National Board of Medical Examiners Customized Examination Scaled Score Interpretation Guide

Similar documents
INTERNAL MEDICINE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (IM-ITE SM )

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Creating an Online Test. **This document was revised for the use of Plano ISD teachers and staff.

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Examinee Information. Assessment Information

Houghton Mifflin Online Assessment System Walkthrough Guide

TIMSS ADVANCED 2015 USER GUIDE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL DATABASE. Pierre Foy

InCAS. Interactive Computerised Assessment. System

CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACHIEVEMENT TEST Introduction One of the important duties of a teacher is to observe the student in the classroom, laboratory and

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics

We re Listening Results Dashboard How To Guide

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Using SAM Central With iread

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Emporia State University Degree Works Training User Guide Advisor

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Home Access Center. Connecting Parents to Fulton County Schools

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

Your School and You. Guide for Administrators

Independent Assurance, Accreditation, & Proficiency Sample Programs Jason Davis, PE

DOES OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION AMONG GIFTED STUDENTS?

Moodle 2 Assignments. LATTC Faculty Technology Training Tutorial

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

MyUni - Turnitin Assignments

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

Guide for Test Takers with Disabilities

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2010). Social psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

License to Deliver FAQs: Everything DiSC Workplace Certification

Achievement Testing Program Guide. Spring Iowa Assessment, Form E Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT), Form 7

Bittinger, M. L., Ellenbogen, D. J., & Johnson, B. L. (2012). Prealgebra (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

ecampus Basics Overview

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

Understanding and Interpreting the NRC s Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (2010)

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Evaluation of Teach For America:

MMOG Subscription Business Models: Table of Contents

Running head: LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF UNIVERSITY REGISTERS 1

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Online Administrator Guide

TIPS PORTAL TRAINING DOCUMENTATION

TOEIC Bridge Test Secure Program guidelines

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

BLACKBOARD TRAINING PHASE 2 CREATE ASSESSMENT. Essential Tool Part 1 Rubrics, page 3-4. Assignment Tool Part 2 Assignments, page 5-10

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.

Grade Dropping, Strategic Behavior, and Student Satisficing

STANDARDIZED COURSE SYLLABUS

i>clicker Setup Training Documentation This document explains the process of integrating your i>clicker software with your Moodle course.

EMPOWER Self-Service Portal Student User Manual

Best Colleges Main Survey

Evaluation of Usage Patterns for Web-based Educational Systems using Web Mining

Evaluation of Usage Patterns for Web-based Educational Systems using Web Mining

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning

NCEO Technical Report 27

Preferences...3 Basic Calculator...5 Math/Graphing Tools...5 Help...6 Run System Check...6 Sign Out...8

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

EDCI 699 Statistics: Content, Process, Application COURSE SYLLABUS: SPRING 2016

Starting an Interim SBA

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

2 User Guide of Blackboard Mobile Learn for CityU Students (Android) How to download / install Bb Mobile Learn? Downloaded from Google Play Store

Does the Difficulty of an Interruption Affect our Ability to Resume?

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Schoology Getting Started Guide for Teachers

Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

STUDENT MOODLE ORIENTATION

Millersville University Degree Works Training User Guide

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

BOS 3001, Fundamentals of Occupational Safety and Health Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes.

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

General Information about NMLS and Requirements of the ROC

Theory of Probability

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

A Comparison of the Effects of Two Practice Session Distribution Types on Acquisition and Retention of Discrete and Continuous Skills

Staff Briefing WHY IS IT IMPORTANT FOR STAFF TO PROMOTE THE NSS? WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO COMPLETE THE NSS? WHICH STUDENTS SHOULD I COMMUNICATE WITH?

PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT OF TEACHERS AND STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. James B. Chapman. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia

Lyman, M. D. (2011). Criminal investigation: The art and the science (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

Functional Skills. Maths. OCR Report to Centres Level 1 Maths Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Moodle MyFeedback update April 2017

Degree Audit Self-Service For Students 1

Textbook Evalyation:

Foothill College Fall 2014 Math My Way Math 230/235 MTWThF 10:00-11:50 (click on Math My Way tab) Math My Way Instructors:

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Cypress College STEM² Program Application

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Running head: METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES FOR ACADEMIC LISTENING 1. The Relationship between Metacognitive Strategies Awareness

Preschool assessment takes places for many reasons: screening, GENERAL MEASURES OF COGNITION FOR THE PRESCHOOL CHILD. Elizabeth O.

