CHAPTER - 3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS

Similar documents
Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Language Acquisition Chart

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

Developing True/False Test Sheet Generating System with Diagnosing Basic Cognitive Ability

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Outcome Based Education 15/01/2012

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

10.2. Behavior models

Florida Reading for College Success

Ontologies vs. classification systems

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Self Study Report Computer Science

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

The Ontario Curriculum

South Carolina English Language Arts

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

USING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL

What is Thinking (Cognition)?

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Digital Media Literacy

Function Number 1 Work as part of a team. Thorough knowledge of theoretical procedures and ability to integrate knowledge and performance into

EQuIP Review Feedback

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

CROSS COUNTRY CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Abstractions and the Brain

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

Copyright Corwin 2015

Innovative Methods for Teaching Engineering Courses

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

Promoting Active Learning in University Classes

Slam Poetry-Theater Lesson. 4/19/2012 dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx. Lindsay Jag Jagodowski

WHI Voorhees SOL Unit WHI.3 Date

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

SPATIAL SENSE : TRANSLATING CURRICULUM INNOVATION INTO CLASSROOM PRACTICE

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Module 12. Machine Learning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Administrative Services Manager Information Guide

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Timeline. Recommendations

A Characterization of Calculus I Final Exams in U.S. Colleges and Universities

More ESL Teaching Ideas

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Between. Art freak. and. school freak. Lupes Facilitator : A magic teacher

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Multiple Intelligences 1

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Colorado Academic. Drama & Theatre Arts. Drama & Theatre Arts

Notes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course (Deciding What to Design) 1

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

Vision for Science Education A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Transcription:

Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 45 CHAPTER - 3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS In life, objectives help to focus our attention and efforts; they indicate what has to be accomplished. In education, objectives indicate what the students have to learn; they are explicit formulations of the ways in which students are expected to be changed by the educative process. Objectives are especially important in teaching because teaching is a intensitional and reasoned act. Teaching is intentional because it is primarily to facilitate student learning. Teaching is reasoned because what teachers teach their students is judged by them to be worthwhile. The reasoned aspect of teaching relates to what objectives teachers select for their students. The intentional aspect of teaching concerns how teachers help students to achieve the objectives, that is, the learning environments the teachers create and the activities and experiences they provide. The learning environment, activities, and experience should be aligned with, or be consistent with, the selected objectives.

46 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 47 Need For a Taxonomy What can teachers do when confronted with what they believe to be an exceedingly large number of vague objectives? To deal with the problem of vagueness, they need to make the objectives more precise. In a nutshell, teacher need an organizing frame work that increases precision and, most important, promotes understanding. A taxonomy is a special kind of frame work. In a taxonomy the categories lie along a continuum The objectives are classified in a taxonomy. A statement of an objective contains a verb and a noun. The verb generally describes the intended cognitive process. The noun generally describes the knowledge students are expected to acquire or construct. The most useful form for stating objectives is to express them in terms which identify both the kind of behaviour to be developed in the student and the content. The structure of objectives The domain of objectives is presented as a continuum ranging from quite general to very specific. Along this continuum, Krathwohl and Payne (1971) identified three evels of specificity called global. Educational and instructional guidance objectives, with the later commonly referred to as instructional objectives. Global objectives are complex, multifaceted learning outcomes that require substantial time and instruction to accomplish. A global objective is something presently out of reach; it is something to strive for, to move toward, or to become. For teachers to use global objectives in their planning and teaching, the objectives must be broken down into a more focused, delimited form. Educational objectives describe stu- dent behaviour and some content on which the behaviour will be performed. Educational objectives occupy the middle range on the objective continuum. As such, they are more specific than global objectives but more general than the objectives needed to guide the day-to-day class room instruction that teachers provide. The purpose of instructional objectives is to focus teaching and testing on narrow, day-to-day slices of learning in fairly specific content areas. Relationship of Global, Educational and Instructional Objectives In terms of scope, global objectives are broad, whereas instructional objectives are narrow; that is, global objectives do not deal with specifics, and instructional objectives deal only with specifics. Global objectives may require one or even many years to learn, whereas instructional objectives can be mastered in a few days. Global objectives provide vision that quite often becomes the basis for support for educational programmes. At the other end of the spectrum, instructional objectives are useful for planning daily lessons. Bloom s Taxonomy LEVEL OF OBJECTIVES Scope Global Educational Instructional Time Broad One or Moderate Narrow Hours Needed More Years Weeks Or Or Days Months Function Provide vision Design Prepare lesson curriculum Plans Following the 1948 Convention of the American

