Guidance and information for teachers. 4th Edition. Digital

Similar documents
Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Sample Reports. for Progress Test in Maths.

Using SAM Central With iread

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

Houghton Mifflin Online Assessment System Walkthrough Guide

Test Administrator User Guide

Creating a Test in Eduphoria! Aware

WiggleWorks Software Manual PDF0049 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

READ 180 Next Generation Software Manual

Developing a College-level Speed and Accuracy Test

Star Math Pretest Instructions

Student Handbook. This handbook was written for the students and participants of the MPI Training Site.

Preparing for the School Census Autumn 2017 Return preparation guide. English Primary, Nursery and Special Phase Schools Applicable to 7.

INTERNAL MEDICINE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (IM-ITE SM )

CHANCERY SMS 5.0 STUDENT SCHEDULING

Longman English Interactive

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

STUDENT MOODLE ORIENTATION

REVIEW OF CONNECTED SPEECH

The Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) provides a picture of adults proficiency in three key information-processing skills:

Mathematics process categories

InCAS. Interactive Computerised Assessment. System

Tuesday 13 May 2014 Afternoon

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

Your School and You. Guide for Administrators

PIRLS. International Achievement in the Processes of Reading Comprehension Results from PIRLS 2001 in 35 Countries

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Newlands Girls School

Test How To. Creating a New Test

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

Moodle Student User Guide

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Renaissance Learning P.O. Box 8036 Wisconsin Rapids, WI (800)

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening

Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment User Guide

Outreach Connect User Manual

The Keele University Skills Portfolio Personal Tutor Guide

What effect does science club have on pupil attitudes, engagement and attainment? Dr S.J. Nolan, The Perse School, June 2014

Moodle 2 Assignments. LATTC Faculty Technology Training Tutorial

Call Center Assessment-Technical Support (CCA-Technical Support)

SECTION 12 E-Learning (CBT) Delivery Module

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

PROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS. Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

PowerTeacher Gradebook User Guide PowerSchool Student Information System

MOODLE 2.0 GLOSSARY TUTORIALS

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Eastbury Primary School

College Entrance Testing:

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

TIPS PORTAL TRAINING DOCUMENTATION

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Understanding and Supporting Dyslexia Godstone Village School. January 2017

GCSE. Mathematics A. Mark Scheme for January General Certificate of Secondary Education Unit A503/01: Mathematics C (Foundation Tier)

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

Urban Analysis Exercise: GIS, Residential Development and Service Availability in Hillsborough County, Florida

Parent s Guide to the Student/Parent Portal

Renaissance Learning 32 Harbour Exchange Square London, E14 9GE +44 (0)

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Fisk Street Primary School

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Paper Reference. Edexcel GCSE Mathematics (Linear) 1380 Paper 1 (Non-Calculator) Foundation Tier. Monday 6 June 2011 Afternoon Time: 1 hour 30 minutes

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

NCEO Technical Report 27

African American Male Achievement Update

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Measurement. Time. Teaching for mastery in primary maths

Applications from foundation doctors to specialty training. Reporting tool user guide. Contents. last updated July 2016

Language Acquisition Chart

Textbook Evalyation:

PUBLIC CASE REPORT Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school

myperspectives 2017 Click Path to Success myperspectives 2017 Virtual Activation Click Path

Tour. English Discoveries Online

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

Home Access Center. Connecting Parents to Fulton County Schools

Managing the Student View of the Grade Center

Strategies for Solving Fraction Tasks and Their Link to Algebraic Thinking

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Copyright 2017 DataWORKS Educational Research. All rights reserved.

