Partners for Review. A Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Network for a Robust Review Process

Similar documents
Sharing Information on Progress. Steinbeis University Berlin - Institute Corporate Responsibility Management. Report no. 2

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

Dr. Judith Christina Abdel-Massih-Thiemann. Freelance consultant for organizational and project development

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

5 Early years providers

HCFC Phase-Out Management Plan Servicing Sector

Interview on Quality Education

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

RAMSAR Government CEPA NFP

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Navigating in a sea of risks: MARISCO, a conservation planning method used in risk robust and ecosystem based adaptation strategies

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

The Bologna Process: actions taken and lessons learnt

Implementing Pilot Early Grade Reading Program in Morocco

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Services for Children and Young People

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Date Re Our ref Attachment Direct dial nr 2 februari 2017 Discussion Paper PH

No educational system is better than its teachers

SME Academia cooperation in research projects in Research for the Benefit of SMEs within FP7 Capacities programme

School Leadership Rubrics

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

11:00 am Robotics and the Law: An American Perspective Prof. Ryan Calo, University of Washington School of Law

Medium-Term Strategy (MTS) Designed by Mahmoud Hamed

PUBLIC CASE REPORT Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

PROJECT RELEASE: Towards achieving Self REgulated LEArning as a core in teachers' In-SErvice training in Cyprus

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATION IN YOUTH AND LEISURE INSTRUCTION 2009

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Participatory Appraisal of Pro- Poor Income Potentials (Pro-Poor PACA)

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Evidence into Practice: An International Perspective. CMHO Conference, Toronto, November 2008

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

WHAT IS AEGEE? AEGEE-EUROPE PRESENTATION EUROPEAN STUDENTS FORUM

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Soulbus project/jamk Part B: National tailored pilot Case Gloria, Soultraining, Summary

Addressing TB in the Mines: A Multi- Sector Approach in Practice

Meeting on the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and Good Practices in Skills Development

LIBRARY AND RECORDS AND ARCHIVES SERVICES STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 to 2020

A Brief Profile of the National Educational Panel Study

Marketing Committee Terms of Reference

The EUA and Open Access

Partnership Agreement

elearning OVERVIEW GFA Consulting Group GmbH 1

Tanga Dairy Platform: Case study teaching note

University of Toronto

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR TRAINEESHIPS

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Appendix IX. Resume of Financial Aid Director. Professional Development Training

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

2 di 7 29/06/

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020

Contents. (1) Activities Units of learning outcomes and expert interviews... 2

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Regional Capacity-Building on ICT for Development Item 7 Third Session of Committee on ICT 21 November, 2012 Bangkok

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

EUROPEAN STUDY & CAREER FAIR

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

HOW DO YOU IMPROVE YOUR CORPORATE LEARNING?

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Caring about sharing your professional experience? ShareIT Trainers in Literacy and Basic Skills Informal Knowledge Transfer

Participatory Impact Monitoring - PIM : Selected reading examples

Content. 1. Technical workshop Marine Directive

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Working with Local Authorities to Support the Localism Agenda

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Global Convention on Coaching: Together Envisaging a Future for coaching

Taking Action to Strengthen

Lifelong Learning Programme. Implementation of the European Agenda for Adult Learning

youthpart When can we drop the e in participation? Documentation Seminar On Youth & E-Participation August 19 & 20, 2013 Helsinki Finland

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Transcription:

Partners for Review A Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Network for a Robust Review Process GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS UNITED NATIONS ACADEMIA NGOs PRIVATE SECTOR

THE CONTEXT To achieve the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations Member States pledged to commit to a robust, voluntary, effective, participatory, transparent and integrated follow-up and review framework operating at the national, regional and global levels. (A/RES/70/1, 71). A well-designed monitoring mechanism will contribute to the successful implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals by enabling the international community to track progress towards achieving the Agenda, encouraging the exchange of best practices and mutual learning, and promoting the coordination and effectiveness of the international development system. The State-led monitoring and review systems will form the foundation for achieving sustainable development at national level. On a global level, effective national review systems will be a precondition for mutual learning at the High-Level Political Forum. Early reporting cycles in this context will pave the way for SDG review until 2030. The review and follow-up mechanism as part of the Agenda poses challenges for all Member States. The creation of a national institutional framework to promote integrated policy-making, policy coherence and stakeholder participation, and the alignment of national priorities with global goals remain cross-cutting issues. However, transnational cooperation between government practitioners and the stakeholders to be involved in the review process is not yet institutionalised. Access to and exchange of practicable solutions is still not systematically available. G O V E R N M E N T A C A D E M I A P R PARTNERS FOR REVIEW THE VISION Partners for Review will be a transnational multi-stakeholder network for government representatives and stakeholders from civil society, the private sector and academia involved in the national review and monitoring process towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. S E C T O R I V A T E S O C I E T Y Partners for Review will build on exchanges and retreats in the lead-up to the HLPF and help meet the demand for extended follow-up. The network will facilitate dialogue and peer learning on challenges, provide space to explore best practices and lessons learnt, mobilise knowledge, and share expertise on new and emerging issues related to national monitoring and review. C I V I L Partners for Review will bring together members prior to reporting at the HLPF to facilitate the preparation of appealing and engaging presentations and to offer assistance on integrating recommendations into national level processes. The initiative will gather constructive, effective and practicable solutions for meeting the joint commitment to review progress towards achieving the 2030 Agenda at national level. Partners for Review will enable dialogue on the review of SDGs and coordinate the demand for and supply of policy advice among practitioners. Against this background, Partners for Review will contribute to developing a robust global review and accountability mechanism for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

