Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) State Plan and Consortium Agreement

Similar documents
School-Wide Restorative Practices: Step by Step

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

The School Discipline Process. A Handbook for Maryland Families and Professionals

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

State Parental Involvement Plan

Restorative Practices In Iowa Schools: A local panel presentation

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Peaceful School Bus Program

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Restorative Measures In Schools Survey, 2011

Pyramid. of Interventions

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Section 6 DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

A Review of the MDE Policy for the Emergency Use of Seclusion and Restraint:

Positive Learning Environment

Why Should We Care About 616 and 618 Compliance Data in the Era of RDA?

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Geographic Area - Englewood

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Public Policy Agenda for Children

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District February 12-14, 2014

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Denver Public Schools

Positive Behavior Support In Delaware Schools: Developing Perspectives on Implementation and Outcomes

School Leadership Rubrics

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Restorative Practices: Fostering Healthy Relationships & Promoting Positive Discipline in Schools A Guide for Educators

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

HEATHER EDL ORMISTON, PH.D., NCSP

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

The State and District RtI Plans

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

A Compendium of Practice & Findings

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Emergency Safety Intervention Part 2: Know Your ESI Data

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Kahului Elementary School

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

Youth & Family Services Counseling Center

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Prevent Teach Reinforce

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

SUPPORTING AND EDUCATING TRAUMATIZED STUDENTS. CSSP Conference 2014 Barb Bieber

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES FOR STUDENTS IN CHARTER SCHOOLS Frequently Asked Questions. (June 2014)

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE NOW!

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Oakland Terrace School For The Visual And Performing Arts

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

Safe & Civil Schools Series Overview

SY School Performance Plan

MENTAL HEALTH FACILITATION SKILLS FOR EDUCATORS. Dr. Lindsey Nichols, LCPC, NCC

Garfield High School

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

Emergency Safety Interventions: Requirements

Oakland Unified School District. restorative. justice. implementation guide. A Whole School Approach

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Dr. Charles Barnum Elementary School Improvement Plan

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Upward Bound Program

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

The FPA Diversity Scholarship Program is available for the following FPA National Conferences:

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Transcription:

PBIS provides a positive and effective alternative to the traditional methods of discipline. PBIS methods are research-based and proven to significantly reduce the occurrence of problem behaviors in the school, resulting in a more positive school climate and increased academic performance. PBIS is consistent with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and Act 1225, Juvenile Justice Reform Act (R.S. 17:252), which advocates the use of positive behavior interventions and supports and school-based disciplinary strategies that reduce or eliminate the need to use suspension and expulsion as disciplinary options. Its primary purpose is to increase the amount of instructional time for all students, particularly those with challenging behaviors by building the capacity of LEA s and schools to use a data-driven approach that is educationally oriented, emphasizes proactive practices, and are effective with promoting social-behavioral competence of staff and students. The specific goal of PBIS is to replace the use of reactive, punitive, and exclusionary consequences (e.g. detention/suspension/expulsion) measures with proactive, preventative, and educative processes that will reduce the need for disciplinary measures. The Louisiana Department of Education s PBIS project is embedded in the State Performance Plan (SPP) for special education (Indicator 4A and 4B) as the initiative the state is funding to reduce the excessive (discrepancy) removal of special education students, including the excessive removal by race and ethnicity (disproportionality). Moreover, virtually all districts are satisfying the IDEA and BESE Model Master Discipline Plan requirements that schools implement a positive behavioral approach by participating in the consortiums. With the revision of LA R.S. 17:252, and the passage of Act 136 of 2010, the consortiums throughout the state are also conducting trainings in classroom management. PBIS is a data driven systems approach developed to assist schools and community settings achieve socially important behavior change. Multi-tiered systems of support are put in place to support staff while they teach and encourage positive, healthy behaviors. PBIS is the integration of four elements: Operationally defined and valued outcomes, Behavioral and biomedical science, Research-validated practices, and Systems change to both enhance the broad quality with which all students are living/learning and reduce problem behaviors. When schools or community settings implement PBIS the result is documentation of more desirable child or youth behaviors and safer learning environment where students are able to achieve increased learning. The vision of the LDOE PBIS plan is as follows: Louisiana Department of Education Implementation Plan All communities and schools work together to ensure healthy and safe living and learning environments for children and youth. All stakeholders work toward a unified, sustainable local system that supports school and community implementation of PBIS. Data is systematically collected, analyzed and used to guide and plan for effective changes that lead to positive social emotional and academic development. Goals The more immediate goals of the LDOE PBIS Implementation Plan are as follows: 1. Create local systems that support and sustain implementation of PBIS in school and community settings. 2. Create awareness and shared language for addressing the social/behavioral needs of children and youth. 3. Create school environments where appropriate behavior is shaped through teaching, modeling, practice, and positive feedback.