Transcription:

Guidance and information for teachers 4th Edition Digital

NGRT Digital All students require headphones to access this test. Introduction The New Group Reading Test (NGRT) was published in a paper edition in September 2010. It comprised four levels of tests with equivalent forms for students from age six to 16. This digital edition departs in two significant ways from the paper test on which it is based: 1. it is adaptive; 2. it comprises three equivalent forms (A, B and C) which may be administered to students across the age range seven to 16. Results from trialling the digital test with children in Year 1 demonstrated that the method of answering the questions was a barrier to such young children and their performance was significantly lower when tested with the digital edition rather than the paper edition. NGRT Digital, therefore is suitable for the following year groups: NGRT Digital Form Year Group England and Wales Scotland Northern Ireland A Years 2 11 P3 S5 P3 Year 12 B Years 2 11 P3 S5 P3 Year 12 C Years 2 11 P3 S5 P3 Year 12 When to test We recommend administering NGRT Digital three times a year: once in each term. This will allow the most effective monitoring of reading progress. Another possible way of using NGRT Digital would be to screen all students in the first term of the year. This screening can identify weaker readers for whom an intervention can be put in place. The intervention group can be screened again in the second term, and all students again in the third term. The recent addition of a third digital form does not in any way hinder schools who may be used to using NGRT Digital once a year or twice a year - it can still be used in the same way. Page 1 of 26

Adaptive testing with NGRT The NGRT digital edition comprises the unaltered content of the paper tests. However, this is presented in a way that allows students reading to be tested according to their performance as they are taking the test rather than by age or year group. An analysis of the difficulty of all questions in the paper tests has been carried out in order to create the adaptive, digital test. Like the paper edition, NGRT Digital comprises three sections: phonics, sentence completion and passage comprehension. However, the digital test is adaptive and each student s performance is assessed as they complete the test and the questions adapted to be in line with the ability they demonstrate. This is a benefit, particularly to students with weak skills they can be tested with material at a lower level than that determined by age and for students with high level skills as they can be tested with material that better reflects their ability. Students enter the test according to their age. All start with the sentence completion section. Depending on the score from this part of the test, they will be moved on to the passage comprehension section or be given the phonics tasks. Those who complete the phonics tasks will not be presented with the passage comprehension. Testing time will be approximately 30 minutes. However, please note that as NGRT Digital is adaptive the time taken to test each student will vary, so some will finish before others. The sequence of questions in the sentence completion section is based on the probability of a student answering a question correctly based on those questions answered correctly on the basal set (which is determined by age). This will make testing shorter and, importantly, place the child at an appropriate level for the hardest part of the test, the reading comprehension. Most students will complete the sentence completion section followed by the comprehension section and read and answer questions on one, two or three passages at the appropriate level of difficulty. If students perform poorly on the sentence completion section they will complete the phonics section and will not be administered any comprehension passages. Each form of the digital test should be considered as a single test with several parts: Sentence completion (a bank comprising all questions across all levels) Phonics section (the full content from Test 1) Reading comprehension passage by passage rather than grouped by level as students will be directed to an appropriate initial passage on the basis of performance on sentence completion. Generally, this should be a secure basis for selecting the next part of the test but some students skills may be stronger or weaker in sentence completion than in passage comprehension so the program will adjust to performance on the initial passage too. So: All students will start the test with sentence completion The program will determine the first question based on date of birth Each student will progress through the test according to performance Students with very low scores will move to the phonics section Students will be presented with one, two or three passages; this will shorten test time and is possible because the level of passage will be suited to the individual on the basis of their sentence completion score. Page 2 of 26

Administering the test Note: The test administrator will need to read through the following instructions well in advance of the test session. Prior to testing It is strongly advised that you go to: https://help.testingforschools.com/display/hoh/sittings NGRT now works on tablets, via the GL app. For instructions on how to adminster, please visit: gl-assessment.co.uk/installing-the-gl-assessment-app/ Administration The test must be administered in a formal test environment with students made aware that they are taking a test and that the usual expectations of behaviour and constraints of a test session will be in place. Each student will need either their own personal computer with a mouse, or a tablet, along with a high quality set of headphones. You are advised to check that headphones are working and that sound levels are appropriate before logging on to Testwise. All administration instructions are incorporated into the test program but please introduce the test session and check that students understand the instructions and the method of answering by walking around the room as they work through these parts of the test. When students are settled, explain that they are going to take a test that will show how well they can read and understand what they have read. Students must work in silence but if they have a query they should raise their hand and wait for the teacher to approach them. Answer any questions at this stage and explain that you cannot help with any of the test questions. Reassurance Further explain that the test starts with some practice questions to get them used to the real questions and that all instructions are given by audio. NGRT is not a timed test so students should work through the questions at their own pace. Sentence completion example question All students will start the test with the sentence completion section and see the following example question. The voice over will explain that the students have to click on the word (from a choice of five) that they think best completes the sentence. Once the students have clicked on Next they cannot return to the previous question. In the practice section students will receive feedback telling them whether they have Page 3 of 26

