Assessment Details Document Assessment Objectives: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of specified content

Similar documents
Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

Turkey in the 20 th Century guide

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Language A: language and literature Teacher support material

The International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme. Repton School

DISV IB DIPLOMA HANDBOOK striving for excellence by engaging minds, exciting learners, acting ethically and showing empathy

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

Introduction To Business Management Du Toit

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

St. Theodore Guerin Catholic High School

M55205-Mastering Microsoft Project 2016

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Qualitative Research and Audiences. Thursday, February 23, 17

Curriculum for the Bachelor Programme in Digital Media and Design at the IT University of Copenhagen

Tuesday 13 May 2014 Afternoon

International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

Ks3 Science 2010 Sats Paper

Annual Report Accredited Member

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

Human Biology: Physiology and Health (Higher) Unit. level 6 (6 SCQF credit points)

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

PROGRAMME SYLLABUS International Management, Bachelor programme, 180

ACTL5103 Stochastic Modelling For Actuaries. Course Outline Semester 2, 2014

Technical Skills for Journalism

Timeline. Recommendations

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Programme Specification 1

Intermediate Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Modelling: Online Single Country Course

STUDYING RULES For the first study cycle at International Burch University

Business Studies A Level Past Exam Papers Pdf

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Implementing a tool to Support KAOS-Beta Process Model Using EPF

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Pearson Baccalaureate Higher Level Mathematics Worked Solutions

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

HSMP 6611 Strategic Management in Health Care (Strg Mgmt in Health Care) Fall 2012 Thursday 5:30 7:20 PM Ed 2 North, 2301

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Regions Of Georgia For 2nd Grade

Prince2 Foundation and Practitioner Training Exam Preparation

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Faculty of Social Sciences

Online Administrator Guide

Syllabus Foundations of Finance Summer 2014 FINC-UB

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

November 2012 MUET (800)

Florida Reading for College Success

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Environmental Science: Earth s Resources (National 3) level 3 (6 SCQF credit points)

WHI Voorhees SOL Unit WHI.3 Date

City University of Hong Kong Course Syllabus. offered by School of Law with effect from Semester A 2015/16

Julia Smith. Effective Classroom Approaches to.

Microeconomics And Behavior

Articulation Agreement between Life University & Atlanta Technical College

Bachelor of Science in Banking & Finance: Accounting Specialization

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Past Year Papers For Pyc1501

TOPIC VN7 PAINTING AND DECORATING

DIPLOMA IN REIKI. The basis of all good Reiki treatment routines lies in a complete knowledge by the Therapist of the

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

A&S/Business Dual Major

YOUR FUTURE IN IB. Why is the International Baccalaureate a great choice for you? Mrs. Debbie Woolard IB Director Marietta High School

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

TUESDAYS/THURSDAYS, NOV. 11, 2014-FEB. 12, 2015 x COURSE NUMBER 6520 (1)

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

MARKETING MANAGEMENT II: MARKETING STRATEGY (MKTG 613) Section 007

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

CPMT 1303 Introduction to Computer Technology COURSE SYLLABUS

Math 96: Intermediate Algebra in Context

Operating Theatre Nursing Multiple Choice Questions Sample

Edexcel Gcse Maths 2013 Nov Resit

Ontologies vs. classification systems

Introduction to Financial Accounting

EQuIP Review Feedback

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

UC San Diego - WASC Exhibit 7.1 Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators

level 5 (6 SCQF credit points)

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

International Business Bachelor. Corporate Finance. Summer Term Prof. Dr. Ralf Hafner

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Creating a Test in Eduphoria! Aware

Penn State University - University Park MATH 140 Instructor Syllabus, Calculus with Analytic Geometry I Fall 2010

Secondary English-Language Arts

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

POLITECNICO DI MILANO SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

Transcription:

Assessment Details Document Assessment Objectives: There are four assessment objectives (AOs) for the SL and HL economics course. Having followed the economics course at SL or HL, students will be expected to do the following: 1. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of specified content Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the common SL/HL syllabus Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of current economic issues and data At HL only: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the higher level extension topics 2. Demonstrate application and analysis of knowledge and understanding Apply economic concepts and theories to real-world situations Identify and interpret economic data Demonstrate the extent to which economic information is used effectively in particular contexts At HL only: Demonstrate application and analysis of the extension topics 3. Demonstrate synthesis and evaluation Examine economic concepts and theories Use economic concepts and examples to construct and present an argument Discuss and evaluate economic information and theories At HL only: Demonstrate economic synthesis and evaluation of the extension topics 4. Select, use and apply a variety of appropriate skills and techniques Produce well-structured written material, using appropriate economic terminology, within specified time limits Use correctly labelled diagrams to help explain economic concepts and theories Select, interpret and analyse appropriate extracts from the news media Interpret appropriate data sets At HL only: Use quantitative techniques to identify, explain and analyse economic relationships (Economics Guide, 2010)

