Center for Business and Economic Research

Similar documents
ATHLETIC ENDOWMENT FUND MOUNTAINEER ATHLETIC CLUB

Financing Education In Minnesota

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA TO THE STATEWIDE ECONOMY

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Trends in College Pricing

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Chapter Six The Non-Monetary Benefits of Higher Education

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

The Colorado Promise

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Fiscal Years [Millions of Dollars] Provision Effective

Scholarship Reporting

Michigan State University

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

In 2010, the Teach Plus-Indianapolis Teaching Policy Fellows, a cohort of early career educators teaching

Arkansas Private Option Medicaid expansion is putting state taxpayers on the hook for millions in cost overruns

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

IN-STATE TUITION PETITION INSTRUCTIONS AND DEADLINES Western State Colorado University

State Budget Update February 2016

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Alex Robinson Financial Aid

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Options for Tuition Rates for 2016/17 Please select one from the following options, sign and return to the CFO

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

Student Transportation

Program budget Budget FY 2013

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Is College Worth It? Understanding The Costs And Benefits of College

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

A New Compact for Higher Education in Virginia

Series IV - Financial Management and Marketing Fiscal Year

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Augusta Independent Board of Education August 11, :00 PM 207 Bracken Street Augusta, KY

Enter Samuel E. Braden.! Tenth President

WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

BASIC EDUCATION IN GHANA IN THE POST-REFORM PERIOD

A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education Using the case study approach to contribute to evidence-based policy

ATHLETIC TRAINING SERVICES AGREEMENT

Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

For Your Future. For Our Future. ULS Strategic Framework

Texas Public Libraries:

Optimal Enrollment Targets for the University of Minnesota, Morris

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

STUDENT FEES FOR ADMISSION, REGISTRATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Program Change Proposal:

6 Financial Aid Information

Program Review

VISTA GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT

Question No: 1 What must be considered with completing a needs analysis for a family saving for a child s tuition?

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

Professor Christina Romer. LECTURE 24 INFLATION AND THE RETURN OF OUTPUT TO POTENTIAL April 20, 2017

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Strategic Planning Summer Working Group Report Revenue and Reputation Enhancements through Short Course and Certificate Program Activity August, 2015

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Transcription:

Center for Business and Economic Research

The University of Alabama 2007-2008 Economic Impacts Samuel Addy and Ahmad Ijaz January 2009 Center for Business and Economic Research Culverhouse College of Commerce The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama 2007-2008 Economic Impacts Highlights For 2007-2008, The University of Alabama (UA) economic impacts on the State of Alabama were $1.917 billion and 9,444 jobs. Alabama will realize a 7.6 percent annual rate of return on the $199.4 million state appropriation to UA. Alabama home football games had an impact of roughly $21.4 million per home game on the state and a total impact of $150.1 million for the seven games in 2007. For every $1 of state appropriation UA creates a $9.62 impact through leveraging. UA economic impacts on the Tuscaloosa metro area were $1.262 billion and 8,104 jobs. Each home football game had an impact of about $14.2 million on the Tuscaloosa metro area; the 7-game total impact was $99.6 million. Expected real annual rates of return for the UA 2007-2008 graduation class range from 9.6 percent to 13.8 percent compared to a high school graduate. Marginal real annual rates of return range from 9.6 percent to 26.5 percent depending on the degree. UA presents very attractive public and private investment opportunities and provides many other benefits to its graduates and society. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 1

Introduction This report presents the economic impacts of The University of Alabama (UA) on the State of Alabama and the Tuscaloosa metro area. Both expenditure and employment impacts are presented. Public and private investment analyses of a UA education are also presented because state appropriations and tuition and other attendance costs can be considered as investments by both the state and the students. The analyses show that those investments are worthwhile and that UA has a significant impact on the economies of both the state and Tuscaloosa metro area. Through its teaching, research, and service activities, UA provides numerous benefits that have lasting impacts on the general public and its graduates. The University generates jobs, yields large tax revenues, attracts business and industry to the region and state, provides assistance in business creation and growth, and promotes innovation. UA also improves workforce skills and the general quality of life in the Tuscaloosa metro area, the state, and the nation. Graduates learning abilities and intellectual growth are enhanced, enabling them to earn high incomes, and contribute significantly in various ways to society. Higher incomes result in more tax revenues for the state and other tax jurisdictions. UA has an extensive outreach program and links with communities, business, industry, and government, through which it is involved in economic development and social programs at the community, regional, and state levels. The University employed 4,772 faculty and staff and hundreds of students in the 2007-2008 academic year. Total UA expenditure for 20072008 is $856.8 million. The University spent $288.8 million on payroll and $320.1 million on purchases. Students spent approximately $248 million on off-campus housing, food, books, clothing, etc. State appropriation of $199.4 million represents 33 percent of UA payroll and purchases, but just 23 percent of the total UA expenditure for the year. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 2

