Course Overview. Sentence Meaning. Semantic Theory. Lecture 1 Introduction

Similar documents
Segmented Discourse Representation Theory. Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure

Basic Syntax. Doug Arnold We review some basic grammatical ideas and terminology, and look at some common constructions in English.

Types and Lexical Semantics

Unit 8 Pronoun References

Derivational: Inflectional: In a fit of rage the soldiers attacked them both that week, but lost the fight.

Universal Grammar 2. Universal Grammar 1. Forms and functions 1. Universal Grammar 3. Conceptual and surface structure of complex clauses

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

Introduction to HPSG. Introduction. Historical Overview. The HPSG architecture. Signature. Linguistic Objects. Descriptions.

Lecture 9. The Semantic Typology of Indefinites

Compositional Semantics

Constraining X-Bar: Theta Theory

Chapter 4: Valence & Agreement CSLI Publications

Construction Grammar. University of Jena.

Part III: Semantics. Notes on Natural Language Processing. Chia-Ping Chen

LEXICAL COHESION ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE WHAT IS A GOOD RESEARCH PROJECT? BY BRIAN PALTRIDGE A JOURNAL ARTICLE

Context Free Grammars. Many slides from Michael Collins

Argument structure and theta roles

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Some Principles of Automated Natural Language Information Extraction

Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO NEW AND OLD INFORMATION IN TURKISH LOCATIVES AND EXISTENTIALS

1/20 idea. We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21. based on assigned readings. so you ll be ready to discuss them in class

Natural Language Processing. George Konidaris

Common Core ENGLISH GRAMMAR & Mechanics. Worksheet Generator Standard Descriptions. Grade 2

English for Life. B e g i n n e r. Lessons 1 4 Checklist Getting Started. Student s Book 3 Date. Workbook. MultiROM. Test 1 4

Underlying and Surface Grammatical Relations in Greek consider

Aspectual Classes of Verb Phrases

Enhancing Unlexicalized Parsing Performance using a Wide Coverage Lexicon, Fuzzy Tag-set Mapping, and EM-HMM-based Lexical Probabilities

The presence of interpretable but ungrammatical sentences corresponds to mismatches between interpretive and productive parsing.

Lesson 12. Lesson 12. Suggested Lesson Structure. Round to Different Place Values (6 minutes) Fluency Practice (12 minutes)

The Verbmobil Semantic Database. Humboldt{Univ. zu Berlin. Computerlinguistik. Abstract

The Four Principal Parts of Verbs. The building blocks of all verb tenses.

Controlled vocabulary

Parsing of part-of-speech tagged Assamese Texts

Syntax Parsing 1. Grammars and parsing 2. Top-down and bottom-up parsing 3. Chart parsers 4. Bottom-up chart parsing 5. The Earley Algorithm

Words come in categories

The Structure of Multiple Complements to V

Adjectives tell you more about a noun (for example: the red dress ).

The following shows how place value and money are related. ones tenths hundredths thousandths

Intension, Attitude, and Tense Annotation in a High-Fidelity Semantic Representation

Focusing bound pronouns

Coercion in a general theory of argument selection*

Writing a composition

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Developing Grammar in Context

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Case government vs Case agreement: modelling Modern Greek case attraction phenomena in LFG

ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL COHESION IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS JOURNALS. A Thesis

Ontologies vs. classification systems

Dear Teacher: Welcome to Reading Rods! Reading Rods offer many outstanding features! Read on to discover how to put Reading Rods to work today!

Proof Theory for Syntacticians

Answer Key For The California Mathematics Standards Grade 1

P a g e 1. Grade 5. Grant funded by:

Language Acquisition Fall 2010/Winter Lexical Categories. Afra Alishahi, Heiner Drenhaus

Dual Content Semantics, privative adjectives, and dynamic compositionality

Ch VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS.

Executive Session: Brenda Edwards, Caddo Nation

BASIC ENGLISH. Book GRAMMAR

Chapter 9: Conducting Interviews

Specifying Logic Programs in Controlled Natural Language

Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Pre-Processing MRSes

The subject of adjectives: Syntactic position and semantic interpretation

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

Chunk Parsing for Base Noun Phrases using Regular Expressions. Let s first let the variable s0 be the sentence tree of the first sentence.