SCOPUS An eye on global research. Ayesha Abed Library

Transcription:

Score Interpretation Guide Page of 0 Test Dates: to Scaling Group: B00000 () NBME s provide medical schools with a tool for measuring students' understanding of a series of content areas defined by each school. Course objectives vary across schools, and customized examinations can be targeted to meet the specifics of a given curriculum. NBME neither sets nor recommends a "passing" score. Generally, s should be used in conjunction with other indicators of student performance to determine grades. Scores scores were computed for the total test and the content areas that were defined by your faculty during the test construction process. scores were computed to have a mean of and a standard deviation of for the scaling group of examinees identified in the heading of this report. Though the scaled scores have the look and feel of percent correct scores, they are not. This scale provides a useful tool for comparing the scores of your students to one another. It is important to note that the scaled scores produced for this administration can only be compared to other administrations of this same exam that used the same scaling group. In order to compute scaled scores, the scaling group must have at least examinees. For the first administration of an exam, the scaling group consists of examinees from that administration only. For subsequent administrations of the same exam, your school had the option to select the scaling group to be used to compute scaled scores. Scaling groups for the same exam can be defined based on examinees from the current administration, previous administrations, or a combination of both. When a school selects the same scaling group for all administrations of an exam, it allows for direct comparison of examinee scores across test administrations of the same exam. Percent correct scores were also computed for the total test and content areas. Interpretation Guide. For more information on percent correct scores, please see the Percent Correct Score Rosters and Distributions of Scores The Roster of Scores shows a total test scaled score for each examinee. The scaled scores for the content areas that you selected to appear on the roster are also shown. A Roster of Percent Correct Scores is also provided for each administration. All reported scores also appear in a comma separated value (CSV) text file that can be downloaded and used to import scores into your local database. A content area must have at least items in order for the score to be reported. Numerical scores for content areas with less than items are not reported due to low reliability. A frequency distribution of the total test scaled score for the total group is provided if two or more examinees tested during the dates shown above. The distribution shows the number and percentage of examinees at each score, along with corresponding cumulative frequencies and percentages.

Score Interpretation Guide Page of 0 Test Dates: to Scaling Group: B00000 () Individual Performance Profiles Individual performance profiles reporting total test scaled and percent correct scores are provided if there were at least examinees in the scaling group. Profile bands representing performance on the total test and areas of relative strengths and weakness in content areas selected by your school to appear on the profiles are also shown. A content area must have at least 0 items to appear on a profile. Due to increased measurement error based on small sample sizes and item groups, profile bands for content areas with less than 0 items are not reported. Profiles are posted as separate report files in a zip file, along with a consolidated report file that contains each examinee s profile sorted in last name order. Item Analysis Report If 0 or more examinees in the current administration met the criteria for inclusion in an item analysis (IA), an online IA report is provided to help you interpret their performance on each item. Examinees who did not take the exam under standard timing conditions, scored more than standard deviations below the mean, omitted more than 0% of the items, and other examinees who were removed at the request of your school were not included in the IA. Item text and related images, along with content area information, item difficulty and the percentage of examinees answering each option are shown. If the IA is based on at least 0 examinees, discrimination indices are also provided. Historical item difficulties for each item based on USMLE Step and/or an NBME subject examination are provided for gross comparative purposes only. Since these values were computed when items appeared in examinations administered in different contexts, caution is advised when interpreting and comparing historical item statistics. Most of the same information is also provided in a printable report and a CSV file. Further information on interpreting the online IA report can be viewed by clicking on the Help link on the IA screen. The online IA report is available for six months from the date it was posted and can only be accessed with the use of an RSA SecurID key provided to your school s Executive Chief Proctor.

Score Descriptive Statistics Page of 0 Scaling Group: B00000 () Test Dates: Order ID: B00000 to score descriptive statistics, reliability and the standard error of measurement (SEM) values appear below for the total test and all content areas defined by your school. The reliability coefficient estimate refers to a score s expected consistency. An examination score is reliable to the extent that administration of a different random sample of items from the same content domain would result in little or no change in an examinee s rank order in the group. Reliability is affected by the homogeneity of the items and of the examinees, as well as by the length of the examination. Measurement error is present in all test scores, and the SEM provides an index of the imprecision of scores. Like the standard error for a laboratory study, the SEM is expressed on the same scale as the test scores and can be used to construct confidence intervals around the scores. For example, if an examinee receiving a scaled score of 0 was tested repeatedly with similar exams, 9% of the scores received should fall between and (0 plus/minus two times an SEM of ). The reliabilities and SEMs are computed based on the scaling group of examinees. Examinees who did not take the exam under standard timing conditions, scored more than standard deviations below the mean, omitted more than 0% of the items, and other examinees who were removed at the request of your school were excluded from these calculations. Total Group Scaling Group (N=00) (N=99) ID Content Area N Items Reliability SEM Mean SD Low High Mean SD Low * * Total Content Area Content Area Content Area Content Area 00 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 High * This content area does not appear on the roster but may appear on the individual performance profile.

Score Distribution (Based on All Examinees Tested) Page of 0 Test Dates: to Scaling Group: B00000 () Score 0 9 0 Cumulative Count % Count % Score Count % 0 9 0 0 9 9 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 Cumulative Count % 90 0 09 9 0 9 9 9 9 99 00

Roster of Scores Page of 0 Scaling Group: B00000 () Test Dates: to ID 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Name EXAMINEE A EXAMINEE B EXAMINEE C EXAMINEE D EXAMINEE E Score Content Area ID* ( Scores) * Please refer to the Score Descriptive Statistics page for content area names. Note that if no scores are listed, no content areas with at least items were selected to appear on the roster.