UA Direct 2007-2008 Expenditures Total: $856,791,667 Students $247,960,814 29% Payroll $288,772,232 34% Other Expenses $320,061,620 37% Visitors to the University make other expenditures in addition to the above-mentioned $856.8 million. Football alone had a visitor expenditure impact of about $14.2 million per game in the Tuscaloosa metro area and $21.4 million per game statewide. UA visitors include athletic event spectators, visiting parents and relatives, visiting academic personnel, business representtatives, and others. Visitors are drawn to activities such as honors day, commencement ceremonies, homecoming, band competitions, alumni weekends and reunions, and other events. Academic and business visitors attend conferences, seminars, lectures, and other educational programs. Other business visitors include media representatives, education officials, vendors, research sponsors, and candidates for faculty and staff positions. The direct UA expenditure generates more rounds of spending in the area and the state that are captured by multipliers determined from the Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II). RIMS II is an input-output model developed and maintained by the U.S. Department of Commerce s Bureau of Economic Analysis. The model is available for every state and metro area in the nation and also for many counties. An economic model that uses RIMS II multipliers for the State of Alabama and the Tuscaloosa metro area was developed and used in this study. UA Economic Impacts on Alabama Not all of the total $856.8 million UA expenditure was made within the state; a portion went to vendors outside Alabama. About 80 percent of payroll, 90 percent of purchases, and all student expenditures are assumed to be spent in Alabama. The total 2007-2008 UA expenditure in Alabama is thus $767.0 million. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 3

The economic impacts of UA on the state for the academic year were $1,917.5 million and 9,444 jobs (Table 1). This $1.9 billion expenditure impact is generated from the $767.0 million direct in-state expenditures and a visitor impact of $201.2 million. The additional visitor expenditure impact comprises $157.9 million from athletics and $43.3 million from other visitor expenditures. Football alone had a $150.1 million visitor expenditure impact from seven home games at about $21.4 million per game. Basketball, baseball, gymnastics, swimming, etc. are conservatively estimated to have $7.8 million in expenditure impact. The total $1.9 billion expenditure impact is estimated to have generated $49.2 million state sales and income tax revenues and $29.0 million city and county sales taxes for a total of $78.2 million. Source Table 1 The University of Alabama 2007-2008 Expenditure Impacts on Alabama (Millions of dollars) Total Spent in Alabama Indirect Impact Total Impact The University of Alabama Payrolls $288.8 $231.0 $285.9 $516.9 Purchases $320.1 $288.1 $356.5 $644.5 $608.8 $519.1 $642.4 $1,161.4 Student Expenditures $248.0 $248.0 $306.9 $554.8 Visitor Expenditures $201.2 Total $856.8 $767.0 $949.2 $1,917.5 Employment Impact (Jobs) 9,444 Statewide Fiscal Impact $78.2 State Sales Tax $23.2 State Income Tax $26.1 Local (City and County) Sales Tax $29.0 Note: Rounding effects may be present. Source: Center for Business and Economic Research, The University of Alabama. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 4

UA 2007-2008 Economic Impact on Alabama Employment Impact: 9,444 Jobs Expenditure Impact: $1,917.5 million Visitors $201,222,632 10% Payroll $516,902,296 27% Students $554,812,322 29% Other Expenses $644,524,088 34% The UA impacts on the state listed in the previous paragraph are only part of what the state gets in return for state appropriations of $199.4 million. Many public benefits of education are hard to measure innovation promotion, direct and indirect new business development and job creation, general improvements in the quality of life, some public service, etc. but others such as additional tax receipts can be determined. From a public investment perspective, these additional tax revenues are what the state derives from making the appropriation. UA education from a statewide investment perspective is considered for the class of 2008 assuming that 30 percent of the class will reside permanently out of state, and also that the state sales and income tax rates remain unchanged. The $199.4 million state funding for 2007-2008 is offset in the same year by the state and local tax receipts. Thus, net investment by the state is $150.2 million if just state tax receipts are considered, but $121.2 million if both state and local tax receipts are considered. Over the working life of the class of 2008, the UA education will enable them to generate $831.2 million additional income and sales taxes; $583.1 million in state only sales and income tax collections and another $248.1 million in city and county sales taxes. These additional tax collections yield annual rates of return on the state s investment that are multiples of the current 10-year U.S. Treasury Bond rate. The $583.1 million of state tax receipts translate into a 5.6 percent annual rate of return on a net investment of $150.2 million if just state revenues are considered. The total $831.2 million in additional state and local tax receipts yields annual rates of return of 7.6 percent on a $150.2 million net investment and 8.9 percent on a $121.2 million net investment. There are additional tax and other government revenues that are not considered here such as property taxes and vehicle registration and tag fees. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 5

