Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees

Similar documents
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Monitoring & Evaluation Tools for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

State Parental Involvement Plan

Monitoring & Evaluation of Community and Stakeholder Engagement. Nombuyiselo Tshandu Wits Clinical HIV/TB Research Unit South Africa

Poster Presentation Best Practices. Kuba Glazek, Ph.D. Methodology Expert National Center for Academic and Dissertation Excellence Los Angeles

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Casual, approximately 8 hours per week. Director, CLIPP. Employee Name Signature Date

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Lymphedema Advocacy Group

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Summarizing Webinar Protocol and Guide for Facilitators

Class Numbers: & Personal Financial Management. Sections: RVCC & RVDC. Summer 2008 FIN Fully Online

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

The Moodle and joule 2 Teacher Toolkit

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Committee to explore issues related to accreditation of professional doctorates in social work

Thesis-Proposal Outline/Template

ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

Evaluation of Respondus LockDown Browser Online Training Program. Angela Wilson EDTECH August 4 th, 2013

Model of Human Occupation

Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Public Policy Agenda for Children

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

- COURSE DESCRIPTIONS - (*From Online Graduate Catalog )

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

The Entrepreneurial Mindset Syllabus

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

Gena Bell Vargas, Ph.D., CTRS

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Patient/Caregiver Surveys

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

1 Instructional Design Website: Making instruction easy for HCPS Teachers Henrico County, Virginia

School Leadership Rubrics

COMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Faculty Athletics Committee Annual Report to the Faculty Council September 2014

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

Designing Propagation Plans to Promote Sustained Adoption of Educational Innovations

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Trainee Handbook. In Collaboration With. University of Arkansas for Medical Science (UAMS)

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1

2. CONTINUUM OF SUPPORTS AND SERVICES

BEING MORTAL. Community Screening & Discussion Toolkit

COURSE SYLLABUS for PTHA 2250 Current Concepts in Physical Therapy

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

An Introduction to LEAP

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

Writing Functional Dysphagia Goals

Trauma Informed Child-Parent Psychotherapy (TI-CPP) Application Guidance for

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Planning a research project

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

Executive Guide to Simulation for Health

Committee on Academic Policy and Issues (CAPI) Marquette University. Annual Report, Academic Year

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Local Activism: Identifying Community Activists (2 hours 30 minutes)

Adult Degree Program. MyWPclasses (Moodle) Guide

Consultation skills teaching in primary care TEACHING CONSULTING SKILLS * * * * INTRODUCTION

IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

Research papers free download pdf >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Education and Training Committee, 19 November Standards of conduct, performance and ethics communications plan

Lecturing in the Preclinical Curriculum A GUIDE FOR FACULTY LECTURERS

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

INTERNAL MEDICINE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (IM-ITE SM )

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

ATW 202. Business Research Methods

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

Evaluation Off Off On On

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Transcription:

Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees Produced by: Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center (MSKTC) For the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) Under Grant Number H133A110004 March 2012

Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees Introduction This guide is intended to support model systems (MS) grantees in their efforts to engage stakeholders through communities of practice. Along with your fellow MS grantees, you are already part of an existing CoP with a shared purpose: research in the areas of SCI, TBI, and Burn injury. Your existing CoP uses various modes of communication: listservs, emails, conference calls, in-person meetings, and cross-collaboration among injury areas. Many members of the audiences for your work are also engaged in their own CoPs. Through linking the community of MS grantees with a constellation of audience communities, you have the opportunity to significantly enhance the relevance and broaden the reach of your research, bringing it closer to the lived experience of those who could inform, benefit from, and apply it. There is tremendous potential to bring existing communities of practice into the circles of MS grantees to support your research and recruitment efforts and your priority planning. Connecting with CoPs may help you to define and plan your research, expose you to a pool of potential participants in research studies, or broaden the reach of MS research results. In this guide you will find descriptions of a community of practice, including its purpose, participants, and modes of communication. Additionally, the guide offers step-by-step guidance on how to connect within an existing community of practice, identify what information you would like to share, what kinds of interactions you are seeking, preliminary questions you may have, and ways to track your engagement and evaluate the results of your efforts. You can use the worksheet at the end of this guide to create your plan for CoP engagement. Please input your responses on a copy of the worksheet as you read through the guide. In addition to creating this guide, the Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center (MSKTC) provides technical assistance to help you plan and effectively engage with CoPs. For more information, please contact us at MSKTC@air.org. Part I: Basics of a Community of Practice What is a community of practice? A community of practice (CoP) is a set of relationships and ongoing interactions among a group of individuals with common interests. In other words, it is a group of people who meet to discuss a topic of common interest. For example, a professional CoP may involve clinicians who meet in person to share practices and address common challenges in treating patients. In this example, the CoP may meet monthly with a different clinician presenting a practice and challenges in treatment, and then the group would discuss how these challenges might be addressed. The focus of this group is shared learning. Additional resources such as research and online tools may enhance that learning and sharing. In a CoP, participants develop their own shared goals, agenda, and timeline, while the members of the group share leadership and Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 1

