Getting Started An Assessment/Evaluation Workbook

Similar documents
Patient/Caregiver Surveys

Requirements-Gathering Collaborative Networks in Distributed Software Projects

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

DIGITAL GAMING & INTERACTIVE MEDIA BACHELOR S DEGREE. Junior Year. Summer (Bridge Quarter) Fall Winter Spring GAME Credits.

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

Digital Technology Merit Badge Workbook

Executive Summary. Saint Francis Xavier

Trends & Issues Report

A PRIMER FOR HOST FAMILIES

Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Blending the Arts and Academics to Create Powerful Outcomes

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Colorado

Different Requirements Gathering Techniques and Issues. Javaria Mushtaq

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

HSMP 6611 Strategic Management in Health Care (Strg Mgmt in Health Care) Fall 2012 Thursday 5:30 7:20 PM Ed 2 North, 2301

Reforms for selection procedures fundamental programmes and SB grant. June 2017

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Essentials of Rapid elearning (REL) Design

ASTR 102: Introduction to Astronomy: Stars, Galaxies, and Cosmology

From practice to practice: What novice teachers and teacher educators can learn from one another Abstract

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

ESSENTIAL SKILLS PROFILE BINGO CALLER/CHECKER

Mapping the Assets of Your Community:

MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM COMMUNICATION THROUGH VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS

Introduction to Simulation

Diploma of Building and Construction (Building)

Learning Microsoft Office Excel

Cambridge NATIONALS. Creative imedia Level 1/2. UNIT R081 - Pre-Production Skills DELIVERY GUIDE

CHAPTER 2: COUNTERING FOUR RISKY ASSUMPTIONS

Nearing Completion of Prototype 1: Discovery

Key concepts for the insider-researcher

DOES OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION AMONG GIFTED STUDENTS?

Lawyers for Learning Mentoring Program Information Booklet

THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR MODEL IN ELECTRONIC LEARNING: A PILOT STUDY

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

Building Extension s Public Value

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

The University of Southern Mississippi

A Strategic Plan for the Law Library. Washington and Lee University School of Law Introduction

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

University of Toronto

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

White Paper. The Art of Learning

Team Dispersal. Some shaping ideas

Building a Vibrant Alumni Network

Pragmatic Use Case Writing

Software Maintenance

Teaching Colorado s Heritage with Digital Sources Case Overview

Training Pack. Kaizen Focused Improvement Teams (F.I.T.)

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Fearless Change -- Patterns for Introducing New Ideas

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

DSTO WTOIBUT10N STATEMENT A

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Ten Easy Steps to Program Impact Evaluation

Community engagement toolkit for planning

Information DUT

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

GETTING THE MOST OF OUT OF BRAINSTORMING GROUPS

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Supporting Youth Transition through Transportation & Mobility

Case of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Lebanese. International University

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

February 16. Save $30 on Registration: Designed for Managers and Staff of After School Programs. Early Bird Deadline: January 26, 2017

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Importance of a Good Questionnaire. Developing a Questionnaire for Field Work. Developing a Questionnaire. Who Should Fill These Questionnaires?

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Health Literacy and Teach-Back: Patient-Centered Communication. Copyright 2011 NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

Australia s tertiary education sector

Alabama

Assessment and Evaluation

James H. Walther, Ed.D.

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Programme Specification

Executive Summary. Lava Heights Academy. Ms. Joette Hayden, Principal 730 Spring Dr. Toquerville, UT 84774

Transcription:

Stakeholder Empowered Assessments and Evaluations Getting Started An Assessment/Evaluation Workbook Department of Human and Community Development 905 South Goodwin Urbana, IL 61801 Evolve 1 When outcomes are uncertain, answers hard to devise, That s time to form a team, tap dreams, and improvise. Listen to your audience, build a scene on every hope, Shake up thinking, see new patterns in the kaleidoscope. You don t have to play alone, so start placing your bet On links to lots of partners, near and far across the Net. Join hands beyond tall silos, step out of the lonely cells, Seek a common state, collaborate, for community wealth. Rosabeth Moss Kanter 1 Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (2001), Evolve. Boston Mass: Harvard Business School Press.

Decisions for Your Assessment What is the purpose of your assessment/evaluation? Who are your stakeholders? Who will serve on your assessment/evaluation committee? Usually it is people with a stake in the issue, but is it always the same people? How do we engage other groups in the community, youth, seniors, newcomers, etc. Whose opinion do you want? Whose needs will you assess? Which issues do you want your assessment/evaluation to explore? What type of assessment/evaluation technique will you use? What questions will you include in the assessment or evaluation? How many people will you survey? How will you distribute your survey? How will completed surveys be returned to you? How will you follow-up to enhance your response rate? What kind of data analysis will you need? Who will publicize the survey and the survey results? How will you report the results? Distribution strategy? Media of reports? Who will write the final report?