UA Economic Impacts on Tuscaloosa Metro Area Of the total $856.8 million UA expenditure, we estimate that 70 percent of payroll, 60 percent of purchases, and all student expenditures were spent in the Tuscaloosa metro area. Thus, adjusting for leakages out of the area, UA expenditures in the metro area totaled $642.1 million (Table 2). This results in an expenditure impact of $1,262.3 million, including a visitor expenditure impact of $133.5 million that consists of $104.8 million from athletics and $28.7 million from other visitor expenditures. Football provided a visitor expenditure impact of $99.6 million from the seven home games played in Tuscaloosa. The average impact per game was about $14.2 million. Basketball, baseball, gymnastics, swimming, etc. are estimated to have had a $5.2 million impact. The University also had an employment impact of 8,104 jobs for the area. The $1,262.3 million expenditure impact is estimated to have generated area county and city sales tax revenues of $21.8 million. Table 2 The University of Alabama 2007-2008 Expenditure Impacts on Tuscaloosa Metro Area (Millions of dollars) Source Total Spent in Tuscaloosa Metro Area Indirect Impact Total Impact The University of Alabama Payrolls $288.8 $202.1 $153.2 $355.3 Purchases $320.1 $192.0 $145.5 $337.6 $608.8 $394.2 $298.7 $692.9 Student Expenditures $248.0 $248.0 $187.9 $435.9 Visitor Expenditures $133.5 Total $856.8 $642.1 $486.6 $1,262.3 Employment Impact (Jobs) 8,104 Local (City and County) Sales Tax $21.8 Note: Rounding effects may be present. Source: Center for Business and Economic Research, The University of Alabama. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 6

UA 2007-2008 Economic Impact on Tuscaloosa Metro Area Employment Impact: 8,104 Jobs Expenditure Impact: $1,262.3 million Students $435,865,519 34% Visitors $133,526,356 11% Other Expenses $337,562,590 27% Payroll $355,322,681 28% UA Education as Private Investment A University of Alabama education is also an investment by students. Every year thousands of new students enroll in UA degree programs. The benefits for these students are manifold. First, education is its own reward. Additionally, the ability to learn and grow intellectually increases the graduate s earning potential. However, the college degree comes at a cost that includes the obvious cost of the education (tuition, room and board, books, etc.), as well as forgone earnings while in school. The forgone earnings, often called the opportunity cost, is taken to be the earnings potential of the educational level immediately below the graduate s highest degree. For example, the opportunity cost of pursuing a master s degree is the earnings potential of a bachelor s degree holder. The cost of study is therefore the opportunity cost plus the direct expenditure to obtain the degree. This cost is the actual marginal cost of pursuing the degree, which can be compared to the marginal benefit or addition to value (called value added) for the graduate, to determine whether the decision to obtain a UA degree is prudent. Value added is the difference in salaries of a particular degree graduate with that of a specified reference. The reference for marginal value added is a person with the degree level immediately below. Only half the opportunity cost is included in the marginal cost of the UA degree since many students work an average of 20 hours a week to support their education. A category of people with some college is included in the study to capture individuals who began college but did not complete the bachelor s degree requirements. These individuals will earn more income in their working lives than high school graduates will without college experience. In the marginal analysis, the average doctoral degree salary is compared to that of the master s degree, a master s is compared to a bachelor s, and a bachelor s to a high school graduate with UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 7