48 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 49 Psychological Association, B.S. Bloom took a lead in formulating a classification of the goals of the educational process. Three domains of educational activities were identified: Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Cognitive is for mental skills, Affective is for growth in feelings or emotional area, while Psychomotor is for manual or physical skills. Bloom and his coworkers established a hierarchy of educational objectives, which is referred to as Bloom s Taxonomy, while attempts to divide objectives into subdivisions ranging from the simplest behaviour to the most complex. Cognitive domain is demonstrated by behaviour related to intellectual skills : comprehending information, organizing ideas, analyzing and synthesizing data, choosing among alternatives in problem solving, and evaluating ideas or actions. Affective domain is demonstrated by behaviour indicating attitudes of awareness, interest, attention, concern, ability to listen and respond in interactions with others. Psychomotor learning in demonstrated by physical skills like co-ordination, dexterity, manipulation, grace, strength, speed and actions which demonstrate the fine motor skills such as use of instruments or tools. Instructional Objectives: Cognitive Domain Knowledge Knowledge is remembering of previously learned material. This may involve the recall of a wide range of materials, from specific facts to complex theories. In the knowledge level, the child knows only the information. This does not mean the information is meaningful to the student. Knowledge represents the lowest level of learning outcomes in the cognitive domain. Comprehension Comprehension is defined as the ability to grasp the meaning of material. This may be shown by translating material from one form to another (words to symbols) by interpreting material (estimating future trends (predicting consequences or effects). These learning outcomes go one step beyond the simple remembering of material, and represent the lowest level of understanding. Application Application refers to the ability to use learned material in new and concrete situations. This may include the application of such things as rules, methods, concepts, principles, laws and theories. Learning outcome in this area require a higher level of understanding than those under comprehension. Analysis Analysis refers to the ability to break down material into its component parts so that its orginational structure may be understood. This may include the identification of parts, analysis of the relationship between parts, and recognition of the organizational principles involved. Learning outcomes here represent a higher intellectual level than comprehension and application because they require an understanding of both of the content and the structural form of the material. Synthesis Synthesis refers to the ability to put parts together to form a new whole. Learning outcomes in this area stress creative behaviours, with major emphasis on the formulation of new patterns or structure. Examples of learning objectives at this level are : write

50 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 51 a well organized theme, propose a plan for an experiment, integrate learning from different areas into a plan for solving a problem, formulate a new scheme for classifying objects. Evaluation Evaluation is concerned with the ability to judge the value of material for a given purpose. The judgment are to be based on definite criteria. Learning outcomes in this area are highest in the cognitive hierarchy because they contain elements of all the other categories, plus conscious value judgments based on clearly defined criteria. Examples of learning objectives at this level are : judge the logical consistency of written material, judge the adequacy with which conclusions are supported by data. Many of the behaviours of an individual are controlled more by feelings and emotions rather than by cognition. A student of mathematics who develops genuine interest in reading books related to mathematics, organizing mathematical recreational activities like puzzle context is a person who has undergone changes in his feelings and emotions. Such behaviours are said to be changes in the affective domain. Instructional Objectives: Affective Domain. Receiving This means paying attention towards something. It indicates the ability of an individual to receive information. Awareness of the sources of information and willingness to receive the information are the sublevels of this category. Responding The learner participates actively in the process. Regularity in attention and motivation leads to responding. Valuing Valuing is based on the internalization of a set of specified values. The learner understands that the activity he is called upon to perform is valuable. Organizing The learner organizes values into priorities by contrasting different values, resolving conflicts between them, and creating a unique values system Characterization The values are imbibed and the learners behave in a pervasive, consistent, predictable manner. Psychomotor Domain Instructional Objectives Along with the behavioural changes in the cognitive and affective domain the learner has to master certain skills to make the development complete. Speaking, Reading, Writing, Drawing are activities where motor co-ordination is required. Changes of this category leading to mastery of skills are said to be changes in the psychomotor domain. Perception The ability to use sensory cues to guide motor activity. This ranges from sensory stimulation, through cue selection, to translation. Set Readiness to act. It shows the desire to learn a new process. Guided Response The early stage in learning a complex skill that