responsibility for each meeting. Also, the members will determine how long the CoP will continue. When the goals of a CoP are met, the participants may end the CoP or they may redefine a focus and goals and continue in a new direction. It is important to note that participants may join or leave the CoP at any time, and the size of the group may fluctuate over time. Although communication will occur electronically in an online CoP, the steps needed to establish goals and activities for the group remain the same. There are many existing communities of practice whose membership includes people you may want to engage to strengthen your research in spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and burn injury (Burn). Online communities of practice are likely to be most accessible to you and allow you a broader reach. Medical professionals, individuals with SCI, TBI and Burn, and their families and friends are all already regularly interacting over the Internet in forums to which you may be able to fruitfully connect. For example, as you see in the table below, the PatientsLikeMe website hosts communities for individuals with TBI as well for those with SCI. On Allnurses.com, practitioners in the burn injury area are linked. Table 1. Selected Sample* of Existing Communities of Practice CoP Name Participant type Location (on- or off-line) Type Activity PatientsLikeMe PatientsLikeMe Allnurses.com Individuals with SCI Individuals with TBI Nurses working with Burn patients http://www.patientslikeme.com/conditions/271 Online forum and blogs http://www.patientslikeme.com/conditions/150 Online forum and blogs 80 members 368 members http://allnurses.com/burn-nursing/ Online forum 571,885 members * The MSKTC has developed a list of online and face-to-face CoPs in the areas of SCI, TBI, Burn, and general health. Contact the Center for more information. Are CoPs always online? CoPs are not always online. As noted in the definition above, a CoP is a community, not a location. A CoP might interact online, over the phone, face-to-face, or through some combination of these means. Social media has enhanced opportunities to collaborate asynchronously, but the availability of one-to-many social media does not replace the need for personal contact. This personal contact can be done by email, phone call, or in-person meetings. Fortunately, technology can enhance the ways in which we can collaborate. However, the heart of a CoP is its members who have a shared interest and are engaged in conversation and collaboration with each other. Who participates in a CoP? A CoP may involve any number or type of individual. In Table 1, we see CoPs for individuals with an injury and a CoP of nurses. There are also communities of practice for family members, caregivers, other practitioners, and researchers. Anyone can participate in a CoP; however, your choice of CoP in which to participate will depend on your personal or professional goals. There are several types of groups that MS grantees will want to interact with, including individuals with an injury, family members/caregivers, nurses, doctors, physical therapists, and researchers Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 2

in the field of that injury area, general practitioners who treat individuals with an injury after they leave acute care settings, advocacy groups, and policymakers. How will we know if our participation in a CoP has any results? The indicators you will want to track will depend on the goals you set for engagement through a CoP. In many cases, you may seek to increase the frequency of two-way communication with stakeholder groups. In this case, some basic indicators might include: Number of meetings of the CoP (if in person) Number of participants in the CoP Number of replies to or comments on your online posts Ratings of content you contribute (if the technology used has a rating feature) Number of messages (emails, IMs, tweets, etc.) exchanged between you and community members Number of downloads from the MS website Number of visits to the MS web pages As you can see, some measures can be used for online or in-person interactions. Creating a simple tracking mechanism to capture contacts and other indicators is helpful and can be done in Excel or other software. However, you want to know more than just numbers you want to know whether the information you shared with consumers is useful to them or used by them and how. And as you gather input from consumers, you want to let them know how the information they have shared with you is being used by the Model System. For these data, you need to consider what qualitative information you would like to gather. Analyzing the content of members posts to the community is an easy place to start: Do they mention your research and your participation in the community? Are they positively disposed to it? Do their contributions suggest that they are applying what they are learning from you or that they feel you are being responsive to their needs in your planning? Part II: Step-by-Step Guide to Getting Started How do I begin a CoP with other interested participants? This guide presents ways to enter into relationships with established groups to create a community of practice around topics of interest to you. The MSKTC has identified a number of online and face-to-face communities of consumers that exist to discuss issues of health care generally, or specifically about SCI, TBI, or Burn. We present establishing your presence in an existing CoP through seven steps: Step 1: Goals Step 2: Audience Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 3