Grades Breakdown Assessment Objectives SL/HL Paper 1 SL/HL Paper 2 SL/HL Paper 3 SL/HL Internal Assess ment Overall 1.1. Knowledge and understanding 30% 35% 30% 20% 30% (SL) 30% (HL) 1.2. Application and analysis 30% 30% 30% 35% 30% (SL) 30% (HL) 1.3. Synthesis and evaluation 20% 25% 0% 25% 25% (SL) 20% (HL) 1.4. Selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques 20% 10% 40% 20% 15% (SL) 20% (HL) Assessment Outline SL Assessment Component External assessment (3 hours) Paper 1 (1 hour and 30 minutes) An extended response paper (50 marks) Assessment objectives 1, 2, 3, 4 Section A Syllabus content: section 1 microeconomics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (25 marks) Section B Syllabus content: section 2 macroeconomics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (25 marks) 40% Paper 2 (1 hour and 30 minutes) A data response paper (40 marks) Assessment objectives 1, 2, 3, 4 Section A Syllabus content: section 3 international economics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (20 marks) Section B Syllabus content: section 4 development economics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (20 marks) Internal assessment (20 teaching hours) This component is internally assessed by the teacher and externally moderated by the IB at the end of the course. Students produce a portfolio of three Weighting 80% 40% 40% 20%

commentaries, based on different sections of the syllabus and on published extracts from the news media. Maximum 750 words x 3 (45 marks) Assessment Outline HL Assessment Component External assessment (3 hours) Paper 1 (1 hour and 30 minutes) An extended response paper (50 marks) Assessment objectives 1, 2, 3, 4 Section A Syllabus content: section 1 microeconomics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (25 marks) Section B Syllabus content: section 2 macroeconomics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (25 marks) 40% Paper 2 (1 hour and 30 minutes) A data response paper (40 marks) Assessment objectives 1, 2, 3, 4 Section A Syllabus content: section 3 international economics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (20 marks) Section B Syllabus content: section 4 development economics Students answer one question from a choice of two. (20 marks) Paper 3 (1 hour) HL extension paper (50 marks) Assessment objectives 1, 2 and 4 Syllabus content, including HL extension material: sections 1 to 4 microeconomics, macroeconomics, international economics, development economics Students answer two questions from a choice of three. (25 marks per question) Internal assessment (20 teaching hours) This component is internally assessed by the teacher and externally moderated by the Weighting 80% 30% 30% 20% 20%

IB at the end of the course. Students produce a portfolio of three commentaries, based on different sections of the syllabus and on published extracts from the news media. Maximum 750 words x 3 (45 marks) External assessment details SL Paper 1 Duration: 1 hour 30 minutes Weighting: 40% The structure of this paper is the same as HL paper 1 but the questions that require extended responses may be the same as, or different from, the HL paper 1 questions. Students answer two questions in total, one from section A and one from section B. In each section, students are required to answer one question from a choice of two. The questions are each subdivided into two parts, (a) and (b). Students are expected to demonstrate the following assessment objectives. Assessment Objective Sections A and B :Part a Sections A and B :Part b AO1 knowledge and available available understanding AO2 application and analysis AO3 synthesis and evaluation AO4 selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques available available available available available Section A The principal focus is on section 1 of the syllabus microeconomics. While the principal focus of the questions is on section 1, it is likely that students will be required to draw on other sections of the syllabus. The command terms used in each question, or part thereof, indicate the depth required.

Part (a) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis and the selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 10 marks. Part (b) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, synthesis and evaluation, and the selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 15 marks. The section A question is worth a total of 25 marks. Section B The principal focus is on section 2 of the syllabus macroeconomics. While the principal focus of the questions is on section 2, it is likely that students will be required to draw on other sections of the syllabus. The command terms used in each question, or part thereof, indicate the depth required. Part (a) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and the selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 10 marks. Part (b) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, synthesis and evaluation, and the selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 15 marks. The section B question is worth a total of 25 marks. Responses are assessed with an analytic markscheme specific to the question paper, which indicates the required responses, any particular breakdown of marks and the markbands used to allocate marks. Overall, the maximum for paper 1 is 50 marks. Paper 2 Duration: 1 hour 30 minutes Weighting: 40% The structure of this paper is the same as HL paper 2. However, these data response questions may be the same as, or different from, those used for the HL paper. The text/data used may not be the same at SL and at HL. Students answer two questions in total, one from section A and one from section B. In each section, students are required to answer one question from a choice of two.

The questions are each subdivided into four parts, (a), (b), (c) and (d). Students are expected to demonstrate the following assessment objectives. Assessment Objective AO1 knowledge and understanding AO2 application and analysis AO3 synthesis and evaluation AO4 selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques Sections A and B :Part a Sections A and B :Part b Sections A and B :Part c Sections A and B :Part d available available available available available available available available available available Section A The principal focus is on section 3 of the syllabus international economics. While the principal focus of the questions is on section 3, it is likely that students will be required to draw on other sections of the syllabus. The command terms used in each question, or part thereof, indicate the depth required. Part (a) of each question requires knowledge and understanding. It is subdivided into (i) and (ii). The maximum for each of these is 2 marks, with a combined maximum of 4 marks. Part (b) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 4 marks. Part (c) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 4 marks. Part (d) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and synthesis and evaluation. The maximum for this part is 8 marks. The section A question is worth a total of 20 marks.