52 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 53 includes imitation and trial and error. Adequacy of performance is achieved by practicing. Mechanism This is the intermediate stage in learning a complex skill. Learned responses have become habitual and the movements can be performed with some confidence and proficiency. Complex Overt Response The skillful performance that involves complex movement patterns proficiency is indicated by a quick, accurate, and highly co-ordinated performance, requiring a minimum of energy. This category includes performing without hesitation, and automatic performance. Adaptation The learner responds effectively to unexpected experiences. Skills are well developed and the individual can modify movement patterns to fit special requirements. OBJECTIVES Knowledge Understanding Explains COGNITIVE DOMAIN BEHAVIOURAL / KEY WORDS VERBS Recalls, Recognizes, Names, Reproduces, outlines, States. Identifies, Converts, Distinguishes, Estimates Generalizes, Translates, Compares, Classifies, Detects, errors, para phrases, Discriminates Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation OBJECTIVES Receiving Responding Valuing Organizing Characterization OBJECTIVES Perception Computes, Manipulates, Solves, Relates, Predicts, Constructs, Selects Analyses, Breakdown, Associates, Examines Combines, Compiles, Designs, Summarizes Creates Appraises, Justifies, Criticizes, Defends. AFFECTIVE DOMAIN BEHAVIOURAL / KEY WORDS VERBS Asks, Gives, Points to, Chooses Answers, Performs, Recites, Reports, Discusses Initiates, Invites, Joins, Shares, Demonstrates Adheres, Alters, Formulates, Relates Influences, Qualifies, Solves, Verifies, Modifies PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN BEHAVIOURAL / KEY WORDS VERBS Detects, Identifies, Isolates

54 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 55 Set Guided Response Mechanism Complex Overt Response Adaptation Begins, Displays, Reacts Copies, Traces, Reproduces, Responds Assembles, Constructs, Manipulates Dismantles, Fastens, Mends Alters, Rearranges, Adapts. Behavioiural Objectives / Specifications Behavioural objectives or performance objectives or specifications are terms that refer to a description of observable student behaviour or performance. Since learning cannot be seen directly, teachers must make inferences about learning from evidence they can see and measure. Behavioural objectives provide an ideal vehicle for making inferences. A well constructed behavioural objective describes an intended learning outcome. It communicates the conditions under which the behaviour is performed, a verb which defines the behaviour itself and the degree (criteria) to which a student must perform the behaviour. In short instructional objectives are not directly observable and measurable. But their evidence of attainment can be collected through specifications. Taxonomy Reframed: Educational Objectives for the 21 st Century The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives was one of the outstanding research work in the field of education. It is a frame work for classifying statements of what we expect or intend students to learn as a result of instruction. The frame work was conceived as a means of facilitating, the exchange of test items among faculty at various universities in order to create banks of items, each measuring the same educational objective. The revision of this frame work was developed in much the same manner forty five years later by Loren Anderson. (a former student of Benjamin Bloom). Here after, this is referred to as the Revised Taxonomy. Revised Bloom s Taxonomy: from One Dimension to Two Dimensions In the original taxonomy, the knowledge category embodied both noun and verb aspects. The noun or subject matter aspect was specified in knowledge s extensive subcategories. The verb aspect was included in the definition given to knowledge. This brought uni-dimensionality to the frame work at the cost of a knowledge category that was dual in nature and thus different from the other Taxonomic categories. This anomaly was eliminated in the revised taxonomy by allowing these two aspects, the noun and verb, to form separate dimensions, the noun providing the basis for the knowledge dimension and the verb forming the basis for the cognitive process dimension. The Knowledge Dimension The one dimensional form of the original taxonomy becomes a two dimensional table with the addition of the products of thinking (various forms of knowledge). Forms of knowledge are listed in the revised taxonomy on factual, conceptual, procedural and met cognitive. Factual Knowledge is knowledge that is basic to specific disciplines. This dimension refers to essential facts, terminology, details or elements students must know or be familiar with in order to understand a

