Network for Quality Teaching and Learning (HB3233) Educator Effectiveness and Common Core State Standards District Application for Funds

Similar documents
LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Vertical Teaming. in a small school

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

School Leadership Rubrics

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Comprehensive Progress Report

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Hokulani Elementary School

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Cuero Independent School District

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Mark Keppel High School

Program Change Proposal:

EMPLOYEE CALENDAR NOTES

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Strategic Plan Dashboard

NC Global-Ready Schools

Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING THE HANDOUTS AND THE POWERPOINT

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Improvement Plan

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Kahului Elementary School

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

A. Permission. All students must have the permission of their parent or guardian to participate in any field trip.

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. gadoe.

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Geographic Area - Englewood

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

SCNS changed to MUM 2634

Skaggs Elementary. Plano ISD School Improvement Plan: School Based Improvement Committee. Principal: Jamey J Allen

Public School Choice DRAFT

World s Best Workforce Plan

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Financing Education In Minnesota

Dr. Brent Benda and Ms. Nell Smith


Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

Librarian/Library Faculty Meeting

Distinguished Teacher Review

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

CDS Code

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Brandon Alternative School

Transcription:

Network for Quality Teaching and Learning (HB3233) Educator Effectiveness and Common Core State Standards District Application for Funds The purpose of the EE/CCSS Strategic Investment funds is to help build school district capacity for high quality professional learning to support implementation of Educator Effectiveness (SB290/ESEA Waiver) and the Common Core State Standards to improve educator practice and student learning. Districts participating in the EE/CCSS Professional Learning Conferences may complete and submit this form with an attached budget worksheet and narrative for approval between January 2, 2014 and May 1, 2014. Please send all forms to Sarah Phillips (email: sarah.phillips@state.or.us; fax: (503) 378-5156; or, U.S. mail: Office of Learning, ATTN: Sarah Phillips, 255 Capitol St. NE, Salem, OR 97310 ). Districts can expect funds will be available in EGMS, upon approval, within three weeks of submission. All funds must be spent by June 30, 2015. District Name: Lebanon Community School District Please address the following questions in your narrative. (expand the number of pages as needed): 1. Describe how the Standards for Professional Learning (Learning Communities, Leadership, Resources, Data, Learning Design, Communication) informed your application. Learning Communities: We have both horizontal (grade level) and vertical (spanning 3 grades) learning communities at all levels, K-12, and we have regular meeting times for our learning community work. The need for these teams to meet and develop performance tasks aligned to the common core is a central theme of our application. Leadership: We have both teacher leaders and principals facilitating our learning community work. We created a CCSS leadership team comprised of both teachers and administrators to lead this work in our district. Resources: We have used both building and district resources to provide the time and training our leaders and teams need to facilitate this work. Data: We are a data-driven organization and are continually analyzing data from our formative and summative assessments that we use in our district to determine where interventions and extentions are necessary. Learning Designs: We are using the research from John Hattie s work (Visible Learning) to help guide our work. We are also accessing resources and research that was used to build the Engage NY CCSS curriculum. Communication: We are constantly communicating our progress to all stakeholders. We have designed our training based upon feedback from a survey of staff. We also use Google Aps to collaboratively create, share, and store all of our documents for the CCSS so that teachers can access the materials easily when they need them. 2. What is the focus of your professional learning activities in this application (e.g. standards/rubric training for teachers and principals; subscription resources, e.g. Teachscape, TalentEd, PD 360; Inter-rater reliability training; creating CCSS aligned materials and resources; utilizing regional coaches; release time for peer observations, creating assessments, and other research based practices that support your districts full implementation of EE and CCSS.)? Standards/rubric training for teachers and principals Inter-rater reliability training

Creating CCSS aligned materials and resources Creating assessments 3. What are your district s goals for use of these funds and what outcomes do you expect for the 2013-15 school year? Move from Standard-referenced to Proficiency -based grading. Develop rubrics for all performance tasks that are aligned to the CCSS. Train teachers on the implementation of CCSS rubrics. Align all common assessments to the CCSS. Standards for K-12 in ELA and Math will be unpacked and mapped/paced. AVID strategies will be implemented throughout grades 6-12. 4. How will you leverage other funds to support this work? We will use Title IIA funds, Title I funds, Tier II ESD funds, and general education funds to support this work. We believe aligning our curriculum to the CCSS standards and developing effective educators is the most critical work we can be engaged with at this time. We are using resources from all of these funds to support this work. 5. Please describe the steps (who, what, and when) your district will take to focus on and strengthen your professional learning to support implementation of EE/CCSS. 2013-2014 Board will be presented a Standards-Referenced Policy for grading by the Superintendent by August 2014. Identify and adopt rubrics for CCSS for K-12 grade levels. Identify 2, at a minimum, performance tasks for math and ELA for K-12 grade levels, which District level teams will complete by June 2014. 2014-15 Establish and train a teacher team for the purpose of becoming local experts in the practice of proficiency-based grading. Secondary teachers will unpack and map standards for ELA and math. Create or identify and adopt rubrics for performance tasks aligned to CCSS. Train K-12 teachers on CCSS rubrics. Establish grade level teams with representation from across the district to design or identify and adopt common assessments aligned to the CCSS. Implement AVID strategies in grades 6-12. Continue to support and train teachers on SLGs (SMART goals).