answered correctly or incorrectly. This will not be a feature of the test, however. Because the digital version of NGRT is adaptive, each student will see a different set of test questions. Performance on the sentence completion section will determine which part of the test will be administered next. Phonics section example questions This section of the test is in four parts and each part has a single example question with feedback. Initial letter items These questions are supported by a picture and the student is asked to identify the first letter of the word illustrated (the audio provides the word). Sounds like items Again, supported by a picture and by audio, the student is asked to select the word that Page 4 of 26

sounds like the item illustrated. Final letter sound items Students are presented with the first part of a word and from a selection of digraphs or trigraphs (two or three letters which together represent a single sound) and three letter combinations have to complete the word. Initial letter sound items Students are presented with the final part of a word and a selection of letters from which Page 5 of 26

they must select one to complete the word. These four short exercises are aimed at students who are at the very beginning of learning to read or whose reading is delayed and there is a need to test that they can match letters to sounds, understand simple rhyme and complete real words by adding final or initial sounds. Passage comprehension example questions Students will see one, two or three passages (determined by performance on sentence completion and, as appropriate, the initial passage). A short passage, appropriate to the demands of the test passage is presented as an example and for practice. For the easiest passage comprehension, The Park, a short example passage about looking after a pet mouse replicates the layout of the real test questions where the story text and questions relating to that part of the story are on the same screen. Here is an example: Here is an example of one screen from The Park : All other passage comprehension tasks are introduced by a short passage with example Page 6 of 26

questions which show students how to answer the questions. In these passages students can navigate through the story text using the scroll bar and through the questions using the Next and Back buttons separately so they can refer to any part of the story at any time to answer any question. The example section looks like this: Here is an example from one of the test passages: During the test Page 7 of 26

Page 8 of 26

During the test session, you should walk around periodically to prevent copying and to ensure that students understand how to answer the test on-screen. Any students showing signs of difficulties should be given assistance. However, you should give no help at all in the choosing of answers or explaining text. Testing time will be approximately 30 minutes. Some students may finish in a shorter time and should have work to hand so that they remain occupied until the whole group has completed the test. At the end of the test all responses will be stored on the Testwise server. Please do not turn off any computer until the students have clicked on the End Test button and have been taken back to the page showing that the test has been taken: The test environment As mentioned above students completing NGRT need to be in a quiet room without interruptions. Enough time should be allocated to allow students to settle, be given the introduction to the test and complete it. A total of 40 minutes should be sufficient to introduce and administer the test. Students should be told that they must work in silence but that if they have a query they should raise their hand and wait for the teacher to approach them. While students are completing the test, the teacher should walk round the computer suite to check that they are progressing appropriately and that they are not having difficulty with the methods of answering questions. Unexpected incidents Page 9 of 26

If there is a failure in your computer system while students are completing the test, it will not be possible to re-enter the test at the point at which the failure occurred. If students have fully completed a section of the test and a computer failure occurs, they will be able to recommence the test at the section after the one they have completed. If students complete the test and responses are stored (that is, they have clicked the End Test button) and then the system fails, it will be possible to retrieve responses and reports from the GL Assessment back-up server. NGRT Group report A group report will be available after testing and is made up of the following sections: Overview This is a short introduction which describes the test content and how the test works. This will be useful when sharing reports with colleagues who may not be familiar with NGRT. Why use NGRT? Again, this is a short section setting out the main uses of NGRT. Relationship between NGRT scores This comprises a simple diagram showing how standard age scores (SAS), stanine scores and national percentile ranks relate to each other. Example results This page shows an annotated version of the group report table with a glossary of terms used. Group scores for sentence completion and passage comprehension Scores for the pre-determined group include SAS, stanines, group rank and national percentile rank. Importantly, this table highlights a gap of two or more stanines between the Page 10 of 26

