Evaluating Social Innovation: Insights from the Field

Similar documents
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

There are three things that are extremely hard steel, a diamond, and to know one's self. Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard s Almanac, 1750

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

Designing Propagation Plans to Promote Sustained Adoption of Educational Innovations

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Intentional coaching and planning: Integrating mathematics teaching practices into content instruction

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

VIA ACTION. A Primer for I/O Psychologists. Robert B. Kaiser

To tell the TRUTH: Dealing with Negativity in the Workplace

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Note on the PELP Coherence Framework

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

Knowledge Synthesis and Integration: Changing Models, Changing Practices

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

School Leadership Rubrics

Power of Ten Leadership Academy Class Curriculum

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

CHAPTER 2: COUNTERING FOUR RISKY ASSUMPTIONS

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Book Review: Build Lean: Transforming construction using Lean Thinking by Adrian Terry & Stuart Smith

Opening Essay. Darrell A. Hamlin, Ph.D. Fort Hays State University

SHINE. Helping. Leaders. Reproduced with the permission of choice Magazine,

INSPIRE A NEW GENERATION OF LIFELONG LEARNERS

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention

Health Literacy and Teach-Back: Patient-Centered Communication. Copyright 2011 NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

Student Experience Strategy

The Virtual Design Studio: developing new tools for learning, practice and research in design

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Monitoring & Evaluation Tools for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Colorado Academic. Drama & Theatre Arts. Drama & Theatre Arts

STRATEGIC GROWTH FROM THE BASE OF THE PYRAMID

In attendance: Wendy, Randi, Steve, Krichanna, Maya, Tony, Anecia, Nicole, Archana, Megan, Adrienne, Amy, Sacha, Hannah, Jennifer, Charles, Susan,

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Get with the Channel Partner Program

Summarizing Webinar Protocol and Guide for Facilitators

Running Head: STUDENT CENTRIC INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

PCG Special Education Brief

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Contact: For more information on Breakthrough visit or contact Carmel Crévola at Resources:

SAMPLE. ORG423: Communication Strategies for Leaders

Students Transitioning to Adult Roles (STAR) Person-Centered Planning (PCP)

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

eportfolios in K-12 and in Teacher Education

Fostering Success Coaching: Effective partnering with students from foster care. Maddy Day, MSW Jamie Crandell, MSW Courtney Maher

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

COLLEGE ADMISSIONS Spring 2017

Passport to Your Identity

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

NC Global-Ready Schools

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

Understanding University Funding

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Educating for innovationdriven

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Upward Bound Program

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

Portfolio-Based Language Assessment (PBLA) Presented by Rebecca Hiebert

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Keeping our Academics on the Cutting Edge: The Academic Outreach Program at the University of Wollongong Library

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Intentional coaching and planning: Integrating practices into content instruction

Leadership Development

Transcription:

Evaluating Social Innovation: Insights from the Field A conversation with: Hallie Preskill, Managing Director, FSG Tanya Beer, Associate Director, Center for Evaluation Innovation John Cawley, Director of Programs and Operations, J.W. McConnell Family Foundation Meg Long, Deputy Director, OMG Center November 14, 2012 Boston Geneva Mumbai San Francisco Seattle Washington FSG.ORG

Today s Agenda Overview of Developmental Evaluation and Social Innovation Hallie Preskill, FSG Case Example: YouthScape John Cawley, J.W. McConnell Family Foundation Case Example: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Community Partnerships Portfolio Meg Long, OMG Center Audience Questions & Answers Tanya Beer (Moderator), Center for Evaluation Innovation Wrap-up 2 2012 FSG

About FSG and Strategic Learning & Evaluation Nonprofit consulting and research firm founded out of Harvard Business School in 2000 Staff of over 100 in Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Washington DC, Geneva, and a presence in Mumbai Success in strategic planning and evaluation with over 200 foundations, corporations, and nonprofits Thought leader Evaluating Social Innovation published in 2012 (funded and co-authored by the Center for Evaluation Innovation) Articles published in Harvard Business Review, Stanford Social Innovation Review, and American Journal of Evaluation, including Collective Impact (SSIR 2010) Breakthroughs in Shared Measurement and Social Impact (funded by Hewlett Foundation, 2009) FSG is driven by the same passion that drives our clients: a passion for greater social impact 3 2012 FSG

Foundations, Nonprofits, and Corporations Are Striving to Address a Multitude of Social Issues in a Myriad of Ways The challenges we are facing are complex, dynamic, and not easily solved 4 2012 FSG

Defining Developmental Evaluation (DE) An approach to evaluation that is grounded in systems thinking and supports innovation by collecting and analyzing real time data in ways that lead to informed and ongoing decision making as part of the design, development, and implementation process. -Michael Q. Patton DE is particularly suited for innovative approaches to solving social problems where the path to success is not clear 5 2012 FSG

DE Represents a Different Way to Engage in Evaluation Initiative is innovating and in development Exploring Creating Emerging Try Developmental Evaluation Initiative is forming and under refinement Improving Enhancing Standardizing Time Try Formative Evaluation Initiative is stabilizing and well-established Established Mature Predictable Try Summative Evaluation DECISION POINT DECISION POINT Developmental evaluation requires a certain level of readiness and commitment to learning 6 2012 FSG