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

Objectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition

11/29/2010. Statistical Parsing. Statistical Parsing. Simple PCFG for ATIS English. Syntactic Disambiguation

English. Mock Examination 2

Chapter 3: Semi-lexical categories. nor truly functional. As Corver and van Riemsdijk rightly point out, There is more

Past, Present, and Future Tenses. Language Presentation by Mark

Local Artists in Yuma, AZ

Morphosyntactic and Referential Cues to the Identification of Generic Statements

Control and Boundedness

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Universal Design for Learning Lesson Plan

Language acquisition: acquiring some aspects of syntax.

Name: Class: Date: ID: A

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Facultad de Comunicación, Lingüística y Literatura Escuela de Lenguas Sección de Inglés

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Which verb classes and why? Research questions: Semantic Basis Hypothesis (SBH) What verb classes? Why the truth of the SBH matters

A First-Pass Approach for Evaluating Machine Translation Systems

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

MGSE: MGSE4.MD.1; MGSE4.MD.2; MGSE4.MD.3; MGSE4.MD.8; MGSE4.MD.4; MGSE4.MD.5; MGSE4.MD.6; MGSE4.MD.7

Unit 14 Dangerous animals

Possessive have and (have) got in New Zealand English Heidi Quinn, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Strategic discourse comprehension

Parents Support Guide to Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar in Year 6.

Part I. Figuring out how English works

Links, tails and monotonicity

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

lgarfield Public Schools Italian One 5 Credits Course Description

Encoding. Retrieval. Forgetting. Physiology of Memory. Systems and Types of Memory

The Evolution of Random Phenomena

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

15 The syntax of overmarking and kes in child Korean

Transcription:

Semantic Theory Lecture 1 Introduction Manfred Pinkal & Stefan Thater FR 4.7 Allgemeine Linguistik (Computerlinguistik) Universität des Saarlandes Summer 2012 Course Overview Lexical semantics Sentence semantics (compositional semantics) Discourse semantics 2 Sentence Meaning Truth-conditional semantics: to know the meaning of a (declarative) sentence is to know what the world would have to be like for the sentence to be true. Sentence meaning = truth-conditions Every student works M,g = 1 iff. every student works Indirect interpretation by translating sentences into logical formulas Every student works x(student (x) work (x)) 3

Every student works x(stud (x) work (x)) M,g = 1 iff VM(stud ) VM(work ) bill M1 bill M2 work work student mary teacher student mary teacher x(stud (x) work (x)) M1,g = 1 x(stud (x) work (x)) M2,g = 0 4 Central Concepts Reference and denotation Truth and truth conditions Entailment and inference 5 Sentence Semantics Basic semantics construction Quantifier scope Generalized quantifiers 6

Compositionality The principle of compositionality: The meaning of a complex expression is a function of the meanings of its parts and of the syntactic rules by which they are combined (cited from Partee &al., 1993) Every student works M,g = ( f1( Every student M,g, works M,g ) Every student M,g = ( f2( Every M,g, student M,g ) 7 Compositional Semantics Construction Semantic lexicon: every λpλq x(p(x) Q(x)) student student works work Semantics construction: λpλq x(p(x) Q(x))(student ) β λq x(student (x) Q(x)) NP S VP λq x(student (x) Q(x))(work ) β x(student (x) work (x)) DET N works Every student 8 Interpretation of Adjectives (1) a.! John is a blond piano player b.! John is blond (2) a.! John is a poor piano player b.! John is poor 9

Quantifier Scope (1) An American flag was hanging in front of every building (2) Every student speaks two foreign languages (3) A representative of every company saw most samples (4) Many computational linguists in three Saarbrücken institutes work on a variety of interesting problems in language technology 10 Monotonicity and Generalized Quantifiers (1) a.! Bill got a degree in LST b.! Bill got a degree (2) a.! Bill didn t get a degree in LST b.! Bill didn t get a degree 11 Monotonicity and Generalized Quantifiers (1) Every master student got a degree in LST (2) Every master student got a degree (3) Every student got a degree in LST (4) Most master students got a degree in LST (5) Exactly three master students got a degree in LST 12