Sentence Completion and Passage Comprehension parts of the test. Analysis by reading age This shows the spread of reading age for the whole group and for males and females. Group scores for phonics This shows raw scores by section for students who answered the phonics questions. Page 11 of 26

Group demographic comparison with gender as the baseline This compares the group s score for each gender against all students as part of the group average and the national average. NGRT Individual report for teachers Page 12 of 26

This report focuses on results for an individual student. It opens with the sections: Overview Why use NGRT Digital? Relationship between NGRT Digital scores which are very similar to those in the NGRT Digital Group report. Example results are annotated. Page 13 of 26

The NGRT Digital Individual report for teachers offers an analysis of responses to both the sentence completion and passage comprehension parts of the test and an analysis of the types of comprehension questions achieved by each student. Page 14 of 26

The page above shows the full set of scores and a graphical representation of the results from the sentence completion part of the test. All questions have been put onto a scale representing the difficulty of each question and the same scale has been used to establish the reading ability level of an average student at any given age. Thereby, a student begins the sentence completion test with a question that is slightly below the difficulty level that would match the age-related reading ability level. This is shown on the graphic about as Question difficulty and Reading Ability scale. The test adjusts quickly to present questions of either increasing or decreasing difficulty depending on whether the student answers correctly or incorrectly. At the end of this part of the test, the student s reading ability is recalculated and this new Reading Ability Scale score determines which part of the NGRT Digital will be administered next. Page 15 of 26

The page above shows the graphical representation of responses to the passage comprehension part of the test. The same Question difficulty and Reading Ability scale have been used. In this part of the test, students must read and complete each passage before moving onto the next one; that is, the passages are not adaptive. However, after the initial passage, the student s reading ability is re-calculated and an appropriate next passage is administered. Comprehension questions have been classified and an analysis of which questions have been achieved by the student is shown in the table. Finally, this report includes a short narrative which will highlight the need, if any, for further assessment and recommend an appropriate next step. Page 16 of 26

Where students have been administered the Phonics part of NGRT Digital, these scores are given in a table with a short narrative which takes into account both the age of the student and the test results. NGRT Digital Group progress report for teachers The third in the suite of NGRT Digital reports is the Group progress report for teachers. This allows the results from two administrations of the test to be compared for a group of students. A six month time period between test sessions has been applied as the default; this will allow for both progress to be made and for the test to measure this progress in a meaningful way. Re-testing over a short time frame can be counter-productive and the results may not be reliable. Please note that if you are using NGRT twice in the same school year you must administer both forms (in either order) to be able to generate this report. Form A and Form A or Form B and Form B should be used over two or more school years but not within the same school year. The report has the following sections: What is NGRT Digital? Why use NGRT Digital to track progress? both of which give background information and an explanation of why the report has been developed. The third section: What is the Reading Ability Scale? explains how progress can be quantified using an additional measure which is unique in this format to NGRT. Page 17 of 26