Who Are Your Stakeholders? People affected by the program and people whose decisions both positive and negative will affect the future of the program. To whom do the activities of your organization matter? Stakeholders are individuals, groups or other organizations who may or may not be directly affiliated with your organization, but believe they have an investment in the success (or failure) of your activities. Stakeholders must be given an opportunity to provide feedback or to state concern about your goals and objectives whenever possible. For whom is your program designed? Who is involved in the program delivery? With what people or organizational networks are you associated? Who is making the decisions? Who can limit the success of your work? Who can help make your work successful? Users Youth Adults Seniors Families Hospitals Wellness Centers Elected officials Media Potential Funders State and/or Federal Agencies Lots of others

Brainstorm to list as many methods as possible for gathering information about potential assessments in your area. Type of Assessment Advantages Disadvantages Does this technique encourage participation from the community? Are there biases associated with this technique? Does this technique flexible in incorporating new information from the community? What are the difficulties typically encountered with this method?

Type of Assessment Definition Size of Sample Secondary Data Analysis Self Administered Surveys Analysis of existing data collected by another individual or organization, usually to meet another research focus. Analyst has no control of what variables are included in the initial research. Generally less expensive than collecting original data. A survey to collect information from or about people to describe, compare or explain their knowledge, attitude or behavior. Respondents complete the survey independently. Output is a summary of the questions asked and is more easily processed by statistical software. In-person Face to face interview, completing the survey with the respondent. Usually based on very large data samples. 300-500 completed surveys. Delphi Model Key Informant Interviews Focus Groups Expert Panels Mailed or delivered Mailed or delivered by volunteers. Volunteers can deliver the surveys in person but allow the respondent to complete the survey alone. Personally delivered surveys usually yield a high response rate. Telephone Telephone interviews, now using computer technology to enter response directly into an electronic database during the interview. Usually yields a low response rate. An iterative consensus building process. Panel members work independently and are provided equal access to a set of questions central to the analysis (questions are usually open-ended or follow a Likert scale). Panelists participate in several rounds of input and feedback. In the first round, they are asked for their independent analysis or opinion. Once all responses are gathered, the major finding is posted and shared with the other panelists. Participants can then change their opinion in response to ideas of the group. The revised findings are posted to begin in the third round, and so on. Output is a group-based analysis of a single issue. In-depth interviews of people who are knowledgeable about a particular issue. Loosely structured allowing a free flow of ideas and information. Key informant interviews can be informal and spontaneous or more structured using written questionnaires. Most useful when the purpose of the assessment is to identify recommendations or when data collected by other means need to be explained in more detail. Organized discussion with a selected group of individuals to examine their values, feelings and opinions. Especially suited for assessment where it is important to gain insight into several or alternative perspectives about the same topic. Relies on group dynamics and the spontaneous interaction within the group. Group interview comprised of panelists chosen for their personal qualities, their knowledge, experience of the subject matter and for their independence and impartiality. Often, expert panels engage in the Delphi methodology. 15-40 panelists. 10-30 interviews. 8-12 people per group*. 6-12 people per panel*. * Depending on the diversity of opinion on any given issue, several groups or panels might be warranted.

Type of Assessment Advantages Disadvantages Secondary Data Analysis Self Administered Surveys In-person Mailed or delivered Telephone Delphi Model Key Informant Interviews Focus Groups Expert Panels

Identify the Goal and Objectives of Your Assessment/Evaluation What is the specific purpose of your assessment/evaluation? What information do you need and why? Identify the specific objectives of your assessment. List the specific information you want to collect? 1 2 3 4 5 Anatomy of an Assessment A Introductory feel-good questions 2. Participating in the community program has had a positive impact on my organization. There is more community involvement as a result of participating in our program. Our community is a good place to live. B Questions addressing each of the assessment objectives. C Questions about the respondent. Demographics Role in the community or organization Participation in related community/organizational events Length of time respondent has been involved with program, community or organization. D Space for open-ended additional comments. E Contact information of person/organization conducting the survey. 2 Responses within a 5-point scale.

Survey Timeframe Activity Create the survey committee Identify the important issues to be addressed by the survey Design the survey Select the sample Distribute the survey and collect the data Week Person or Group Responsible 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Data Analysis Create a draft report for review by members of the survey committee Prepare the final report Distribute the findings of the survey to the community