Discourse Semantics Anaphora and Ellipsis Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) Presuppositions Tense and temporal structure 13 Anaphora and Ellipsis Anaphora (1) Bill likes his dog. He pampers him. (2) Bill likes his dog, although he sometimes bites him. (3) Bill likes his dog, although she sometimes bites him. Ellipsis (4) John loves Mary, and so does Bill. (5) John loves his wife, and so does Bill. 14 Presuppositions (1) a. Bill regrets that his cat has died b. Bill doesn t regret that his cat has died (2) a. Bill s cat has died b. Bill s cat hasn t died (3) a. Bill owns a cat b. Bill doesn t own a cat 15

Information structure (1) a. Who ate the cake? b. Bill ate the cake. (2) a. What did Bill eat? b. Bill ate the cake. (3) Only the CEOs of the startup companies were invited to the meeting. 16 Lexical Semantics Event semantics Thematic roles Plurals, mass nouns, collective predicates 17 Synonymy (1) Twenty-eight states had reductions in the number of automobile accidents (2) Twenty-eight states had reductions in the number of car accidents 18

Hyponymy (1) a. A car accident happened yesterday on the highway b. A motor-vehicle accident happened yesterday [ ] (2) a. No car accident happened yesterday on the highway b. No motor-vehicle accident happened yesterday [ ] Meronymy, Antonymy, 19 Verb Alternations (1) a.! John sold the book for 19.95 b.! The book sells for 19.95 (2) a.! Bees are swarming in the garden b.! The garden is swarming with bees (3) a.! The window broke b.! A rock broke the window c.! John broke the window with a rock 20 Inverse Predicates (1) a.! John is taller than Bill b.! Bill is smaller than John (2) a.! Mary likes John b.! John pleases Mary (3) a.! Mary gave Peter the book b.! Peter received the book from Mary (4) a.! John sold the car to Bill for 3.000 b.! Bill bought the car from John for 3.000 21

Plurals and Collective Predicates (1) a.! The students worked b.! All students worked c.! Every student worked (2) a.! The students met b.! All students met c.! Every student met 22 Plurals and Collective Predicates (1) Two students presented a paper (2) Five students carried three pianos upstairs (3) 500.000 visitors ordered 1.200.000 cups of coffee 23 States vs. Events (1) a. John is running b. John is building a house c. * John is knowing the answer (2) a. John ran carefully b. John carefully built a house c. * John carefully knew the answer (3) a. John runs (has the habit of running) b. John recites poems (has the habit of reciting poems) c. John knows the answer 24

Further Phenomena Polysemy fast car / fast road / fast driver feed rabbit / eat rabbit / wear rabbit Non-literal interpretation: metonymy The ham-sandwich wants to pay I am parked out back and have a flat tire Non-literal interpretation: metaphor 25 Exercises & Exam Final exam takes place on Tuesday, July 24th You have to register until Tuesday, July 10th Exercise sheets: You have to get at least 50% of the points to be admitted to the final exam Exercise sheets can be done in teams For more details see www.coli.uni-saarland.de/courses/semantics-12 26 Literature Gamut, Logic, Language, and Meaning, Vol. 2, University of Chicago Press, 1991 Kamp and Reyle, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, 1993 27

Schedule ic Tuesday Thursday 17.04.2012 19.04.2012 24.04.2012 L Introduction ST, MP 26.04.2012 L Formal foundations ST 01.05.2012 Tag der Arbeit 03.05.2012 Ex Formal foundations ST 08.05.2012 L Semantics construction ST 10.05.2012 Ex Semantics construction ST 15.05.2012 L Cooper-Storage ST 17.05.2012 Christi Himmelfahrt 22.05.2012 L Lexical semantics MP 24.05.2012 Ex Cooper-Storage ST 29.05.2012 L Lexical semantics MP 31.05.2012 Ex Lexical semantics MP 05.06.2012 L Lexical semantics MP 07.06.2012 Fronleichnam 12.06.2012 L Lexical semantics MP 14.06.2012 Ex Lexical semantics MP 19.06.2012 L Generalized quantifiers ST 21.06.2012 ST 26.06.2012 L DRT MP 28.06.2012 Ex Generalized quantifiers ST 03.07.2012 05.07.2012 L DRT MP 10.07.2012 L Presuppositions ST 12.07.2012 Ex DRT MP 17.07.2012 L Presuppositions ST 19.07.2012 Ex Presuppositions ST 24.07.2012 Final exam 26.07.2012 28