Example scores are annotated: NGRT Digital Group progress report for teachers Example Results The Standard Age Score (SAS) is the most important piece of information derived from NGRT. The SAS is based on the number of questions a student has answered correctly: the score is adjusted for age and placed on a scale that makes a comparison with a nationally representative sample of students of the same age across the UK. The average score is 100. The SAS is key to benchmarking and tracking progress and is the fairest way to compare the performance of different students within a year group or across year groups. This is the difference between the Standard Age Score for the first administration of the test and the second administration of the test. The Stanine places the student's score on a scale of 1 (low) to 9 (high) and offers a broad overview of his or her performance. Performance on a test like NGRT can be influenced by a number of factors and the confidence bands are an indication of the range within which a student's score lies. The narrower the band the more reliable the score. 90% confidence bands are a very high level estimate. The NC (National Curriculum) reading level is based on teacher assessment collected when the test was developed. It is an estimate of the level the student has attained at the time NGRT was administered. Student name Age at test (yrs:mths) SAS SAS (90% confidence bands) Reading age SAS Overall confidence bands NC reading Stanine NPR Reading age difference Progress category Reading Stanine Ability Scale level Lower Upper SC PC 8 92 304 10:0 9:4 10:8 3B 6 7-1 Average 8 91 320 10:11 10:2 11:8 3A 9 8 5 45 332 11:7 10:10 12:4 4C 5 5 +21 Above average 8 90 408 17:0 16:0 17:0+ 5A 8 8 Marianne Gilbey 6:09 121 7:06 120 12:01 98 12:11 119 John Smith Age at test is the chronological age of the student at each test point. A student's score is only an estimate of their ability on any one occasion as performance can be affected by a number of factors. The dot represents the student's SAS and the horizontal line represents the confidence band. The yellow shaded area shows the average score range. Progress has been defined as below average, average or above average and is based on the national data set of students tested on two occasions. Nationally, 15% of students will fall into the below/above average categories and 70% in the average category. The National Percentile Rank (NPR) relates to the SAS and indicates the percentage of students obtaining any score. NPR of 50 is average. NPR of 5 means that the student's score is within the lowest 5% of the national sample; NPR of 95 means that the student's score is within the highest 5% of the national sample. The Reading Ability Scale is a development scale and can be used to monitor a student s reading ability or development over time. The values on the scale are 0 to 600 a higher scale score represents a higher reading ability level. The reading ability of a student aged 6 years is around 200; for age 9 years it is around 300; and for age 16 it is around 400. The reading age (or age equivalent score) is the age at which a score is most likely to be achieved based on the national sample. To allow for an easy comparison between a student's ability in Sentence Completion and Passage Comprehension, a Stanine score is given for both parts of NGRT. A gap of two or more Stanines is highlighted in the report. The table of Group scores allows immediate comparison of each student s performance at both test points. Direct comparison can be made of: Standard Age Score Overall stanine National Percentile Rank Age Equivalent Score NC Level Stanine for sentence completion Stanine for passage comprehension In addition, a visual representation of progress is included by the graphic showing the Standard Age Score with confidence bands. Level of progress is shown by SAS points gained (or otherwise) and this is further described as below average, average or above average. If a student s reading is average the SAS will be between 89 and 111. Because NGRT results are adjusted for age, average progress over a period of six months or more will be demonstrated by a similar score at both test points. A slightly lower score at the second test point does not mean that progress has not been made; the gap has to be statistically significant to show lack of progress or, indeed, higher than average progress. Page 18 of 26

Some examples: Connor Callaghan is a good reader and has demonstrated average progress over the 12 months between test points. This can be seen very clearly from the graphic which shows that his performance on both occasions is more or less identical: A drop of 2 standard score points is not significant. The drop in stanine score for sentence completion is probably due to test content at a higher level. This is determined by the chronological age of the student so will represent 12 months higher difficulty level from the first question with the test adapting to a level that reflects Connor s reading ability after two or three questions. Ruth Galley is an above average reader and again, like Connor, her results are, more or less, identical. However the gap between Ruth s reading at sentence level and at passage level has widened. This may be something that needs attention although with stanine scores of 5 and 9 (sentence completion and passage comprehension) her performance is in the average and high range respectively. Philip Lima has made progress that is classed as below average with a score at the second test point that is 8 standard score points lower. His reading overall is now in the below average range. Of concern will be the stanine score of 2 for passage comprehension. Philip s sentence level reading has improved and as performance on this first part of NGRT determines the difficulty level of the first passage, this may have impacted on his performance in passage comprehension. Thomas Hogarth s reading has improved to the extent that he is now in the average range and his progress can be classed as above average. His age equivalent score is much closer to this chronological age too. In both aspects of reading tested by NGRT Thomas has improved. Page 19 of 26