Developmental Evaluation Involves Working Closely with Clients to Inform Learning and Decision Making Processes Context Analysis Feedback Loops Learning Facilitation Ongoing Sense-Making Social Innovation Developmental Evaluation Improved Social Innovation The nature of social innovation requires this integrated, responsive, and adaptive evaluation practice 7 2012 FSG

YouthScape FSG.ORG Developmental Evaluation: Enabler of Change YouthScape Youth engagement: Head, heart and hands (youth) Community projects Institutional change Innovation: transforming youthserving organizational culture DE: complex, diverse, changing environment = need for rapid feedback, course corrections Purpose: Improvement (local, national, sector) vs. accountability Approach: Embedded versus detached; continuous versus episodic; learning versus judgment Role: Feed data from sites into ongoing local and national process: Action Evaluation Strategy Results: Fed back immediately to groups so that local action could be taken AND contributed to national community of practice DE: A tool for making the path as we walk it 8 2012 FSG

YouthScape FSG.ORG DE Is an Innovation Itself: Test, Fail, Learn, Improve Organizational readiness for DE at multiple levels Documentation, training, and workshops related to DE, failure, innovation Lack of trained, experienced DEs Community facilitation Emotional intelligence Ongoing training and resources from national DE Training of 2 cohorts of DEs nationally Cost: The meter is always running A fully funded external DE is expensive Timing: invest early, then audit Internalize DE functions within organizational culture Develop guides, tools and skills for dissemination DE is a fundamental element of rapid prototyping 9 2012 FSG

YouthScape FSG.ORG DE: Part of the Foundation s Social Innovation Strategy Advantages of Using a Developmental Evaluation Approach Value for McConnell Foundation Practical support for grantees who are taking risks in uncharted territory Foundation has knowledge, experience to share with the philanthropic sector YouthScape participants, Saskatoon, Canada Value for Social Change Organizations A useful, engaging methodology for improving practice in real time A powerful tool for organizational development; becoming an expressive organization DE: Reality testing of your compass 10 2012 FSG

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Community Partnerships Portfolio FSG.ORG From a Hunch, to a Theory, to the Reality of Change Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation s Community Partnerships Portfolio Ambitious undertaking: Placebased, multi-sector partnership, multiyear strategy to increase postsecondary completion rates for low income young adults Many actors and moving parts: 7 grantee communities, over 250 stakeholders, 2 technical assistance/coaching organizations, 1 evaluation partner, and 1 amorphous theory of change Highly exploratory: Who can really champion a community-wide completion agenda and get people to change the way they do things? Purpose of the evaluation: Understand the work on the ground Explore how it differs in different contexts Understand factors that impede or facilitate sites progress Evaluator as integral partner to the investment management team Not so much about the methods but the process to use what we are learning to shape the work on the ground and to document what we are learning Emerging factors have implications for design and implementation of future investments Learning, documenting, and refining AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY 11 2012 FSG

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Community Partnerships Portfolio FSG.ORG DE = R&D for the Social Sector Shifting mindset from achieving specific outcomes to learning and understanding; this work is NOT about: What is the ideal? When will we see student level impact? Not about testing an idealized model but about co-crafting the approach Different use of Theory of Change Wrong assumptions or dramatic changes in the context are good for us DE requires more than methodological and content skills and the evaluation role is often blurry Evaluator as facilitator, therapist, measurement expert, advisor Frequent, persistent, and consistent communication and shared reflection times Build a case for value-add of DE Use findings to increase likelihood of success Use and refine all your theories implicit or explicit - differently Remove the magic happens here gaps with strong articulation and understanding of how change happens Refine, drop, or repurpose your data collection tools AND metrics to reflect what you have learned Structured, transparent, yet flexible processes and protocols go a long way Need for clarity about when we are taking on what role and how the information will be processed and used 12 2012 FSG

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Community Partnerships Portfolio FSG.ORG DE Is Not for the Faint of Heart Advantages of Using a Developmental Evaluation Approach Value for Evaluators Really challenges your thinking Stretches your skillset Students from Community Partnerships site in Brownsville, TX Value for Social Change Organizations Significantly deeper insights and stronger implementation Authentic partners learning and championing the work with you One of the only approaches that really helps you learn from mistakes and make right-time significant adjustments True innovation cannot happen incrementally and on the periphery 13 2012 FSG

Audience Questions Tanya Beer Center for Evaluation Innovation Hallie Preskill FSG John Cawley J.W. McConnell Family Foundation Meg Long OMG Center 14 2012 FSG

Thank You! Today s webinar was presented in partnership with the Center for Evaluation Innovation Thank you for joining in the conversation today Please fill in the brief electronic survey that you ll receive after today s event to share your feedback with us For more information on Strategic Learning and Evaluation visit: http://www.fsg.org/ourapproach/strategicevaluation.aspx To access the recording and to download the slides from today s webinar, and the Evaluating Social Innovation article, visit http://fsg.org/evaluatingsocialinnovation 15 2012 FSG