4. Use a data collection/management system that provides reliable and easily accessible data to assist in evaluation and decision-making. 5. Develop a state wide system of professional development (including trainers and coaches) to support the implementation of PBIS. Expected outcomes for PBIS schools/districts: As schools and districts implement systems and strategies of PBIS, they are expected to attain both immediate and long-term outcomes. Immediate Outcomes: Those things that are expected to result soon after PBIS is implemented and continue to be evident as PBIS is sustained over time. An increase in: Appropriate behavior as defined by schoolwide PBIS expectations, Student achievement, Parent/guardian satisfaction and positive reports about their child s school as reflecting a safe environment, Feelings of safety and positive environments in schools as measured by the school climate survey; Use of data in making programmatic decisions; and Involvement of community members Long-term Outcomes: Those effects that are expected over time as PBIS is implemented in many schools and communities. These effects are more difficult to show a direct causal relationship and yet PBIS is expected to play a contributing role. An increase in the graduation rates. An increase in positive behaviors exhibited by students in the community. A decrease in the number of students assigned to alternative schools, alternative programs, and the juvenile justice system due to behavior issues. Plan of Action LDOE Commitment The LDOE is responsible for providing funds to the Regional PBIS Consortiums to facilitate and support the statewide implementation of PBIS. These funds are used by the PBIS facilitators in each region to provide quality professional development and technical assistance to the LEAs and to support the fidelity of PBIS implementation in LEAs and schools. The LDOE PBIS contacts are responsible for providing technical support to the regional consortiums, identifying needed data and developing a database to capture the data submitted

by the schools and LEAs. The LDOE and regional PBIS facilitators use the data for planning and to further the development of PBIS. The LDOE is responsible for sharing the statewide data with constituents as requested. Available Amount and Funding Source: LDOE provides Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA Part B) allocations to eight local education agencies (LEAs) to serve as fiscal agents for their respective regional PBIS consortiums. For 2017-18, funding will be allocated as non-competitive awards to eight (8) regional PBIS Consortiums with each receiving $53,125.00. Eligible Recipients: Eight (8) Regional PBIS Consortiums Population Eligible to be Served: Teacher, students, and staff grades Pre-K through 12 th grade, administrators, district contacts, parents, PBIS District Coordinators and team members. Allowable Services by Funded Consortiums: The LDOE provides funds to the eight regional PBIS Consortiums to support and enhance the implementation of PBIS in the schools. The PBIS funds may be used for the following: Trainings Presenters Stipends/Sub Pay Training Materials Travel within the state/region Consortium Commitment The emphasis of the Consortia is to ensure that all districts within its geographic area are trained on the 3 PBIS tiers with fidelity. Each Consortium is expected develop a Plan of Action and to ensure the plan addresses all schools within its area that have identified PBIS as its positive behavioral approach. Trainings conducted shall include: Minimum of 1 of each of the following: o Universal Team training o Secondary Interventions for At-Risk students o Tertiary Interventions for At-Risk and identified (504/SPED) students Data Based Decision Making Classroom Management training addressing the provisions of Act 136 of 2010 FBA (Functional Behavior Assessment) and BIP (Behavior Intervention Plan) trainings Fidelity to PBIS Implementation The Regional Consortium may also provide trainings that support positive behavior practices in the schools after all required trainings have been scheduled for the region. Trainings may include, but are not limited to: Youth Mental Health First Aid, Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE), Trauma Informed Practices, Restorative Practices, etc.

The eight Regional PBIS Facilitators are also responsible for the following: Collect, organize, and submit school and district data for inclusion in state reports; Submit quarterly reports to LDOE as indicated in the data collection matrix (table 1). Quarterly reports shall contain: (1) Types of trainings conducted, and (2) Attendance by LEA. The annual report will include fidelity data collected from the LEAs in the region. All reports should be submitted no later than 30 days after the quarter has ended in the spreadsheet provided by the LDOE; and Meet periodically (in person and/or by phone) with the LDOE staff to plan, evaluate, and make improvements to the PBIS plan and district project. District Commitments Assign/Identify administrative support and coordination at the district level; Establish and support a PBIS District Coordinator position at the district level; Ensure the PBIS district coordinator function is assigned and supported fiscally. (See page four and five for more information about the Coach function); Ensure requested data are collected and submitted; and Ensure administrative support at all levels of the district (e.g. school board, superintendent, principal). School Commitments Participating schools will make the implementation of PBIS with fidelity a school improvement goal until the program is fully implemented and self-sustaining; Establish a school-based PBIS team with a strong administrative presence and active support for PBIS implementation and program sustainability; All school staff will be involved in supporting the behavioral or social/emotional development of children and youth within the school; The school level team will attend at least one training per year to learn how to be a supportive structure within their school as well as learn new strategies which will benefit students at all three levels; The school level team will meet at least monthly to plan and support school staff and the strategies being implemented;