Step 3: Mode and Frequency Step 4: Identifying MS Information to Share and How Step 5: Identifying Questions for Participants Step 6: Feedback and Measurement Step 7: Sharing Results The remainder of this guide will walk you through activities using the Worksheet in Appendix A to create your CoP engagement plan. Pull out the Worksheet when you are ready to begin and read on. Step 1: Goals Your first step will be to determine your goals for a CoP, which will help to clarify whether you would like to engage with an injury-specific or a general health group, and whether you would like to find (or create) an in-person or online group. Sample goals: Engage consumers in our Center s research projects Get feedback on materials we develop Get input to our research topics for study Recruit advisory committee members Disseminate information developed by our Center and other MS grantees You should identify 2-5 goals for your CoP. These goals will drive your engagement throughout the process and will inform the types of information you share and the questions you ask of other participants. Note that your goals may change over time. Step 2: Audience Both setting your goals and selecting your audience go hand in hand at the start of your planning. Which audience do you intend to engage with? It depends on your goals. For example, if you goal is to help clinicians to improve their evidence-based practices, your audience may be a CoP of therapists. If your goal is to recruit participants for your research studies, then your audience may involve a CoP of individuals with an injury or patients in general. Sample audience: People with SCI Caregivers of persons with SCI Family members of persons with SCI Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 4

In this example, we have listed 3 distinct but related types of participants. In fact, you may find that existing CoPs tend to serve only individuals with an injury, or primarily family members of a person with an injury. To begin, select just one primary audience and note that you may expand reach or ask those CoP participants to share information with secondary audiences. Step 3: Mode and Frequency Now that you have determined your goals and primary audience, how would you like to interact and how frequently? The MSKTC has gathered a list of online and face-to-face CoPs for you to peruse, or you may have identified another CoP. Select the mode that will allow your staff to best interact and then determine how frequently staff will be required to participate in the CoP. Sample mode: Join an existing online community of practice on PatientsLikeMe that has 80 patient members Sample frequency: Two staff members join the group Each staff member checks discussions weekly Each staff member posts at least once per month Note that you may need to change the frequency or number of staff involved, depending on how engaged the participants are. You may also decide to join more than one group, or participate in both an online forum and an in-person group nearby. Also, the MSKTC staff will be available to help with initial contact to CoP moderators to introduce the MS grantees, if requested. Step 4: Identifying MS Information to Share and How As you plan your approach to engaging in a CoP, consider what specific information you want to share, how you want to interact with participants, and what questions you may have. Remember joining an existing group will require some time to build relationships and trust with the group members. Allow time for interactions among the members and your staff to grow. First, your MS project staff will introduce themselves to the group. Then, your staff will find ways to interact with the group periodically that advances the goals of the community while also advancing those of your research. It is important when joining a CoP, as with any new group, to get familiar with the community including the individuals who participate, their goals, and the common ideas and information that they share. As you engage more frequently and over time in the CoP and build trust with members, you may begin to influence those discussions and goals of the group. Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 5