Required Assurances The district assures and certifies compliance with ail regulations, policies, and requirements as they relate to the acceptance and use of state funds. The district agrees to carry out the project as proposed in the application. District Superintenldenfc's3igTiature

Budget Worksheet Function Improvement Support Support School Support Support Staff Services Staff Community Total by Object of Instruction Services Services Administration Services Services Teacher Services Services Services Instructional Instructional (24XX) Business, Fiscal, Central Advancement, Technology (30XX) Activities (221X) Staff: Staff Transportation Recruitment, Services Planning, Assessment (2240) (25XX) Research, Retention (2660) and Testing Development, (2640) (2230) Evaluation Object (2620) 1. Licensed Salaries (111) 2. Classified Salaries (112) 3. Administrative Salaries (113) 1. Substitute 6,000 3,740 9,740 Salaries (12X) 2. Additional 4,000 2,000 6,000 Salaries (130) 3. Benefits (2XX) 3,340 1,920 5,260 4. Instructional, Technical, and Professional Services (31X) 5. Travel (340) 1,000 18,564 19,564 6. Communication (350) 7. Non- Instructional Professional and Technical Services (38X) 8. Instructional 2,500 2,000 4,500 Supplies and Materials (4XX) 9. Dues and Fees (640) Total by Function 16,840 28,224 45,064

1. Licensed Salaries Budget Narrative: Please describe each line item from the budget worksheet as specifically as possible in the table below 2. Classified Salaries 3. Administrative Salaries 4. Substitute Salaries 5. Additional Salaries Substitutes used for staff to attend conferences and release for the CCSS/EE Team to design professional development for grade level and content are teams Extra duty hours for team members to prepare and follow up with in-district professional development 6. Benefits 7. Instructional, Technical, and Professional Services 8. Travel Travel to conference in Portland and Los Angeles 9. Communication 10. Non-Instructional Professional and Technical Services Additional Comments:

Network for Quality Teaching and Learning (HB3233) Educator Effectiveness and Common Core State Standards District Reporting on Use of Funds District Name : Lebanon Community School District Please provide a summary that describes how the EE-CCSS Strategic Initiative funds were used to support professional learning for Educator Effectiveness/Common Core State Standards implementation in your district. This information will be reported to the State Legislature and posted on the ODE website. Abstract (3-5 sentences): The EE-CCSS Team conducted a survey of all certified staff in the area of common core implementation, common assessments aligned to Smarter Balanced and the districtwide engagement strategies. With this information, we designed professional development for grade level and content area teams using district early release days and teacher leaders. Please indicate the number and types of educators that were involved in implementation in your district: Categories of Educators # Elem # Middle #High School #District District Administrators 2 Building Administrators.5 *K-8 th.5 *K-8th 1 Subject Area Teachers (specify 4 1 1 content) Teachers of CTE Teachers of Special Education Teachers of English Learners Specialists, Librarians, Counselors, other Student Services Exclusive Bargaining Units representing teachers Please describe any collaborative structures for professional learning developed or enhanced to support implementation of EE/CCSS in your district with these funds. We will have teacher leaders at each grade level lead with the support of a principal. The teacher leaders are part of the EE/CCSS team and will meet monthly to differentiate their instruction and design the next step to the common goal of the team. This team aligned the goal with the district priorities and designed a three year plan. What lessons learned/models/examples can you share with other districts? Designing internal professional development to ensure all teachers have a basic understanding and skill set.

Vision: Creating equitable access to CCSS content for all Lebanon students Performance Tasks & Curriculum 2013-2014 Step Up To Writing (Dist. PD) Unpacking ELA CCSS Standards ELA Performance Tasks Rubric Calibration Math Performance Tasks Math Performance Tasks Rubrics 2014-2015 Math Performance Tasks Rubric Callibration Performance Task in Pinnacle Math Curriculum Map/ Pacing Guide/ Unpacking CCSS Standards Smarter Balanced (Dist. PD) ELA Adoption 2015-2016 Implement new ELA Adoption ELA Curriculum Map/Pacing Guide/ Unpacking CCSS Standards Step Up To Writing 2016-2017 Common Formative Assessments Proficiency Based Grading 2013-14 Pinnacle gradebook in Pioneer, Hamilton Creek, Cascade and Riverview Board Policy reflective of standards based grading Attach standards to assignments 2014-15 Pinnacle gradebook in all schools grades 1st-12th Develop a group of people as Proficiency based grading "experts" 2015-16 Full implementation of Pinnacle Content area implement profiency grading throughout the district

Vision: Creating equitable access to CCSS content for all Lebanon students Every teacher is expected to know the Common Core standards being taught in their grade level, the order in which they are taught, the appropriate formative and summative assessments, be calibrated in the common rubric and enter these scores into Pinnacle to report to parents. In order to achieve this, every teacher needs to be involved in the process. To this end, we will flatten the communication flow by having two teams doing this work. CCSS District Team Who: 1 teacher from each grade level and representatives from every building 2 meetings per month: (1) 4 hour meeting-decisions (1) 1 hour meeting-planning Lead Grade Level Teams with an administrator District Grade Level Teams Who: Every teacher in that grade level 1 meeting on every third Wednesday Early Release Purpose: Pacing Guide, Curriculum Alignment, Performance Tasks, Common Rubrics, Standards Referenced Grading, Prepare for Smarter Balanced