some college experience. The value added of people with some college is obtained by comparing their income to that of high school graduates. Table 3 shows the results of the investment analysis with the assumption that graduates will retire at 67 years of age. The table also shows lifetime earnings in both current and real (year 2008) dollars. Expected lifetime earnings increase from about $2.3 million for a high school graduate to $7.2 million for the doctoral degree; the corresponding real lifetime earnings range is $1.0 million to $3.8 million. The investment analysis was performed using real or constant year 2008 dollars. The real annual rate of return on private investment in a UA education is determined by generating the annual cost and income streams over the different lifetimes of the categories being considered. People who attend some college will have real lifetime earnings of about $1.3 million, $251,706 more than a high school graduate, and result in a 9.6 percent real annual rate of return on their UA investment. Bachelor and master s degree holders will earn marginal value added of $683,262 (a real annual return of 16.0 percent) and $877,579 (a real annual return of 26.5 percent), respectively. A doctorate will earn $914,922 more than a master s, a 17.3 percent real annual rate of return. The positive real rates of return and their magnitude indicate that the decision to pursue a UA degree is very sensible. The master s degree has the highest marginal return on investment, but the doctoral degree earns the most, even over the shorter working life. These real investment returns are better than the long term return on investment in U.S. equity markets. One may also consider the rate of return on attending college relative to stopping with high school graduation. The master s degree yields the greatest real annual rate of return again with 13.8 percent, followed by the doctorate at 12.4 percent. The bachelor s yields an 11.9 percent return, and some college has the lowest return of 9.6 percent. Table 3 UA Education as Private Investment (Class of 2008) Degree/Diploma High School Some College Bachelor s Master s Doctorate Average Starting Salary ($) 19,058 22,431 34,478 52,994 76,829 Total Cost of Degree (2008 $) 44,694 120,168 184,698 309,266 Lifetime Earnings (2008 $) 1,034,456 1,286,162 1,969,424 2,847,003 3,761,926 Incremental Income (2008 $) 251,706 683,262 877,579 914,922 Real Annual Return on Investment 9.6% 16.0% 26.5% 17.3% Real Return Relative to High School 9.6% 11.9% 13.8% 12.4% Lifetime Earnings (Current $) 2,337,865 2,848,742 4,163,034 5,782,305 7,205,680 Incremental Income (Current $) 510,877 1,314,292 1,619,271 1,423,375 Note: Rounding effects may be present. Total cost of degree is the direct cost of the education (tuition, room and board, books, etc.), as well as forgone earnings while in school. Source: Center for Business and Economic Research, The University of Alabama. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 8

30% 25% Real Annual Rates of Return of a UA Education by Degree 26.5% 20% 15% 10% 9.6% 9.6% 16.0% 11.9% 13.8% 17.3% 12.4% 5% 0% Some College Bachelor's Master's Doctorate Marginal Return Relative to High School Summary and Conclusions The 2007-2008 University of Alabama economic impacts on the State of Alabama are $1.9 billion expenditure impact and 9,444 jobs. The University is also an excellent investment opportunity for the state, providing a 7.6 percent annual rate of return on state appropriations to UA. The economic impacts on the Tuscaloosa metro area are $1.3 billion and 8,104 jobs. An education at The University of Alabama is a very high-yielding investment for its students. The real annual rate of return on some college attendance is 9.6 percent over a high school graduate. The bachelor s degree has a 16.0 percent real annual rate of return over some college attendance, and the master s degree yields a 26.5 percent return over a bachelor s degree. The doctorate provides a 17.3 percent marginal return over the master s and provides the highest lifetime earnings. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 9

It is important to note that any study of this kind has many uncertainties. The real rates of earnings growth may change. So can income and sales tax rates, student enrollment, rate of alumni residence in the state, etc. However, under the assumptions of this report, a UA education is a very sound investment for students (better than stock indexes) and a better investment for the state than many bonds. In addition, there are several intangible benefits of a UA education that cannot be measured. The University produces skilled and knowledgeable people; provides valuable research, adding to the stock of knowledge; enhances graduates ability to learn and grow intellectually and to contribute in various ways to society; and provides valuable service to communities and the state. The intangible, yet very real and critical, role of higher education in the modern high-tech economy is valued. Economic growth is attributable to the knowledge economy characterized by increasing returns, rather than the physical economy with its diminishing returns. Physical products, on the other hand, depreciate and become obsolete. The information age makes UA essential to the economic development of the metro area, the state, and the nation. The 2007-2008 economic impacts of The University of Alabama on Alabama and the Tuscaloosa metro area certainly exceed by far the measurable component. Acknowledgments The staff of the Center for Business and Economic Research (CBER), Financial Accounting and Reporting (FAR), and the Office of Institutional Research (OIR) provided valuable assistance to the completion of this report. Ms. Sherry Lang and Ms. Deborah Hamilton of CBER and Ms. Melissa Barnett of FAR were especially helpful. UA 2007-2008 Economic Impacts on Alabama and Tuscaloosa MSA CBER, UA 10