Section B The principal focus is on section 4 of the syllabus development economics. While the principal focus of the questions is on section 4, it is likely that students will be required to draw on other sections of the syllabus. The command terms used in each question, or part thereof, indicate the depth required. Part (a) of each question requires knowledge and understanding. It is subdivided into (i) and (ii). The maximum for each of these is 2 marks, with a combined maximum of 4 marks. Part (b) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 4 marks. Part (c) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. The maximum for this part is 4 marks. Part (d) of each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and synthesis and evaluation. The maximum for this part is 8 marks. The section B question is worth a total of 20 marks. Responses are assessed with an analytic markscheme specific to the question paper, which indicates the required responses, any particular breakdown of marks and the markbands used to allocate marks. Overall, the maximum for paper 2 is 40 marks. External assessment details HL Paper 1 Duration: 1 hour 30 minutes Weighting: 30% The structure of this paper is the same as SL paper 1. However, the questions that require extended responses may be the same as, or different from, the SL paper 1 questions. Please see the section External assessment details SL, for further details. Paper 2 Duration: 1 hour 30 minutes Weighting: 30% The structure of this paper is the same as SL paper 2. However, these data response questions may be the same as, or different from, the SL paper. The texts/data used may not be the same as at SL.

Paper 3 Duration: 1 hour Weighting: 20% Students answer two questions in total, from a choice of three questions. The questions are each subdivided into a number of parts. The number of parts will vary. Students are expected to demonstrate the following assessment objectives. Assessment objective All questions AO1 knowledge and understanding AO2 application and analysis AO4 selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques Examination questions The focus of the questions is on the syllabus content from sections 1 to 4, including the HL extension material and topics studied at HL only. The command terms used indicate the depth of response required. Each question requires knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and selection, use and application of a variety of appropriate skills and techniques. Many question parts require the use of a calculator. Graphic display calculators (GDCs) are allowed during the examination, and students should be familiar with their use. Full details are given in the section Use of calculators. Each question is worth 25 marks. A question and answer booklet will be provided, and additional answer sheets may be used if necessary. Responses are assessed with an analytic markscheme specific to the question paper, which indicates the required responses and any particular breakdown of marks. A markband approach is used to allocate the marks for questions using AO2 command terms, such as explain. The markband descriptors will vary depending on the content of the examination. A typical example is given below. Level descriptor and Marks 0 4 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 0 1 The written response is limited. 1 2 2 The written response is clear. 3 4

Overall, the maximum for this paper is 50 marks. External assessment markbands SL and HL Paper 1 (SL/HL) Section A and section B Part (a) Level Level Descriptor Marks 0-10 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 There is little understanding of the specific demands of the question. 0 1-3 Relevant economic terms are not defined. There is very little knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are significant errors. 2 There is some understanding of the specific demands of the question. 4-6 Some relevant economic terms are defined. There is some knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are some errors. 3 There is understanding of the specific demands of the question. 7-8 Relevant economic terms are defined. Relevant economic theory is explained and applied. diagrams are included and

applied. examples are used. There are few errors. 4 There is clear understanding of the specific demands of the question. 9 10 Relevant economic terms are clearly defined. Relevant economic theory is clearly explained and applied. diagrams are included and applied effectively. examples are used effectively. There are no significant errors.

Section A and section B Part (b) Level Level Descriptor Marks 0-10 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 There is little understanding of the specific demands of the question. 0 1-5 Relevant economic terms are not defined. There is very little knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are significant errors. 2 There is some understanding of the specific demands of the question. 6-9 Some relevant economic terms are defined. There is some knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are some errors. 3 There is understanding of the specific demands of the question. 10-12 Relevant economic terms are defined. Relevant economic theory is explained and applied. diagrams are included and

applied. examples are used. There are few errors. 4 There is clear understanding of the specific demands of the question. 13-15 Relevant economic terms are clearly defined. Relevant economic theory is clearly explained and applied. diagrams are included and applied effectively. examples are used effectively. There are no significant errors. Paper 2 (SL/HL) Section A and section B Part (a): (i) and (ii) Level Level descriptor Marks 0-2 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 There is limited understanding or vague definition 2 There is clear understanding or accurate definition 0 1 2

Part (b) and part (c) Level Level descriptor Marks 0-4 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 The written response is limited. 2 The written response is accurate. 0 1-2 3-4 Or Level Level descriptor Marks 0-4 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 There is a correct diagram or an accurate written response. 2 There is a correct diagram and an accurate written response. 0 1-2 3-4 Part (d) Level Level descriptor Marks 0-8 0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 Few relevant concepts are recognized. 0 1-2 There is basic knowledge/understanding.

2 Relevant concepts are recognized and developed in reasonable depth. 3-5 There is clear knowledge/understanding. There is some attempt at application/analysis. 3 Relevant concepts are recognized and developed in reasonable depth. 6-8 There is clear knowledge/understanding. There is effective application/analysis. There is synthesis/evaluation, supported by appropriate theory and evidence.