School level teams will ensure that all school data, including evaluation data, are collected and submitted in a timely manner; School level teams analyze data and utilize the findings to guide staff in the implementation of PBIS; School teams will analyze and use data in a robust way to guide the design and implementation of behavioral supports, especially at the targeted and intensive levels; Each participating school will work with a PBIS District Coordinator who will provide leadership to the school level team as well as the rest of the school staff; and Each school will conduct Tiered Fidelity Inventory to determine the level of implementation and identify areas for continued growth. District Coordinator Commitments/Role The purpose of establishing a state-wide network of behavior support district coordinators is to create a core group of highly skilled school professionals who have: Knowledge of the PBIS systems and practices, Ability to attend quarterly regional meetings; Ability to attend trainings at the district level as appropriate; Capacity to provide PBIS technical assistance; and Capacity to support teams in their efforts to implement PBIS practices and systems. To be considered a District Coordinator, the professional should: Be employed by the district with the intent to implement or expand PBIS during the school year; Have an agreement with the district to serve as a District Coordinator; Agree to provide coaching support for schools; Be capable of working with each school team leader to provide technical assistance in maintaining necessary records and progress reports to implement and support PBIS; Be willing to work with community-based agencies and services; and Be capable of providing and/or facilitating ongoing follow-up activities as identified and needed by the school team.

Individuals being considered as District Coordinator should have the following experiences and skills: Ability to conduct small group training sessions with adults; Familiarity with typical classroom structures, operation, policies etc.; Familiarity with general behavior and instructional management and curriculum; History of consistent follow-through with tasks; Experiences with individuals or groups from diverse backgrounds (e.g. parents, students, agency representatives, community members, educators); Ability to facilitate team meetings; Basic to intermediate computer skills; and Provide support to schools to conduct TFI. More specific district coordinator functions include: Providing support to the PBIS Leadership Team meetings and subcommittees. Ensuring the collection, organization, and submission of school evaluation data for inclusion in a state-wide report. Serving as a resource or mentor to schools interested in PBIS, as available. Providing training on PBIS, as appropriate. Districts are encouraged to explore a variety of approaches to provide the district coordinator function. District and School Teams Training is designed for coaches and school leadership teams. School leadership team membership should include: School principal or key administrator in charge of discipline for larger schools, General education teacher, and Special education teacher with expertise in area of behavior. Other team members should include: Counselor, school psychologist, or school social worker,

Support staff (e.g., paraprofessionals, cafeteria, bus, library, or office staff, and Parent(s). Student (s) (Required for High School; Consider student participation for other levels of schools). District coordinator and school leadership team members are expected to ensure that PBIS information is shared with all school staff. Team training will be designed to include the following areas: Features of the PBIS approach; Practices and systems essential to implementing PBIS; Components and operations of school-wide discipline systems; Ways to collect and analyze data; Evaluation of fidelity of implementation of school wide PBIS; Strategies for involving parents and other community partners; Strategies for addressing more intense needs of students with behavioral issues and concerns; and Strategies for sustaining school-wide implementation over time. Evaluation Data collected by the State, District and School Teams will drive the decision-making process and assist in the continued development of PBIS. Whenever possible the LDOE will use data currently collected to inform stakeholders of the progress of those schools and districts that have implemented PBIS. The Healthy Communities staff will work with the Data Management and/or SIS staff to develop a PBIS data collection plan for participating districts/schools that will utilize data collected for either school or state use to eliminate undue burden on the participating schools. The LDOE will collect and analyze relevant PBIS data annually. The state, district and school teams will use the data to demonstrate effectiveness and/or make revisions and adjustments to the appropriate plans. LDOE will collect and analyze data from participating schools and publish the summary of findings, at least annually, to demonstrate the effectiveness of this initiative. Data analysis will drive adjustments or revisions to plans as needed. The evaluation plan will focus on four critical questions: 1. To what degree are schools implementing the three levels of School-wide PBIS with fidelity? 2. What changes in behavior are evident where PBIS is implemented? 3. What changes in academic performance are evident where PBIS is implemented? 4. Have schools created/maintained positive learning environments since implementing PBIS?

Table 1 provides an overview of the evaluation process, including the data to be collected, the data sources and those responsible for the data collection. Table 1 Evaluation Data Collection Matrix Evaluation Question Data Needed Data Source Person Responsible When To what degree are schools implementing school-wide PBIS? What changes in behavior are evident where PBIS is being implemented? Information about the schools use of PBIS Behavior data Tiered Fidelity Inventory Office Referrals Suspension/expulsion data (in and out of school) Attendance Referrals for special education evaluation or alternative setting Discrepant and disproportionality data (Indicator 4A and 4B) School Team District Coordinator Consortium Facilitator School Team District Team LDOE Annually On-going Annually What changes in academic performance are evident where PBIS is being implemented? English Reading and Math Performance State Assessment Results District assessment results LDOE Annually To what degree do students, families, and school staff perceive the school to be safe and PBIS helpful? School Safety Environment School Climate Survey School Team Annually