WHAT DOES IT OFFER? INITIATE A NETWORK // to bring together stakeholders from government, civil society, academia and the private sector. FOSTER EXCHANGE // in face-to-face meetings via semi-annual conferences in partner countries and on an accompanying online platform. FACILITATE DIALOGUE // on shared challenges to establishing national review mechanisms suitable for tracking progress on the SDGs. COMMUNICATE EXAMPLES // on the preparation of appealing, interesting and engaging presentations to encourage dialogue on approaches taken. ENABLE PEER LEARNING // to share experiences and lessons learned during early SDG reporting cycles for constructive follow-up and knowledge management. PROVIDE ASSISTANCE // in the lead-up to National Voluntary Presentations at the annual HLPF Ministerial Segment. PROVIDE KNOWLEDGE // to maintain, mobilise and disseminate best practices and approaches for international peers through global partnerships. SUPPORT FOLLOW-UP // on recommendations made at the HLPF and their integration into national systems. IDENTIFY SOLUTIONS // for practicable, effective and individualised approaches to align national circumstances to the 2030 Agenda. CONTRIBUTE TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT // by strengthening a robust, effective and integrated global review framework for successfully achieving the 2030 Agenda. HELP COORDINATE // the demand for and supply of best practices among practitioners.

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE? The lessons you have offered, the actions you have showcased, and the gaps you have identified, they are what this Forum is about. Advancing the SDGs through sharing of experiences, and mutual learning. (closing remarks to the 2016 HLPF by UN Under-Secretary-General Wu Hongbo) The High-Level Political Forum is the central space for overseeing the follow-up and review process at the global level. National Voluntary Presentations showcase countries individual approaches to implementing and reviewing the 2030 Agenda, and will encourage further reflection, learning and dialogue. However, national presentations also present countries with the two-fold challenge of creating a national review mechanism suitable for both tracking progress towards achieving the SDGs and reviewing efforts made. The first HLPF after the adoption of the 2030 Agenda has demonstrated that these are shared challenges, and that there is demand for extended follow-up, continued exchange and space for discourse all of which Partners for Review will offer. Partners for Review is inviting practitioners and stakeholders from countries committed to providing National Voluntary Presentations at the HLPF to take part in the review process of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Partners for Review is being initiated on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development and the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety and aims to evolve as a global partnership in the joint commitment to create a robust review mechanism. It will offer a platform for sharing approaches, strategies and policies towards finding practicable solutions. PARTNERS FOR REVIEW WHAT IS IT ABOUT? The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development places considerable demands on all countries to develop national monitoring and review mechanisms. This involves making complex, comprehensive and transformative policy choices. National approaches to SDG review are diverse, yet they involve cross-cutting issues: What are the key components for a robust national review mechanism? How can horizontal and vertical policy coordination be ensured? How can adequate stakeholder involvement be organised, managed and sustained? How to reconcile national circumstances with the global sustainable development goals? How to incorporate recommendations from the HLPF into the national context? What lessons learnt and experiences can other countries share? What are the requirements for effective follow-up, and how can mutual learning be facilitated for added-value? Partners for Review aims to address these issues in order to find practicable solutions to foster robust review. As a multi-stakeholder network to advance national systems and efficient reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals, it will contribute to a robust review at national and global level.

Imprint Published by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Partners for Review Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 53113 Bonn T +49 228-4460-1888 partnersforreview@giz.de www.giz.de As at September 2016 Printed by Bayleydruck GmbH, Bonn Design and layout kippconcept GmbH, Bonn www.kippconcept.de GIZ is responsible for the content of this publication.