Sample information to share: Two staff members will introduce themselves and describe their work for the MS, what is a Model System, how to reach us, and our goals of learning from patients about their questions and concerns to help inform the research we are doing We have several factsheets on SCI topics that we will share We will generate interest in joining our advisory committee by sharing what the committee does, time commitment, and some results we ve had Sample interactions: We will listen in on conversations by lurking to learn what patients are talking about We will learn who the frequent posters are and how people respond Based on comments, we will link to factsheets or other resources we know about to build our reputation as a reliable source for members If questions come up that another MS can answer, we will bring those questions to the MS listserv. It may seem unnecessary to specify exactly what types of interactions you will engage in; however, having clear expectations for your staff means that they will know how much time to spend given the limited resources and heavy workload of your team. In addition to interactions as shown above, you may also build in some reporting time at your regular team meetings to share the results of your staff engagement. Step 5: Identifying Questions for Participants In addition to sharing information and resources that your MS can offer, you may also have questions that you would like to ask of the CoP members. These questions might reflect current research, or ideas and interests you have for future research. Or, your questions might relate to whether clinicians use a particular evidence-based practice, for example. Consider your questions and whether you can ask a question every few weeks, or if you would like to develop a brief survey for members to complete. Sample questions for participants: We plan to ask the CoP members some questions about pain management After a month or so of active participation, our staff will start to ask questions and gather feedback As we see interest building, we will ask members if they would be interested in participating (if they are local; near another SCI MS as a referral) in our study or on an advisory committee. Continue to use the worksheet to identify your next steps. Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 6

Step 6: Feedback and Measurement Gathering feedback from participants of the CoPs can help make the CoPs more useful. In addition, to determine the effectiveness of your CoP activities, you will want to measure the results of your engagement in some way that is helpful to you without creating undue burden on your research team. Consider the various metrics your MS would like to have in hand at the end of six months. You will want to gather both quantitative and qualitative measures where possible. Measures: Examples: Number of participants in the CoP at the start and end of the 6-month period Number (or types) of replies to our postings in the forum (or level of interest in topics and documents we bring to the face-to-face groups) Save quotes and comments from participants to help us share and understand the use and usefulness of information we have provided Save comments and input to our research agenda Number of telephone or email contacts outside the online forum to our MS center requesting information Number of participants who responded to our request for study participants Number of participants who responded to our request for advisory committee participants Number of visits to the MS web pages (if analytics available) Number of click-throughs for references to our websites and online publications, through using a link shortener such as *bitly.com to track URLs distributed via email or social media (or number of requests made for information through face-to-face and phone contacts) *bitly.com MSKTC staff will provide a brief tutorial on using bitly.com to MS grantees. Bitly.com links may be included in emails (or other types of electronic messages) and then tracked through the bitly.com website to determine how many recipients of that email clicked through to view online resources. This simple, free tool may also show how far the communication has progressed. For example, PatientsLikeMe: SCI has 80 participants, but my email to this group led to 140 click-throughs to my web page, which may mean that the emails I send are reaching a broader audience (i.e., members are finding them valuable enough to forward them to others). In addition to sharing information from your MS and gathering input from the CoP, you will want to share back with the group new knowledge or projects that reflect their interest or input. For example, if you ask the group to participate in a brief survey, then plan to share results. If you have questions related to your research, reflect on how the CoP s input has helped to shape your thinking or link to results of your work. Where possible, share preliminary results and other information to enhance your role as a source of useful, reliable information. Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 7

Step 7: Report on Activities of CoPs The MSKTC staff will contact you monthly to learn about progress and to hear any stories you may share about successes and challenges. We will be available to help with initial contact to CoP moderators, collect information from all the MS grantees involved, and create a 6-month report on progress for NIDRR. This report will include any data that you are able to collect and report both quantitative and qualitative measures as identified through your plan. In addition, we will interview one person from your team who is leading the engagement with CoPs for your Model System. We are interested in your staff reflections and impressions of your efforts in particular, we would like to know whether the CoPs have a new or greater understanding of the MS and the work that you do. Your responses will help inform NIDRR and other MS grantees about the potential for outreach and engagement through CoPs, contribute to the broader growing research around CoPs, and help us to refine this guide. Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 8

Worksheet: Planning for Communities of Practice Use this template to create your plan for establishing linkages within an existing CoP. Refer to the Guide for examples in each area below. Contact MSKTC@air.org and reference Communities of Practice with questions. Goals: Audience: Mode: (see list of existing online and in-person groups provided by the MSKTC) Frequency: Information to Share and How: Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 9

Interactions: Our Questions for CoP Participants: Feedback and Measurement: Sharing Results: Date/time for calls with MSKTC staff: Our tracking process to record progress will be: Support Needed From MSKTC Staff (msktc@air.org): Planning for Communities of Practice: A Guide for Model Systems Grantees 10