56 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 57 discipline or solve a problem in it. Conceptual Knowledge is knowledge of classifications, principles, generalizations, theories, models, or structures pertinent to a particular disciplinary area. Procedural knowledge refers to information or knowledge that helps students to do something specific to a discipline, subject, and area of study. It also refers to methods of inquiry, very specific or finite skills, algorithms, techniques and particular methodologies. Meta cognitive knowledge is the awareness of one s own cognition and particular cognitive processes. It is strategic or reflective knowledge about how to go about solving problems, cognitive tasks, to include contextual and conditional knowledge and knowledge of self. It is of increasing significance as researchers continue to demonstrate the importance of students being aware of their met cognitive activity, and then using this knowledge to appropriately adapt the ways in which they think and operate. The Cognitive Process Dimension The original number of categories, six, was retained, but with important changes. Three categories were renamed, the order of two was interchanged, and those category names retained were changed to verb form to fit the way they are used in objectives. Like the original taxonomy, the revision is a hierarchy in the sense that the six major categories of the Cognitive Process dimension are believed to differ in their complexity, with Remember being less complex than Understand, which is less complex than Apply, and so on. The Taxonomy Table Evaluating Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehensive Knowledge Old version Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering New version Comparison of Old Version with New Version of Taxonamy Conclusion The revision s primary focus is on the taxonomy in use. Bloom s taxonomy was traditionally viewed as a tool best applied in the earlier years of schooling (primary and junior primary years). The revised taxonomy is more universal and easily applicable at elementary, secondary and even tertiary levels. In the national and international scenario, there is a newer reading in the teaching learning process especially after the wider infusion of the cognitive and constructive psychological interpretations on learning. Gardner s explorations of human intellect in terms of Multiple Intelligence theory triggered this paradigm shift from behaviorist to a new wider perspective. In essence, the wider lacuna that exist in the contemporary teaching learning process in terms of evaluation can be minimized by incorporating the essential spirit of Revised Bloom s Taxonomy.

58 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 59 A list of objectives and specifications to be followed in Mathematics classrooms 1. Objectives of the Cognitive domain. I. The learner gathers information (acquires knowledge) of mathematical terms, symbols, concepts, etc. II. III. i. recalls the terms, symbols etc. recognizes the terms, symbols etc. The learners comprehends (or develops understanding of) the terms, symbols, concepts, etc. i. closely observes the phenomena iii Compares items on the basis of the attributes identifies relations Identifies mistakes committed in the process of comprehending v. classifies objects or phenomena in terms of the attributes. v Defines concepts in terms of the attributes Gives one s own illustrations or examples for a concept. The learner applies the learned information in new or unfamiliar situations. i. identifies the purpose for application i Makes the unfamiliar familiar Identifies the relation among the data available. Hypothesis a plan of action for solution v. tests the adequacy of the data for facing the new situation v vi ix. Finds out additional data, if required Arrives at generalizations. Judges whether the conclusions arrived at are valid establishes new relations or conclusions x. makes correct estimation. xi. x xi Verifies every step on the basis of principles Synthesizes the process involved in the solutions and summarizes the results systematically At every stage monitors the progress along the correct path. 2. Objective of the affective domain I. The learner develops healthy interest related to Mathematics. Specification: The learner: i. attends to articles related to mathematics from various media. i Reads books on great mathematicians. Regularly uses mathematics library and mathematics laboratory Likes company of mathematically talented persons. v. derives pleasure in solving mathematical puzzles. Creates puzzles on one s own.

60 Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher Becoming A Reflective Mathematics Teacher 61 II. III. v vi ix. Seeks necessary clarifications from the teacher. Writes articles on the subject in the magazine. Collects illustrations, aids related to mathematics. x. prepares albums to preserve collections related to the subject. The learner develops scientific attitude towards mathematics i. refrains from jumping into conclusions i Accepts a proposition when and only when it is logically proved. Accepts errors without hesitation. Points out errors in facts, arguments, etc. v. exhibits habits of questioning. v Shows eagerness to probe into problematic situations. Maintains precision, clarity, logical stability in verbal or written statements. The learner appreciates the beauty of mathematics. i. appreciates the rhythm and beauty of geometrical and number patterns. i gets pleasure while experiencing the accurate and precise way of mathematical arguments. Constructs beautiful pattern using geometrical shapes. 3. Objectives of Psychomotor domain I. The learner develops skill in a. Computation i. performs the four primary operations with speed and accuracy. i Uses short cut methods to make calculations. Works out computation mentally. Records the written form of computations systematically and clearly. b. drawing geometrical figures and graphs Specifications: The learners: i. takes measurements accurately using instruments i Estimates length, area etc without using the instrument Selects appropriate scales for drawing plans. Does free hand drawing fairly v. draws geometrical figures and graphs accurately using appropriate instruments. Labels figures or graphs correctly. c. interpreting given figures i. interprets graphs and charts correctly i Identifies the relation connecting the various parts of a figure, graph or tables. Converts the measures in a diagrammatic representation to real measures with accuracy.