Visiting Scholars. Strategic Intervention Brief #12

Similar documents
Educational Leadership and Administration

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Deans, Chairpersons, and Directors

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

Guide to the Program in Comparative Culture Records, University of California, Irvine AS.014

IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING DIRECTIONS CAREFULLY PRIOR TO PREPARING YOUR APPLICATION PACKAGE.

Nine Steps to Building a New Toastmasters Club

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

New Programs & Program Revisions Committee New Certificate Program Form

University of Toronto

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

School Leadership Rubrics

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

What is an internship?

Application for Fellowship Theme Year Sephardic Identities, Medieval and Early Modern. Instructions and Checklist

Program Change Proposal:

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Librarians of Highlights of a survey of RUL faculty. June 7, Librarians of 2023 June 7, / 11

Engagement of Teaching Intensive Faculty. What does Engagement mean?

PHL Grad Handbook Department of Philosophy Michigan State University Graduate Student Handbook

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Retaining Postdoc Women Through Effective Postdoctoral Policies. Helen Mederer Department of Sociology University of Rhode Island

DISCOVERY Loyalty Programme

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

Michigan State University

Innovation in Education and Research

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Housekeeping. Questions

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH VETERANS SUPPORT CENTER

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

I AKS Research Grant

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Additional Contacts: Course Description:

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

GRAND CHALLENGES SCHOLARS PROGRAM

ENGINEERING FACULTY HANDBOOK. College of Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, MI

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

Supplemental Focus Guide

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

176 (33.9%) 55 (10.6%)

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Fearless Change -- Patterns for Introducing New Ideas

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

This quotation identifies the core practice

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Market Intelligence. Alumni Perspectives Survey Report 2017

What Women are Saying About Coaching Needs and Practices in Masters Sport

University of Essex Access Agreement

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Progress or action taken

Dual Career Services in the College of Engineering. Melissa Dorfman Director, Dual Career Services (cell)

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

PERSONALIZED MEDICINE FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research 2014

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

ST PHILIP S CE PRIMARY SCHOOL. Staff Disciplinary Procedures Policy

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Transcription:

Strategic Intervention Brief #12 Visiting Scholars About half of the ADVANCE IT projects in Rounds 1 and 2 organized visiting scholar programs designed to provide benefits both to women STEM scholars and to the broader university community. As one institutional leader asserted, visiting scholar programs offer considerable benefits for low cost and are winwin across the board for everybody. This Brief delineates different approaches to using this strategy. Two related Briefs will interest readers also. Some institutions organize their visiting scholars programs through individual grants to faculty members, and Brief 2 discusses ways to organize individual grants. Visiting scholars programs can be used as a form of mentoring, which is more fully discussed in Brief 3. Rationale Inviting visiting scholars has both institutional and individual benefits. Visiting scholars for ADVANCE are often senior STEM women whose work is highly respected. Thus, their presence on a campus symbolically highlights the ADVANCE project and raises the visibility of successful women STEM scholars. Their public presentations can frame issues concerning the work, challenges, and successes of women STEM scholars in ways that open new conversations on a campus. Their visits also can further institutional momentum for change through frank conversations with senior leaders about the importance of institutional commitment and strategies for moving forward this agenda. University leaders often do not want to their institutions to follow too far behind their peers nor run too far ahead. Information shared by visiting scholars can help university leaders gauge whether their institution is competitive with others on matters of recruiting and supporting women colleagues, and institutional movement toward significant cultural and policies changes can sometimes be aided by examples of what other institutions are doing. Individual female faculty members also benefit from the presence of visiting scholars. Senior scholars are exemplars of accomplishment and possibility for peers and early-career faculty. The relationships they forge with colleagues as part of their campus visits can serve as a form of individual mentoring. Especially for women scholars in situations with few women colleagues, interactions with visiting scholars can offer a form of mentoring that is not otherwise available. Purpose While all visiting scholar programs are designed to make an impact on the institution and enhance the work and lives of women STEM faculty, the specific purposes, formats, and target audiences vary across institutions, depending on institutional goals. The purposes of visiting scholar programs typically include some combination of the following: To provide campus-wide visibility for the goal of increasing the recruitment and success of women STEM scholars and, specifically, to provide visibility for ADVANCE as a program serving this overall institutional goal To provide occasions for discussing critical factors and institutional issues relevant to the recruitment and success of female STEM faculty