NGRT Digital Group progress report for teachers School: Sample School Group: ST Date(s) of first test: 29/06/2012 14/09/2012 Date(s) of second test: 04/06/2013 18/06/2013 Analysis by reading age equivalent band No. of students: 50 NGRT Form(s): A NGRT Form(s): B No. of students Mean age (yrs:mths) Percentage of students by reading age equivalent bands 8:00 8:11 9:00 9:11 10:00 10:11 11:00 11:11 12:00 12:11 6:11 or less 7:00 7:11 13:00 13:11 14:00+ All students 50 Males 25 Females 25 11:04 4% 8% 8% 12% 0% 12% 20% 6% 30% 12:03 0% 0% 10% 10% 10% 2% 4% 12% 52% 11:04 2% 6% 2% 6% 0% 6% 10% 6% 12% 12:03 0% 0% 6% 6% 0% 2% 4% 8% 24% 11:04 2% 2% 6% 6% 0% 6% 10% 0% 18% 12:03 0% 0% 4% 4% 10% 0% 0% 4% 28% The report includes an analysis by reading age for the group. The distribution of age equivalent scores has changed for the whole group and for boys and girls. Of note in the example is the increase in the percentage of boys in the top band (+12%) after 12 months. Page 20 of 26

NGRT Digital Group progress report for teachers School: Sample School Group: ST Date(s) of first test: 29/06/2012 14/09/2012 Date(s) of second test: 04/06/2013 18/06/2013 No. of students: 50 NGRT Form(s): A NGRT Form(s): B Group demographic comparison All students analysis The table below shows mean (average) scores for your group and the distribution of scores for your group compared with those for the national sample at the first point of testing followed by the second point of testing. Stanine 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 No. of students Mean SAS <74 74 81 82 88 89 96 97 103 104 111 112 118 119 126 >126 National All students 50 100 4% 7% 12% 17% 20% 17% 12% 7% 4% 101.1 2% 14% 8% 8% 16% 20% 26% 2% 4% 106.1 0% 10% 10% 12% 6% 18% 20% 18% 6% The table below shows the mean (average) scores with confidence bands for your group. All students No. of students Mean SAS SAS (90% confidence bands) National 100.0 101.1 All students 50 106.1 Set out is the distribution of SAS and stanine scores for the group against the national average. Page 21 of 26

There follows a similar analysis by gender. Further analysis will be determined by the demographic information uploaded for the group. Here is an example of this group analysed by Free School Meals. NGRT Digital Group progress report for teachers School: Sample School Group: ST Date(s) of first test: 29/06/2012 14/09/2012 Date(s) of second test: 04/06/2013 18/06/2013 No. of students: 50 NGRT Form(s): A NGRT Form(s): B Group demographic comparison Free school meals analysis The table below shows mean (average) scores for your group and the distribution of scores for your group compared with those for the national sample at the first point of testing followed by the second point of testing. Stanine 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 No. of students Mean SAS <74 74 81 82 88 89 96 97 103 104 111 112 118 119 126 >126 National All students 50 No 40 Yes 10 100 4% 7% 12% 17% 20% 17% 12% 7% 4% 101.1 2% 14% 8% 8% 16% 20% 26% 2% 4% 106.1 0% 10% 10% 12% 6% 18% 20% 18% 6% 102.6 2% 10% 4% 6% 16% 14% 22% 2% 4% 108.1 0% 6% 8% 8% 4% 14% 16% 18% 6% 95.3 0% 4% 4% 2% 0% 6% 4% 0% 0% 98.0 0% 4% 2% 4% 2% 4% 4% 0% 0% The table below shows the mean (average) scores with confidence bands for your group. Free school meals No. of students Mean SAS SAS (90% confidence bands) National 100.0 All students 50 101.1 106.1 No 40 102.6 108.1 Yes 10 95.3 98.0 Page 22 of 26

NGRT Digital Group progress report for teachers School: Sample School Group: ST Date(s) of first test: 29/06/2012 14/09/2012 Date(s) of second test: 04/06/2013 18/06/2013 No. of students: 50 NGRT Form(s): A NGRT Form(s): B Progress profiles The NGRT SAS scores for the first and second administrations of the test are shown in the diagram. Students who are considered to be making average progress are in the white band. Students making below average progress are in the orange band and those making above average progress are in the green band. Above average progress Average progress Below average progress Males Females The final section of the report presents data in a scattergram showing the distribution of categories of progress for the group. From this example it is clear to see that most students are above the dashed, diagonal line and this represents that the majority has made progress across the ability range. This is confirmed by the table which, in this case, shows that all but 4% of this group have made average or above average progress. Page 23 of 26

