (10), 898-907. van Weeren, J. H. P., de Mul, F. F. M., Peters, M. J., Kramers-Pals, H., & Roossink, H. J. (1982). Teaching problem-solving in physics: A course in electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 50 (8), 725-732. Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). The impact of goal-specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science, 20, 75-100. Ward, M., & Sweller,J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 1-39. Wenger, R. H. (1987). Cognitive science and algebra learning. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, (pp. 217-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 6

Woods, D. R. (1987). Problem solving in practice. In D. Gabel (Ed.). What research says to the science teacher: Volume five, problem solving. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association. Zajchowski, R. & Martin, J. (1993). Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker novices in physics: knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structures? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (5), 459-470. 7