Strategic Intervention Brief 12: Visiting Scholars 2 To showcase distinguished women scholars in STEM fields whose presence models possible career routes for women scholars, inspires women faculty, and reminds the campus community of the contributions and career successes of women scholars To provide individual mentoring for women faculty members and/or graduate students, including support to advance their research and opportunities for discussion about career paths and strategies for managing personal and professional responsibilities To enhance institutional cross-disciplinary connections among STEM scholars and members of the campus community who are concerned about issues pertaining to women scholars To provide opportunities and occasions for supporting institutional linkages with STEM-related colleagues in schools and other groups within the local community Audience Visiting scholars offer benefits for the institution and for individual faculty members. Some programs provide opportunities for women across career stages to invite, interact with, and benefit from time with visiting scholars. Other programs focus their programs in ways that specifically benefit the research development and professional socialization of their early career women faculty. For example, they may enable an early-career faculty member to invite a senior colleague for the explicit purpose of helping the junior scholar create relationships with advanced scholars who may offer opportunities for collaboration and introductions to other researchers with like interests. Such programs often seek to help pre-tenure faculty members develop relationships with senior scholars who can serve in later years as external reviewers for tenure and promotion decisions. Also, as the host of a visiting scholar, the early-career scholar s visibility and connections on her own campus are enhanced. Models While some institutions are fairly informal in the organization of their programs, offering grant support as interest occurs among their faculty, other programs are more formal and purposeful. Key issues to consider in designing visiting scholars programs include the following: Organization of visits. The organization and structure of visits to campus vary, depending on campus priorities. Some programs focus on inviting visiting scholars to participate in a major campus event, such as a symposium, while other programs use their visiting scholars for more individual interactions with STEM faculty and institutional leaders. Generally, however, visits may include one or more public talks, colloquia, presentations, or lectures to the university community at large or to specific departments. Programs often also include opportunities for visiting scholars to interact oneon-one with STEM women faculty. Visits may also include special seminars with doctoral students, visits with local K-12 schools or teachers, and/or meetings between the visitor and key institutional leaders about supportive and inclusive institutional cultures conducive to the success of women STEM faculty. When programs are intended to support the work of a specific faculty member, the invitation may make clear that the visiting scholar is the guest of that faculty member, a message emphasizing to all involved that the visiting scholar s time with the individual faculty member is as important as the large public events. Invitations to individuals or groups of scholars. Scholars may be invited individually or in small groups. Individual scholars may each visit for several days, with programs tailored to their areas of scholarly focus, while groups of scholars may be invited to participate together in a major institutional symposium or conference.

Strategic Intervention Brief 12: Visiting Scholars 3 Women scholars only. Universities often stipulate that the visiting scholars should be women; however, in some cases, either men or women may be invited as long as they meet the criterion set for visiting scholars at the institution (e.g., doing research relevant to women scholars on campus, being highly distinguished in their field of expertise). The importance of emphasizing prestige. Some universities have found that creating a prestigious title, such as Distinguished Visiting Scholar, attracts the attention and interest of nationally known scholars. How an invitation is extended to a potential visitor also can convey prestige. For example, some programs extend invitations through a committee in order to clearly convey institutional interest in the scholar. At other institutions, the department chair of an early-career STEM faculty member extends the invitation, explaining to the invited scholar that the invitation is considered to be a prestigious honor and includes the special responsibilities of mentoring an early-career colleague that is, the invitation is more than a typical request for a research talk. Honoraria. Typically, institutions provide funding for travel, lodging, and food, accompanied by a modest honorarium ($400-$500). Overall, this is a modest investment relative to the benefits that institutions report. Decision or selection process. Decisions about whom to invite depend on the purposes and structure of a program. The ADVANCE leadership team may make the decisions, or committees may be designated to choose visiting scholars. Institutions that use their programs to bring in colleagues to work with specific faculty members typically use an application process whereby faculty members submit proposals for approval. Application criteria will relate to the purpose of the visiting scholar program. If the program intends to support the research of a faculty member, for example, one part of the application will request information about how the proposed visit will advance a faculty member s research program and career or request evidence that the proposed visiting scholar is a national or international leader. Attracting highly distinguished scholars is one factor that adds prestige and enhances the impact of visiting scholars programs. Advertising process. Brochures that announce the program annually and describe the application process are one way to advertise. Kansas State holds a spring luncheon funded by deans and department heads, to which are invited all eligible early-career faculty members from across campus and their department heads. The luncheon is an occasion to celebrate the awards made the previous year and to provide a panel of three or four previous grant recipients who discuss their experiences and lessons learned about effective visiting scholar activities. Since some early-career faculty are initially nervous about inviting a highly regarded senior scholar, the luncheon is intended to provide information about all aspects of the process and alleviate any concerns. Examples Below we offer a few examples of institutional approaches to grants for visiting scholars: New Mexico State University intentionally organized its visiting scholar program to have an impact on NMSU women STEM scholars, graduate students, and undergraduates, as well as on K-12 students. The program was intended to enhance the visibility of women scholars and to affect the pipeline of women in STEM fields. To achieve these goals, every ADVANCE Visiting Professor visited K-12 classrooms or interacted with K-12 educators in order to be a role model and affirm the place of women in science. The visits of several days duration also involved public seminars, research colloquia, and luncheon talks. Following the great success of a visit in 2003 by Virginia Valian, WISELI at the University of Wisconsin- Madison hosts a major event and talk by a high-profile speaker each year, rather than multiple smaller events.