The last pages of the report list students in each category of progress. Page 24 of 26

Comparing students performance on sentence completion and passage comprehension NGRT provides a standard age score derived from the test as a whole which gives the most accurate and reliable indication of a student s reading ability. However, it is possible to look at sub-scale scores for each section of the test in order to determine if students have particular areas of strength or areas for further development in their reading skills. The scores for the sub-scales are presented using stanines rather than standard age scores. Stanines minimise the over interpretation of small, insignificant differences among test scores. As a rough guide, if the sub-scale stanines are the same or differ by one, this indicates similar performance on the two sub-scales. If the stanine score differs by two or more, it may be an indication of significantly different performance on the two sections of the test. Therefore it is important to recognise that any significant differences in the two subscale scores may only be indicative of a difference in performance and would benefit from further investigation. For example the Suffolk Reading Scale (SRS) could be used to confirm students reading ability at sentence level and the York Assessment of Reading Comprehension (YARC) could be used to confirm their ability in reading comprehension. Sentence completion The sentence completion section of the NGRT assesses students reading skills at sentence level. These skills are slightly different from those used when reading a whole text and answering retrieval and inferential questions about that text. In the sentence completion questions students have much less contextual information to use in order to determine the missing word. Therefore students who rely heavily on contextual cues to draw even simple inferences may score less well on this section of the NGRT. The lack of contextual cues will mean that students have to rely more heavily on their word knowledge (vocabulary) in order to successfully answer the more difficult sentence completion questions where the vocabulary may be considered challenging for students in that age range. Therefore students with a more extensive vocabulary may perform better on the sentence completion questions. In sentence completion questions the students also need to rely more heavily on syntactic cues (the structure of a sentence) and their own knowledge of grammatical features when deciding which of the five possible options best completes the sentence. Some of the distracters that are used in the sentence completion questions have been chosen as they are semantically (in meaning) or graphically (in written form) similar to the target word; however using any of these distracters would make the sentence grammatically incorrect. Therefore the student is required to read both the sentence and all five of the answer options very closely in order to determine the correct answer. Although students need to be able to make single local inferences in order to answer the sentence completion questions they do not need to employ any of the more complex global inferencing skills required in the passage completion section of the test. Therefore a student who has difficulty understanding longer texts or making complex inferences may perform significantly better on the sentence completion section of the NGRT. Passage comprehension In the passage comprehension section students need to use a variety of reading skills to read up to three passages and answer a number of questions on each passage. In reading and answering the texts students are expected to make global as well as local inferences. Each text is accompanied by a range of question types including: Page 25 of 26

Context comprehension Retrieval Inference and deduction Organisation of texts Writer s use of language Writer s purpose and viewpoints Social, cultural and historic tradition. The scores students obtain on this section of the test are influenced by their ability across a wide range of reading skills. Students who are very good at decoding but poor at inference and deduction may obtain a significantly lower stanine score on this section of the test. The majority of students will achieve scores that are within one or two stanines: for example 2:3 or 7:6 and for exceptionally good readers 9:8 or 7:9. It is likely that just a small number of students will need additional investigation as indicated above but this aspect of NGRT now enables screening and progress tracking for large groups of students and more meaningful individual profiling from a single test. Testwise Technical Support Team If you have any problems using Testwise, email the Testwise Technical Support Team at support@gl-assessment.co.uk. You can view our full Testwise Support Services on our website: https://www.gl-assessment.co.uk/support/online-testing-support/ Copyright 2017 GL Assessment GL Assessment is part of the GL Education. 1st Floor, Vantage London, Great West Road, Brentford, TW8 9AG. gl-assessment.co.uk info@gl-assessment.co.uk Page 26 of 26