Strategic Intervention Brief 12: Visiting Scholars 4 The event is designed to bring together women faculty from throughout campus to promote crossdepartmental networking. At Columbia University, the ADVANCE Program organized a Science of Diversity Lecture Series that brought in distinguished visiting scholars to give major, highly publicized talks about the social science research that sheds light on gender-related issues. Including highly regarded scholars in research-focused, prestigious events, which are organized to have national visibility, conveys a strong message to the research community and university about the critical importance of the issues addressed. Kansas State University s Advanced Distinguished Lecturer Award is a signature feature of its ADVANCE project, lauded by institutional leaders and faculty members as the program s greatest success and a huge return on investment. The primary purpose of the program is to support and advance the careers of pretenure STEM faculty. Early-career STEM faculty women can propose to host a distinguished nationally recognized visitor (female or male) once a year for up to 5 years. The visitor spends time visiting the lab and discussing common research interests with the hosting early-career colleague, gives a talk open to the university community, and participates in a dinner with the host and her department chair and/or dean. This dinner serves to help the early-career faculty member become more visible and to highlight her research to institutional leaders. The program has had significant long-term results for early-career faculty participants, leading to ongoing and long-term collaborations, joint grant proposals, invitations to visit the senior scholars campuses, the development of wide collegial networks, and publications. One institutional leader explained, I just can t say enough about that program and the small amount of money it takes to make a huge impact on the individual faculty member and on the campus. Evaluation Most institutions have not provided evidence of careful evaluation of the process and impact of their visiting scholars programs. The basic metric listed in annual reports tends to be the count of attendees at talks done by visiting scholars. Kansas State asks grant recipients to report how the grant has contributed to their careers, which has resulted in reports of benefits to the early-career faculty. Kansas State also surveys those who have served as visiting scholars to learn about their views of the program. One finding of such surveys is that the prestige and distinguished name of the program is attractive to invited scholars. Affordances and Limitations The benefits discussed here are reported by the institutions we have studied that offer visiting scholar programs. We are not familiar with other research on the impact of this strategy for supporting women faculty and encouraging institutional change. Benefits for the scholars who interact with visiting scholars Advice, mentoring, and the opportunity to interact with a role model who can describe experiences and offer guidance concerning professional and work/life issues Reviews of manuscripts and advice about research Reciprocal invitations to visit and speak at the institution of the visiting scholar Offers to collaborate with the visiting scholar on research, grant-seeking efforts, and projects Introductions by the visiting scholar to a broader group of colleagues and networking opportunities at scholarly and professional conferences The opportunity to interact with an advanced scholar who becomes knowledgeable about the early career scholar s work and can be called on as an external reviewer Visibility among department and university colleagues based on hosting the visiting scholar

Strategic Intervention Brief 12: Visiting Scholars 5 Benefits to the institution that invites a visiting scholar Enhancement of the institution s intellectual vibrancy Heightened visibility of women in science and issues concerning gender in the workplace Visible benefits that may attract future applicants for faculty positions. Widened national visibility of the institution Visiting scholars may recommend the university to their undergraduates for graduate study Benefits to the visiting scholar An opportunity to be generative while also being honored Enriched knowledge of other institutions programs and expanded collegial networks Limitations If a visiting scholar program is targeted to early-career female faculty, male colleagues may feel left out or resentful. Careful explanation of the purpose of the program can preclude or diminish this problem. To cite this document Austin, A. E., & Laursen, S. L. (2014). Strategic Intervention Brief #12: Visiting Scholars. In Laursen, S. L., & Austin, A. E., StratEGIC Toolkit: Strategies for Effecting Gender Equity and Institutional Change. Boulder, CO, and East Lansing, MI. www.strategictoolkit.org This research study and development of the StratEGIC Toolkit and other products has been supported by the National Science Foundation through ADVANCE PAID grant #HRD-0930097. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the official views, opinions, or policy of the National Science Foundation.